It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 366 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Nas wrote:
I don't think Duggans is worth a draft pick either. What do you see, 312?

I see a more talented Brock Purdy or Mac Jones.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Regular Reader wrote:
Nas wrote:
I don't think Duggans is worth a draft pick either. What do you see, 312?

I see a more talented Brock Purdy or Mac Jones.


Interesting.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10792
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
312player wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
312player wrote:
Carr cut, Atlanta, Carolina seem like a landing spot..possibly Skins.


if you don't like Fields or Bryce why not trade Fields for a top 6 pick, trade back from #1 to get #4 and other picks, sign Carr, select Carter at #4 or whatever and Anderson at #5 or whatever and move forward with the other picks. I'd def do it in Madden.


I kinda like Fields, I've been a firm believer in Carr sucks, I call him carrbage.

I like Carrbage :lol:
I don't care where he goes....he's not the answer to any team's QB problems

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 4:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Nas wrote:
I don't think Duggans is worth a draft pick either. What do you see, 312?


I think he's got everything you want that can't be coached, tough mentally and physically.. pocket poise, doesn't seem to panic and processes the info quickly n calmly.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.



I'm sure Ozzie wants to sign him..just not sign him for what Jackson wants. If my option was trade him- release him or give him 450 million dollars.. I'd lett him walk.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 7:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.



I'm sure Ozzie wants to sign him..just not sign him for what Jackson wants. If my option was trade him- release him or give him 450 million dollars.. I'd lett him walk.


He's going to be slotted in a few ticks below Burrow. I don't think Burrow is getting $450M

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.



I'm sure Ozzie wants to sign him..just not sign him for what Jackson wants. If my option was trade him- release him or give him 450 million dollars.. I'd lett him walk.


He's going to be slotted in a few ticks below Burrow. I don't think Burrow is getting $450M


Burrow will take a team friendly deal, Jackson won't.. he saw what Watson got, he wants that.. or more.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 7:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.



I'm sure Ozzie wants to sign him..just not sign him for what Jackson wants. If my option was trade him- release him or give him 450 million dollars.. I'd lett him walk.


He's going to be slotted in a few ticks below Burrow. I don't think Burrow is getting $450M


Burrow will take a team friendly deal, Jackson won't.. he saw what Watson got, he wants that.. or more.


Burrow shouldn't. Those motherfuckers refuse to protect him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13245
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.



I'm sure Ozzie wants to sign him..just not sign him for what Jackson wants. If my option was trade him- release him or give him 450 million dollars.. I'd lett him walk.


He's going to be slotted in a few ticks below Burrow. I don't think Burrow is getting $450M


Burrow will take a team friendly deal, Jackson won't.. he saw what Watson got, he wants that.. or more.


Burrow shouldn't. Those motherfuckers refuse to protect him.
Not true Nas. Cinci signed 3 free agent O-line starters before this past season. Unfortunately for them 3 linemen went down at the end of the season.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
312player wrote:
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.



I'm sure Ozzie wants to sign him..just not sign him for what Jackson wants. If my option was trade him- release him or give him 450 million dollars.. I'd lett him walk.


He's going to be slotted in a few ticks below Burrow. I don't think Burrow is getting $450M


Burrow will take a team friendly deal, Jackson won't.. he saw what Watson got, he wants that.. or more.

Unlike Cincinnati, Baltimore has never bothered to get Lamar actually solid pro WRs and Burrow needs Higgins and his guy Chase paid. At least for their next deals. Of course if the idiot Paul Brown and his useless daughter running the team would have to move the franchise if they all aren’t resigned.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 2:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Todd Monken the new OC for Baltimore, Front office didn't consult Lamar Jackson ( I wouldn't either) pretty much guarantees they won't resign him( smart move)

The reports I’ve heard all said he was involved to some extent. And Baltimore can’t be so stupid as not to sign him. Harbaugh still owes him his job. And the fans would revolt.



I'm sure Ozzie wants to sign him..just not sign him for what Jackson wants. If my option was trade him- release him or give him 450 million dollars.. I'd lett him walk.


He's going to be slotted in a few ticks below Burrow. I don't think Burrow is getting $450M


Burrow will take a team friendly deal, Jackson won't.. he saw what Watson got, he wants that.. or more.

Unlike Cincinnati, Baltimore has never bothered to get Lamar actually solid pro WRs and Burrow needs Higgins and his guy Chase paid. At least for their next deals. Of course if the idiot Paul Brown and his useless daughter running the team would have to move the franchise if they all aren’t resigned.


The Ravens are focused on fielding a great defense. Lamar Jackson and Mark Andrews are supposed to carry the offense. It's ridiculous.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38685
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: :lol: Yeah Dan, youre not a 45 million qb bro.


_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7294
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
he isnt a $45 million man but I dont fault him at all for playing the giants as hard as he can. He knows he isnt getting more than the going rate for the franchise tag.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
he isnt a $45 million man but I dont fault him at all for playing the giants as hard as he can. He knows he isnt getting more than the going rate for the franchise tag.

He has no reason to sign a contract for less than $40 million a year though unless he thinks he will fail.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7294
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Sure he does, if he doesn't want to get franchised and potentially exposed next year. This may be his one and only time to strike it rich with a multi-year longer term deal. He definitely doesn't want to get franchised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:22 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
They used to call him Danny Dimes; now you can call him Danny Grant's. If they franchise him, they'll lose flexibility to sign Barkley or tag Barkley.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
They would be dumb to pay Barkley too. He's got about 1-2 years left on those knees.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
Sure he does, if he doesn't want to get franchised and potentially exposed next year. This may be his one and only time to strike it rich with a multi-year longer term deal. He definitely doesn't want to get franchised.

As I said, unless he thinks he is going to fail next year and the Giants are going to let him walk he shouldn't accept less than $40 million. If the Giants tag him the year after he'll get a combined $71 million for 2 years and then he likely gets a massive deal or he gets $56 million for a year and then is a free agent. That's a total of $42 million a year for 3 years or $35 million for 2 years. For a 3 year contract then why accept anything less than $40 million?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7294
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
one way or the other he is getting paid this year, but the Giants aren't paying him 40 mil a year and he knows that. They will simply franchise him if they can't reach a deal. I think they will though. The negotiations are all part of the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
In hindsight they probably should have picked up his 5th year option, I think the 5th year would have been a bit cheaper than the franchise tag. You probably wanna see one more year with him under Daboll before you fully commit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
one way or the other he is getting paid this year, but the Giants aren't paying him 40 mil a year and he knows that. They will simply franchise him if they can't reach a deal. I think they will though. The negotiations are all part of the game.

The point is why wouldn't he just let them franchise tag him instead of signing a deal for $35 million a season? He gets $3 million extra this year, an equal amount of money after two years, and he either becomes a free agent after year 2 or makes $56 million for year 3 and he wouldn't be locked in to year 4 at $35 million either. The only way it costs him money is if he is terrible.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7294
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Sure he does, if he doesn't want to get franchised and potentially exposed next year. This may be his one and only time to strike it rich with a multi-year longer term deal. He definitely doesn't want to get franchised.

As I said, unless he thinks he is going to fail next year and the Giants are going to let him walk he shouldn't accept less than $40 million. If the Giants tag him the year after he'll get a combined $71 million for 2 years and then he likely gets a massive deal or he gets $56 million for a year and then is a free agent. That's a total of $42 million a year for 3 years or $35 million for 2 years. For a 3 year contract then why accept anything less than $40 million?

Because if that is he demand the Giants will simply franchise him, and then the threat of regression or injury could cost him. Daniel Jones had a good year, I am sure the Giants want him back and I am sure he wants to be back, but they arent signing for $40 mill a year. They are just coming out of salary cap hell and have other important players to pay and roster holes to fill. We will see what happens in the next couple of weeks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7294
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Caller Bob wrote:
In hindsight they probably should have picked up his 5th year option, I think the 5th year would have been a bit cheaper than the franchise tag. You probably wanna see one more year with him under Daboll before you fully commit.

agreed, but it was the right call to decline the option. It was the right call to pick up Dexter Lawrence's option. They need to lock him up, and Andrew Thomas. I'd rather see the Giants sign Jones for a few years and franchise Barkley. Barkley is a really good player but I'd be very worried about injury with him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
Because if that is he demand the Giants will simply franchise him, and then the threat of regression or injury could cost him. Daniel Jones had a good year, I am sure the Giants want him back and I am sure he wants to be back, but they arent signing for $40 mill a year. They are just coming out of salary cap hell and have other important players to pay and roster holes to fill. We will see what happens in the next couple of weeks.
The point is that there isn't much reason for him to take a contract for around the current franchise tag number unless he thinks he is going to blow it next year and get cut.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7294
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
one way or the other he is getting paid this year, but the Giants aren't paying him 40 mil a year and he knows that. They will simply franchise him if they can't reach a deal. I think they will though. The negotiations are all part of the game.

The point is why wouldn't he just let them franchise tag him instead of signing a deal for $35 million a season? He gets $3 million extra this year, an equal amount of money after two years, and he either becomes a free agent after year 2 or makes $56 million for year 3 and he wouldn't be locked in to year 4 at $35 million either. The only way it costs him money is if he is terrible.

Perhaps that is his plan. He is a confident player, and maybe his play is to simply shoot for the moon and accept the tag if it comes to it knowing he could hit the jackpot next year. My guess is that he wants to be a part of what the Giants seem to be doing after a few years of turmoil, and he would want to sign a sensible 3- or 4-year deal. Maybe not. Who knows. What I do know is that in part of a negotiation, of course he is going to aim high and the giants are going to aim low and they will meet somewhere in the middle. the giants own the trump card of using the tag.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7294
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Because if that is he demand the Giants will simply franchise him, and then the threat of regression or injury could cost him. Daniel Jones had a good year, I am sure the Giants want him back and I am sure he wants to be back, but they arent signing for $40 mill a year. They are just coming out of salary cap hell and have other important players to pay and roster holes to fill. We will see what happens in the next couple of weeks.
The point is that there isn't much reason for him to take a contract for around the current franchise tag number unless he thinks he is going to blow it next year and get cut.

Again, there are a couple very good reasons - the threat of injury, the threat of regression on a team without many weapons, and the fact he hasn't historically been that good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: QB landing spots
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
I don't think he fired his agent to ask the Giants for a "sensible 3 or 4 year deal" that would pay him far less than what he would even get with the franchise tag for those 3 years.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 366 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group