It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:08 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 527 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Sex toy training for children isn’t grooming because Aja Romano, self described culture warrior at Vox, vomited up some nonsense earlier this year.


Being in agreement with the Right Wing Loons at Qanon and Marjorie Taylor Greene is a most desired "position" for ya I see. Keep up the good (loon) work why do you.

Does MGT also think the groomer dean was wrong? If so, yes, I am in agreement with MGT that the groomer dean was wrong.


Unfortunately for both you and the rather loony MJT (kindred spirits obviously) the parent of the children "impacted" most by the seminar do not. That really has to just stick in the craw of every Right Wing Loon (particularly the Loony Parents that post here) that they are not in agreement doesn't it? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 9:37 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Sex toy training for children isn’t grooming because Aja Romano, self described culture warrior at Vox, vomited up some nonsense earlier this year.


Being in agreement with the Right Wing Loons at Qanon and Marjorie Taylor Greene is a most desired "position" for ya I see. Keep up the good (loon) work why do you.

Does MGT also think the groomer dean was wrong? If so, yes, I am in agreement with MGT that the groomer dean was wrong.


Unfortunately for both you and the rather loony MJT (kindred spirits obviously) the parent of the children "impacted" most by the seminar do not. That really has to just stick in the craw of every Right Wing Loon (particularly the Loony Parents that post here) that they are not in agreement doesn't it? Just Asking A Question


People who want their children to receive a Christian education = Loons

People who want their children to learn tricks with buttplugs = Good parents

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 9:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Sex toy training for children isn’t grooming because Aja Romano, self described culture warrior at Vox, vomited up some nonsense earlier this year.


Being in agreement with the Right Wing Loons at Qanon and Marjorie Taylor Greene is a most desired "position" for ya I see. Keep up the good (loon) work why do you.

Does MGT also think the groomer dean was wrong? If so, yes, I am in agreement with MGT that the groomer dean was wrong.


Unfortunately for both you and the rather loony MJT (kindred spirits obviously) the parent of the children "impacted" most by the seminar do not. That really has to just stick in the craw of every Right Wing Loon (particularly the Loony Parents that post here) that they are not in agreement doesn't it? Just Asking A Question


People who want their children to receive a Christian education = Loons

People who want their children to learn tricks with buttplugs = Good parents


A self professed "atheist" pontificating on the "merits" of a Christian education. Once again Say it Ain't So, Joe (Orr Road Rod)

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
What y’all think about abortion?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 9:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 9:23 pm
Posts: 869
pizza_Place: Baraccos
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Sex toy training for children isn’t grooming because Aja Romano, self described culture warrior at Vox, vomited up some nonsense earlier this year.


Being in agreement with the Right Wing Loons at Qanon and Marjorie Taylor Greene is a most desired "position" for ya I see. Keep up the good (loon) work why do you.

Does MGT also think the groomer dean was wrong? If so, yes, I am in agreement with MGT that the groomer dean was wrong.


Unfortunately for both you and the rather loony MJT (kindred spirits obviously) the parent of the children "impacted" most by the seminar do not. That really has to just stick in the craw of every Right Wing Loon (particularly the Loony Parents that post here) that they are not in agreement doesn't it? Just Asking A Question


People who want their children to receive a Christian education = Loons

People who want their children to learn tricks with buttplugs = Good parents


A self professed "atheist" pontificating on the "merits" of a Christian education. Once again Say it Ain't So, Joe (Orr Road Rod)


You're really out of touch. I know parents who aren't religious but send their kids to Catholic schools. Better education, better teachers, safer environment, and less likely to have woke wackjobs teaching their kids.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Sex toy training for children isn’t grooming because Aja Romano, self described culture warrior at Vox, vomited up some nonsense earlier this year.


Being in agreement with the Right Wing Loons at Qanon and Marjorie Taylor Greene is a most desired "position" for ya I see. Keep up the good (loon) work why do you.

Does MGT also think the groomer dean was wrong? If so, yes, I am in agreement with MGT that the groomer dean was wrong.


Unfortunately for both you and the rather loony MJT (kindred spirits obviously) the parent of the children "impacted" most by the seminar do not. That really has to just stick in the craw of every Right Wing Loon (particularly the Loony Parents that post here) that they are not in agreement doesn't it? Just Asking A Question

Are you back to representing the overwhelming majority of the rich kids’ parents? Or are finally saying where you stand on adolescent lube training?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
You're really out of touch. I know parents who aren't religious but send their kids to Catholic schools. Better education, better teachers, safer environment, and less likely to have woke wackjobs teaching their kids.

Another Right Wing Whack Job chimes in to lend his never ending "support". If its so "great" then why has enrollment in Catholic Schools been on the decline for decades now? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
You're really out of touch. I know parents who aren't religious but send their kids to Catholic schools. Better education, better teachers, safer environment, and less likely to have woke wackjobs teaching their kids.

Another Right Wing Whack Job chimes in to lend his never ending "support". If it’s so "great" then why has enrollment in Catholic Schools been on the decline for decades now? Just Asking A Question

It’s very expensive and people aren’t as religious as they used to be.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Are you back to representing the overwhelming majority of the rich kids’ parents?
Their silence "speaks" volumes actually.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Or are finally saying where you stand on adolescent lube training?

Have you paid your Qanon membership dues for the year? Just Asking A Question.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
You're really out of touch. I know parents who aren't religious but send their kids to Catholic schools. Better education, better teachers, safer environment, and less likely to have woke wackjobs teaching their kids.

Another Right Wing Whack Job chimes in to lend his never ending "support". If it’s so "great" then why has enrollment in Catholic Schools been on the decline for decades now? Just Asking A Question

It’s very expensive and people aren’t as religious as they used to be.


More like people seeing through the sham that is "indoctrination"

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
You're really out of touch. I know parents who aren't religious but send their kids to Catholic schools. Better education, better teachers, safer environment, and less likely to have woke wackjobs teaching their kids.

Another Right Wing Whack Job chimes in to lend his never ending "support". If it’s so "great" then why has enrollment in Catholic Schools been on the decline for decades now? Just Asking A Question

It’s very expensive and people aren’t as religious as they used to be.

But why would anyone pass up an opportunity to get a "great" Catholic School education when they obviously can afford to do so? Just Asking A Question.

The Parker people specifically?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
You're really out of touch. I know parents who aren't religious but send their kids to Catholic schools. Better education, better teachers, safer environment, and less likely to have woke wackjobs teaching their kids.

Another Right Wing Whack Job chimes in to lend his never ending "support". If it’s so "great" then why has enrollment in Catholic Schools been on the decline for decades now? Just Asking A Question

It’s very expensive and people aren’t as religious as they used to be.

But why would anyone pass up an opportunity to get a "great" Catholic School education when they obviously can afford to do so? Just Asking A Question.

The Parker people specifically?


The United States has never been more popular as a country yet Catholic School enrollment has been on a precipitous decline for decades. Something seems amiss. And considering the loony brigade that happens to have been "educated" as part of their fine education and post here, I totally understand why this would be the case.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Sam Fels is a Francis Parker alum, but I don't think ass play was an elective yet.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
You're really out of touch. I know parents who aren't religious but send their kids to Catholic schools. Better education, better teachers, safer environment, and less likely to have woke wackjobs teaching their kids.

Another Right Wing Whack Job chimes in to lend his never ending "support". If it’s so "great" then why has enrollment in Catholic Schools been on the decline for decades now? Just Asking A Question

It’s very expensive and people aren’t as religious as they used to be.

But why would anyone pass up an opportunity to get a "great" Catholic School education when they obviously can afford to do so? Just Asking A Question.

The Parker people specifically?


The United States has never been more popular as a country yet Catholic School enrollment has been on a precipitous decline for decades. Something seems amiss. And considering the loony brigade that happens to have been "educated" as part of their fine education and post here, I totally understand why this would be the case.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Now you’re representing the level of popularity for the United States throughout its history?

You really don’t want to answer why you support bringing anal toys into a kids’ classroom.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:

You really don’t want to answer why you support bringing anal toys into a kids’ classroom.

That question was answered pages ago but unfortunately you are just too much of a dim bulb to actually have noticed it. Keep spouting your Qanon based conspiracy theories however. The collective ghosts of Falwell and Swaggart would be proud of ya.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:

You really don’t want to answer why you support bringing anal toys into a kids’ classroom.

That question was answered pages ago but unfortunately you are just too much of a dim bulb to actually have noticed it. Keep spouting your Qanon based conspiracy theories however. The collective ghosts of Falwell and Swaggart would be proud of ya.

:lol:

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37833
Location: ...
Curious Hair wrote:
Sam Fels is a Francis Parker alum, but I don't think ass play was an elective yet.


Buttplug Algebra AP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
Pro-groomer it is, then. Odd hill to die on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
storkinastorm wrote:
Pro-groomer it is, then. Odd hill to die on.

If nothing else, it makes it harder to whine about people being called groomers when he’s willing to put up such an emotional defense of buttplug man.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 12:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
If the Qanon "inspired" members of this board are to be "believed", (Thank god I don't)Then Parents, Administrators, Teachers, Public Health Officials and just about everyone else except their Right Wing Loon "buddies", were all in on the gag to have children be "groomed". Ponder that one for a second.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
It is incredible the lengths you are going to to defend this.

Question the motive of others
Question the outrage of parents
Ad hominem attacks about "right wing loons"
Mentions of QAnon
Downplay
Deflect
Say it's not that big a deal
Say it didn't really happen
Debate the definition of the word "groomer"
Semantical arguments
Appeals to authority ("grooming experts")

All to not answer the simple question: is it bad that a school administrator encourages and provides the use of butt plugs and dildos in school? We don't need to hypothesize - he said it right on camera.

Very telling. And somewhat disturbing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 12:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
storkinastorm wrote:
All to not answer the simple question: is it bad that a school administrator encourages and provides the use of butt plugs and dildos in school? We don't need to hypothesize - he said it right on camera.

Very telling. And somewhat disturbing.


What's "disturbing" is that idiots like you actually are flummoxed by the fact that someone would use "sex toys" in a seminar on Sex Education. How stupid and dare I say "disturbing" is that? Just Asking A Question. What is also "disturbing" is that you really do not understand just how much of a raging homophobe that you really appear to be.

But hey as long as you have the "backing" of other "likeminded", Right Wing Loons on the internet, what else do you really need? Just Asking A Question.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
:lol: :lol:

Inside of a few pages, you’ve gone from saying that you wouldn’t support this type of thing in a school setting to stating it didn’t happen anyway to saying that sure it happened, but it’s not grooming. You’ve now apparently landed on “it’s essential that Sex Ex include a convo on butt plugs.”

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 1:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
:lol: :lol:

Inside of a few pages, you’ve gone from saying that you wouldn’t support this type of thing in a school setting to stating it didn’t happen anyway to saying that sure it happened, but it’s not grooming. You’ve now apparently landed on “it’s essential that Sex Ex include a convo on butt plugs.”


"essential" :lol: :lol: :lol: You've run the gamut of not knowing what actually constitutes "grooming" to now knowing what is "off limits" in a seminar on sex education.

Why would the use of sex toys in a seminar on sex education be an example of "grooming"? Just Asking A Question.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
:lol: :lol:

Inside of a few pages, you’ve gone from saying that you wouldn’t support this type of thing in a school setting to stating it didn’t happen anyway to saying that sure it happened, but it’s not grooming. You’ve now apparently landed on “it’s essential that Sex Ex include a convo on butt plugs.”


"essential" :lol: :lol: :lol: You've run the gamut of not knowing what actually constitutes "grooming" to now knowing what is "off limits" in a seminar on sex education.

Why would the use of sex toys in a seminar on sex education be an example of "grooming"? Just Asking A Question.

:lol:

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
:lol: :lol:

Inside of a few pages, you’ve gone from saying that you wouldn’t support this type of thing in a school setting to stating it didn’t happen anyway to saying that sure it happened, but it’s not grooming. You’ve now apparently landed on “it’s essential that Sex Ex include a convo on butt plugs.”


"essential" :lol: :lol: :lol: You've run the gamut of not knowing what actually constitutes "grooming" to now knowing what is "off limits" in a seminar on sex education.

Why would the use of sex toys in a seminar on sex education be an example of "grooming"? Just Asking A Question.

:lol:


Don't really an answer as to why do ya? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 4:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
storkinastorm wrote:
It is incredible the lengths you are going to to defend this.

Question the motive of others
Question the outrage of parents
Ad hominem attacks about "right wing loons"
Mentions of QAnon
Downplay
Deflect
Say it's not that big a deal
Say it didn't really happen
Debate the definition of the word "groomer"
Semantical arguments
Appeals to authority ("grooming experts")

All to not answer the simple question: is it bad that a school administrator encourages and provides the use of butt plugs and dildos in school? We don't need to hypothesize - he said it right on camera.

Very telling. And somewhat disturbing.


But not surprising based on past conversations.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
:lol: :lol:

Inside of a few pages, you’ve gone from saying that you wouldn’t support this type of thing in a school setting to stating it didn’t happen anyway to saying that sure it happened, but it’s not grooming. You’ve now apparently landed on “it’s essential that Sex Ex include a convo on butt plugs.”


_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 5:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Seacrest wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
It is incredible the lengths you are going to to defend this.

Question the motive of others
Question the outrage of parents
Ad hominem attacks about "right wing loons"
Mentions of QAnon
Downplay
Deflect
Say it's not that big a deal
Say it didn't really happen
Debate the definition of the word "groomer"
Semantical arguments
Appeals to authority ("grooming experts")

All to not answer the simple question: is it bad that a school administrator encourages and provides the use of butt plugs and dildos in school? We don't need to hypothesize - he said it right on camera.

Very telling. And somewhat disturbing.


But not surprising based on past conversations.


Oh No. One of 2 chief "Caretakers" of the Loony Bin happens to have shown up for purpose of showing "solidarity" with his fellow "members". And ain't it just "glorious"

And you wonder where all the Loons get the ok for MANY of their "ideas" from aye?

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
The Missing Link wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
It is incredible the lengths you are going to to defend this.

Question the motive of others
Question the outrage of parents
Ad hominem attacks about "right wing loons"
Mentions of QAnon
Downplay
Deflect
Say it's not that big a deal
Say it didn't really happen
Debate the definition of the word "groomer"
Semantical arguments
Appeals to authority ("grooming experts")

All to not answer the simple question: is it bad that a school administrator encourages and provides the use of butt plugs and dildos in school? We don't need to hypothesize - he said it right on camera.

Very telling. And somewhat disturbing.


But not surprising based on past conversations.


Oh No. One of 2 chief "Caretakers" of the Loony Bin happens to have shown up for purpose of showing "solidarity" with his fellow "members". And ain't it just "glorious"

And you wonder where all the Loons get the ok for MANY of their "ideas" from aye?

Is that anything like when Reader shows up to show solidarity with you ? Just asking a question.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 527 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group