It is currently Sat Nov 09, 2024 7:30 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
That's how winners and losers are decided in civil lawsuits. :lol: :lol:
No it isn't. Settlements happen for many different reasons. Just ask Trump. A settlement that doesn't involve any admittance of fault is a win only for the persons bank account.

Seacrest wrote:
Rodgers wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So any tough talk from Kimmel is just posturing.
Yes, Rodgers wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So what was the point of randomly mentioning his name with the Epstein list?


To piss Kimmel off for going after him previously.

And it worked to perfection.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91811
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


He linked himself by becoming partners with the guy who provided meals to Epstein and the girls he abused.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:03 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


Everyone powerful and famous is separated from Epstein by no more than two degrees. Not everyone is as edgy about that fact as Kimmel is.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:03 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
It wasn't random. As Antioch mentioned, Kimmel mocked Rodgers for linking the UFO story and the expected release of the Epstein list. Rodgers may have taken this mockery as an attempt by Kimmel to provide cover for those named in the Epstein Conspiracy.
I don't think that is a win for Rodgers though if that is the explanation.

Tall Midget wrote:
Another possibility is that Rodgers is aware that Kimmel is good friends and business partners with Epstein's former personal chef, who may have witnessed and/or facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Kimmel therefore may have a personal and financial interest in squelching discussion of the Epstein Conspiracy.
Rodgers had a chance to make an argument like that though and chose not to.


He didn't make any argument, nor did he accuse Kimmel of anything. He took a deliberately vague swipe at Kimmel in a somewhat humorous context. You seem perturbed that he didn't make a specific allegation.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57175
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


Everyone powerful and famous is separated from Epstein by no more than two degrees. Not everyone is as edgy about that fact as Kimmel is.

Kimmel definitely had a guilty conscience type feel to his response.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:04 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


He linked himself by becoming partners with the guy who provided meals to Epstein and the girls he abused.


:lol:

Right, Kimmel has cultivated a relationship with someone who may have facilitated Epstein's criminal enterprise.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91811
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
He didn't make any argument, nor did he accuse Kimmel of anything.
Your argument seems to be that he didn't backtrack because he didn't even say anything to backtrack from. That's fair.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91811
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


He linked himself by becoming partners with the guy who provided meals to Epstein and the girls he abused.


:lol:

Right, Kimmel has cultivated a relationship with someone who may have facilitated Epstein's criminal enterprise.

That's the point though. Rodgers could have hammered him on that. He didn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Rodgers had a chance to make an argument like that though and chose not to.


That's a fair criticism of Rodgers.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:13 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


He linked himself by becoming partners with the guy who provided meals to Epstein and the girls he abused.


:lol:

Right, Kimmel has cultivated a relationship with someone who may have facilitated Epstein's criminal enterprise.

That's the point though. Rodgers could have hammered him on that. He didn't.


Is the Pat McAfee show renowned as a forum for logical discourse and rigorous argument?

Rodgers trolled Kimmel for entertainment purposes.

He's not submitting a research article to a peer-reviewed journal.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
If Rodgers didn't accuse Kimmel of anything, how is he backpedaling by saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything? :?:

I guess I don't understand the point of linking Kimmel and the Epstein list last week then. Was it just some random celebrity he chose?



You do know that Kimmel cavorts with Epstein's personal chef, right?

In business with. The guy who snuck food and commiserated with the underage sex slaves. Yes, Kimmel probably "didn't want the list coming out".

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91811
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island
Are you suggesting that being linked to Jeffrey Epstein isn't a big deal?

Personally, I believe I would not be happy being linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


He linked himself by becoming partners with the guy who provided meals to Epstein and the girls he abused.


:lol:

Right, Kimmel has cultivated a relationship with someone who may have facilitated Epstein's criminal enterprise.

That's the point though. Rodgers could have hammered him on that. He didn't.


Is the Pat McAfee show renowned as a forum for logical discourse and rigorous argument?

Rodgers trolled Kimmel for entertainment purposes.

He's not submitting a research article to a peer-reviewed journal.

I fully accept the idea that Rodgers trolled Kimmel for entertainment purposes. I just think it's a win for Kimmel that Rodgers had to admit as such.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Is the Pat McAfee show renowned as a forum for logical discourse and rigorous argument?

Rodgers trolled Kimmel for entertainment purposes.

He's not submitting a research article to a peer-reviewed journal.

I fully accept the idea that Rodgers trolled Kimmel for entertainment purposes. I just think it's a win for Kimmel that Rodgers had to admit as such.[/quote]
It's not done. At some point Kimmel will divest his business partnership. The list isn't even out yet so we're not even close to who gets the last laugh.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16718
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Kimmel's over the top response to a throw-away line from a low-rated sports talk podcast managed to convince way more people that Kimmel's definitely hiding something than the original comment ever could have.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
Wonder what Nancy Armour’s thoughts are on Kimmel’s legacy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Rodgers banned from Pat Mcafee show HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91811
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
It's not done. At some point Kimmel will divest his business partnership. The list isn't even out yet so we're not even close to who gets the last laugh.
Well, at least one partnership was divested. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Long been rumored that Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks love minors.

Rodgers isn't nuts on this. Look, there has to be a cover up by the government. There is no way that it was only Epstein banging kids on that fucking island. He needed other wealthy celebrities to help finance his operation and share in it. It's known by the government and key government officials are being paid off not to reveal the really high profile names.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Beardown wrote:
Long been rumored that Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks love minors.


Image

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9901
pizza_Place: world famous
IkeSouth wrote:
Rodgers banned from Pat Mcafee show HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

McAfee's decision. That's interesting.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Beardown wrote:
Long been rumored that Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks love minors.


Image


That was a telling moment at the Golden Globes when Ricky Gervais brought up Epstein and ripped the shit out of all of those celebrities.

By the way, after the Epstein arrest, Tom Hanks quickly became a citizen of Greece in case he had to make a run for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
It's not done. At some point Kimmel will divest his business partnership. The list isn't even out yet so we're not even close to who gets the last laugh.
Well, at least one partnership was divested. :lol:

It's a laugh. Is that the last laugh?

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The Establishment wants so desperately to write Epstein off as a "Right Wing Conspiracy" as they are doing with Ray Epps.

Quote:
Pizzagate, QAnon and the ‘Epstein List’: Why the Far Right Is Obsessed with Sex Trafficking
An expert on conspiracy theories explains why MAGA figures are embracing the latest twist in the Jeffrey Epstein saga.


https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/ ... n-00134394

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91811
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
It's not done. At some point Kimmel will divest his business partnership. The list isn't even out yet so we're not even close to who gets the last laugh.
Well, at least one partnership was divested. :lol:

It's a laugh. Is that the last laugh?

Well Rodgers said that Kimmel wasn't on the list and then the next day still lost his cushy high paying 20 minutes of work a week.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16718
pizza_Place: Salerno's
That was the deal new ESPN Indy boss PM worked out with ESPN Bristol boss BM: McAfee wacked Rodgers and now in return Magnus has to take out Norboy, like when Tony shotgunned Steve Buscemi.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Florio said today that Rodgers contract with the show ran through the end of the regular season.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
The 6,000 year cabal thing is a conspiracy theory. But Epstein’s list isn’t. There’s video footage that explicitly surveils the people involved and there are documents from his previous court appearances that prove he had a group of powerful people involved. Child sex rings aren’t a conspiracy theory. In the 70s there was the Oakland Ring in Michigan, which also had a fake suicide (the son of a prominent politician). There were FBI busts of child porn throughout the 80s and 90s. And Jared Fogle didn’t round up those teens by himself.

Just like with the way the mainstream media wanted to deflect any decent motive from “The Sound of Freedom”, calling it a QAnon wet dream or whatever, it’s really telling how the Epstein thing is also seemingly being thrown under a rug. Sure they call *him* a pervert and his crimes “heinous”; but any mention of anything regarding a powerful group (unless it includes Trump), they’re way too quick to dismiss.

And you know, some conspiracies are correct. Tuskegee, MK Ultra, Project Blue Book, and Kennedy. All were “crackpot” theories initially.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
It's not done. At some point Kimmel will divest his business partnership. The list isn't even out yet so we're not even close to who gets the last laugh.
Well, at least one partnership was divested. :lol:

It's a laugh. Is that the last laugh?

Well Rodgers said that Kimmel wasn't on the list and then the next day still lost his cushy high paying 20 minutes of work a week.

That's funny because he never said Kimmel was on the list. I guess he had to clarify it for stupid people when it became known about his business partner.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30264
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Florio said today that Rodgers contract with the show ran through the end of the regular season.

A guy that is a big WWE dude might know a little about promotion too, can you imagine the intro for the first show next year.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group