It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 8:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38675
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I dont understand any Bears fan going the LOL Packers !! route when we celebrate a qb who can barely break a huddle and have his HoF bust cast for completing a 10 yard out.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 2:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
There are a lot of fan bases out there that would love 2 Super Bowl wins in 30 years.


You won 2 with Rex Grossman. You would feel different if you had 2 of the 10 greatest quarterbacks.

I loved all 4 of the Super Bowl victories I have been able to enjoy over the years, and the "sick burn" that the QB wasn't up to your Bears fan standards of greatness amuses me.


I wish Grossman liked to study film more than he liked beer. Other than that, you'll never hear me say a negative word about Grossman. He's my favorite Bears quarterback. I still recognized that he was Favre so the expectations were different.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 2:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
It really doesn't explain why this bothers you to the point that you seemingly bring it up in every Packer thread. I'll let Hawger, FF and UMN speak for themselves but it just seems weird that none of the actual fans seem to stew about the 2019 draft as much as you do.


Because you're happy winning a mostly shitty division. Being the great guy that he is, Vegan wants more for you. He recognizes that drafting Higgins would have led to at least 1 more Super Bowl appearance and probably a Super Bowl victory. My 5 year old loves certificates that have no monetary value too.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
It really doesn't explain why this bothers you to the point that you seemingly bring it up in every Packer thread. I'll let Hawger, FF and UMN speak for themselves but it just seems weird that none of the actual fans seem to stew about the 2019 draft as much as you do.


Because you're happy winning a mostly shitty division. Being the great guy that he is, Vegan wants more for you. He recognizes that drafting Higgins would have led to at least 1 more Super Bowl appearance and probably a Super Bowl victory. My 5 year old loves certificates that have no monetary value too.


Yep. Also the fans here are silent because they all happily drink the gute kool aid. Just now on Waddle and Silvy they addressed the disasterous Love trade with an ESPN Milwaukee guy. The point made there was the same here: what the fuck are you doing drafting the future QB when your current QB and the wider team are in the middle of your championship window and need a piece or two to seize the opportunity. The espon Milwaukee guy agreed and said Gute doesn't admit mistakes unlike Ron Wolf. Then they added the equally disasterous Devonte Adams situation which they botched. Under no circumstances do you separate Jordan and Pippen in their prime. That's why guys here have a Krause complex and think they're safe the hands of the organization when really it's your superstar combo that made them relevant. Keep that core together and add to it - don't destroy it.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31559
pizza_Place: What??
Caller Bob wrote:
This board could do MORE with LESS Simple Frank posts

:lol:

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
veganfan21 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
It really doesn't explain why this bothers you to the point that you seemingly bring it up in every Packer thread. I'll let Hawger, FF and UMN speak for themselves but it just seems weird that none of the actual fans seem to stew about the 2019 draft as much as you do.


Because you're happy winning a mostly shitty division. Being the great guy that he is, Vegan wants more for you. He recognizes that drafting Higgins would have led to at least 1 more Super Bowl appearance and probably a Super Bowl victory. My 5 year old loves certificates that have no monetary value too.


Yep. Also the fans here are silent because they all happily drink the gute kool aid. Just now on Waddle and Silvy they addressed the disasterous Love trade with an ESPN Milwaukee guy. The point made there was the same here: what the fuck are you doing drafting the future QB when your current QB and the wider team are in the middle of your championship window and need a piece or two to seize the opportunity. The espon Milwaukee guy agreed and said Gute doesn't admit mistakes unlike Ron Wolf. Then they added the equally disasterous Devonte Adams situation which they botched. Under no circumstances do you separate Jordan and Pippen in their prime. That's why guys here have a Krause complex and think they're safe the hands of the organization when really it's your superstar combo that made them relevant. Keep that core together and add to it - don't destroy it.
The idea that we blindly believe in Gute is absurd. There have been a number of picks/signings/releases that have been questioned. His track record is far from perfect. I just don't obsess about 1 pick from 3 years ago the way you do. It's just strange.

I'll make you a deal though. If Love turns out to be a complete bust (whether it's with the Packers or another team) then I'm willing to come on here and acknowledge that you were correct and Gute completely blew the pick. All you have to do is stop beating a dead horse. Deal?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
But the argument isn't love is a bust, that's not the point. The pick wasn't wrong because love is a bad prospect, the pick was wrong because it robbed the Packers of two players (love cost two picks, not one) it could have used to take control of a NFC conference that was theirs for the taking. It's sort of like prioritizing winning in 2025 and beyond instead of focusing on the window you had in 2019-2021. Again, you didn't like this example, but it's like KC picking a QB this year instead of adding another WR or RB or DE or whatever to strengthen the team around Mahomes and give him more weapons. That's what the Pack should have done - give Rodgers the weapons he needed to return to the championship game - and by not doing so that's why they don't have anything to show for the last three years despite employing the best QB in the NFL. They robbed him (and you) of that opportunity. It was an absolutely backward ass move to make coming off a championship game appearance. There's no bet to be made because the window closed on the Pack, the pick produced nothing during that window, and that's the point.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Last edited by veganfan21 on Mon Jan 30, 2023 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 10:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
But the argument isn't love is a bust, that's not the point. The pick wasn't wrong because love is a bad prospect, the pick was wrong because it robbed the Packers of two players (love cost two picks, not one) it could have used to take control of a NFC north that was theirs for the taking. It's sort of like prioritizing winning in 2025 and beyond instead of focusing on the window you had in 2019-2021. Again, you didn't like this example, but it's like KC picking a QB this year instead of adding another WR or RB or DE or whatever to strengthen the team around Mahomes and give him more weapons. That's what the Pack should have done - give Rodgers the weapons he needed to return to the championship game - and by not doing so that's why they don't have anything to show for the last three years despite employing the best QB in the NFL. They robbed him (and you) of that opportunity. It was an absolutely backward ass move to make coming off a championship game appearance. There's no bet to be made because the window closed on the Pack, the pick produced nothing during that window, and that's the point.


This is what it's all about.

Image

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
But the argument isn't love is a bust, that's not the point. The pick wasn't wrong because love is a bad prospect, the pick was wrong because it robbed the Packers of two players (love cost two picks, not one) it could have used to take control of a NFC north that was theirs for the taking. It's sort of like prioritizing winning in 2025 and beyond instead of focusing on the window you had in 2019-2021. Again, you didn't like this example, but it's like KC picking a QB this year instead of adding another WR or RB or DE or whatever to strengthen the team around Mahomes and give him more weapons. That's what the Pack should have done - give Rodgers the weapons he needed to return to the championship game - and by not doing so that's why they don't have anything to show for the last three years despite employing the best QB in the NFL. They robbed him (and you) of that opportunity. It was an absolutely backward ass move to make coming off a championship game appearance. There's no bet to be made because the window closed on the Pack, the pick produced nothing during that window, and that's the point.


This is what it's all about.

Image

That is a beautiful piece of paper that I don't own, but if people want to keep buying them and putting in the Packers coffers by all means please go ahead. You should get a few Nas.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Two points to mention to vegan who is struggling a lot in this thread.

1. Your Mahomes analogy makes no sense. If Rodgers was 27 the Love pick doesn't happen. The closest comparable analogs are the Pats drafting Jimmy with an older Brady and the Packers drafting Rodgers with an older Favre.

2. Davante wanted to leave. The Packers were willing to pay him to stay, he didn't want to. There is nothing at all that they botched there. Another obvious signal of your disingenuousness is referring to this tandem as Jordan and Pippen. Is Rodgers one of the biggest chokers in nfl history or is he Michael Jordan? He's both or either, depending on what vegan needs for the argument that day! :lol:

Now feel free to continue with your incoherent rambling.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Packers could have tagged Adams. A lot of players want to leave.

Rodgers fell to the Packers, they didn't trade up to get him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
The Packers could have tagged Adams. A lot of players want to leave.

So now the argument is they should have tried to fuck Adams, prevent his payday, and keep him while unhappy? That 100% goes against vegan trying to label this as GB not taking care of their players and having a Krause level detrimental effect on future free agents.

Pick a lane fellas.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:04 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
The closest comparable analogs are the Pats drafting Jimmy with an older Brady
Except Jimmy G was taken in round 2, and the Pats/Brady had already won 5 Super Bowls at that point. Not all that close.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The closest comparable analogs are the Pats drafting Jimmy with an older Brady
Except Jimmy G was taken in round 2, and the Pats/Brady had already won 5 Super Bowls at that point. Not all that close.

Do you not know what the word closest means?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:13 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Do you?

A team that has won 5 Super Bowls and drafted a QB in the second round is in no way shape or form close to the Packers drafting Love.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Do you?

A team that has won 5 Super Bowls and drafted a QB in the second round is in no way shape or form close to the Packers drafting Love.

It's one of the two closest comps we have seen in the last 20 years. A team with an aging 1st ballot HOFer spends a high pick on a QB while the team is still contending for the playoffs and super bowl.

It's not that hard. Find me a closer comparable if you want to convince me you know the definition of the word closest.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Already covered my man; viewtopic.php?f=90&t=113803&start=6480#p3893517

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38675
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The closest comparable analogs are the Pats drafting Jimmy with an older Brady
Except Jimmy G was taken in round 2, and the Pats/Brady had already won 5 Super Bowls at that point. Not all that close.

Do you not know what the word closest means?

Well it is Frank so....

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:23 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Packers could have tagged Adams. A lot of players want to leave.

So now the argument is they should have tried to fuck Adams, prevent his payday, and keep him while unhappy? That 100% goes against vegan trying to label this as GB not taking care of their players and having a Krause level detrimental effect on future free agents.

Pick a lane fellas.


Letting the best WR in the NFL walk when your championship window is getting ready to close is stupid. The tags exist for a reason. He would have agreed to a deal with the threat of the tag. Probably worse than trading up to draft ANOTHER quarterback when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Packers could have tagged Adams. A lot of players want to leave.

So now the argument is they should have tried to fuck Adams, prevent his payday, and keep him while unhappy? That 100% goes against vegan trying to label this as GB not taking care of their players and having a Krause level detrimental effect on future free agents.

Pick a lane fellas.


Letting the best WR in the NFL walk when your championship window is getting ready to close is stupid. The tags exist for a reason. He would have agreed to a deal with the threat of the tag. Probably worse than trading up to draft ANOTHER quarterback when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

He had stated he would not play for the tag, now he could have set out 8 weeks and then came back and played to make sure he got his year of service, but he wanted out.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
badrogue17 wrote:
I dont understand any Bears fan going the LOL Packers !! route when we celebrate a qb who can barely break a huddle and have his HoF bust cast for completing a 10 yard out.
Its the same reason you can celebrate the accomplishments of Hull on the ice and ignore what a complete piece of shit he was off the ice. I understand something like this is far too deep for you to wrap your mind around.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

This is another thing you guys cant make up your mind on. Is Rodgers a choker or did he just not get enough help from Gute? If you say both I'm gonna point to being a choker as the reason another WR probably doesn't help. Another pick a lane thing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I dont understand any Bears fan going the LOL Packers !! route when we celebrate a qb who can barely break a huddle and have his HoF bust cast for completing a 10 yard out.
Its the same reason you can celebrate the accomplishments of Hull on the ice and ignore what a complete piece of shit he was off the ice. I understand something like this is far too deep for you to wrap your mind around.

It's too deep for me thats for sure, I dont know what the fuck this has to do with his comment or this thread :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:30 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

This is another thing you guys cant make up your mind on. Is Rodgers a choker or did he just not get enough help from Gute? If you say both I'm gonna point to being a choker as the reason another WR probably doesn't help. Another pick a lane thing.


He is. Higgins would have foolproofed the roster. Aaron Jones was arguably the best RB in the NFL when they faced the Buccaneers. Adams was the best WR. Even Rodger wouldn't be able to blow that trio of talent.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

This is another thing you guys cant make up your mind on. Is Rodgers a choker or did he just not get enough help from Gute? If you say both I'm gonna point to being a choker as the reason another WR probably doesn't help. Another pick a lane thing.


He is. Higgins would have foolproofed the roster. Aaron Jones was arguably the best RB in the NFL when they faced the Buccaneers. Adams was the best WR. Even Rodger wouldn't be able to blow that trio of talent.

Burrow, the guy you think is better than Mahomes, hasnt gotten it done with Chase and Higgins so far. It's almost like winning a Super Bowl isnt guaranteed and is harder than fans think it is.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:38 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

This is another thing you guys cant make up your mind on. Is Rodgers a choker or did he just not get enough help from Gute? If you say both I'm gonna point to being a choker as the reason another WR probably doesn't help. Another pick a lane thing.


He is. Higgins would have foolproofed the roster. Aaron Jones was arguably the best RB in the NFL when they faced the Buccaneers. Adams was the best WR. Even Rodger wouldn't be able to blow that trio of talent.

Burrow, the guy you think is better than Mahomes, hasnt gotten it done with Chase and Higgins so far. It's almost like winning a Super Bowl isnt guaranteed and is harder than fans think it is.


No one on this board has said Burrow is better. Even with having one of the top 5 offensive coaches in the NFL to go along with GREAT offensive weapons, Mahomes has come up short. I won't hold it against Burrow for just making it to the Super Bowl and the Conference Championship with a crayon eating coach and no offensive line. Aaron Rodgers didn't have that excuse.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

This is another thing you guys cant make up your mind on. Is Rodgers a choker or did he just not get enough help from Gute? If you say both I'm gonna point to being a choker as the reason another WR probably doesn't help. Another pick a lane thing.


He is. Higgins would have foolproofed the roster. Aaron Jones was arguably the best RB in the NFL when they faced the Buccaneers. Adams was the best WR. Even Rodger wouldn't be able to blow that trio of talent.

Burrow, the guy you think is better than Mahomes, hasnt gotten it done with Chase and Higgins so far. It's almost like winning a Super Bowl isnt guaranteed and is harder than fans think it is.


No one on this board has said Burrow is better. Even with having one of the top 5 offensive coaches in the NFL to go along with GREAT offensive weapons, Mahomes has come up short. I won't hold it against Burrow for just making it to the Super Bowl and the Conference Championship with a crayon eating coach and no offensive line. Aaron Rodgers didn't have that excuse.

So Lafleur is better than Taylor, not so sure about that. At least Taylor has been to the Super Bowl.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
No one on this board has said Burrow is better. Even with having one of the top 5 offensive coaches in the NFL to go along with GREAT offensive weapons, Mahomes has come up short. I won't hold it against Burrow for just making it to the Super Bowl and the Conference Championship with a crayon eating coach and no offensive line. Aaron Rodgers didn't have that excuse.

What is the evidence that Zac Taylor is a bad coach?

Also, the Chiefs were in 13 personell on 3rd and long in the 4th quarter of a tied game because they had no WRs, and Pat had a high ankle sprain. Invalidates any OL excuses.


_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
when you're a receiver away from being in the Super Bowl.

This is another thing you guys cant make up your mind on. Is Rodgers a choker or did he just not get enough help from Gute? If you say both I'm gonna point to being a choker as the reason another WR probably doesn't help. Another pick a lane thing.


He is. Higgins would have foolproofed the roster. Aaron Jones was arguably the best RB in the NFL when they faced the Buccaneers. Adams was the best WR. Even Rodger wouldn't be able to blow that trio of talent.

Burrow, the guy you think is better than Mahomes, hasnt gotten it done with Chase and Higgins so far. It's almost like winning a Super Bowl isnt guaranteed and is harder than fans think it is.


No one on this board has said Burrow is better. Even with having one of the top 5 offensive coaches in the NFL to go along with GREAT offensive weapons, Mahomes has come up short. I won't hold it against Burrow for just making it to the Super Bowl and the Conference Championship with a crayon eating coach and no offensive line. Aaron Rodgers didn't have that excuse.

So Lafleur is better than Taylor, not so sure about that. At least Taylor has been to the Super Bowl.


I don't love LaFloor, but I would take him over Taylor. Taylor seems like a solid man, but a bad coach.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 11:52 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
No one on this board has said Burrow is better. Even with having one of the top 5 offensive coaches in the NFL to go along with GREAT offensive weapons, Mahomes has come up short. I won't hold it against Burrow for just making it to the Super Bowl and the Conference Championship with a crayon eating coach and no offensive line. Aaron Rodgers didn't have that excuse.

What is the evidence that Zac Taylor is a bad coach?

Also, the Chiefs were in 13 personell on 3rd and long in the 4th quarter of a tied game because they had no WRs, and Pat had a high ankle sprain. Invalidates any OL excuses.



It's just my personal opinion.

Burrow didn't have an offensive line last year and still beat that ass when Mahomes was a full strength and had Hill. He won 3 straight games against Mahomes with 4th quarter comebacks.

Mahomes still had 2 of his top 3 targets. Burrow still had 2 of his top 3 targets after Boyd was injured. The offensive line was a HUGE difference. Mahomes would have been dead behind a shit offensive line on Sunday.

Again, Karen didn't have this issue. He had an excellent offensive line, great running back, and the BEST receiver. Higgins would have Rodgers proofed the roster. They would have beaten Brady and probably an injured Mahomes.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group