It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:55 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » DOUCHEBAG OF THE WEEK

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 9
  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
denisdman
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You
Top
 Profile  
 
Rod
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 1:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79549
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


In a headdress and at least some blackface, both of which are social taboos.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don
Top
 Profile  
 
denisdman
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
If I had to guess, I believe legally there has to be malice or intent to harm in the comment. I doubt that would be provable. But would you want this in front of a jury?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You
Top
 Profile  
 
denisdman
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


In a headdress and at least some blackface, both of which are social taboos.


Yeah I get it. But the outfit matches the team he is rooting for.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You
Top
 Profile  
 
shakes
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


settling a claim requires the defendant to have money. We're talking Deadspin here, what are they gonna do, offer up Julie's closet of muslim cricket gear?

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!
Top
 Profile  
 
Tall Midget
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:09 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


In a headdress and at least some blackface, both of which are social taboos.


Yeah I get it. But the outfit matches the team he is rooting for.


Is it really "blackface" if only half of your face is black?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.
Top
 Profile  
 
Rod
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79549
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
shakes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


settling a claim requires the defendant to have money. We're talking Deadspin here, what are they gonna do, offer up Julie's closet of muslim cricket gear?



I thought about that too. Maybe this will take out Deadspin the way Hulk Hogan and Peter Thiel took out Gawker.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don
Top
 Profile  
 
Rod
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79549
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tall Midget wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


In a headdress and at least some blackface, both of which are social taboos.


Yeah I get it. But the outfit matches the team he is rooting for.


Is it really "blackface" if only half of your face is black?



It's Mulattoface.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don
Top
 Profile  
 
Caller Bob
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


In a headdress and at least some blackface, both of which are social taboos.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Tall Midget
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
shakes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


settling a claim requires the defendant to have money. We're talking Deadspin here, what are they gonna do, offer up Julie's closet of muslim cricket gear?


Perhaps they could provide one of Julie's t-shirts so the kid could use it to build a teepee.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
Tall Midget wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


In a headdress and at least some blackface, both of which are social taboos.


Yeah I get it. But the outfit matches the team he is rooting for.


Is it really "blackface" if only half of your face is black?

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
Gorilla Monsoon
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:18 am
Posts: 77
pizza_Place: All of them
Douchebag wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


In a headdress and at least some blackface, both of which are social taboos.


Yeah I get it. But the outfit matches the team he is rooting for.


Is it really "blackface" if only half of your face is black?

Image


Will you stop
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
:lol: :lol:

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
SpiralStairs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
denisdman wrote:
If I had to guess, I believe legally there has to be malice or intent to harm in the comment. I doubt that would be provable. But would you want this in front of a jury?

That’s the standard for celebrities and public figures which this kid isn’t. Actual malice doesn’t need to be shown, but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid probably gives him and Deadspin enough wiggle room to keep this case from going anywhere.

Had the post not been run through the Online Outrage Machine it would have died a quiet death on a website no one reads.

I also wonder what demonstrable harm the kid has suffered seeing as he’s already being viewed as a hero by MANY who otherwise would have no idea he existed but for the Deadspin post.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.
Top
 Profile  
 
Juice's Lecture Notes
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
SpiralStairs wrote:
but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid

If you don't count a closeup profile shot of the kid being the main picture of the article both on the website and on every social media post Deadspin, as well as every other user, made promoting the article, then yeah, I guess you could argue the piece isn't centered on him.
Top
 Profile  
 
Bagels
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid

If you don't count a closeup profile shot of the kid being the main picture of the article both on the website and on every social media post Deadspin, as well as every other user, made promoting the article, then yeah, I guess you could argue the piece isn't centered on him.


that's the genius of it.
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
SpiralStairs wrote:
denisdman wrote:
If I had to guess, I believe legally there has to be malice or intent to harm in the comment. I doubt that would be provable. But would you want this in front of a jury?

That’s the standard for celebrities and public figures which this kid isn’t. Actual malice doesn’t need to be shown, but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid probably gives him and Deadspin enough wiggle room to keep this case from going anywhere.

Had the post not been run through the Online Outrage Machine it would have died a quiet death on a website no one reads.

I also wonder what demonstrable harm the kid has suffered seeing as he’s already being viewed as a hero by MANY who otherwise would have no idea he existed but for the Deadspin post.

He's already gotten a scholarship offer to Liberty University!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
a retard
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7180
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
Image

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."
Top
 Profile  
 
Franky T
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9960
pizza_Place: world famous
SpiralStairs wrote:
denisdman wrote:
If I had to guess, I believe legally there has to be malice or intent to harm in the comment. I doubt that would be provable. But would you want this in front of a jury?

That’s the standard for celebrities and public figures which this kid isn’t. Actual malice doesn’t need to be shown, but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid probably gives him and Deadspin enough wiggle room to keep this case from going anywhere.

Had the post not been run through the Online Outrage Machine it would have died a quiet death on a website no one reads.

I also wonder what demonstrable harm the kid has suffered seeing as he’s already being viewed as a hero by MANY who otherwise would have no idea he existed but for the Deadspin post.

Same can be said about Nick Sandmann. He has generational wealth now.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.
Top
 Profile  
 
SpiralStairs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid

If you don't count a closeup profile shot of the kid being the main picture of the article both on the website and on every social media post Deadspin, as well as every other user, made promoting the article, then yeah, I guess you could argue the piece isn't centered on him.

Read the headline and the post itself.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.
Top
 Profile  
 
denisdman
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
shakes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


settling a claim requires the defendant to have money. We're talking Deadspin here, what are they gonna do, offer up Julie's closet of muslim cricket gear?


I do not know it for a fact, but they should have a media liability policy. It is all but required to be in the business. Newsroom will often stand on principle, but most insurers would recognize this is not a case to try.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You
Top
 Profile  
 
SpiralStairs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Here’s a fun twist, apparently the kid and his family are affiliated with a Native American tribe.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.
Top
 Profile  
 
This Ends in Antioch
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid

If you don't count a closeup profile shot of the kid being the main picture of the article both on the website and on every social media post Deadspin, as well as every other user, made promoting the article, then yeah, I guess you could argue the piece isn't centered on him.

Read the headline and the post itself.

I thought you retired from pre-judging after your Rittenhouse debacle.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants
Top
 Profile  
 
Rod
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79549
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
shakes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This type of claim falls under a media liability policy. Any claim is not going to court. It gets settled. I am not sure where this falls legally but it has a terrible fact pattern- big media attacking a kid that gets all sorts of negative social media coverage while a kid is just rooting for his team.


settling a claim requires the defendant to have money. We're talking Deadspin here, what are they gonna do, offer up Julie's closet of muslim cricket gear?


I do not know it for a fact, but they should have a media liability policy. It is all but required to be in the business. Newsroom will often stand on principle, but most insurers would recognize this is not a case to try.



I'm gonna say Deadspin has no such policy.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don
Top
 Profile  
 
SpiralStairs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid

If you don't count a closeup profile shot of the kid being the main picture of the article both on the website and on every social media post Deadspin, as well as every other user, made promoting the article, then yeah, I guess you could argue the piece isn't centered on him.

Read the headline and the post itself.

I thought you retired from pre-judging after your Rittenhouse debacle.

I forget how I called that one. I think I said he might get convicted of manslaughter but murder.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.
Top
 Profile  
 
This Ends in Antioch
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
SpiralStairs wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
but the fact that the guy didn’t name the kid and didn’t center the article on the kid

If you don't count a closeup profile shot of the kid being the main picture of the article both on the website and on every social media post Deadspin, as well as every other user, made promoting the article, then yeah, I guess you could argue the piece isn't centered on him.

Read the headline and the post itself.

I thought you retired from pre-judging after your Rittenhouse debacle.

I forget how I called that one. I think I said he might get convicted of manslaughter but murder.

Scoreboard

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants
Top
 Profile  
 
SpiralStairs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
I NEVER CLAIMED TO BE CLAIRVOYANT GET OFF MY ASS PLZ

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.
Top
 Profile  
 
This Ends in Antioch
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
SpiralStairs wrote:
I NEVER CLAIMED TO BE CLAIRVOYANT GET OFF MY ASS PLZ

Image

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants
Top
 Profile  
 
SpiralStairs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
I’m really good at predicting the future when I know the outcome in advance

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nardi
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2023 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
SpiralStairs wrote:
I’m really good at predicting the future when I know the outcome in advance

Goddam, you have gotten so lame that it actually hurts.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 9
  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » DOUCHEBAG OF THE WEEK

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group