It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:26 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 55  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:21 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
Jimmy G, Geno Smith?!?! Jesus what the fuck is wrong with some of you people?


Brock Purdy?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I'll take Fields and the questions marks over Geno fucking Smith :lol:

Same with the other guys that have been listed.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23841
pizza_Place: Pizanos
veganfan21 wrote:

Why are you avoiding offensive weapons? When you said you wouldn't build around Fields, I agreed, but I assumed you meant you wouldn't want to draft guys specifically because their style of plays meshes with Fields. Unless I'm reading your above post incorrectly, it looks like "building around Fields" means something different to the both of us.

I do want weapons. I would draft/acquire legit studs at WR or TE etc because to me I need those players irrespective of who is at QB. If Fields sucks then I find a QB who can leverage the weapons in front of him. In other words, I don't want to skip drafting the next Megatron (I know there's prolly no Megatron in the draft, but just using him as an example), just because my QB (Fields) can't capitalize on Megatron's talents. To me, it's give me Megatron because he's the best player available, and if the QB can't use him, I'll find one someone who can.

Because I think they’re acquired only with the opportunity cost of impact defensive players. I wouldn’t want to take a Megatron and have him waste away with a guy who can’t get him the ball over somebody who can anchor the defense for a decade.

I don’t hate the Bears skill guys. Claypool, Mooney, Kmet, Jones, Herbert and St. Brown are probably an average group at worst.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'll take Fields and the questions marks over Geno fucking Smith :lol:

Same with the other guys that have been listed.


I would too. However, someone would still give you draft capital for Fields. I'll take the draft capital over Fields.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
I'll take the draft capital over Fields.
Depends on what sort of capital.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'll take the draft capital over Fields.
Depends on what sort of capital.


True.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38673
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Did the Bears offense look appreciably worse with Nathan fucking Peterman passing the ball yesterday ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
Did the Bears offense look appreciably worse with Nathan fucking Peterman passing the ball yesterday ?


No. He's a bum too. The sack totals of the other starters should have tell everyone that Fields is the problem. I'm not saying the offensive line doesn't need to be upgraded, but statues managed to stay upright.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:

Why are you avoiding offensive weapons? When you said you wouldn't build around Fields, I agreed, but I assumed you meant you wouldn't want to draft guys specifically because their style of plays meshes with Fields. Unless I'm reading your above post incorrectly, it looks like "building around Fields" means something different to the both of us.

I do want weapons. I would draft/acquire legit studs at WR or TE etc because to me I need those players irrespective of who is at QB. If Fields sucks then I find a QB who can leverage the weapons in front of him. In other words, I don't want to skip drafting the next Megatron (I know there's prolly no Megatron in the draft, but just using him as an example), just because my QB (Fields) can't capitalize on Megatron's talents. To me, it's give me Megatron because he's the best player available, and if the QB can't use him, I'll find one someone who can.

Because I think they’re acquired only with the opportunity cost of impact defensive players. I wouldn’t want to take a Megatron and have him waste away with a guy who can’t get him the ball over somebody who can anchor the defense for a decade.

I don’t hate the Bears skill guys. Claypool, Mooney, Kmet, Jones, Herbert and St. Brown are probably an average group at worst.


I hear you. Let's consider a case where you have a surefire HOF prospect on offense vs a solid/pro bowl type player on D, for example just to illustrate the point. I'm probably going for the surefire HOF'er on offense. I'm drafting him while simultaneously expecting Fields to use him to his potential. If Fields can't then he shouldn't be my QB - I'm not going to draft lesser players because of the ineptness of the QB, it just means to me we need a better QB.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:42 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10767
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'll take Fields and the questions marks over Geno fucking Smith :lol:

Same with the other guys that have been listed.

I'm not saying Geno Fucking Smith or Jimmy G are the answer....I'm just saying those are the options.

It really comes down to when the line in the sand will be drawn for Fields being a Pace draft pick or being a Poles guy. If Poles doesn't want his career tied to Fields, he has to be dealt NOW or if he's lucky he can squeeze one more year. Problem is....there is value NOW....one more you and that value in draft capital is likely gone.

Keep Fields.....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.
Trade Fields....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.

I personally think Fields will be back and Poles will get to draft one more QB next year, but in any case....whenever he drafts / signs a QB...he better get it right. I don't think the answer is out there this offseason.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
They're not legitimate options. Cutting Fields is technically an option too. But is that going to happen?

C'mon. Ryan Poles may end up being a horrible GM, but at this point there is absolutely zero chance he would replace Justin Fields with Geno Smith or Jimmy G. Its nonsense to even suggest it :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10091
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
They need 10 of the top 20 free agents, 8 draft picks (1 in the top 5, 5 in 15-90, 2 late rounders), and 5 UDFA. Put them with the better half of the 2022 roster, and maybe they have an 8-9 team for 2023.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:05 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10767
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Frank Coztansa wrote:
They're not legitimate options. Cutting Fields is technically an option too. But is that going to happen?

C'mon. Ryan Poles may end up being a horrible GM, but at this point there is absolutely zero chance he would replace Justin Fields with Geno Smith or Jimmy G. Its nonsense to even suggest it :lol:

Look...I agree with you that Fields will be a Bear next year and have the starting QB job....I just think it's fair to point out they have other options and Poles has already shown to be pretty shrewd in this tank / rebuild project.

I just don't trust any of the QB's in this draft and there's a few suggesting they do just that. No. Thank. You.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38673
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I just dont know how you can find a guy to replace 75 yards through the air against the Lions.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Some dumbfuck told us that the guy who managed 114 yards thru the air against the Vikings might be the answer.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
BigW72 wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'll take Fields and the questions marks over Geno fucking Smith :lol:

Same with the other guys that have been listed.

I'm not saying Geno Fucking Smith or Jimmy G are the answer....I'm just saying those are the options.

It really comes down to when the line in the sand will be drawn for Fields being a Pace draft pick or being a Poles guy. If Poles doesn't want his career tied to Fields, he has to be dealt NOW or if he's lucky he can squeeze one more year. Problem is....there is value NOW....one more you and that value in draft capital is likely gone.

Keep Fields.....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.
Trade Fields....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.

I personally think Fields will be back and Poles will get to draft one more QB next year, but in any case....whenever he drafts / signs a QB...he better get it right. I don't think the answer is out there this offseason.

Poles career is already tied to fields. Either he keeps him and he's on the hook for his success or lack thereof or he trades him and every touchdown he gets is Brock for Broglio discussion.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 4:31 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10767
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Darkside wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'll take Fields and the questions marks over Geno fucking Smith :lol:

Same with the other guys that have been listed.

I'm not saying Geno Fucking Smith or Jimmy G are the answer....I'm just saying those are the options.

It really comes down to when the line in the sand will be drawn for Fields being a Pace draft pick or being a Poles guy. If Poles doesn't want his career tied to Fields, he has to be dealt NOW or if he's lucky he can squeeze one more year. Problem is....there is value NOW....one more you and that value in draft capital is likely gone.

Keep Fields.....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.
Trade Fields....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.

I personally think Fields will be back and Poles will get to draft one more QB next year, but in any case....whenever he drafts / signs a QB...he better get it right. I don't think the answer is out there this offseason.

Poles career is already tied to fields. Either he keeps him and he's on the hook for his success or lack thereof or he trades him and every touchdown he gets is Brock for Broglio discussion.

Right now Poles is tied to Fields? No. Pace drafted Fields and it's Poles first year which he spent clearing cap space under the "we need to evaluate him". The question is....can he squeeze out one more year and say "I didn't draft him". That is debatable.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
BigW72 wrote:
Darkside wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'll take Fields and the questions marks over Geno fucking Smith :lol:

Same with the other guys that have been listed.

I'm not saying Geno Fucking Smith or Jimmy G are the answer....I'm just saying those are the options.

It really comes down to when the line in the sand will be drawn for Fields being a Pace draft pick or being a Poles guy. If Poles doesn't want his career tied to Fields, he has to be dealt NOW or if he's lucky he can squeeze one more year. Problem is....there is value NOW....one more you and that value in draft capital is likely gone.

Keep Fields.....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.
Trade Fields....draft the hell out of DL and OL and this team is WAY better.

I personally think Fields will be back and Poles will get to draft one more QB next year, but in any case....whenever he drafts / signs a QB...he better get it right. I don't think the answer is out there this offseason.

Poles career is already tied to fields. Either he keeps him and he's on the hook for his success or lack thereof or he trades him and every touchdown he gets is Brock for Broglio discussion.

Right now Poles is tied to Fields? No. Pace drafted Fields and it's Poles first year which he spent clearing cap space under the "we need to evaluate him". The question is....can he squeeze out one more year and say "I didn't draft him". That is debatable.

Wrong. If he trades him and he's great it's a scar on Poles. What we're you thinking trading Lou Brock? Poles is tied to Fields, don't matter who drafted him.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Poles' career is tied to playoffs and Super Bowls.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Poles' career is tied to playoffs and Super Bowls.

Rodgers isn't.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Poles' career is tied to playoffs and Super Bowls.

Rodgers isn't.


State Farm commercials.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I'm even more of an Anderson over Carter guy after these playoffs. Great players should be noticed in big games. He also on the sidelines for too many plays. I've seen enough of Roquan out of breath. I don't need to see another Georgia player huffing and puffing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31523
pizza_Place: What??
Nas wrote:
I'm even more of an Anderson over Carter guy after these playoffs. Great players should be noticed in big games. He also on the sidelines for too many plays. I've seen enough of Roquan out of breath. I don't need to see another Georgia player huffing and puffing.

But that's so fixable.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23841
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm even more of an Anderson over Carter guy after these playoffs. Great players should be noticed in big games. He also on the sidelines for too many plays. I've seen enough of Roquan out of breath. I don't need to see another Georgia player huffing and puffing.

But that's so fixable.

He’s fat. Fat guys need more oxygen.

I’d be fine with Anderson over Carter. I’d feel a lot better about it if they found another way to shore up the tackle position in FA before making that pick.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 8:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38248
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm even more of an Anderson over Carter guy after these playoffs. Great players should be noticed in big games. He also on the sidelines for too many plays. I've seen enough of Roquan out of breath. I don't need to see another Georgia player huffing and puffing.

But that's so fixable.

He’s fat. Fat guys need more oxygen.

I’d be fine with Anderson over Carter. I’d feel a lot better about it if they found another way to shore up the tackle position in FA before making that pick.


Anderson over Carter all day after watching last night's game.

Character issues are harder to fix as you get older.

If you won't stay in shape playing for free, then does a pocketful of money make it more likely that you will?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
I don't know if it's been mentioned here or anywhere else, but if I'm the Bears I have no problem using a 4th or 5th round pick on Stetson Bennett. Guy probably is a career backup, but you never know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23841
pizza_Place: Pizanos
One Post wrote:
I don't know if it's been mentioned here or anywhere else, but if I'm the Bears I have no problem using a 4th or 5th round pick on Stetson Bennett. Guy probably is a career backup, but you never know.

I think he’s a very good college player but I wouldn’t want to spend a pick on him. He reminds me of Ian Book a little, albeit a lot smaller and with much better weapons.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
One Post wrote:
I don't know if it's been mentioned here or anywhere else, but if I'm the Bears I have no problem using a 4th or 5th round pick on Stetson Bennett. Guy probably is a career backup, but you never know.


The Bears should use a 4th rounder on a backup QB?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 11:08 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
One Post wrote:
I don't know if it's been mentioned here or anywhere else, but if I'm the Bears I have no problem using a 4th or 5th round pick on Stetson Bennett. Guy probably is a career backup, but you never know.


The Bears should use a 4th rounder on a backup QB?


Didn't the Redskins do this in the same draft they took RG3?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Poles' career is tied to playoffs and Super Bowls.

Rodgers isn't.

Thank goodness he won that one.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 55  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BigW72, Clawmaster and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group