It is currently Sun Nov 10, 2024 12:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 49  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57176
There is no way they finish the year with only 40 wins. There are just too many games and it is almost impossible to not win some.

60 is the lowest anyone should be thinking.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Bagels wrote:
but Bob can't even make a 2 foot putt


Everyone's a critic, breakfast sandwich


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:37 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12439
RFDC wrote:
There is no way they finish the year with only 40 wins. There are just too many games and it is almost impossible to not win some.

60 is the lowest anyone should be thinking.


This is closer to accurate. Some of their hitters, even if there are questions on them (like Vaughn) are also not hitting. Some of these players will have some production.

The overall issue is the talent is just very bad. The starting rotation is not major league quality - 2 or 3 of these guys are, at best, Triple A, fill-ins. It will be hard to be consistent (or in the White Sox case, win even 40% of their games) if the starters are this bad and their more proven hitters aren't producing.

Whether it's 40 wins or 60 wins, there isn't much to take from this roster though. I know they have a decent minor league system so maybe some hope for the future, but if they refuse to spend.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102656
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
RFDC wrote:
There is no way they finish the year with only 40 wins. There are just too many games and it is almost impossible to not win some.

60 is the lowest anyone should be thinking.
Honestly, have you watched more than couple innings of Sox baseball this year? We've certainly had some poor teams on the Southside over the last decade, but this is a whole new level of bad. The offense struggles to score 2 runs a game. They have 8 HR and 31 RBI has a team.
Sox just gave up 27 runs and 4 HRs the past 3 games to the Reds.

Sox won 61 games last season. The 2024 edition is much worse than last year's club.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
i think i'd go between 50-60


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57176
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102656
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
RFDC wrote:
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.
You would think so, but since the AS break last season, the White Sox are 25-60. That extrapolates to 47.6 wins over a 162 game season. They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season. They haven't won a series in April since 2022.

The 2003 Tigers were the worst team in recent memory at 49-113. This year's White Sox is going to come close to that.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:02 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12439
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.
You would think so, but since the AS break last season, the White Sox are 25-60. That extrapolates to 47.6 wins over a 162 game season. They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season. They haven't won a series in April since 2022.

The 2003 Tigers were the worst team in recent memory at 49-113. This year's White Sox is going to come close to that.


You do make a strong case that they this team may be even worse than we are projecting. They have been historically bad for awhile now.

Unless they start bringing up some of their better young talent, which seems like a bad idea this year if they aren't ready, guys like Siroka and Flexen are probably not major league starters and Crochet is not a #1, and will eventually be limited by innings (and probably regression). Most days, there are 5 to 6 easy outs in that lineup - it's really hard too Maldonado, Lopez, Shewmake, DeJong and Pillar ever be anything but bad.

Vaughn, Benintendi, Jiminez and Sheets probably need to carry this offense and they have to hope Fletcher becomes a productive hitter. Is Vaughn anything more than average though? Yes, he's better than he's been, but there just isn't much upside here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season.


now that's pretty crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82060
every cub loss is like a win so add 81 to whichever number you like

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 2:22 pm
Posts: 2114
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.
You would think so, but since the AS break last season, the White Sox are 25-60. That extrapolates to 47.6 wins over a 162 game season. They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season. They haven't won a series in April since 2022.

The 2003 Tigers were the worst team in recent memory at 49-113. This year's White Sox is going to come close to that.


and this roster is even worse than the crap they had post-AS break last season. It sucks, because I enjoy watching baseball, but I haven't watched more than a few innings since going to opening day. The thought of watching them this weekend didn't even cross my mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10081
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
BD wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.
You would think so, but since the AS break last season, the White Sox are 25-60. That extrapolates to 47.6 wins over a 162 game season. They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season. They haven't won a series in April since 2022.

The 2003 Tigers were the worst team in recent memory at 49-113. This year's White Sox is going to come close to that.


You do make a strong case that they this team may be even worse than we are projecting. They have been historically bad for awhile now.

Unless they start bringing up some of their better young talent, which seems like a bad idea this year if they aren't ready, guys like Siroka and Flexen are probably not major league starters and Crochet is not a #1, and will eventually be limited by innings (and probably regression). Most days, there are 5 to 6 easy outs in that lineup - it's really hard too Maldonado, Lopez, Shewmake, DeJong and Pillar ever be anything but bad.

Vaughn, Benintendi, Jiminez and Sheets probably need to carry this offense and they have to hope Fletcher becomes a productive hitter. Is Vaughn anything more than average though? Yes, he's better than he's been, but there just isn't much upside here.

Almost any player above replacement level will be traded the last week of July if they are not on the IL. Maybe not Benintendi because of his contract.

They are very likely to finish out the season 13-39 in their last 52.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:36 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12439
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
BD wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.
You would think so, but since the AS break last season, the White Sox are 25-60. That extrapolates to 47.6 wins over a 162 game season. They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season. They haven't won a series in April since 2022.

The 2003 Tigers were the worst team in recent memory at 49-113. This year's White Sox is going to come close to that.


You do make a strong case that they this team may be even worse than we are projecting. They have been historically bad for awhile now.

Unless they start bringing up some of their better young talent, which seems like a bad idea this year if they aren't ready, guys like Siroka and Flexen are probably not major league starters and Crochet is not a #1, and will eventually be limited by innings (and probably regression). Most days, there are 5 to 6 easy outs in that lineup - it's really hard too Maldonado, Lopez, Shewmake, DeJong and Pillar ever be anything but bad.

Vaughn, Benintendi, Jiminez and Sheets probably need to carry this offense and they have to hope Fletcher becomes a productive hitter. Is Vaughn anything more than average though? Yes, he's better than he's been, but there just isn't much upside here.

Almost any player above replacement level will be traded the last week of July if they are not on the IL. Maybe not Benintendi because of his contract.

They are very likely to finish out the season 13-39 in their last 52.


Another good point, but I don't know who we are even talking about. Maybe there's a reliever or two that can be moved, Jimenez if he stays healthy, but I think the demand for White Sox players will be somewhat limited.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
I have good news for White Sox fans....that 2003 Tigers team parlayed their historically bad season into a transformative player, Justin Verlander in the 2004 draft. What transformative player will the White Sox redeem in the 2025 draft? Stay tuned!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10755
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
BD wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.
You would think so, but since the AS break last season, the White Sox are 25-60. That extrapolates to 47.6 wins over a 162 game season. They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season. They haven't won a series in April since 2022.

The 2003 Tigers were the worst team in recent memory at 49-113. This year's White Sox is going to come close to that.


You do make a strong case that they this team may be even worse than we are projecting. They have been historically bad for awhile now.

Unless they start bringing up some of their better young talent, which seems like a bad idea this year if they aren't ready, guys like Siroka and Flexen are probably not major league starters and Crochet is not a #1, and will eventually be limited by innings (and probably regression). Most days, there are 5 to 6 easy outs in that lineup - it's really hard too Maldonado, Lopez, Shewmake, DeJong and Pillar ever be anything but bad.

Vaughn, Benintendi, Jiminez and Sheets probably need to carry this offense and they have to hope Fletcher becomes a productive hitter. Is Vaughn anything more than average though? Yes, he's better than he's been, but there just isn't much upside here.

I'm trying really hard to take the emotion / bias out of this, but seriously....I cannot think of a worse roster in my lifetime. As a said before....they'll get 40 wins. I'd bet money they don't get 50. They seriously may challenge that 2003 Detroit team with 43 wins.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10081
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
BD wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
BD wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I completely get that this is a really bad team. But it is just about impossible to only win 40 games. The Oakland team last year was brutal as well and they got to 50.

Even the worst of teams have some stretches where they play decent and get a few wins.
You would think so, but since the AS break last season, the White Sox are 25-60. That extrapolates to 47.6 wins over a 162 game season. They haven't won a series since August 4-6 last season. They haven't won a series in April since 2022.

The 2003 Tigers were the worst team in recent memory at 49-113. This year's White Sox is going to come close to that.


You do make a strong case that they this team may be even worse than we are projecting. They have been historically bad for awhile now.

Unless they start bringing up some of their better young talent, which seems like a bad idea this year if they aren't ready, guys like Siroka and Flexen are probably not major league starters and Crochet is not a #1, and will eventually be limited by innings (and probably regression). Most days, there are 5 to 6 easy outs in that lineup - it's really hard too Maldonado, Lopez, Shewmake, DeJong and Pillar ever be anything but bad.

Vaughn, Benintendi, Jiminez and Sheets probably need to carry this offense and they have to hope Fletcher becomes a productive hitter. Is Vaughn anything more than average though? Yes, he's better than he's been, but there just isn't much upside here.

Almost any player above replacement level will be traded the last week of July if they are not on the IL. Maybe not Benintendi because of his contract.

They are very likely to finish out the season 13-39 in their last 52.


Another good point, but I don't know who we are even talking about. Maybe there's a reliever or two that can be moved, Jimenez if he stays healthy, but I think the demand for White Sox players will be somewhat limited.


Pham if he hits anywhere like he did last year, Robert if he is healthy and playing, someone will add Eloy, Vaughn can probably be a bench bat (hey, the Marlins took Burger last year), maybe a reliever having a good year. Moncada probably won't be back in time, and the veteran starters are all junk pile.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
There is no way they finish the year with only 40 wins. There are just too many games and it is almost impossible to not win some.

60 is the lowest anyone should be thinking.
Honestly, have you watched more than couple innings of Sox baseball this year? We've certainly had some poor teams on the Southside over the last decade, but this is a whole new level of bad. The offense struggles to score 2 runs a game. They have 8 HR and 31 RBI has a team.
Sox just gave up 27 runs and 4 HRs the past 3 games to the Reds.

Sox won 61 games last season. The 2024 edition is much worse than last year's club.

Here's the funny bad part. Chris Getz/Pedro Grifol's defense is WORSE. I was under the impression that,"yeah, we'll suck but we'll be able to catch the ball and we're going to stop walking 8 guys a game."

5th most in BBs
27th in defense.

They are terrible at everything. 60 wins? Where will they come from? Defense, offense, or pitching?

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Caller Bob wrote:
I have good news for White Sox fans....that 2003 Tigers team parlayed their historically bad season into a transformative player, Justin Verlander in the 2004 draft. What transformative player will the White Sox redeem in the 2025 draft? Stay tuned!


Apparently 10th is the highest they can draft next year.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102656
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
denisdman wrote:
Apparently 10th is the highest they can draft next year.
This is the first I have heard of this.


Nardi wrote:
60 wins? Where will they come from? Defense, offense, or pitching?
Twins plane crash, so the Sox get like 10 wins via forfeit.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Frank Coztansa wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Apparently 10th is the highest they can draft next year.
This is the first I have heard of this.


Nardi wrote:
60 wins? Where will they come from? Defense, offense, or pitching?
Twins plane crash, so the Sox get like 10 wins via forfeit.


It was on the Score today- it is the new Collective Bargaining rules.

https://www.mlb.com/news/draft-rule-cha ... th-new-cba

“ Teams that receive revenue-sharing payouts can't receive a lottery pick for more than two years in a row and those that don't can't get a top-six choice in consecutive Drafts. Furthermore, a club that's ineligible for the lottery can't select higher than 10th overall.”

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102656
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Hmm. Are you sure? I thought I remember reading a blurb from a blurb in this section about the Sox not getting a top ten pick about a hundred or so times, but I cannot be certain.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12439
denisdman wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Apparently 10th is the highest they can draft next year.
This is the first I have heard of this.


Nardi wrote:
60 wins? Where will they come from? Defense, offense, or pitching?
Twins plane crash, so the Sox get like 10 wins via forfeit.


It was on the Score today- it is the new Collective Bargaining rules.

https://www.mlb.com/news/draft-rule-cha ... th-new-cba

“ Teams that receive revenue-sharing payouts can't receive a lottery pick for more than two years in a row and those that don't can't get a top-six choice in consecutive Drafts. Furthermore, a club that's ineligible for the lottery can't select higher than 10th overall.”


I wonder if the White Sox are aware of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I just heard it on the Score today and then researched the new draft rules. So it looks like 10th is the top pick they can get for the 2025 draft. I believe they are 5th this year.

I am not certain.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:31 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12439
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
RFDC wrote:
There is no way they finish the year with only 40 wins. There are just too many games and it is almost impossible to not win some.

60 is the lowest anyone should be thinking.
Honestly, have you watched more than couple innings of Sox baseball this year? We've certainly had some poor teams on the Southside over the last decade, but this is a whole new level of bad. The offense struggles to score 2 runs a game. They have 8 HR and 31 RBI has a team.
Sox just gave up 27 runs and 4 HRs the past 3 games to the Reds.

Sox won 61 games last season. The 2024 edition is much worse than last year's club.

Here's the funny bad part. Chris Getz/Pedro Grifol's defense is WORSE. I was under the impression that,"yeah, we'll suck but we'll be able to catch the ball and we're going to stop walking 8 guys a game."

5th most in BBs
27th in defense.


They are terrible at everything. 60 wins? Where will they come from? Defense, offense, or pitching?


That is what they sold to us. Great defense, better brand of baseball.

It's much worse so far.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40578
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Hmm. Are you sure? I thought I remember reading a blurb from a blurb in this section about the Sox not getting a top ten pick about a hundred or so times, but I cannot be certain. :evil:


:lol:

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13235
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
denisdman wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Apparently 10th is the highest they can draft next year.
This is the first I have heard of this.


It was on the Score today- it is the new Collective Bargaining rules.

https://www.mlb.com/news/draft-rule-cha ... th-new-cba

“ Teams that receive revenue-sharing payouts can't receive a lottery pick for more than two years in a row and those that don't can't get a top-six choice in consecutive Drafts. Furthermore, a club that's ineligible for the lottery can't select higher than 10th overall.”

Dennis, perhaps you were lounging on the beach in Belize during this scintillating back and forth...
https://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=131746&p=4024925&hilit=Cashman#p4024925

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
pittmike wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Hmm. Are you sure? I thought I remember reading a blurb from a blurb in this section about the Sox not getting a top ten pick about a hundred or so times, but I cannot be certain. :evil:


:lol:


Oh geesh. Sorry. I got it. LOL

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Apparently 10th is the highest they can draft next year.
This is the first I have heard of this.


It was on the Score today- it is the new Collective Bargaining rules.

https://www.mlb.com/news/draft-rule-cha ... th-new-cba

“ Teams that receive revenue-sharing payouts can't receive a lottery pick for more than two years in a row and those that don't can't get a top-six choice in consecutive Drafts. Furthermore, a club that's ineligible for the lottery can't select higher than 10th overall.”

Dennis, perhaps you were lounging on the beach in Belize during this scintillating back and forth...
https://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=131746&p=4024925&hilit=Cashman#p4024925


LOL, hard to keep up around here even though I am pretty active.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13235
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
denisdman wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Apparently 10th is the highest they can draft next year.
This is the first I have heard of this.


It was on the Score today- it is the new Collective Bargaining rules.

https://www.mlb.com/news/draft-rule-cha ... th-new-cba

“ Teams that receive revenue-sharing payouts can't receive a lottery pick for more than two years in a row and those that don't can't get a top-six choice in consecutive Drafts. Furthermore, a club that's ineligible for the lottery can't select higher than 10th overall.”

Dennis, perhaps you were lounging on the beach in Belize during this scintillating back and forth...
https://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=131746&p=4024925&hilit=Cashman#p4024925


LOL, hard to keep up around here even though I am pretty active.

Murph wrote:
Miss a little, miss a lot

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I actually caught the posts about the value of the second round pick, but I did not know the genesis of the argument.

Put me in the camp as one who thinks they find a way to get to 60 wins.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 49  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group