It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 3:19 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 55  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 3:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38263
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m more & more convinced the Bears’ best hope is that Houston falls in love with somebody. If not, I don’t think the pressure is there for anybody to pay a huge cost for 1/1.


I'd be completely happy taking Anderson with the first pick.

Look at "Far Too Early 23 Mock Drafts" created across these here internets just after the 22 draft ended. Anderson is 1/1 on almost every one. I bet our super sleuths can even find posts hoping we could possibly so lucky as to draft him.



I don't see the trade scenarios opening up for the Bears. But I hope I'm wrong.

Anderson will be a good get at 1.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
There are rumors out there that Stroud may return to OSU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82148
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I promise you there will be GM/scouts who see Levis throw and will have to have him. He is Mahomes and Cutler


He's tough. His fingers on his throwing hand were mangled, and he put them back in place and kept pushing. Cutler wouldn't have done that in the Super Bowl.

To your point, Levis makes some questionable decisions, but he also drops dimes that are frequently dropped. You can't teach Mahomes or Favre like aggressiveness. You can harness it with the right coaching.


I mean in terms of elite arm strength.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82148
Bagels wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Bagels wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m more & more convinced the Bears’ best hope is that Houston falls in love with somebody. If not, I don’t think the pressure is there for anybody to pay a huge cost for 1/1.


yea it seems to be a general assumption that someone is going to pay a huge cost to get the pick, what if they aren't.

Well if they truly are satisfied with Fields they can enjoy taking who they perceive as the very best player in the draft which will be a huge upgrade to the team. That is a pretty good worst-case scenario.


yea for sure, it's a good worst case to take the #1 pick
But you need quantity
I mean is anyone here arguing that they SHOULD take the #1 pick ? (whoever it is )
general consensus seems to be they trade down to #3 and get 100 extra picks, then they trade down from there to get 100 more


I would be satisfied if they dropped down one spot and got that texans second round pick.

My ony goal out of the draft is to get Anderson. If they can do that and get some lagniappe, all the better. If not, OK

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4056
pizza_Place: Lino's
There will be a team that will be willing to give up a ton to move up and take Bryce Young, it almost would seem like GM malpractice to not take advantage of this rare opportunity to stock up on early round picks.

Indy still makes the most sense given the fact that they have a quality offensive line and the GM is definitely on the hot seat.

There are always guys that skyrocket up or drop a few slots after the combine, but Poles does not seem to be blinded by that stuff like Pace, he seems to be in it for a long rebuild which makes me think he will try to stockpile picks and use them to pick 4-5 guys in the first three rounds that he thinks will be the core of his roster for the next 5-10 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23857
pizza_Place: Pizanos
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

If he loves a QB, he should get him.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
No, he shouldn’t. Not this year. Somebody will be dumb enough but if it’s the Texans, that’s next-level dumb.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10781
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
man of few opinions wrote:
No, he shouldn’t. Not this year. Somebody will be dumb enough but if it’s the Texans, that’s next-level dumb.

The Texans have spent 3 seasons being next-level dumb, why would 2023 be any different? They are a disaster. So is Indy and so is Carolina. If we can get the Raiders to go into stupid mode, that would be even better.

So many posssibilities!

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.


The GM should have already been fired after presiding over the shit show that is his roster. For a guy who can't settle on a coach what makes anyone think he can run a draft effectively.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23857
pizza_Place: Pizanos
If any GM identifies a guy that he believes will be a franchise QB, he should do what it takes to get him. That’s job 1. Most other positions have degrees of acceptability. QB changes the direction of the franchise and there are fewer than two dozen guys in the world who can competently run an NFL offense.

And if the GM is wrong, he should be fired.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
If any GM identifies a guy that he believes will be a franchise QB, he should do what it takes to get him. That’s job 1. Most other positions have degrees of acceptability. QB changes the direction of the franchise and there are fewer than two dozen guys in the world who can competently run an NFL offense.

And if the GM is wrong, he should be fired.


Somewhat separately, I think there's something fundamentally wrong with the sport if the success of a 60 person roster or whatever it is depends on the competence of one guy. So now you got basically 26 teams every year stumbling their way through busts and recycled QBs trying to find that one lottery ticket. The lottery winners sneer and laugh at everyone else until their guy blows a knee or whatever and then the cycle repeats itself. I just find this annual QB search everyone engages in to be so damn boring. The offseason is more intriguing in basketball and baseball since if you don't have a QB you can safely assume your team isn't going anywhere, so why even bother paying attention.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23857
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Football is unpredictable in a way basketball isn’t and entertaining in a way baseball can’t be.

Teams like the Lions were fun to watch. They never had a chance of winning anything meaningful but they were pure entertainment. A .500 team in baseball is torture (e.g., the Sox). QB matters for super bowls but unless you’re Danny Bernstein, watching sports isn’t only about championships.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16761
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Owner / Coach / Quarterback in that order.

Tom Brady on the Lions with Matt Patricia as HC isn't winning a Super Bowl, probably wouldn't even make the playoffs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hussra wrote:
Owner / Coach / Quarterback in that order.

Tom Brady on the Lions with Matt Patricia as HC isn't winning a Super Bowl, probably wouldn't even make the playoffs.


Not sure about that. There are so many coaches who are thought of as great when in reality they just happened to coach a star QB, with a few exceptions. Look at the common denominator between these coaches:

Reid
Payton
Belichik
Tomlin
Jimmy Johnson
Marriuci
Dungy

Exceptions may be the Harbaughs, Vrabel, Cowher, Kyle Shanahan, etc.

That's why I always think it's a lazy and potentially dumb move to target the OC of some team that has a star QB. I can tell you right now: the OCs for KC, Buffalo, Cincy, etc., ain't doing shit. Obviously Dabbol looks real solid now but I think that's an exception. We know Nagy sucked, Hackett sucked, all Brady OCs sucked as HCs, and so on. When will the league get a clue.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23857
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I would launch Eberflus & hire Ben Johnson today if given the chance.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I would launch Eberflus & hire Ben Johnson today if given the chance.


That's what I'm talking about. Not necessarily firing Eberflus but looking at OCs/HCs that thrive without game changer QBs. Enormous respect for Vrabel, Shanahan, Carrol, etc.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
If any GM identifies a guy that he believes will be a franchise QB, he should do what it takes to get him. That’s job 1. Most other positions have degrees of acceptability. QB changes the direction of the franchise and there are fewer than two dozen guys in the world who can competently run an NFL offense.

And if the GM is wrong, he should be fired.

No, he shouldn’t. “Doing what it takes” to get a guy cripples a franchise more than it works. There may be a guy you really like where it just doesnt make sense to do whatever it takes to get him. Especially if you are the Texans and colts this year where you already have a top-4 draft pick. Take the best available option and live to fight another day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2023 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23857
pizza_Place: Pizanos
man of few opinions wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
If any GM identifies a guy that he believes will be a franchise QB, he should do what it takes to get him. That’s job 1. Most other positions have degrees of acceptability. QB changes the direction of the franchise and there are fewer than two dozen guys in the world who can competently run an NFL offense.

And if the GM is wrong, he should be fired.

No, he shouldn’t. “Doing what it takes” to get a guy cripples a franchise more than it works. There may be a guy you really like where it just doesnt make sense to do whatever it takes to get him. Especially if you are the Texans and colts this year where you already have a top-4 draft pick. Take the best available option and live to fight another day.

Then you’re a middling franchise. You’re either great or out of work. No in between for these people.

It’s akin to the Warren hire. Anybody can make good decisions when they’re safe. No brainers are well vetted before they hit decision makers. Warren didn’t handle challenges well yet he fails upward because he racked up easy wins.

The measure of an executive is getting big things correct. Can’t do that and the fucker should shuffle back to whatever VP role he had before being promoted.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Interesting theory. Lots of successful teams didn’t gamble and make risky trades to move up and grab a QB at the top of the draft, but if you think that’s the mark of a great gm, you can roll with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
veganfan21 wrote:
Hussra wrote:
Owner / Coach / Quarterback in that order.

Tom Brady on the Lions with Matt Patricia as HC isn't winning a Super Bowl, probably wouldn't even make the playoffs.


Not sure about that. There are so many coaches who are thought of as great when in reality they just happened to coach a star QB, with a few exceptions. Look at the common denominator between these coaches:

Reid
Payton
Belichik
Tomlin
Jimmy Johnson
Marriuci
Dungy

Exceptions may be the Harbaughs, Vrabel, Cowher, Kyle Shanahan, etc.

That's why I always think it's a lazy and potentially dumb move to target the OC of some team that has a star QB. I can tell you right now: the OCs for KC, Buffalo, Cincy, etc., ain't doing shit. Obviously Dabbol looks real solid now but I think that's an exception. We know Nagy sucked, Hackett sucked, all Brady OCs sucked as HCs, and so on. When will the league get a clue.


Reid is the only coach on that list to have success in two cities.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4056
pizza_Place: Lino's
It was always interesting to hear certain hosts on WSCR go on and on about how little impact a head coach or manager has on a team, but then to rail on and on every day about how the White Sox manager was screwing up the team, that said, it seems in the NFL you must have a quality GM or at the very least talent in your college scouting department to succeed.

There is an obvious gulf in ability/talent in head coaches, guys like Tomlin and Vrabel seem to know how to field a competitive team despite no always having a top end QB, guys like Cap'n Grab Ass Matt Nagy get exposed quickly for having absolutely no idea what they are doing, but team are always looking for the next offensive genius.

Franchises with poor ownership like the Bears seem to have a revolving door at the GM position as they flail around making bad hire after bad hire will maybe have one or two season of success but will always trend toward mediocrity until they make changes at the top.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91923
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

I'll take Young. You pick another rookie QB. I say Young far outperforms whoever you pick. Do you think I'm wrong?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 10:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

I'll take Young. You pick another rookie QB. I say Young far outperforms whoever you pick. Do you think I'm wrong?


Start the Bryce Young vs Will Levis thread.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4056
pizza_Place: Lino's
Really hoping the Texans fall in love with Bryce Young and feel they need to trade up just to make sure they get him because that opens up the best trade scenarios as you are likely able to trade back twice as the Colts than become increasingly desperate for one of the top guys.

Never thought the tank job would work out this perfectly, but now the heat is on Poles to get this right, he will either go down as the greatest GM in Bears history or go down in flames.

Highly likely that all three of the top rated QBs end up starting next year, along with several other guys picked later, it's just the nature of the league.

Do not share the love Nas has for Levis, but he's better right now than many of the guys that played in the league last week, he will be heavily pursued by the teams that were not able to trade up to the top of the draft.

Not sure if Anderson is still there if you move back to 4, wondering what Poles does at that point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23857
pizza_Place: Pizanos
man of few opinions wrote:
Interesting theory. Lots of successful teams didn’t gamble and make risky trades to move up and grab a QB at the top of the draft, but if you think that’s the mark of a great gm, you can roll with that.

I don’t think a great GM has to make big trades, just that they find ways to get good players. In this specific case, I think that if the Texans decide Hendon Hooker is the next Peyton Manning and they move up a spot to insure they can draft a generational QB talent, it’s an understandable move.

And unlike Ryan Pace, Caserio should get the axe if he does that and he’s wrong.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

I'll take Young. You pick another rookie QB. I say Young far outperforms whoever you pick. Do you think I'm wrong?

I say the odds of young OR any other rookie quarterback in this draft becoming stars are so long that if the bears or anyone else take Young, I’ll take my chances with the next guy up OR draft a different position with that pick OR trade down to someone blinded by qb lust and acquire more picks and take a qb later on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Interesting theory. Lots of successful teams didn’t gamble and make risky trades to move up and grab a QB at the top of the draft, but if you think that’s the mark of a great gm, you can roll with that.

I don’t think a great GM has to make big trades, just that they find ways to get good players. In this specific case, I think that if the Texans decide Hendon Hooker is the next Peyton Manning and they move up a spot to insure they can draft a generational QB talent, it’s an understandable move.

And unlike Ryan Pace, Caserio should get the axe if he does that and he’s wrong.

If I owned a franchise I would hire a GM who I knew I could trust would take advantage of the desperate style gm you describe, trading the house to move up one spot to choose one of these qbs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4056
pizza_Place: Lino's
If you stay in top 4, almost have to take Anderson or Carter if they are still there, a few red flags for both, but either one could be dominant in the NFL.

Dropping lower than 4 means you may be looking at one of the OT's or a second tier DT/DE.

Can see taking your C for the next 10 years in the 2nd round, or a significant upgrade at LB.

Liking this Ika kid from Baylor if he's there in the 3rd round.

A slot WR like Downs or Flowers could slide back a bit if you pick up extra picks.

Would love to see Milton from GA is he slips to 4th round, would give you a bigger back, and will need quality depth if you do not bring Montgomery back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 12:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
MANY believe Shanahan and John Lynch are great evaluators. They took Solomon Thomas 3rd in the draft and traded 3 first round picks+ for Trey Young. It's all a gamble. You have to be aggressive for your guys.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 55  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: hootmon, Jaw Breaker and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group