It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 4:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4902 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 164  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 11:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Fields has some exceptional talents and if they choose to keep him, that coaching staff should be hard at work developing a new offense that truly takes advantage of his talents. This guy is not conventional and the Bears need to invent some schemes that suit him, he isn’t going to be molded into something a lot of people wish he was. If they decide he is the guy, they need to come up with something outside the box to take advantage of it.

He could pass in college. Either learn to pass in the NFL or switch to running back.


Hilarious.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
The Hawk wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Who says that Fields isn't able to throw?
Anyone who has ever watched a Bears game.


Rubbish. So, the guy quarterbacking the Ohio State Buckeyes and had excellent statistics to show for it in throwing the ball was someone else? I saw this same qb make some very good throws along with some bad ones. For a team which had a terrible offensive line and weak receiving for the entire season.

Lots of great college quarterbacks can't figure out how to throw it well in the NFL.

If it wasn't for his running he would be on the way to being cut.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
He had all day to throw and wide open receivers at Ohio State. He didn’t need to process defenses as quickly.

At the most elite levels of sports, only a tiny percentage of skill separates the the great from the good or the mediocre. Just as Fields has that special something in running ability, to this point it is evident that he doesn’t have it with passing. And just as you can’t reasonably expect certain QBs to run like Fields, you can’t assume Fields will eventually pass like Mahomes or Burrow.

And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6856
Jaw Breaker wrote:
He had all day to throw and wide open receivers at Ohio State. He didn’t need to process defenses as quickly.

At the most elite levels of sports, only a tiny percentage of skill separates the the great from the good or the mediocre. Just as Fields has that special something in running ability, to this point it is evident that he doesn’t have it with passing. And just as you can’t reasonably expect certain QBs to run like Fields, you can’t assume Fields will eventually pass like Mahomes or Burrow.

And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.


Fields will never pass like Mahones or Burrow and they will never run like Fields. The question is if you rather have a L.Jackson type QB or roll the dice in the draft and pick up a guy with the comp of Mahones but smaller. Personally, I would trade Fields and draft a QB. I do not like scrambling to be my QB's number 1 skill. Their careers are short and they have never won their team a Super Bowl.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Jaw Breaker wrote:
And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.




Cutler was 3 seasons in with a 4000 plus yard season under his belt before the Bears got ahold of him. Fields is still developing as a prospect and hasn’t had much around him to help with that development -not to mention he spent his 1st season with a head coach that had already proven he had no idea what he was doing. Cutler was a full 7 years into his career when people were still making those excuses, it’s not at all a good or fair comparison imo


Almost every star QB needs a supporting cast, Burrow most likely isn’t all that good without Higgins, Chase, and Mixon.. Hurts looked completely different once the Eagles got guys like AJ Brown. Allen took big steps after Diggs landed there..


You can hate it all you want, but most QB’s need a supporting cast and good coaching to maximize their potential. Hell, most players in the NFL need that. I will never understand people that dismiss this criticism as nothing more than an excuse.. especially when any sane person should be able to agree that the Bears have very little top tier talent on the offensive side of the ball. I mean, it’s not a lie to say the Bears don’t have much.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
NME wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.




Cutler was 3 seasons in with a 4000 plus yard season under his belt before the Bears got ahold of him. Fields is still developing as a prospect and hasn’t had much around him to help with that development -not to mention he spent his 1st season with a head coach that had already proven he had no idea what he was doing. Cutler was a full 7 years into his career when people were still making those excuses, it’s not at all a good or fair comparison imo


Almost every star QB needs a supporting cast, Burrow most likely isn’t all that good without Higgins, Chase, and Mixon.. Hurts looked completely different once the Eagles got guys like AJ Brown. Allen took big steps after Diggs landed there..


You can hate it all you want, but most QB’s need a supporting cast and good coaching to maximize their potential. Hell, most players in the NFL need that. I will never understand people that dismiss this criticism as nothing more than an excuse.. especially when any sane person should be able to agree that the Bears have very little top tier talent on the offensive side of the ball. I mean, it’s not a lie to say the Bears don’t have much.


Yup.

Aaron Rodgers was a different QB without Davante Adams

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6304
pizza_Place: Frozen
Fumbles

28 - Fields in 27 games
95 - Cutler in 153 games
159 - if Fields plays 153 games

166 - Brett Favre in 302 games
313 - if Fields plays 302 games


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
vitoscotti wrote:
Fumbles

28 - Fields in 27 games
95 - Cutler in 153 games
159 - if Fields plays 153 games

166 - Brett Favre in 302 games
313 - if Fields plays 302 games





Josh Allen has 52 fumbles in roughly 70 starts.. what’s your point..?



And I doubt Fields continues to fumble at a 1 for 1 rate for his entire career.. especially if he becomes more of a passer than a runner (which he was in college)

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Jaw Breaker wrote:
He had all day to throw and wide open receivers at Ohio State. He didn’t need to process defenses as quickly.

At the most elite levels of sports, only a tiny percentage of skill separates the the great from the good or the mediocre. Just as Fields has that special something in running ability, to this point it is evident that he doesn’t have it with passing. And just as you can’t reasonably expect certain QBs to run like Fields, you can’t assume Fields will eventually pass like Mahomes or Burrow.

And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.


Rubbish. No receivers worth a crap. A bunch of never were offensive linemen. Cutler was in no way similar to Fields and never had as bad an offensive line and receivers.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juiced wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
He had all day to throw and wide open receivers at Ohio State. He didn’t need to process defenses as quickly.

At the most elite levels of sports, only a tiny percentage of skill separates the the great from the good or the mediocre. Just as Fields has that special something in running ability, to this point it is evident that he doesn’t have it with passing. And just as you can’t reasonably expect certain QBs to run like Fields, you can’t assume Fields will eventually pass like Mahomes or Burrow.

And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.


Fields will never pass like Mahones or Burrow and they will never run like Fields. The question is if you rather have a L.Jackson type QB or roll the dice in the draft and pick up a guy with the comp of Mahones but smaller. Personally, I would trade Fields and draft a QB. I do not like scrambling to be my QB's number 1 skill. Their careers are short and they have never won their team a Super Bowl.


The problem is that this year's QBs don't appear to wow anyone, unlike next year's class.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6304
pizza_Place: Frozen
Everyone hopes Fields improves his reading of defenses, passing, and cutting back on his 1 fumble a game average. He could stall in improvement or even get worse in all three. Fellow fumbler Daunte Culpepper maintained his 1 fumble a game average through his long career


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 5:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Black QBs fumble says vito. Shocking

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31651
pizza_Place: What??
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Black QBs fumble says vito. Shocking

Be pretty funny if they actually did.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
NME wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.




Cutler was 3 seasons in with a 4000 plus yard season under his belt before the Bears got ahold of him. Fields is still developing as a prospect and hasn’t had much around him to help with that development -not to mention he spent his 1st season with a head coach that had already proven he had no idea what he was doing. Cutler was a full 7 years into his career when people were still making those excuses, it’s not at all a good or fair comparison imo


Almost every star QB needs a supporting cast, Burrow most likely isn’t all that good without Higgins, Chase, and Mixon.. Hurts looked completely different once the Eagles got guys like AJ Brown. Allen took big steps after Diggs landed there..


You can hate it all you want, but most QB’s need a supporting cast and good coaching to maximize their potential. Hell, most players in the NFL need that. I will never understand people that dismiss this criticism as nothing more than an excuse.. especially when any sane person should be able to agree that the Bears have very little top tier talent on the offensive side of the ball. I mean, it’s not a lie to say the Bears don’t have much.


Great Post! 8)

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 5:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6304
pizza_Place: Frozen
Especially not being Poles pick his prospect status will wind down early in the coming season. Then he's on the hot seat and have to produce no matter the surrounding talent. This will be the last year he's handed the starting job on a silver platter solely on his unmet potential high ceiling. He'll be under even more intense pressure and scrutiny. If they load up the offensive line and wide receivers and he still stinks the year could get ugly for him. Hopefully he beats the odds and has a terrific passing year and is the QB of the Bears future and not another wasted #1 pick..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 6:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6304
pizza_Place: Frozen
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Black QBs fumble says vito. Shocking


You've posted an unbelievable 97794 times!!! If you took a step each time you posted that would convert to 49 miles!!! That would be like walking from Chicago to Kenosha, WI!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Juiced wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
He had all day to throw and wide open receivers at Ohio State. He didn’t need to process defenses as quickly.

At the most elite levels of sports, only a tiny percentage of skill separates the the great from the good or the mediocre. Just as Fields has that special something in running ability, to this point it is evident that he doesn’t have it with passing. And just as you can’t reasonably expect certain QBs to run like Fields, you can’t assume Fields will eventually pass like Mahomes or Burrow.

And the “supporting cast” argument is the same thing we went through with Cutler…until he was given a good supporting cast and still sucked.


Fields will never pass like Mahones or Burrow and they will never run like Fields. The question is if you rather have a L.Jackson type QB or roll the dice in the draft and pick up a guy with the comp of Mahones but smaller. Personally, I would trade Fields and draft a QB. I do not like scrambling to be my QB's number 1 skill. Their careers are short and they have never won their team a Super Bowl.


Where do you get your football information from? You make it appear that you think a dice roll can net you a Patrick Mahomes. I say that Mahomes greatness is mainly due to his mobility and ability to make tacklers miss more than anything else. And there is no one in college this year who is close to the ability of Mahomes.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The Hawk wrote:
And there is no one in college this year who is close to the ability of Mahomes.




Caleb Williams.. but he’s not expected to enter the draft until next year.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
next year is really a bumper crop of QB talent if they all come out

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
plenty of people have mentioned it but Fields on his best day will be Lamar Jackson. And I don't think Lamar's going to ever take the Ravens to a super bowl winner. Might have to think about starting over at QB.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 1:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Fields had better WR this year than Lamar Jackson has had in his career. Lamar Jackson is the Ravens offense. For better or worse.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 1:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
City of Fools wrote:
plenty of people have mentioned it but Fields on his best day will be Lamar Jackson. And I don't think Lamar's going to ever take the Ravens to a super bowl winner. Might have to think about starting over at QB.


I think Justin Fields has a very high upside as a NFL passer, higher than what we have seen from Lamar Jackson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
BD wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
plenty of people have mentioned it but Fields on his best day will be Lamar Jackson. And I don't think Lamar's going to ever take the Ravens to a super bowl winner. Might have to think about starting over at QB.


I think Justin Fields has a very high upside as a NFL passer, higher than what we have seen from Lamar Jackson.

Fields Will new sniff the stats Jackson had in 2019.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Nas wrote:
Fields had better WR this year than Lamar Jackson has had in his career. Lamar Jackson is the Ravens offense. For better or worse.


?? Fields was the only offense the bears had last year too. i never left a season thinking "well that was mostly on everyone else but the quarterback". he did have plenty of rookie moments but his highlights were the best in the league. we would have been 0-17 without him.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
BD wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
plenty of people have mentioned it but Fields on his best day will be Lamar Jackson. And I don't think Lamar's going to ever take the Ravens to a super bowl winner. Might have to think about starting over at QB.


I think Justin Fields has a very high upside as a NFL passer, higher than what we have seen from Lamar Jackson.

Fields Will new sniff the stats Jackson had in 2019.


What did you sniff before typing that post. :D

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
veganfan21 wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
BD wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
plenty of people have mentioned it but Fields on his best day will be Lamar Jackson. And I don't think Lamar's going to ever take the Ravens to a super bowl winner. Might have to think about starting over at QB.


I think Justin Fields has a very high upside as a NFL passer, higher than what we have seen from Lamar Jackson.

Fields Will new sniff the stats Jackson had in 2019.


What did you sniff before typing that post. :D

:drunken: standing line to board a flight... :oops:

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2023 6:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
BD wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
plenty of people have mentioned it but Fields on his best day will be Lamar Jackson. And I don't think Lamar's going to ever take the Ravens to a super bowl winner. Might have to think about starting over at QB.


I think Justin Fields has a very high upside as a NFL passer, higher than what we have seen from Lamar Jackson.

Fields Will new sniff the stats Jackson had in 2019.


Neither will lamar

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
IkeSouth wrote:
we would have been 0-17 without him.


That’s quite the endorsement… he won three games! And let’s look at Fields in those three wins:

8/17 for 121 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT, 85.7
8/17 for 106 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT, 27.7
13/21 for 179 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT, 85.2

And Mooney was playing in those first two wins.

I think Poles is going to shock everyone (especially at WSCR) and draft a QB.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jaw Breaker wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
we would have been 0-17 without him.


That’s quite the endorsement… he won three games! And let’s look at Fields in those three wins:

8/17 for 121 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT, 85.7
8/17 for 106 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT, 27.7
13/21 for 179 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT, 85.2

And Mooney was playing in those first two wins.

I think Poles is going to shock everyone (especially at WSCR) and draft a QB.


I don't think there was a trade market for him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Jaw Breaker wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
we would have been 0-17 without him.


That’s quite the endorsement… he won three games! And let’s look at Fields in those three wins:

8/17 for 121 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT, 85.7
8/17 for 106 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT, 27.7
13/21 for 179 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT, 85.2

And Mooney was playing in those first two wins.

I think Poles is going to shock everyone (especially at WSCR) and draft a QB.


Stats don't say shit compared to what your eyes see. Fields is great. But I would still draft a QB because why the hell not.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4902 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 164  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group