It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:30 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:52 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Florio is on the Score right now arguing that LaFleur, "quietly one of the best coaches in the NFL," has won a lot of games in spite of Aaron Rodgers (and the tension between Roders and Gute) rather than because of Aaron Rodgers. :lol:


Florio has a lot of bad thoughts.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16773
pizza_Place: Salerno's
I don't get the Florio-LaFleur bromance. LaFleur's done fuck-all without Rodgers at this point. Maybe Florio trying to get out in front in case LaFleur still wins the North without Rodgers. Not that winning the NFC North this coming season would be all that--you just have to be better than Jared Goff, a Bears QB with 6 wins total over 2 seasons and maybe 1 win in the division for Fields? and on-his-way-out and missing his go-to receivers Capt Kirk.

Could just be Florio trolling Rodgers. Florio's quite proud of some Rodgers throw-away presser quote where Rodgers says not to listen to anything Florio says.


Last edited by Hussra on Tue May 02, 2023 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30287
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Florio is on the Score right now arguing that LaFleur, "quietly one of the best coaches in the NFL," has won a lot of games in spite of Aaron Rodgers (and the tension between Roders and Gute) rather than because of Aaron Rodgers. :lol:


Florio has a lot of bad thoughts.

He does but I do believe he is right that the tension was always between Gute and Rodgers. LaFleur as a coach, still to be determined but about to find out.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:02 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Florio is on the Score right now arguing that LaFleur, "quietly one of the best coaches in the NFL," has won a lot of games in spite of Aaron Rodgers (and the tension between Roders and Gute) rather than because of Aaron Rodgers. :lol:


Florio has a lot of bad thoughts.

He does but I do believe he is right that the tension was always between Gute and Rodgers. LaFleur as a coach, still to be determined but about to find out.


It appeared that Rodgers wasn't a fan of LaFloor's conservative approach. I know great competitors can come off as assholes in the middle of a competition, but I didn't think Rodgers had respect for his coach. Will LaFloor focus on winning more than looking pretty on the sidelines?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
:lol: LaFloor


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Don't forget that LaFleur also had to deal with having an elite receiver in Adams and how much it hurt the offense to have him there.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16773
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Nas wrote:
It appeared that Rodgers wasn't a fan of LaFloor's conservative approach. I know great competitors can come off as assholes in the middle of a competition, but I didn't think Rodgers had respect for his coach. Will LaFloor focus on winning more than looking pretty on the sidelines?



So you think LaFleur's good-looking? Kinda sus


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:08 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Caller Bob wrote:
:lol: LaFloor


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:09 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Don't forget that LaFleur also had to deal with having an elite receiver in Adams and how much it hurt the offense to have him there.


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:11 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hussra wrote:
Nas wrote:
It appeared that Rodgers wasn't a fan of LaFloor's conservative approach. I know great competitors can come off as assholes in the middle of a competition, but I didn't think Rodgers had respect for his coach. Will LaFloor focus on winning more than looking pretty on the sidelines?



So you think LaFleur's good-looking? Kinda sus


I can't recall seeing a more metrosexual head coach than him. Coaches don't generally care about their appearance.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:14 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Hussra wrote:
Nas wrote:
It appeared that Rodgers wasn't a fan of LaFloor's conservative approach. I know great competitors can come off as assholes in the middle of a competition, but I didn't think Rodgers had respect for his coach. Will LaFloor focus on winning more than looking pretty on the sidelines?



So you think LaFleur's good-looking? Kinda sus


I can't recall seeing a more metrosexual head coach than him. Coaches don't generally care about their appearance.


Grooming definitely appears to be one of LaFloor's main interests!

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:40 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Hawg Ass wrote:
When he plays well this year, 24 will be ripped up and a new contract will be in play.
Right, a new contract for him to play on the Texans :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16773
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Nas wrote:
Hussra wrote:
Nas wrote:
It appeared that Rodgers wasn't a fan of LaFloor's conservative approach. I know great competitors can come off as assholes in the middle of a competition, but I didn't think Rodgers had respect for his coach. Will LaFloor focus on winning more than looking pretty on the sidelines?



So you think LaFleur's good-looking? Kinda sus


I can't recall seeing a more metrosexual head coach than him. Coaches don't generally care about their appearance.



dang, you nailed it:

Image

NAS knows good-looking dudes

Matt Patricia shut out? You'd think the best coaches, Belichick or Mike McCarthy , would be the most attractive to chicks, based on how chicks seem to go about these things. This Bet.Us Kramer chick has a slightly different list, no LaFleur or even LaFloor. Maybe she knows what's up and that LeFleur's a LeFraud.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 1:18 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
When he plays well this year, 24 will be ripped up and a new contract will be in play.
Right, a new contract for him to play on the Texans :lol:


:lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
That contract for Love is pretty glaring, One can take away 2 things..

1. Front office has very little confidence in Love.
2. Love has no confidence in himself.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
312player wrote:
That contract for Love is pretty glaring, One can take away 2 things..

1. Front office has very little confidence in Love.
2. Love has no confidence in himself.

It depends on what the incentives are. If they’re easy to make then he will make $2.3M more than he would have with the 5th year option.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
That contract for Love is pretty glaring, One can take away 2 things..

1. Front office has very little confidence in Love.
2. Love has no confidence in himself.

It depends on what the incentives are. If they’re easy to make then he will make $2.3M more than he would have with the 5th year option.


Isn't it 7 million less guaranteed? .. and if they believed in him why not ink a 3 year 40 mill deal..he'd sign it. They know he sucks, he knows he sucks.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
312player wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
That contract for Love is pretty glaring, One can take away 2 things..

1. Front office has very little confidence in Love.
2. Love has no confidence in himself.

It depends on what the incentives are. If they’re easy to make then he will make $2.3M more than he would have with the 5th year option.


Isn't it 7 million less guaranteed? .. and if they believed in him why not ink a 3 year 40 mill deal..he'd sign it. They know he sucks, he knows he sucks.

They are clearly hedging their bets but that’s both smart and understandable. If he plays well, everyone wins.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:49 pm
Posts: 870
pizza_Place: World Famous, Lord Stanley's, DeKalb Rock City
Hussra wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hussra wrote:
Nas wrote:
It appeared that Rodgers wasn't a fan of LaFloor's conservative approach. I know great competitors can come off as assholes in the middle of a competition, but I didn't think Rodgers had respect for his coach. Will LaFloor focus on winning more than looking pretty on the sidelines?



So you think LaFleur's good-looking? Kinda sus


I can't recall seeing a more metrosexual head coach than him. Coaches don't generally care about their appearance.



dang, you nailed it:

Image

NAS knows good-looking dudes

Matt Patricia shut out? You'd think the best coaches, Belichick or Mike McCarthy , would be the most attractive to chicks, based on how chicks seem to go about these things. This Bet.Us Kramer chick has a slightly different list, no LaFleur or even LaFloor. Maybe she knows what's up and that LeFleur's a LeFraud.


Kliff is top three, if not at the top of the mountain. He's a slightly older Ryan Gosling. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
That contract for Love is pretty glaring, One can take away 2 things..

1. Front office has very little confidence in Love.
2. Love has no confidence in himself.

It depends on what the incentives are. If they’re easy to make then he will make $2.3M more than he would have with the 5th year option.


Isn't it 7 million less guaranteed? .. and if they believed in him why not ink a 3 year 40 mill deal..he'd sign it. They know he sucks, he knows he sucks.

They are clearly hedging their bets but that’s both smart and understandable. If he plays well, everyone wins.

It's a win/win for the player and the team so of course bears fans are upset :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
That contract for Love is pretty glaring, One can take away 2 things..

1. Front office has very little confidence in Love.
2. Love has no confidence in himself.

It depends on what the incentives are. If they’re easy to make then he will make $2.3M more than he would have with the 5th year option.


Isn't it 7 million less guaranteed? .. and if they believed in him why not ink a 3 year 40 mill deal..he'd sign it. They know he sucks, he knows he sucks.

They are clearly hedging their bets but that’s both smart and understandable. If he plays well, everyone wins.

It's a win/win for the player and the team so of course bears fans are upset :lol:


seen that spin all over the packers internet

It's pretty clear what it is.

Lot's of teams are gearing up for QB in the 24 draft

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
I don't really see the win for Love in this. It sounds as if he gets around $10 million less guaranteed if he isn't good and if he is good he likely gets a new long term deal. If he is average, then he gets like $2 million more for one year and then he gets to play a season just waiting to be replaced by the rookie.

I know he signed it but it does seem clear the Packers are already scouting QBs for the first round pick next year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 7:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
They are in the same position as the Bears at QB. The worst thing that can happen in 23 is for Love to be neither definitively good or bad.

I think there might be 7 QB drafted in the first round of 24.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 7:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
They are in the same position as the Bears at QB. The worst thing that can happen in 23 is for Love to be neither definitively good or bad.

I think there might be 7 QB drafted in the first round of 24.
You'll see some of them fall. It seems to be a trend to always think that "Next year is the year of the QB" especially when it does have a superstar available at 1.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 7:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
They are in the same position as the Bears at QB. The worst thing that can happen in 23 is for Love to be neither definitively good or bad.

I think there might be 7 QB drafted in the first round of 24.
You'll see some of them fall. It seems to be a trend to always think that "Next year is the year of the QB" especially when it does have a superstar available at 1.


and 2

I just love how Pratt from Tulane plays. Maybe he isn't elite when you scout him as an NFL player, like Duggins from TCU this year

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 8:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
good dolphin wrote:
They are in the same position as the Bears at QB. The worst thing that can happen in 23 is for Love to be neither definitively good or bad.

I think there might be 7 QB drafted in the first round of 24.


If Love is neither good nor bad, the Pack would be wise to move on.

I fear this is the kind of season Fields will have--and that Poles will then hold off on drafting a new QB.

If/when he does so, I hope he emphasizes accuracy, reading ability and pocket presence over "traits".

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
They are in the same position as the Bears at QB. The worst thing that can happen in 23 is for Love to be neither definitively good or bad.

I think there might be 7 QB drafted in the first round of 24.


If Love is neither good nor bad, the Pack would be wise to move on.

I fear this is the kind of season Fields will have--and that Poles will then hold off on drafting a new QB.

If/when he does so, I hope he emphasizes accuracy, reading ability and pocket presence over "traits".
That gets a lot harder when Fields starts asking for the deal that Jones/Hurts/Jackson got.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30287
I see more of the gang is gathering in New York this morning, running it back New York style.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Hawg Ass wrote:
I see more of the gang is gathering in New York this morning, running it back New York style.

I’m surprised AR didn’t get them to trade for Adams.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2023 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hawg Ass wrote:
We are about to find out about Gute a little.


Hawger, the bootlicking is blinding you, my friend. Here's why: you've already found out a ton about Gute, such as:

Gute cannot distinguish between keeping windows open and closing them prematurely.
Gute is uncomfortable with superstars
Gute engineered the breakup of the best thing you had going since 2011

What else is there to know?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group