It is currently Sat Sep 21, 2024 5:41 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 ... 94  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16282
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Their analysis of Bellinger is absurdly terrible.

Bernstein said if Bad Bellinger (.167 average) shows up, the new contract would be a disaster (no shit). Then LoHo says it might be ok if he keeps his elite defense (I was waiting for the Heyward comp). Bernstein responds that Bellinger is actually a negative WAR defender. :lol:

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32037
pizza_Place: Milano's
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "
Larry admitted he got it from some NFL teams Twitter , but had a round up of all the experts in the 2017 draft and would you believe, none of them had Mahomes #1. crazy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 30421
pizza_Place: What??
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "
Larry admitted he got it from some NFL teams Twitter , but had a round up of all the experts in the 2017 draft and would you believe, none of them had Mahomes #1. crazy.

Seems like a decent question of why not one had him. Not one?

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
More inexplicable anti Williams stances as part of their pro Fields propaganda. If Williams hits then this show shouldn't be allowed to celebrate.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32037
pizza_Place: Milano's
Nardi wrote:
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "
Larry admitted he got it from some NFL teams Twitter , but had a round up of all the experts in the 2017 draft and would you believe, none of them had Mahomes #1. crazy.

Seems like a decent question of why not one had him. Not one?


No. i think most had him at 3 or 4, one person had him at 6. This was an aggregate of all the "big time " players like McShay, Kiper, etc. etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:51 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
Bagels wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "
Larry admitted he got it from some NFL teams Twitter , but had a round up of all the experts in the 2017 draft and would you believe, none of them had Mahomes #1. crazy.

Seems like a decent question of why not one had him. Not one?


No. i think most had him at 3 or 4, one person had him at 6. This was an aggregate of all the "big time " players like McShay, Kiper, etc. etc.


Is the argument that the Bears shouldn't take Caleb Williams at #1 because draft analysts don't (or often) rank the college players correctly? If so, that's interesting coming from the guy who compared Bryce Young to Drew Brees, but then said he wouldn't draft him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nardi wrote:
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "
Larry admitted he got it from some NFL teams Twitter , but had a round up of all the experts in the 2017 draft and would you believe, none of them had Mahomes #1. crazy.

Seems like a decent question of why not one had him. Not one?


I argue that the lower the barrier to entry to a sport is then the harder it is to identify surefire talent. Not too sure about baseball but in basketball in general there's no such thing as a wes welker who goes undrafted then did what he did. Or Kurt Warner. Or Brady. Or Purdy even. There are linemen who come out of nowhere then turn out to be really good. That's because anyone maybe 5'7 and above can be molded into a serviceable if not good football player, that's what I mean by lower barrier to entry. So when potentially anyone can be decent it becomes hard to pinpoint the surefire player. Basketball is more exclusive because if a prospect is not at least 6'4 he's already being removed from "he could be the best player in the NBA" consideration. I'm not sure if there's a similar conversation in football based on traits alone.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40340
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
veganfan21 wrote:
More inexplicable anti Williams stances as part of their pro Fields propaganda. If Williams hits then this show shouldn't be allowed to celebrate.


They will.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32037
pizza_Place: Milano's
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "
Larry admitted he got it from some NFL teams Twitter , but had a round up of all the experts in the 2017 draft and would you believe, none of them had Mahomes #1. crazy.

Seems like a decent question of why not one had him. Not one?


No. i think most had him at 3 or 4, one person had him at 6. This was an aggregate of all the "big time " players like McShay, Kiper, etc. etc.


Is the argument that the Bears shouldn't take Caleb Williams at #1 because draft analysts don't (or often) rank the college players correctly? If so, that's interesting coming from the guy who compared Bryce Young to Drew Brees, but then said he wouldn't draft him.

It was him pushing back at the semi straw man that he’s a “generational talent “
I realize some have said that
It just seemed like a really dumb segment, like it’s breaking news that draft analysts in any sport get things wrong . Wait until he gets to GM’s !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55182
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "

It's time for draft analysts to be Held Accountable. Words matter. Actions have consequences.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32635
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Curious Hair wrote:
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "

It's time for draft analysts to be Held Accountable. Words matter. Actions have consequences.


And the only time radio hosts are held accountable is when they say, “BOOBS”.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23318
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
According to the draft "experts" aggregate rankings DeShon Kizer was the #1 QB. Well that's what Larry said and then he kept reading and Kizer was actually tied with Mitch. Still bad though. Dan was particularly mad when Larry said Mayock had Mahomes 6th, behind Nathan Peterman.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:40 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33973
Why does Larry think it’s important to point out what the media guys have gotten wrong through the years?

All we have to do is look at what the actual GMs have gotten wrong through the years to know nobody has this figured out.

And we know the actual GMs have gotten a shit load of picks wrong


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:41 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
Bagels wrote:
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Bagels wrote:
When i went out at lunch , Larry's bit for a good 10-15 minutes (at least, had to go back to work) was that OMG NFL DRAFT ANALYSTS AREN'T ALWAYS CORRECT. Dan exhaustedly "and they face no repurcussions?!?!?! "
Larry admitted he got it from some NFL teams Twitter , but had a round up of all the experts in the 2017 draft and would you believe, none of them had Mahomes #1. crazy.

Seems like a decent question of why not one had him. Not one?


No. i think most had him at 3 or 4, one person had him at 6. This was an aggregate of all the "big time " players like McShay, Kiper, etc. etc.


Is the argument that the Bears shouldn't take Caleb Williams at #1 because draft analysts don't (or often) rank the college players correctly? If so, that's interesting coming from the guy who compared Bryce Young to Drew Brees, but then said he wouldn't draft him.

It was him pushing back at the semi straw man that he’s a “generational talent “
I realize some have said that
It just seemed like a really dumb segment, like it’s breaking news that draft analysts in any sport get things wrong . Wait until he gets to GM’s !


Strange segment. Just listened. Does anyone think that these draft experts are right normally?

Bernstein wants consequences to bad rankings...the "draft industrial complex".

Holmes using this to further his Fields infatuation and to cast doubt on anything that is pro Caleb.
Holmes is not biased at all.

This show is accusing others of being in tribes on Williams vs. Fields. This show may be the most one-sided I have seen in their defense of Fields.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:45 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
[quote="Beardown"]Why does Larry think it’s important to point out what the media guys have gotten wrong through the years?

All we have to do is look at what the actual GMs have gotten wrong through the years to know nobody has this figured out.

And we know the actual GMs have gotten a shit load of picks wrong[/qu
Holmes is still calling out Poles for getting a 3rd round pick round. I think he seriously expects a GM to hit on all of their higher picks. Leila also does that.

Good points though. Just don't think they are making the point they think they are in pointing out that the draft isn't easy to predict.

That still doesn't address why the Bears wouldn't take Caleb.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This is all just Holmes thinking he's making intelligent points when in reality he's engaging in a really bad case of hindsight bias. I think Dan knows this but he's more concerned with advancing the show's Fields agenda.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22702
pizza_Place: Pizanos
During Beenstein’s diatribe on sports media wrongthink, did he mention he was an initial booster of Marc Trestman?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38459
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
During Beenstein’s diatribe on sports media wrongthink, did he mention he was an initial booster of Marc Trestman?

Also in on Marc Trestman getting his booster.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40340
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
During Beenstein’s diatribe on sports media wrongthink, did he mention he was an initial booster of Marc Trestman?


I am sure he doesn’t recall. His disk drive overwrites the past as he moves on.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22702
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Unrelated note: I once saw Trestman while waiting for a table at Yard House in Glenview.

Anybody who saw that guy and didn’t immediate wonder if he was allowed within 500 feet of a school shouldn’t be making hiring decisions (*special dispensation for Keyshawn Johnson, of course).

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 21791
pizza_Place: Giordano's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
During Beenstein’s diatribe on sports media wrongthink, did he mention he was an initial booster of Marc Trestman?

What did he and dumbass Terry call him over and over, "Real. Damn. Coach." or some other nonsense? Or was that Fox?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32635
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
During Beenstein’s diatribe on sports media wrongthink, did he mention he was an initial booster of Marc Trestman?


Like Jack, Beenstein, lol.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55182
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
During Beenstein’s diatribe on sports media wrongthink, did he mention he was an initial booster of Marc Trestman?

What did he and dumbass Terry call him over and over, "Real. Damn. Coach." or some other nonsense? Or was that Fox?

They couldn't have. Trestman was a weirdo from day one when he was talking about staring into Jay Cutler's eyes in a Raleigh motel room. Must have been Fox.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22702
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Definitely Fox and definitely Bernsie compensating for his love of fellow intellectual Trestman.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 1:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:04 am
Posts: 584
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Turned on podcast to get thoughts of NFC and AFC championships game.....got Dan just being all political with far right newsmax and the covid vaccine and ripping rural people.

I get newmax is junk, covid vaccine(I did the vax and a booster), but rural people because they are poor just seems extreme and I am surprised Mitch has obviously not said anything about this through the years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40340
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
cookie23 wrote:
Turned on podcast to get thoughts of NFC and AFC championships game.....got Dan just being all political with far right newsmax and the covid vaccine and ripping rural people.

I get newmax is junk, covid vaccine(I did the vax and a booster), but rural people because they are poor just seems extreme and I am surprised Mitch has obviously not said anything about this through the years.


Mitch say something? :lol:

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81442
You cannot win a world series with Juan Uribe as a starting shortstop/Avery Johnson at point guard.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32635
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
cookie23 wrote:
Turned on podcast to get thoughts of NFC and AFC championships game.....got Dan just being all political with far right newsmax and the covid vaccine and ripping rural people.

I get newmax is junk, covid vaccine(I did the vax and a booster), but rural people because they are poor just seems extreme and I am surprised Mitch has obviously not said anything about this through the years.


He thanks you for not listening.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
denisdman wrote:
cookie23 wrote:
Turned on podcast to get thoughts of NFC and AFC championships game.....got Dan just being all political with far right newsmax and the covid vaccine and ripping rural people.

I get newmax is junk, covid vaccine(I did the vax and a booster), but rural people because they are poor just seems extreme and I am surprised Mitch has obviously not said anything about this through the years.


He thanks you for not listening.


Thankfully, most people do not get their medical advice from Dan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:27 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
Yesterday, Dan wanted terrorism charges against a statue being defaced. Lawrence agreed.

At least a hate crime is needed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 ... 94  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group