It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 11:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 55  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
unless you believe Stroud, Young or Levins or whatever is a stud QB, why do you disagree.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:50 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23881
pizza_Place: Pizanos
veganfan21 wrote:
unless you believe Stroud, Young or Levins or whatever is a stud QB, why do you disagree.

The bears have one of the better running backs in football. Sure, he plays QB, but they have the pieces for a great run game.

Run the ball, play decent defense. You don’t need two high end 1s to be good at defense.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
unless you believe Stroud, Young or Levins or whatever is a stud QB, why do you disagree.

The bears have one of the better running backs in football. Sure, he plays QB, but they have the pieces for a great run game.

Run the ball, play decent defense. You don’t need two high end 1s to be good at defense.


I guess you're more of a draft for need guy. I'm a draft the best player available person.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
If the Bears just trade down to #2, I will be pissed. Leaving this draft without future #1 picks from other teams is grounds for termination.

Yep. If they come out of this deal without a future 1st for next year then they have screwed up in a major way.

The only way that makes any sense is if they trade Fields and take a QB with the #1 pick.


Even then, they need to get multiple first round picks for Fields.

If they found a taker for multiple first-round picks for Fields, it would be hard not to seriously consider taking that, especially if they really like one of the QB's coming out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
If Fields could fetch multiple first round picks, then they wouldn't even consider trading him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57199
I cannot fathom a situation in which they trade both the 1 pick and Fields. But man that would be crazy. They better be 125% sure that Fields and no QB in this draft class is going to be any good. That is quite the gamble to punt on the most important position on the field.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
I cannot fathom a situation in which they trade both the 1 pick and Fields. But man that would be crazy. They better be 125% sure that Fields and no QB in this draft class is going to be any good. That is quite the gamble to punt on the most important position on the field.


That would take a lot of balls. I'm all for it.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31540
pizza_Place: What??
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I cannot fathom a situation in which they trade both the 1 pick and Fields. But man that would be crazy. They better be 125% sure that Fields and no QB in this draft class is going to be any good. That is quite the gamble to punt on the most important position on the field.


That would take a lot of balls. I'm all for it.

Not only are you for it, it was your idea, iirc. Vegan is late on the parallel thinking.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31540
pizza_Place: What??
After all this time, I still haven't heard a good explanation why Fields being able to run like the dickens will make him be able to throw like the dickens.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I cannot fathom a situation in which they trade both the 1 pick and Fields. But man that would be crazy. They better be 125% sure that Fields and no QB in this draft class is going to be any good. That is quite the gamble to punt on the most important position on the field.


That would take a lot of balls. I'm all for it.

Not only are you for it, it was your idea, iirc. Vegan is late on the parallel thinking.


It was. I'm cool with sharing it. Hopefully, Poles is thinking the same thing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Caller Bob wrote:
If Fields could fetch multiple first round picks, then they wouldn't even consider trading him.

Not following you. The Bears wouldn't consider trading Fields for a couple first-rounders?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 3:36 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23881
pizza_Place: Pizanos
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If Fields could fetch multiple first round picks, then they wouldn't even consider trading him.

Not following you. The Bears wouldn't consider trading Fields for a couple first-rounders?

He’s saying Fields isn’t good enough to warrant multiple firsts.

And if he were, you wouldn’t want to trade him.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 3:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If Fields could fetch multiple first round picks, then they wouldn't even consider trading him.

Not following you. The Bears wouldn't consider trading Fields for a couple first-rounders?


Either he's saying he would be too good to trade or they would do it without thinking. I wasn't sure either.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If Fields could fetch multiple first round picks, then they wouldn't even consider trading him.

Not following you. The Bears wouldn't consider trading Fields for a couple first-rounders?


If Fields could truly fetch multiple first rounders it means he's an established top 5-7 QB and they wouldn't even think about trading him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Caller Bob wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If Fields could fetch multiple first round picks, then they wouldn't even consider trading him.

Not following you. The Bears wouldn't consider trading Fields for a couple first-rounders?


If Fields could truly fetch multiple first rounders it means he's an established top 5-7 QB and they wouldn't even think about trading him.

Nah, it would mean you have a target team caught up in “running QB mania”. I don’t think any sane QB is giving up two first rounders for Fields but all it takes is one maniac who over-values running ability in their QB. If the Bears find that maniac they’d be crazy not to consider it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
QB with three years of rookie contract control who has proven quite a bit in the league is worth more than you guys think. People will pay two first round picks for the chance to draft Young/stroud/levis

my bottom line for Fields would be 3 first rounders, because I don't want to trade him

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
LOL don’t worry I think your safe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Nas wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I cannot fathom a situation in which they trade both the 1 pick and Fields. But man that would be crazy. They better be 125% sure that Fields and no QB in this draft class is going to be any good. That is quite the gamble to punt on the most important position on the field.


That would take a lot of balls. I'm all for it.

Not only are you for it, it was your idea, iirc. Vegan is late on the parallel thinking.


It was. I'm cool with sharing it. Hopefully, Poles is thinking the same thing.


I like the reasoning. Trade Fields to someone like LV, who will probably suck, for their #1 over the next three years. Then trade the #1 to Indy for their next two #1. If everything really cuts your way, then trade #4 to the Panthers for their next two #1.

Get some hump like Wentz to qb as a tank for next year.

You would have four first round picks next year, two of them most likely in the top 10. You also have another two #1, to ensure you get no worse than Maye but possibly Williams. Now, if you tank well enough and are in the first two spots next year so you don't have to use draft capital to trade, you have 6 first round picks in two drafts with one of them being a HIGHLY touted QB...and two more #1 the following year.

That's failure proof at that point.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
man of few opinions wrote:
LOL don’t worry I think your safe


last guy who lol at me in trade talks was Caller Bob when I said Cease and Jimenez for Quintana several months before it happened

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I cannot fathom a situation in which they trade both the 1 pick and Fields. But man that would be crazy. They better be 125% sure that Fields and no QB in this draft class is going to be any good. That is quite the gamble to punt on the most important position on the field.


That would take a lot of balls. I'm all for it.

Not only are you for it, it was your idea, iirc. Vegan is late on the parallel thinking.


It was. I'm cool with sharing it. Hopefully, Poles is thinking the same thing.


I like the reasoning. Trade Fields to someone like LV, who will probably suck, for their #1 over the next three years. Then trade the #1 to Indy for their next two #1. If everything really cuts your way, then trade #4 to the Panthers for their next two #1.

Get some hump like Wentz to qb as a tank for next year.

You would have four first round picks next year, two of them most likely in the top 10. You also have another two #1, to ensure you get no worse than Maye but possibly Williams. Now, if you tank well enough and are in the first two spots next year so you don't have to use draft capital to trade, you have 6 first round picks in two drafts with one of them being a HIGHLY touted QB...and two more #1 the following year.

That's failure proof at that point.


You could possibly get Williams and Harrison in a same draft

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
good dolphin wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
LOL don’t worry I think your safe


last guy who lol at me in trade talks was Caller Bob when I said Cease and Jimenez for Quintana several months before it happened

Sick burn.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
man of few opinions wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
LOL don’t worry I think your safe


last guy who lol at me in trade talks was Caller Bob when I said Cease and Jimenez for Quintana several months before it happened

Sick burn.


Image

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2023 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5000
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
good dolphin wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
LOL don’t worry I think your safe


last guy who lol at me in trade talks was Caller Bob when I said Cease and Jimenez for Quintana several months before it happened





Are you predicting the Bears will trade Fields this year before/during the draft? If not then this response makes no sense..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2023 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5000
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nardi wrote:
After all this time, I still haven't heard a good explanation why Fields being able to run like the dickens will make him be able to throw like the dickens.




Well, the idea would be that defenses would have to dedicate extra resources to his ability to run that would thin them in other areas. And it’s reasonable to admit that Fields doesn’t have elite talent anywhere around him and if one or two of those types of players were added, the results could be drastically improved.


I’d like to make this point by using Justin’s numbers from year 1 to year 2 because it shows that despite having almost identical talent around him he was able to show progress throwing the ball..


His TD to INT’s went from 7/10 to 17/11 in year two.. this despite throwing the ball less per start in year 2 (27 Att. per game under Nagy for a total of 270 att to 21.2 under Getsy for a total of 318). His TD% also doubled going from 2.6 to 5.3 (Patrick Mahomes has had two full years as a starter where his was 5.4 and 5.6 respectively)


His rating also jumped up a bit over 10 points from year 1 to year 2 as well as a small increase in his completion %.


And again, I think this is significant because the talent around him didn’t really improve at all and could even be argued that it was downgraded slightly by losing Allen at WR and Daniels on the line.. and yet, Fields still showed progression passing from year 1 to year 2.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2023 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14911
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Nardi wrote:
After all this time, I still haven't heard a good explanation why Fields being able to run like the dickens will make him be able to throw like the dickens.


It should be your eyes and brain that tells that to you. His arm is very strong. He can make all of the throws including throwing on the run.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2023 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
He is so elite and capable that he should retire this offseason to ensure he enters the HOF without further damage to his body.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2023 7:16 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23881
pizza_Place: Pizanos
This page has me more convinced than ever that he’s ultra mobile Jay Cutler.

We’re back to saying he’ll be good because of arm strength and blaming his failures on everybody around him.

Image

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2023 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5000
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This page has me more convinced than ever that he’s ultra mobile Jay Cutler.

We’re back to saying he’ll be good because of arm strength and blaming his failures on everybody around him.





Odd take considering we’re not talking about a veteran QB on his 2nd team headed into his 8th season. We’re talking about a guy headed into his 3rd year who is still developing. It’s also a stretch to say pointing out the lack of talent on the Bears is equivalent to excusing all of his poor play.



Not sure if your post is directed at me or not, if it is it’s wildly inaccurate because I’m in no way shape or form excusing all of Justin’s poor play by blaming everyone else -he certainly has his own shortcomings.


That said, I at least used some data to make my point that he’s improved from year 1 to year 2 as a passer with virtually no changes around him outside of the coaching. Not to mention, I was answering a very specific question another poster asked -not making excuses. Football is the ultimate team sport, so it would make sense that if real legit talent is added around him, his opportunities to improve even more increase, no?

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14911
pizza_Place: Grazianos
veganfan21 wrote:
He is so elite and capable that he should retire this offseason to ensure he enters the HOF without further damage to his body.


He will be the best quarterback in the division next season when given a good offensive line and wide receivers to work with. He has generational quarterback talent. I'm more worried about the ability of the Bear's offensive coordinator to program the offense around his terrific assets.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's


Poles controls the offseason? That's hilarious. His last two trades he got absolutely swindled on.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 55  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group