It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 10:28 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 353 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 10:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Caller Bob wrote:
It's interesting to juxtapose JORR's NHL thought's here against his baseball(specifically Pitcher Wins) thoughts



I've never criticized a pitcher for his team's overall lack of success. Carlton's 1972 season may be the greatest of all time and his team didn't win a World Series. Let me know when McDavid can play every shift.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57222
I agree there is an argument to be made for Lebron/Jordan, Tiger/Jack. And as great as McDavid has been so far I dont think there is an argument to be made for him yet.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10785
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
RFDC wrote:
I agree there is an argument to be made for Lebron/Jordan, Tiger/Jack. And as great as McDavid has been so far I dont think there is an argument to be made for him yet.

Agreed....but if this kid follows the ability of McDavid, we can rule out calling him a bust. It's really up to the GM to fill in the remaining pieces. McDavid isn't a bust...he's pretty fucking awesome and he hasn't won anything yet.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 11:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
RFDC wrote:
I agree there is an argument to be made for Lebron/Jordan, Tiger/Jack. And as great as McDavid has been so far I dont think there is an argument to be made for him yet.



Fair enough. He's only 26 years old.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 7:07 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
This pencil-necked midget is the future of the NHL?




They said the same thing about this guy:

Image


So you're predicting that Bedard will achieve the same level of greatness you envisioned for Daniel Palka and Doug McDermott?

Well then, now I'm really beginning to think he may turn out to be a bust after all.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3899
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
What do people really expect from him though? He probably isn't going to be Gretzky or McDavid or Crosby. Will you be disappointed if he's Denis Savard or Yvan Cournoyer?


Bedard is a better prospect than Kane was and from all accounts is more driven and competitive. Bedard is the in the same tier with Matthews for best prospect since McDavid. Simply go back and look at what Bedard did this past winter in the World Juniors while being one of the youngest players there. It was historic. I expect Bedard to be a 50 goal, 125 point top 5 player in the league in his prime.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:50 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tall Midget wrote:
So you're predicting that Bedard will achieve the same level of greatness you envisioned for Daniel Palka and Doug McDermott?



I did think Palka looked like a top power hitter sort of like what Schwarber has turned out to be or what Burger appears he might be. A Rob Deer type. He turned out not to be.

Was I a big fan of Doug McDermott? I don't think so. I may have been trolling. :lol:

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Ok, now I have some doubts about this kid, smh



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57222
Kid doesnt have twitter. That is a parody account.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
doesnt take much to get one past Bob

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries. There is no reason Bedard can't be on Crosby or McDavid's level.

As far as the Gretzky/McDavid debate. These are always annoying. Gretzky played in an era where every top scorer could skate into the zone and just rip a slap shot from the blue line with no net traffic and the goalie wouldn't come close to stopping it. Any NHL goalie who gives that up now to anyone besides the odd fluke doesn't exist because they're not in the NHL. Also the defensemen as a whole are extremely superior now. So yes, guys like McDavid are on the same level as Gretzky. McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s and Gretzky would put up McDavid numbers today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Tall Midget wrote:
RFDC wrote:
TM you must have missed pictures of Kane when he was a new draftee.

No doubt he looks like a pencil necked dweeb in this pic, but you put skates on the kid and a stick in his hand and he transforms into dominant.


Kane is an anomaly, though, isn't he? I'm not saying this guy won't be good, but I'm not so sure about "dominant".

I guess we'll find out soon enough how good he really is.


Bedard is bigger than Kane and has been better than Kane at every comparable level so far.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
No doubt we will see. But I will be very shocked if the kid is not dominant. He has all the skills and appears to be a really hard worker who is all in on being a great player.



What do people really expect from him though? He probably isn't going to be Gretzky or McDavid or Crosby. Will you be disappointed if he's Denis Savard or Yvan Cournoyer?



People are expecting McDavid/Crosby tier. It might actually be a disappointment if he is only as good as Savard as crazy as that sounds.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Hockey Gay wrote:
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries. There is no reason Bedard can't be on Crosby or McDavid's level.

As far as the Gretzky/McDavid debate. These are always annoying. Gretzky played in an era where every top scorer could skate into the zone and just rip a slap shot from the blue line with no net traffic and the goalie wouldn't come close to stopping it. Any NHL goalie who gives that up now to anyone besides the odd fluke doesn't exist because they're not in the NHL. Also the defensemen as a whole are extremely superior now. So yes, guys like McDavid are on the same level as Gretzky. McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s and Gretzky would put up McDavid numbers today.


if it was so easy to score in the 80s then why did Gretzky routinely have 80 more points every year than the person in second place? Was Wayne the only person shooting slap shots from the blue line?


McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s? But some guy named Mario Lemieux was getting lapped by Gretzky in scoring every year. I guess McDavid is also on a different tier than Lemieux, huh?


You should change your name to HockeyRet@rded

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
shakes wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries. There is no reason Bedard can't be on Crosby or McDavid's level.

As far as the Gretzky/McDavid debate. These are always annoying. Gretzky played in an era where every top scorer could skate into the zone and just rip a slap shot from the blue line with no net traffic and the goalie wouldn't come close to stopping it. Any NHL goalie who gives that up now to anyone besides the odd fluke doesn't exist because they're not in the NHL. Also the defensemen as a whole are extremely superior now. So yes, guys like McDavid are on the same level as Gretzky. McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s and Gretzky would put up McDavid numbers today.


if it was so easy to score in the 80s then why did Gretzky routinely have 80 more points every year than the person in second place? Was Wayne the only person shooting slap shots from the blue line?


McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s? But some guy named Mario Lemieux was getting lapped by Gretzky in scoring every year. I guess McDavid is also on a different tier than Lemieux, huh?


You should change your name to HockeyRet@rded

And McDavid just out scored Pastrnak by 40 points. You think that's the last time he dominates the scoring race in his career? Don't play stupid like it wasn't much easier to score back in the 80's. I also never insulted Gretzky.

Also, thanks for agreeing with me about Bedard.

Now go back to blowing Trea Young.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65745
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Let's just wait and see what he looks like against NHL players. I'm not willing to say this guybwill reach Palka levels of amazingness until I see him go against the best of the best.
That being said I sure ho0e this kid fills out quickly cause he looks fragile. I get he's 17 and still will put on some pounds but damn he looks pretty smol.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hockey Gay wrote:
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries.


That's usually right. There are guys like Lindros and LaFountaine who I would say were disappointing based on their hype, but they're still Hall of Famers.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2953
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
I agree with Hockey Gay. Gretzky changed the game with his talent, the likes of which had not been seen. Goaltending methods changed, defense changed, offense styles to compliment that high level of play changed and are now the norm. I definitely think its fair to say any of the exceptional status guys would have mind blowing numbers in the 80s.

I think its also fair to say if Gretzky were playing today, he would still be exceptional, but not put up the numbers he did in the 80s, because every facet of the game has improved since then.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4068
pizza_Place: Lino's
The salary cap and expansion has greatly diluted the league, there is no way you could keep guys like Gretzky, Lowe, Anderson, Kurri, Messier, Fuhr, and Coffey together for a decade.

Many say that the 1987 Canada Cup was the greatest hockey ever played, not sure if the game will ever reach that level again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55924
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Hockey Gay wrote:
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries. There is no reason Bedard can't be on Crosby or McDavid's level.

I'm not sure about that, unless there have indeed been three or four exceptional-status players who have had a ton of injuries. John Tavares has been as advertised, he's a Hall of Famer. I'm not so sure about Aaron Ekblad.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3899
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
shakes wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries. There is no reason Bedard can't be on Crosby or McDavid's level.

As far as the Gretzky/McDavid debate. These are always annoying. Gretzky played in an era where every top scorer could skate into the zone and just rip a slap shot from the blue line with no net traffic and the goalie wouldn't come close to stopping it. Any NHL goalie who gives that up now to anyone besides the odd fluke doesn't exist because they're not in the NHL. Also the defensemen as a whole are extremely superior now. So yes, guys like McDavid are on the same level as Gretzky. McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s and Gretzky would put up McDavid numbers today.


if it was so easy to score in the 80s then why did Gretzky routinely have 80 more points every year than the person in second place? Was Wayne the only person shooting slap shots from the blue line?


McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s? But some guy named Mario Lemieux was getting lapped by Gretzky in scoring every year. I guess McDavid is also on a different tier than Lemieux, huh?


You should change your name to HockeyRet@rded


When you look at era-adjusted stats, Gretzky's best seasons are still the greatest seasons of all time but what McDavid is doing is not that far behind. If you go era-adjusted points per game per career, Gretzky and Lemieux are nearly identical (1.90) while McDavid is with Bossy at 1.50 in the next grouping. The only forward in the conversation all time with Gretzky is Lemieux. Arguments I've heard of how Lemieux was better than Gretzky are quite convincing but the reality is Lemieux just missed too much time.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:41 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40639
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
You guys aren’t even mentioning Ovechkin will be goals king leaving Gretzky as assists and total points king. Of course if you just take his assists he is points king.

Crosby is just a tad overrated I would say and I haven’t seen enough McDavid or Matthews. Kane in my mind is best American ever fuck Modano and Chelios.

If Connor is Kane or better I’d be more than happy.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23997
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Dumb hockey question here, but was Kane the best player on any of the Cup teams?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:18 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40639
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Dumb hockey question here, but was Kane the best player on any of the Cup teams?


Yes.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23997
pizza_Place: Pizanos
pittmike wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Dumb hockey question here, but was Kane the best player on any of the Cup teams?


Yes.

Which?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55924
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Dumb hockey question here, but was Kane the best player on any of the Cup teams?

There's a case for any of or all three, but none cut-and-dried.

2010, scoring leader all year, one point behind Toews in playoff scoring but with the Cup-winning goal. Certainly could have won the Conn Smythe in 2010 but everyone knew it was going to Toews. However, I have to say the best player that year was Marian Hossa, even if the 2010 team was a little more run-and-gun than the more two-way teams in '13 and '15 that were low-key amazing at keeping the puck out of their own net.

2013 was a full team effort from top to bottom (the league kinda stopped doing cap math, hence Fourth-Liner Michael Frolik), Kane led for the year and playoffs and did get the Smythe, but that year it should have gone to Corey Crawford.

2015, Kane was actually in the middle of a bid for a 100-point season before he went down for the year at the trade deadline. Came back for the playoffs, led the team in scoring while still hurt, but that was the year Duncan Keith carried the tattered remains of the team on his back.

So to answer your question, probably. But that's the story of the Hawks now: Kane was only good because of Toews, who was only good because of Keith, who was only good because of Hjalmarsson, who was only good because of Sharp, who was only good because of Hossa, who was only good because of Crawford, and all of them were only good because Joel Quenneville didn't call the cops when he heard a failed prospect got a blowjob from a homo.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
DAC wrote:
shakes wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries. There is no reason Bedard can't be on Crosby or McDavid's level.

As far as the Gretzky/McDavid debate. These are always annoying. Gretzky played in an era where every top scorer could skate into the zone and just rip a slap shot from the blue line with no net traffic and the goalie wouldn't come close to stopping it. Any NHL goalie who gives that up now to anyone besides the odd fluke doesn't exist because they're not in the NHL. Also the defensemen as a whole are extremely superior now. So yes, guys like McDavid are on the same level as Gretzky. McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s and Gretzky would put up McDavid numbers today.


if it was so easy to score in the 80s then why did Gretzky routinely have 80 more points every year than the person in second place? Was Wayne the only person shooting slap shots from the blue line?


McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s? But some guy named Mario Lemieux was getting lapped by Gretzky in scoring every year. I guess McDavid is also on a different tier than Lemieux, huh?


You should change your name to HockeyRet@rded


When you look at era-adjusted stats, Gretzky's best seasons are still the greatest seasons of all time but what McDavid is doing is not that far behind. If you go era-adjusted points per game per career, Gretzky and Lemieux are nearly identical (1.90) while McDavid is with Bossy at 1.50 in the next grouping. The only forward in the conversation all time with Gretzky is Lemieux. Arguments I've heard of how Lemieux was better than Gretzky are quite convincing but the reality is Lemieux just missed too much time.


Yeah, Lemieux was always fighting one physical issue or another. Who knows how great a completely healthy Mario Lemieux would have been. But that person doesn't exist. Health and durability are part of the player.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Darkside wrote:
Let's just wait and see what he looks like against NHL players. I'm not willing to say this guybwill reach Palka levels of amazingness until I see him go against the best of the best.
That being said I sure ho0e this kid fills out quickly cause he looks fragile. I get he's 17 and still will put on some pounds but damn he looks pretty smol.


He's actually quite huge and not at all fragile. At the combine he did more pull ups than anyone. He's not small, he's just not tall. He doesn't need to fill out.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
DAC wrote:
shakes wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Hockey isn't like other sports. When you're granted exceptional status you are a sure thing that lives up to the hype unless they start dealing with injuries. There is no reason Bedard can't be on Crosby or McDavid's level.

As far as the Gretzky/McDavid debate. These are always annoying. Gretzky played in an era where every top scorer could skate into the zone and just rip a slap shot from the blue line with no net traffic and the goalie wouldn't come close to stopping it. Any NHL goalie who gives that up now to anyone besides the odd fluke doesn't exist because they're not in the NHL. Also the defensemen as a whole are extremely superior now. So yes, guys like McDavid are on the same level as Gretzky. McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s and Gretzky would put up McDavid numbers today.


if it was so easy to score in the 80s then why did Gretzky routinely have 80 more points every year than the person in second place? Was Wayne the only person shooting slap shots from the blue line?


McDavid would put up Gretzky numbers in the 80s? But some guy named Mario Lemieux was getting lapped by Gretzky in scoring every year. I guess McDavid is also on a different tier than Lemieux, huh?


You should change your name to HockeyRet@rded


When you look at era-adjusted stats, Gretzky's best seasons are still the greatest seasons of all time but what McDavid is doing is not that far behind. If you go era-adjusted points per game per career, Gretzky and Lemieux are nearly identical (1.90) while McDavid is with Bossy at 1.50 in the next grouping. The only forward in the conversation all time with Gretzky is Lemieux. Arguments I've heard of how Lemieux was better than Gretzky are quite convincing but the reality is Lemieux just missed too much time.


I agree that McDavid is not far behind, but he's definitely behind him. He's not in Gretzky's class even if he is in the next tier which he definitely is.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Connor Era
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3899
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Dumb hockey question here, but was Kane the best player on any of the Cup teams?


That's tough. He was always on the short list of best players on the team but the reality is if any of Kane, Toews, Keith, Hossa, Seabrook, and probably even Hjalmarsson are not on the team, they don't win the Cups. But to answer your question, 2010 was clearly Toews and Keith as their playoff MVP and 2015 was Keith which is one of the greatest playoff performances ever by a Dman. While Kane won the Conn Smythe in 2013 it probably should have gone to Crawford. So to answer you question I'd say no.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 353 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group