It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 12:22 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
Franky T wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This is pretty simple really.



Do you see Mark Murphy publicly saying the Packers are anxious? No you do not. The Jets owner is publicly saying the Jets are in a hurry to get the deal done. GB is not.

There's nothing left to debate here.

You don't think GB has any urgency in knowing if they will have $60 million of cap space tied up in one player or if they can use that elsewhere? One would think they'd want to know that sooner than later.

There is nothing they can use elsewhere, they know the cap ramifications. They will either take a $41 million cap hit this year, which $32 milllion is already on the cap so it would add $9 million more which leaves them roughly $12 Million below the cap. Or take a $26 million hit this year and $15 next year.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
veganfan21 wrote:
Franky T wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This is pretty simple really.



Do you see Mark Murphy publicly saying the Packers are anxious? No you do not. The Jets owner is publicly saying the Jets are in a hurry to get the deal done. GB is not.

There's nothing left to debate here.

You don't think GB has any urgency in knowing if they will have $60 million of cap space tied up in one player or if they can use that elsewhere? One would think they'd want to know that sooner than later.


You forget that they're run by a dumbass in Gute. He's not as savvy as you presume him to be. The last four years attest to that.

Russ Ball handles all things cap for the Pack.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Franky T wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This is pretty simple really.



Do you see Mark Murphy publicly saying the Packers are anxious? No you do not. The Jets owner is publicly saying the Jets are in a hurry to get the deal done. GB is not.

There's nothing left to debate here.

You don't think GB has any urgency in knowing if they will have $60 million of cap space tied up in one player or if they can use that elsewhere? One would think they'd want to know that sooner than later.

I don't think GB has a lot of urgency. They haven't expressed any. The Jets have.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Because GB has no leverage and no reason to be urgent. They can let this play out until September 7th if they want.


Meanwhile the Jets, who evidently have such a sense of urgency and are in this great big hurry, have not made the trade yet. Talk about illogical jibberish....

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Because GB has no leverage and no reason to be urgent. They can let this play out until September 7th if they want.


Meanwhile the Jets, who evidently have such a sense of urgency and are in this great big hurry, have not made the trade yet. Talk about illogical jibberish....

https://www.nfl.com/news/jets-owner-woo ... timistic-a

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The deal will get done in my opinion, but the pressure is clearly on the Jets if they really want him. If I'm the Packers I'm sitting back waiting for the Jets. One thing is for sure - he Jets management talks too much. They need to shut up and try to get a deal done or just move in another direction before the draft.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
man of few opinions wrote:
The deal will get done in my opinion, but the pressure is clearly on the Jets if they really want him. If I'm the Packers I'm sitting back waiting for the Jets. One thing is for sure - he Jets management talks too much. They need to shut up and try to get a deal done or just move in another direction before the draft.

My guess is Joe Douglas isn't too happy with Woody

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
The deal will get done in my opinion, but the pressure is clearly on the Jets if they really want him. If I'm the Packers I'm sitting back waiting for the Jets. One thing is for sure - he Jets management talks too much. They need to shut up and try to get a deal done or just move in another direction before the draft.


Okay, and how would you describe the Packers' predicament if the Jets move on as you suggest?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
I'd say the Packers have a HOF QB under contract, and the Jets have Zack Wilson and an angry fan base they have gotten all fired up without having a deal done. Personally id go all in on Lamar if I were the Jets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
man of few opinions wrote:
I'd say the Packers have a HOF QB under contract, and the Jets have Zack Wilson and an angry fan base they have gotten all fired up without having a deal done. Personally id go all in on Lamar if I were the Jets.

Frankly I've never understood why they didn't in the first place. A young crazy exciting team, they'd own New York for 6-8 years and Woody could be the man.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Regular Reader wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
I'd say the Packers have a HOF QB under contract, and the Jets have Zack Wilson and an angry fan base they have gotten all fired up without having a deal done. Personally id go all in on Lamar if I were the Jets.

Frankly I've never understood why they didn't in the first place. A young crazy exciting team, they'd own New York for 6-8 years and Woody could be the man.

completely agree. I've never understood why a young team like the jets would want a once great but clearly declining diva like Rodgers coming in and fucking up the young exciting vibe that team could have with Lamar. And im not a huge fan of the running QB philosophy but in this case, with that team, it seems like a fit, more so than decrepit old Rodgers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37811
Location: ...
the jets defense is worthy of an explosive offense. lamar could definitely help with that more than rodgers at this point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Maybe the recent Lamar trade demand is the reason the Packers-Jets deal is stalled?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Maybe they think Lamar is a bitch and his best season is behind him, the Jets have good WRs, they need a QB that throw accurately from the pocket..he ain't it.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
I'd say the Packers have a HOF QB under contract, and the Jets have Zack Wilson and an angry fan base they have gotten all fired up without having a deal done. Personally id go all in on Lamar if I were the Jets.


You're disregarding Jordan Love, who's sat for three years because Gute incompetently drafted him when 1) there was no need and 2) there was no plan for rolling him out. I mean, why would there be a plan anyway when your starter is MVP and just took you to the championship game. Anyway, I digress.

So Love wants to start after three years of clipboard management or he wants out. Per your plan you bring back Rodgers and now you've got two QBs who don't want to be there. Did Gute steal your log in? :lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
veganfan21 wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
I'd say the Packers have a HOF QB under contract, and the Jets have Zack Wilson and an angry fan base they have gotten all fired up without having a deal done. Personally id go all in on Lamar if I were the Jets.


You're disregarding Jordan Love, who's sat for three years because Gute incompetently drafted him when 1) there was no need and 2) there was no plan for rolling him out. I mean, why would there be a plan anyway when your starter is MVP and just took you to the championship game. Anyway, I digress.

So Love wants to start after three years of clipboard management or he wants out. Per your plan you bring back Rodgers and now you've got two QBs who don't want to be there. Did Gute steal your log in? :lol:

Did you say this when they drafted Rodgers?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Yeah the Packers have followed the exact same strategy as the Favre/Rodgers transition. Unlikely that Love is HoF quality, but it worked out well last time.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
It is NOT an apples to apples thing, folks.

State of the Pack Prior to Rodgers:


2003: lose in the divisional round
2004: lose in the wildcard round and draft Rodgers

Bottom Line: Stagnant team with the arrow pointing sideways.

State of the Pack Prior to Love


2019: lose in title game and draft Love
2020: lose in title game

Bottom line: trending up, need a few pieces to get over the hump

It makes sense to draft QB in the first round in the 2000s based on the above. It does not make sense to spend two picks on QB in 2020 based on the above.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
All of that is well and good, but the team who has been publicly courting Aaron Rodgers amd planning the upcoming season under the false assumption that the packers were going to give Rodgers away to them simply because Rodgers wanted to go there, and don’t appear to have any plan B at QB are under more pressure than the team with two qbs. That doesn’t make what the packers are doing with their team brilliant or smart, it just means the jets have painted themselves into a corner. The team without the QB is the one going “oh shit”, not the packers. Eventually a deal will be made anyway, and none of this will matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2023 8:28 pm
Posts: 12
pizza_Place: Google Pizza
The decision of whether or not to trade Aaron Rodgers is a difficult one for the Green Bay Packers. On the one hand, Rodgers is one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL and has led the Packers to a Super Bowl victory. On the other hand, Rodgers has expressed his desire to leave the team, and the Packers may be able to get a significant haul of draft picks in return for him.

There are pros and cons to both keeping Rodgers and trading him. If the Packers keep Rodgers, they will have a top-tier quarterback who gives them a chance to win the Super Bowl every year. However, Rodgers has also made it clear that he is unhappy with the way the team is being run, and he may not be willing to stay long-term. If the Packers trade Rodgers, they will get a significant haul of draft picks that they can use to rebuild the team. However, they will also lose a top-tier quarterback and will have to find a new way to win games.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to trade Aaron Rodgers is a decision that the Packers will have to make based on their own assessment of the situation. There is no right or wrong answer, and both options have pros and cons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
man of few opinions wrote:
All of that is well and good, but the team who has been publicly courting Aaron Rodgers amd planning the upcoming season under the false assumption that the packers were going to give Rodgers away to them simply because Rodgers wanted to go there, and don’t appear to have any plan B at QB are under more pressure than the team with two qbs. That doesn’t make what the packers are doing with their team brilliant or smart, it just means the jets have painted themselves into a corner. The team without the QB is the one going “oh shit”, not the packers. Eventually a deal will be made anyway, and none of this will matter.

Agreed, this deal is getting done one or the other. Way too many people would lose their jobs if not.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31559
pizza_Place: What??
Poor Jets. I hope somebody over there comes to their senses.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
And in the middle of it all is Aaron Rodgers, running his mouth on Pat McAfee like a little bitch making everything worse for both teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I appreciate your analysis but it doesn't follow that the team that wants Rodgers is under more pressure than, as you put it, "the team with two QBs." Again, the problem isn't the mere quantity of QBs on GB it's that they cannot coexist with one another: it's a zero sum game. Actually, it's not even that because since you've botched the Rodgers exit (Gute's weak explanation this week was Krause-like, straight up weasel) and then doubled down on that error by speaking about him in the past tense. So now there's no choice BUT to get rid of him, and the Jets/league know that. The Jets can move on without Rodgers and earn the wrath of a fan base. But the Packers absolutely have to jettison Rodgers, they've already said goodbye. They can thank Gute for orchestrating this shitsow.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
The Jets can move on without Rodgers

No they can't. Stop being obtuse and literally just listen to the fucking owner of the Jets and stop pretending you know more about this than he does :lol: :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
What he said doesn't change anything: the Pack must make the deal. They're already discussing compensation publicly and speaking about Rodgers in the past tense. By doing that they lose leverage because they're painted into a corner now.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The Jets have no quality QB and have put all of their eggs in one basket this off-season, and have ownership telling them they better win now, and they face another season with Zach Wilson in a tough unforgiving market. The Packers have a QB, play in a market that worships them and Aaron Rodgers no matter what happens.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30292
Vegan sounds like the most disgruntled Packers fan I have ever met. :lol:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Hawg Ass wrote:
Vegan sounds like the most disgruntled Packers fan I have ever met. :lol:

He so loves Rodgers and so hates Gute that he is incapable of acknowledging that it’s possible the Packers know what they’re doing. It’s like reading an old article by Jay Mariotti on the White Sox.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 10:28 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Stop being obtuse and literally just listen to the fucking owner of the Jets and stop pretending you know more about this than he does
If there is one thing Jets ownership and management has shown over the years, its that they are competent and always make timely moves to improve their football team.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group