It is currently Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84 ... 94  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 7:44 pm 
Online
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29025
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BD wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Who is this Trysta Frick lady hey have on here today talking WNBA? SOunds like a 16 year old with a froggy throat.


In the last few weeks, her and Fridell have suddenly become weekly guests and she now has a weekend show on the Score.


I haven't heard Frick, but Friedell is absolutely brutal. The guy sounds like he's permanently hung over.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22691
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Tall Midget wrote:
BD wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Who is this Trysta Frick lady hey have on here today talking WNBA? SOunds like a 16 year old with a froggy throat.


In the last few weeks, her and Fridell have suddenly become weekly guests and she now has a weekend show on the Score.


I haven't heard Frick, but Friedell is absolutely brutal. The guy sounds like he's permanently hung over.

Is that the guy who they had on immediately after his firing from the Athletic who sounded like he needed suicide prevention?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 4:26 pm
Posts: 2211
pizza_Place: DATYYy
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
BD wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Who is this Trysta Frick lady hey have on here today talking WNBA? SOunds like a 16 year old with a froggy throat.


In the last few weeks, her and Fridell have suddenly become weekly guests and she now has a weekend show on the Score.


I haven't heard Frick, but Friedell is absolutely brutal. The guy sounds like he's permanently hung over.

Is that the guy who they had on immediately after his firing from the Athletic who sounded like he needed suicide prevention?


No. That was James Fegan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2024 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4490
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Tall Midget wrote:
BD wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Who is this Trysta Frick lady hey have on here today talking WNBA? SOunds like a 16 year old with a froggy throat.


In the last few weeks, her and Fridell have suddenly become weekly guests and she now has a weekend show on the Score.


I haven't heard Frick, but Friedell is absolutely brutal. The guy sounds like he's permanently hung over.


:lol: that’s pretty accurate. He’s also the guy who baited and got into it with Kyrie Irving asking him about a silly retweet of an Alex Jones movie clip from the 90s.

Trysta is a former Barstool employee.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12362
Ron Wolfley wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
BD wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Who is this Trysta Frick lady hey have on here today talking WNBA? SOunds like a 16 year old with a froggy throat.


In the last few weeks, her and Fridell have suddenly become weekly guests and she now has a weekend show on the Score.


I haven't heard Frick, but Friedell is absolutely brutal. The guy sounds like he's permanently hung over.


:lol: that’s pretty accurate. He’s also the guy who baited and got into it with Kyrie Irving asking him about a silly retweet of an Alex Jones movie clip from the 90s.

Trysta is a former Barstool employee.


Shouldn't Trysta have been cancelled for being with Barstool? I would think that's a bridge too far for our sensitive mid-day hosts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81438
I think she's employed by a betting site that buys her time on the score

Dan would kill his mother if a corporate overlord wished it

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2024 7:45 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 30415
pizza_Place: What??
Will the corporate overlords come to get us?

I hope so son. I hope so.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2024 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38458
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nardi wrote:
Will the corporate overlords come to get us?

I hope so son. I hope so.

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 6:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12362
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
that's awesome that they're talking about national WNBA now


The amount of tip-toeing around all of the issues surrounding Caitlin Clark by this show on Monday was not surprising, but still pretty predictable.


On yesterday's show, Dan says he is listening, not talking, and needs to understand the complexities of the WNBA players. They both agreed that an article from the Chicago Tribune must be read before you can have an opinion about the WNBA. They also implied that certain people were some sort of racist, bigot, etc. (they didn't specify which) if you have a negative opinion of the players in the WNBA.

We have found the 1 sport where neither are willing to tell the hard truths that must be told.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40336
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
On Monday they said every reason remotely possible for Clark to get trucked. Except one. Black girls are pissed a white fork they feel is inferior is making the cash and getting the attention.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 7:17 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 30415
pizza_Place: What??
Are you denying she's America's basketball princess?

But you're right that nobody wants to have an honest conversation. Same as usual. Just talk around it and pretend there's SO much nuance. There isn't. The black girls hate she's taking ALL the oxygen in the room and the whites who never watched one fucking second of WNBA say "Hands off, she's our baby girl. Now go fly commercial."

Now back to pretending it's something else.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81438
BD wrote:
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
that's awesome that they're talking about national WNBA now


The amount of tip-toeing around all of the issues surrounding Caitlin Clark by this show on Monday was not surprising, but still pretty predictable.


On yesterday's show, Dan says he is listening, not talking, and needs to understand the complexities of the WNBA players. They both agreed that an article from the Chicago Tribune must be read before you can have an opinion about the WNBA. They also implied that certain people were some sort of racist, bigot, etc. (they didn't specify which) if you have a negative opinion of the players in the WNBA.

We have found the 1 sport where neither are willing to tell the hard truths that must be told.


How many times has he maligned college basketball fans for watching an inferior product?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40336
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
good dolphin wrote:
BD wrote:
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
that's awesome that they're talking about national WNBA now


The amount of tip-toeing around all of the issues surrounding Caitlin Clark by this show on Monday was not surprising, but still pretty predictable.


On yesterday's show, Dan says he is listening, not talking, and needs to understand the complexities of the WNBA players. They both agreed that an article from the Chicago Tribune must be read before you can have an opinion about the WNBA. They also implied that certain people were some sort of racist, bigot, etc. (they didn't specify which) if you have a negative opinion of the players in the WNBA.

We have found the 1 sport where neither are willing to tell the hard truths that must be told.


How many times has he maligned college basketball fans for watching an inferior product?



That and he coded it to mean you like white players.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38458
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: it’s OK to watch and like an inferior product as long as it’s the black wildebeests of the WNBA that are the ones performing it .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16280
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
BD wrote:
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
that's awesome that they're talking about national WNBA now


The amount of tip-toeing around all of the issues surrounding Caitlin Clark by this show on Monday was not surprising, but still pretty predictable.


On yesterday's show, Dan says he is listening, not talking, and needs to understand the complexities of the WNBA players. They both agreed that an article from the Chicago Tribune must be read before you can have an opinion about the WNBA. They also implied that certain people were some sort of racist, bigot, etc. (they didn't specify which) if you have a negative opinion of the players in the WNBA.

We have found the 1 sport where neither are willing to tell the hard truths that must be told.


I read that Trib article. Basically said the conversations related to the WNBA and Caitlin Clark are dangerous and ugly because the league is “predominantly black and substantially queer.”

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40336
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Jaw Breaker wrote:
BD wrote:
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
that's awesome that they're talking about national WNBA now


The amount of tip-toeing around all of the issues surrounding Caitlin Clark by this show on Monday was not surprising, but still pretty predictable.


On yesterday's show, Dan says he is listening, not talking, and needs to understand the complexities of the WNBA players. They both agreed that an article from the Chicago Tribune must be read before you can have an opinion about the WNBA. They also implied that certain people were some sort of racist, bigot, etc. (they didn't specify which) if you have a negative opinion of the players in the WNBA.

We have found the 1 sport where neither are willing to tell the hard truths that must be told.


I read that Trib article. Basically said the conversations related to the WNBA and Caitlin Clark are dangerous and ugly because the league is “predominantly black and substantially queer.”


Then Clark is a minority to be celebrated!

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 11:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 1462
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
Jaw Breaker wrote:
BD wrote:
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
that's awesome that they're talking about national WNBA now


The amount of tip-toeing around all of the issues surrounding Caitlin Clark by this show on Monday was not surprising, but still pretty predictable.


On yesterday's show, Dan says he is listening, not talking, and needs to understand the complexities of the WNBA players. They both agreed that an article from the Chicago Tribune must be read before you can have an opinion about the WNBA. They also implied that certain people were some sort of racist, bigot, etc. (they didn't specify which) if you have a negative opinion of the players in the WNBA.

We have found the 1 sport where neither are willing to tell the hard truths that must be told.


I read that Trib article. Basically said the conversations related to the WNBA and Caitlin Clark are dangerous and ugly because the league is “predominantly black and substantially queer.”


What is Caitlin Clark supposed to do in her situation? Not take the money? This is just the purest example of resentment, i.e. "hating" you'll ever see. All the other stuff getting thrown around is just people trying to sound intellectual when the issue is stupidly obvious.

_________________
Rod wrote:
There are a lot of hateful people out there



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face, a few inches to the good more than Trump was. You wanted this, now you've got it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81438
pittmike wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
BD wrote:
BD wrote:
Bagels wrote:
that's awesome that they're talking about national WNBA now


The amount of tip-toeing around all of the issues surrounding Caitlin Clark by this show on Monday was not surprising, but still pretty predictable.


On yesterday's show, Dan says he is listening, not talking, and needs to understand the complexities of the WNBA players. They both agreed that an article from the Chicago Tribune must be read before you can have an opinion about the WNBA. They also implied that certain people were some sort of racist, bigot, etc. (they didn't specify which) if you have a negative opinion of the players in the WNBA.

We have found the 1 sport where neither are willing to tell the hard truths that must be told.


I read that Trib article. Basically said the conversations related to the WNBA and Caitlin Clark are dangerous and ugly because the league is “predominantly black and substantially queer.”


Then Clark is a minority to be celebrated!


Jackie Robinson had to endure a lot of bigotry early in his career as well

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23311
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Caitlin Clark is the Tim Anderson of basketball?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 21791
pizza_Place: Giordano's
"You're watching the WNBA wrong" is the tip-top of the "Libs eat their own" mountain.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 10:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3192
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
daniel from deerfield hasn't really talked about how his favorite DEI baseball manager is doing with the angels. always blurting out his name before loho could, after any vacant baseball managerial position was discussed. no genuine discussion, just hire ron washington.

he did massage happ's back yesterday - "looks like you've come around...". 0-4 yesterday, batting .218 with 6 HRs. velazquez on the royals is hitting around the same, with more HRs. cuas may be back to delivering next day packages. maybe we'll trade canario for maldonando, since there are no openings in the outfield.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40336
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I notice the term of the week seems to be slug. As in Nico has no slug.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 11:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3192
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
yeah, nico is part of the problem. least amount of HRs from ALL qualified (16) MLB 2nd basemen. ok, no problem. is he hitting for average? .252, 9th out of 16 qualified 2nd basemen. hmmm..

noticed last year...not many clutch hits, many poor situational ABs stood out. stolen bases were nice, they've since gone away. it's obvious nico squeezes the sawdust out of the bat in clutch time.

very good glove, seems like a good teammate, professional, plays hurt...i guess he gets a pass. or, is it some type of privilege?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40336
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Dan is really against the Bears as far as Warren and the stadium is concerned.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 12:00 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12362
pittmike wrote:
Dan is really against the Bears as far as Warren and the stadium is concerned.


I don't think he's necessarily wrong, but I think those two love taking a sports topic and turning into a political issue. I think Lawrence now thinks of himself as a inside political reporter with all of his inside conversations. I think he said he had considered running for office. Dan just wants to go after the evil billionarie's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 1451
Location: Laying in the weeds
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
Dan is really against the Bears as far as Warren and the stadium is concerned.

The 3 of them are looking out for my money.

_________________
You cannot make me care about the WNBA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40336
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
hootmon wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Dan is really against the Bears as far as Warren and the stadium is concerned.

The 3 of them are looking out for my money.


Yeah you should feel good. Particularly as Dan sent his kids to a CPS school with 8,000 times the special money and resources everyone else's kids get.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 1462
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
pittmike wrote:
Dan is really against the Bears as far as Warren and the stadium is concerned.


Is there anyone that is for the Bears current plan that lives here? Warren is a total snake oil salesman, he should any normal person's skin crawl.

_________________
Rod wrote:
There are a lot of hateful people out there



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face, a few inches to the good more than Trump was. You wanted this, now you've got it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7290
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
pittmike wrote:
Dan is really against the Bears as far as Warren and the stadium is concerned.

this is one topic Dan is 100% correct on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 1451
Location: Laying in the weeds
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Dan is really against the Bears as far as Warren and the stadium is concerned.

this is one topic Dan is 100% correct on.

I think quite a few people are against the financing scheme. But today he was really shrill--like he is the only one who sees through this and the rest of the world is happy to get fleeced.
He really did not like the tower crane references.

_________________
You cannot make me care about the WNBA.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84 ... 94  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group