It is currently Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:54 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 94  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32635
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
BD wrote:
- We want this, we deserve this.
- New Zealand and Australia know what needs to be done.
- Gun fetishes
- States with large populations should decide the laws
- Missouri has no restrictions or common sense laws, 4th in gun violence

I really don't know why this show (or this station) think their bad political takes are top of mind.


Sounds like another informative day on WSCR. Maybe it should be required listening for CPS students.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
Douchebag wrote:
BD wrote:
I really don't know why this show (or this station) think their bad political takes are top of mind.

Because people like you listen to it.


I do listen to the podcast. It's more a curiosity as to how bad their takes are all while they think they are saying important things that need to be said.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 1:17 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
The entire station seems to have united against using tax payer money to pay for a new White Sox stadium. For some, it's racist for the White Sox to move from 35th and Shields, but for all, it's not responsible for the city to be on the hook for financing $1B.

I am amazed that we have finally found something that the hosts don't want the city/state to spend money on. They will spend money on anything, just not on a stadium!

Congrats on finally sounding sensible although they probably would be fine with using that $1B on other causes, just not the White Sox.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 30421
pizza_Place: What??
The math isn't hard. Either the city borrows $1B or the White Sox borrow $1B? If the end results will be so lucrative, as Uncle Jerry claims, he should just borrow it himself.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16282
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Grote (subbing for Bernstein and LoHo) going against the grain by challenging Ricketts' statement today that "Jed has had a really nice offseason." Maybe Ricketts meant Hoyer has been able to work a lot on his golf game...he certainly hasn't improved the team from last year.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3193
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
he must be talking about jed rotating into semiconductors and the russell 2000 during the off-season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 30421
pizza_Place: What??
He hired the greatest manager in the history of the universe.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55182
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
BD wrote:
The entire station seems to have united against using tax payer money to pay for a new White Sox stadium. For some, it's racist for the White Sox to move from 35th and Shields, but for all, it's not responsible for the city to be on the hook for financing $1B.

I am amazed that we have finally found something that the hosts don't want the city/state to spend money on. They will spend money on anything, just not on a stadium!

Congrats on finally sounding sensible although they probably would be fine with using that $1B on other causes, just not the White Sox.

There's a better chance of the Bears building a stadium there than the White Sox.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 11:31 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33973
Curious Hair wrote:
BD wrote:
The entire station seems to have united against using tax payer money to pay for a new White Sox stadium. For some, it's racist for the White Sox to move from 35th and Shields, but for all, it's not responsible for the city to be on the hook for financing $1B.

I am amazed that we have finally found something that the hosts don't want the city/state to spend money on. They will spend money on anything, just not on a stadium!

Congrats on finally sounding sensible although they probably would be fine with using that $1B on other causes, just not the White Sox.

There's a better chance of the Bears building a stadium there than the White Sox.


I think it's better for the SOX to be there. Because Bears fans will want and need more parking for 10 games. Less needed for the 81 Sox games where people won't need as much parking cuz it will be more public transportation or just walking there from work. Plus the SOX stadium will be half the seating capacity.

And the Bears stadium will be much bigger then the SOX stadium taking away more parking space.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:56 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
The way the Score (especially this show) characterizes this debate about funding the White Sox new stadium proposal - Illinois needing to be responsible for prioritizing their needs/$$ available - would make you think that the state is actually fiscally responsible and not one of the worst run states in the country.

The entire station is against this funding; probably the first time they have been spending money when the state couldn't afford it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 5:04 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
When this show takes calls, it is so forced. Parkins does a really good job of taking calls and having an actual conversation, Haugh/Mully are not bad either, but this show tries to make the segment a bit and show how smart they are. Just be normal people or don't take calls on the show.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81442
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Grote (subbing for Bernstein and LoHo) going against the grain by challenging Ricketts' statement today that "Jed has had a really nice offseason." Maybe Ricketts meant Hoyer has been able to work a lot on his golf game...he certainly hasn't improved the team from last year.


Is there someone who is more well thought of with no production to his name than Jed Hoyer? He should give Theo half his salary

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:


Is there someone who is more well thought of with no production to his name than Jed Hoyer?


Fields

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:04 am
Posts: 583
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bernstein is all for Sox leaving for Pritzker presidential ambitions are bigger than the Sox and would show he improved Illinois credit rating. What he said during transition.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 6941
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
cookie23 wrote:
... Pritzker ... bigger....


Image

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2412
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
They were leaning ino the "no public money for a White Sox stadium" thing in a very hard and self-righteous fashion. The only problem, at least when I was listening, was they couldn't find a stupid caller to disagree with them. You can only sustain the whole self-righteous chest thumping thing when you have some opposition.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55182
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Warren Newson wrote:
They were leaning ino the "no public money for a White Sox stadium" thing in a very hard and self-righteous fashion. The only problem, at least when I was listening, was they couldn't find a stupid caller to disagree with them. You can only sustain the whole self-righteous chest thumping thing when you have some opposition.

I think a few things make that opposition hard to find. First of all, we're not blind, we can see that the economy is bad and Chicago is not what it was five years ago, and that there are better allocations of limited resources than building a new park for the Sox. Then there's the fact that with the aging demographics of the Score listenership being what they are, New Comiskey opened in their lifetimes. (It opened in my lifetime, albeit when I was in preschool.) When you consider the work that's gone into Wrigley and the United Center--not to mention Comiskey itself!--I think there's an expectation that we build these places to last. Chicago knocks stuff down and builds new stuff all the time, but we don't have that culture of impermanence that's in, say, Atlanta or Dallas.

The other part, and maybe this is kind of a reach, is that part of the crosstown rivalry from the Sox side has always been that dumb rubes think Wrigley Field is the superior venue when the actual thinking man's fans of the Sox know that Comiskey is better thanks to its easy expressway access, ample parking, delicious concessions, open concourses, lack of piss troughs, and crap for kids to do. To renounce all that and say "no, this place sucks, the location blows, the seats are bad, bathrooms could be better, gotta throw it out and start all over" undermines an entire round of that pissing match. The harshest criticism I've heard from Sox fans, other than delusional ones who think the team should move to Crystal Lake or something, has been that you can't see the skyline. No self-respecting Sox fan is gonna call the Score and demand a brand-new stadium with more expensive tickets and more expensive parking so they can gawk at a skyline.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 30421
pizza_Place: What??
Curious Hair wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
They were leaning ino the "no public money for a White Sox stadium" thing in a very hard and self-righteous fashion. The only problem, at least when I was listening, was they couldn't find a stupid caller to disagree with them. You can only sustain the whole self-righteous chest thumping thing when you have some opposition.

I think a few things make that opposition hard to find. First of all, we're not blind, we can see that the economy is bad and Chicago is not what it was five years ago, and that there are better allocations of limited resources than building a new park for the Sox. Then there's the fact that with the aging demographics of the Score listenership being what they are, New Comiskey opened in their lifetimes. (It opened in my lifetime, albeit when I was in preschool.) When you consider the work that's gone into Wrigley and the United Center--not to mention Comiskey itself!--I think there's an expectation that we build these places to last. Chicago knocks stuff down and builds new stuff all the time, but we don't have that culture of impermanence that's in, say, Atlanta or Dallas.

The other part, and maybe this is kind of a reach, is that part of the crosstown rivalry from the Sox side has always been that dumb rubes think Wrigley Field is the superior venue when the actual thinking man's fans of the Sox know that Comiskey is better thanks to its easy expressway access, ample parking, delicious concessions, open concourses, lack of piss troughs, and crap for kids to do. To renounce all that and say "no, this place sucks, the location blows, the seats are bad, bathrooms could be better, gotta throw it out and start all over" undermines an entire round of that pissing match. The harshest criticism I've heard from Sox fans, other than delusional ones who think the team should move to Crystal Lake or something, has been that you can't see the skyline. No self-respecting Sox fan is gonna call the Score and demand a brand-new stadium with more expensive tickets and more expensive parking so they can gawk at a skyline.

I'd like a park I could be proud of as much as the next guy. But it's fine. Green grass, bases are 90 ft. It would look a lot better with some good players running around in it. Oh well, we got that 2nd place mentality. Sign Ohtani? haha, that isn't happening.

$1.2 Billion? haha, that isn't happening.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22702
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I’m wired to think this whole thing is a ruse to give Uncle Jeery pretext to move the team.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6175
pizza_Place: Frozen
During transition Larry appeared to be silent or absent for the first half. Bernstein, Parkins and Spiegel were discussing Jerry Reinsdorf and Governor Pritzker. Three Jewish hosts discussing two Jews in a city of 1% Jewish demographics.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:48 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12366
Lawrence and Dan agreed that Prtizker could use the state finances as a selling point for him running for President.


Last edited by BD on Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13132
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
BD wrote:
Lawrence and Dan agreed that Prtizker could use the state fiances as a selling point for him running for President.

Sounds like prostitution.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16282
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
BD wrote:
Lawrence and Dan agreed that Prtizker could use the state finances as a selling point for him running for President.


Were they saying Illinois’ finances are something to be proud of? The only reason we’re afloat is all the federal Covid money he got.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:04 am
Posts: 583
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bernstein was "old fun and correct Dan" when Spiegs is all wrapped up in having two teams, money bringing in to Chicago from out of town, etc. and Dan perfectly said something to the affect of, "who is traveling from out of state to see the White Sox, hell they have a hard enough time getting people from the city to go."

Spot on! Yes, Dan can be self righteous and virtue signal, but the man is the best at being quick whitted in spot on situations.

Shut Spiegs up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81442
It seems like all this came together as an parachute for the owner of the 78, who is in no rush to develop it.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 78907
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nardi wrote:
I'd like a park I could be proud of as much as the next guy. But it's fine. Green grass


Nope. Wrigley is the only ballpark with green grass. Every Cub fan remembers the day his dad first took him from his urban jungle into the oasis where he smelled the grass.

Sox Park is a concrete monolith located in a dangerous suburb called Bridgeport.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2412
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m wired to think this whole thing is a ruse to give Uncle Jeery pretext to move the team.


That was LoHo's theory as well: go to Springfield, get told to F off, and then say "Sorry Chicago. I tried."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40340
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
good dolphin wrote:
It seems like all this came together as an parachute for the owner of the 78, who is in no rush to develop it.


Would this surprise you in Chicago?

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 1462
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
BD wrote:

Congrats on finally sounding sensible although they probably would be fine with using that $1B on other causes, just not the White Sox.


I think your misunderstanding here is based on thinking that the White Sox are a cause or anything other than a billion dollar professional baseball franchise protected by anti-trust laws.

_________________
Rod wrote:
There are a lot of hateful people out there



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face, a few inches to the good more than Trump was. You wanted this, now you've got it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 1462
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
cookie23 wrote:
Bernstein was "old fun and correct Dan" when Spiegs is all wrapped up in having two teams, money bringing in to Chicago from out of town, etc. and Dan perfectly said something to the affect of, "who is traveling from out of state to see the White Sox, hell they have a hard enough time getting people from the city to go."

Spot on! Yes, Dan can be self righteous and virtue signal, but the man is the best at being quick whitted in spot on situations.

Shut Spiegs up.


That exchange is the reason Bernstein got popular in the first place. Recent Bernstein is a shell of himself and it's a shame

_________________
Rod wrote:
There are a lot of hateful people out there



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face, a few inches to the good more than Trump was. You wanted this, now you've got it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 94  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group