It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:55 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Tall Midget wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
The problem isn’t Love. It’s a horrible defense that can’t cover the middle of the field and continually allows 3rd and long conversions. De'Vondre Campbell cannot cover anyone and that dumbass DC keeps asking him to cover WRs. I can’t believe he still has a job. Just terrible.



It is sickening to continue to watch this unit play, the inside linebacker’s with Campbell and Walker (yes Bob I am giving you credit)is atrocious but it is past time for Joe Barry to go.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91910
Location: To the left of my post
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Start a career? He's like middle age lmao. He will be out of the league in 5 years.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
IkeSouth wrote:
Start a career? He's like middle age lmao. He will be out of the league in 5 years.

He is younger than Fields, he is 25.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91910
Location: To the left of my post
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.

That's because most of the people we are comparing to didn't have their second career start in a season they were turning 25. That's why he is better than Peyton Manning for instance.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.

That's because most of the people we are comparing to didn't have their second career start in a season they were turning 25. That's why he is better than Peyton Manning for instance.

So 25 is now old? :lol:

And he just turned 25 in November.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:26 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
With Christmas coming up, I'm hoping the Packers have a great week.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91910
Location: To the left of my post
It certainly is for someone making their first 15 starts. That's why the fact that he has outperformed Peyton Manning's first 15 starts doesn't really matter. Wasn't the whole point of drafting him and having him sit for 2 years so he would be doing this?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Brick wrote:
It certainly is for someone making their first 15 starts. That's why the fact that he has outperformed Peyton Manning's first 15 starts doesn't really matter. Wasn't the whole point of drafting him and having him sit for 2 years so he would be doing this?

You keep bringing up Manning, no clue what his numbers were to start with. I think they drafted him with the idea that he needed to upgrade footwork but had good arm potential. Rodgers was coming off 2 subpar seasons for him so no way to know he was going to be the league MVP the next 2 years so it worked out this way. Quarterbacks used to never start right away, maybe it will be a good thing.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:32 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hawg Ass wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
Start a career? He's like middle age lmao. He will be out of the league in 5 years.

He is younger than Fields, he is 25.


No he's not.

Sober up, Porky!

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Last edited by Tall Midget on Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91910
Location: To the left of my post
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
It certainly is for someone making their first 15 starts. That's why the fact that he has outperformed Peyton Manning's first 15 starts doesn't really matter. Wasn't the whole point of drafting him and having him sit for 2 years so he would be doing this?

You keep bringing up Manning, no clue what his numbers were to start with. I think they drafted him with the idea that he needed to upgrade footwork but had good arm potential. Rodgers was coming off 2 subpar seasons for him so no way to know he was going to be the league MVP the next 2 years so it worked out this way. Quarterbacks used to never start right away, maybe it will be a good thing.
I am bringing up Manning's numbers to show why the "First 15 starts" metric for Love is so flawed. Most of the good ones weren't in year 3 when they got start 2.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
It certainly is for someone making their first 15 starts. That's why the fact that he has outperformed Peyton Manning's first 15 starts doesn't really matter. Wasn't the whole point of drafting him and having him sit for 2 years so he would be doing this?

You keep bringing up Manning, no clue what his numbers were to start with. I think they drafted him with the idea that he needed to upgrade footwork but had good arm potential. Rodgers was coming off 2 subpar seasons for him so no way to know he was going to be the league MVP the next 2 years so it worked out this way. Quarterbacks used to never start right away, maybe it will be a good thing.
I am bringing up Manning's numbers to show why the "First 15 starts" metric for Love is so flawed. Most of the good ones weren't in year 3 when they got start 2.

Going back that probably isn’t true, quarterbacks didn’t start right away and of course the passing game has evolved immensely.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13239
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.

That's because most of the people we are comparing to didn't have their second career start in a season they were turning 25. That's why he is better than Peyton Manning for instance.

Manning was considered to pretty much of a finished product coming out of college, which is why he was selected at the top of the draft and thrust right into the starting role. Clearly Love was viewed as a bit of a project and was expected to sit and learn. A better comparison at this point would be with Rodgers than Manning.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Last edited by Zippy-The-Pinhead on Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91910
Location: To the left of my post
Hawg Ass wrote:
Going back that probably isn’t true, quarterbacks didn’t start right away and of course the passing game has evolved immensely.
How far back are we talking here? When you look at most of the best quarterbacks of all time they were starting by year 2 with most of them starting in year 1.

What has changed is how often players now start from day 1.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Going back that probably isn’t true, quarterbacks didn’t start right away and of course the passing game has evolved immensely.
How far back are we talking here? When you look at most of the best quarterbacks of all time they were starting by year 2 with most of them starting in year 1.

What has changed is how often players now start from day 1.

I don’t know, I haven’t done precise research. I know for a long period of time, quarterbacks coming direct out of college did not start right away. Hell, Peyton didn’t start right away in college.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Last edited by Hawg Ass on Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91910
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.

That's because most of the people we are comparing to didn't have their second career start in a season they were turning 25. That's why he is better than Peyton Manning for instance.

Manning was considered to pretty much of a finished product coming out of college, which is why he was selected at the top of the draft and thrust right into the starting role. Clearly Love was considered to be bit of a project and was expected to sit and learn. A better comparison at this point would be with Rodgers than Manning.

The point is that it isn't a valid comparison at all. "Starts to being a career" isn't a stat that should be used. I also wouldn't say the Love sucks because he is far behind Kurt Warner in that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.


The numbers say he got outclassed by journeyman Baker Mayfield yesterday


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:54 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I don't like all the Packer hate this week. Go Pack!

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Caller Bob wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.


The numbers say he got outclassed by journeyman Baker Mayfield yesterday

You would have no clue as I know you didn’t watch the game, Caller Bob could have put up numbers against the Packers defense yesterday.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Also, anyone that thinks Love stinks is probably football retarded.

Go Pack!!!

He's just average!

His numbers say differently when you look at starts to begin a career.


The numbers say he got outclassed by journeyman Baker Mayfield yesterday

You would have no clue as I know you didn’t watch the game, Caller Bob could have put up numbers against the Packers defense yesterday.


I'm confused with such HOF talents such as Rashan Gary, and the Georgia Boys, how a journeyman QB could put up such great numbers?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Watch the games and you will learn. It is a great to way to have a better thought than reading a box score and commenting.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
If I tune into the games will I see all of Rashan Gary's make believe sacks that Zippy has been telling me about?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Why don’t you address that with Zippy?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
we have all seen a losing season from love and nobody is comparing him to peyton manning

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
IkeSouth wrote:
we have all seen a losing season from love and nobody is comparing him to peyton manning

He hasn’t played a season.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Hawg Ass wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
we have all seen a losing season from love and nobody is comparing him to peyton manning

He hasn’t played a season.


We know. We're watching too.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
IkeSouth wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
we have all seen a losing season from love and nobody is comparing him to peyton manning

He hasn’t played a season.


We know. We're watching too.

That is not what your post states.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:33 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hawg Ass wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
we have all seen a losing season from love and nobody is comparing him to peyton manning

He hasn’t played a season.


We know. We're watching too.

That is not what your post states.


:lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group