It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 8:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 9:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3385
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
reversing the usa's energy momentum is:

- revoking leases to drill for oil and gas on federal lands and in federal waters

- revoking leases for mining

- halt permits to export LNG

- halting pipelines that would have imported 830k bbl/day (keystone, alone) of canadian oil to the usa

the consequences are two-fold, the hit on usa consumers and the political headaches of relying on other nations for energy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
reversing the usa's energy momentum is:

- revoking leases to drill for oil and gas on federal lands and in federal waters

- revoking leases for mining

- halt permits to export LNG

- halting pipelines that would have imported 830k bbl/day of canadian oil to the usa

the consequences are two-fold, the hit on usa consumers and the political headaches of relying on other nations for energy.


More drilling leases were approved under Biden than were approved by Trump and Obama

The LNG market exploded because of Biden and an unknown person authorizing the destruction of a Russian pipeline. We're now the top supplier of natural gas to Europe.

Edit:

Receipts
https://subscriber.politicopro.com/arti ... e-00138376

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detai ... rd,Bcf%2Fd)%20in%202023.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3385
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
Quote:
At the end of the 2020 fiscal year, right before President Biden took office, a total of 6,234 applications for permit to drill were pending approval. Recent media reports claim that in the last three years, the Biden administration has approved 9,522 permits to drill – which would make up the permit backlog, plus some.

Still, according to the latest BLM data, there are still 5,366 permits currently pending approval before the agency. In part due to the massive slowdown in leasing under the Biden administration, BLM had received a paltry 452 new permit applications year-to-date as of October 2023 – indicating the chilling effect that the bureaucratic slog can have on the industry.

Reminder: one of Biden’s first moves upon taking office was pausing lease sales, resulting in the number of leases for development on federal land slowing down significantly during the Biden administration compared to previous administrations. Delays in sales, ongoing appeals, and settlements with activist groups further contribute to the decline. New Mexico, North Dakota and Colorado have been among the states with lease sales postponed or canceled resulting in a significant economic impact. This impact has affected local and state revenues and budgeting, particularly for these states heavily reliant on oil and gas revenue. Meanwhile, the Biden administration also settled with activist groups and agreed to re-evaluate the National Environmental Policy Act reviews for nearly all of the leases issued under the Trump administration in Wyoming and a significant number across Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Montana. As the Wyoming Tribune Eagle explains back in 2022 when the news broke:

“None of the leases have been vacated, but their future is uncertain. The Department of the Interior now has to reevaluate and retroactively justify more than two dozen lease sales. If it decides it can’t, or its reasoning doesn’t satisfy the court, the sales could be reversed and any existing permits revoked.”

This ongoing NEPA review has been used as rationale for the Bureau of Land Management failing to authorize Wyoming’s November 2020 leases from the state’s last sale under the Trump administration. For perspective, that’s a nearly $7 million sale that’s been in limbo for more than three years.

The Biden administration’s pace of oil and gas leasing isn’t just slow – it’s the slowest in half a century. A Wall Street Journal analysis of federal acres leased for oil and gas production over the past 50 years revealed that the Biden administration leased a historic low of 0.13 million acres during its first 19 months compared to the 4.4 million acres auctioned for lease during the first year and a half of the Trump presidency.


it took a federal judge (3 weeks ago) to end biden's LNG export 'pause':

Quote:
Federal judge blocks Biden’s pause on LNG export permits
The decision to stay the LNG pause upends one of Joe Biden’s major policy nods to climate-focused activists who have accused the president of not doing enough to mitigate planet-warming emissions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Last year marks the third consecutive year in which the United States supplied more LNG to Europe than any other country: 27%, or 2.4 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), of total European LNG imports in 2021; 44% (6.5 Bcf/d) in 2022; and 48% (7.1 Bcf/d) in 2023.




President Joe Biden has approved nearly 50 percent more oil and gas drilling permits for wells on federal land since taking office than former President Donald Trump did in his first three years, according to newly released data from the Interior Department.

But Biden has not trumpeted the permit data, and climate activists have criticized the administration for failing to halt new fossil fuel production on federal lands as Biden promised during the 2020 campaign. Those activists have pointed to approval of the Willow oil project in Alaska, as well as the expansion of natural gas exports 

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55924
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
pittmike wrote:
Joe might be the worst POTUS we have had.

George W. Bush was the worst president we ever had, but in support of your argument, Joe Biden was with him every step of the way on invading Iraq.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40639
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe might be the worst POTUS we have had.

George W. Bush was the worst president we ever had, but in support of your argument, Joe Biden was with him every step of the way on invading Iraq.


Respectfully disagree.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6282
pizza_Place: PizzaHut


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Was Andrew Johnson never president? Did they kill him as planned with Lincoln?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55924
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
pittmike wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe might be the worst POTUS we have had.

George W. Bush was the worst president we ever had, but in support of your argument, Joe Biden was with him every step of the way on invading Iraq.


Respectfully disagree.

Fine, worst president of the modern era. I'm sure James Buchanan was worse if you want to go that deep. But I don't think we've ever truly recovered from the damage to the world and the imperialization of the office that Cheney and the neocons brought upon us. Reagan right up there as well between the AIDS benign neglect and the erosion of the middle class.

Biden was neither as bad nor as great as his respective sides made him out to be. After Trump, the American people understandably rejected the notion of a single figure as head of government in favor of a more committee/bureaucracy-based organization competently administering our decline, and that's more or less what we got. Now, it seems like maybe we don't like that idea so much after all. The gears of the machine kept running for four years, which has to count for something, but "greatest president since FDR" was always horseshit.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3385
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
Nas wrote:




President Joe Biden has approved nearly 50 percent more oil and gas drilling permits for wells on federal land since taking office than former President Donald Trump did in his first three years, according to newly released data from the Interior Department.

But Biden has not trumpeted the permit data, and climate activists have criticized the administration for failing to halt new fossil fuel production on federal lands as Biden promised during the 2020 campaign. Those activists have pointed to approval of the Willow oil project in Alaska, as well as the expansion of natural gas exports [/i]


again:

Quote:
At the end of the 2020 fiscal year, right before President Biden took office, a total of 6,234 applications for permit to drill were pending approval. Recent media reports claim that in the last three years, the Biden administration has approved 9,522 permits to drill – which would make up the permit backlog, plus some.

Still, according to the latest BLM data, there are still 5,366 permits currently pending approval before the agency. In part due to the massive slowdown in leasing under the Biden administration, BLM had received a paltry 452 new permit applications year-to-date as of October 2023 – indicating the chilling effect that the bureaucratic slog can have on the industry.

The Biden administration’s pace of oil and gas leasing isn’t just slow – it’s the slowest in half a century. A Wall Street Journal analysis of federal acres leased for oil and gas production over the past 50 years revealed that the Biden administration leased a historic low of 0.13 million acres during its first 19 months compared to the 4.4 million acres auctioned for lease during the first year and a half of the Trump presidency.



i realize your shtick as a biden guy, but, the man himself told us, "we're going to end fossil fuels". - 2020 debate. don't forget, biden has either proposed or has finalized regulations that have restricted the energy industry.

Quote:
While oil output is at a record high, we could be producing even more but for the president’s “whole of government” effort to chill investment. The year before President Biden was inaugurated, the Energy Information Administration was forecasting oil output in 2023 of 14 million barrels a day. Actual output came in at 1.1 million barrels per day below that forecast.

Oil production hit a record in 2023 because more and more of our oil and natural gas production is occurring on private and state lands, where developers don’t need permission from Washington to drill. In 2005, about 68 percent of our oil and 62 percent of our gas came from private and state lands. Today it’s risen to roughly 75 percent and 90 percent, respectively.

When it comes to production on federal lands, however, we’re living on borrowed time. We’ve been able to maintain output thanks to production from wells drilled on leases issued before Biden became president. While the administration has issued drilling permits to existing leaseholders — as required by law — that hasn’t stopped it from slow walking these permits.



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 10:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3385
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe might be the worst POTUS we have had.

George W. Bush was the worst president we ever had, but in support of your argument, Joe Biden was with him every step of the way on invading Iraq.


i wasn't a big fan of his dad. the terms, 'downsizing' and 'political correctness' were born during his administration. during his term, i remember biden as THE big shot, during the anita hill testimony. pubic hair on a coke can - he must have immediately thought of his furry legs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 786
pizza_Place: Marie's
Nas embarrassing himself with the fake news. Sad!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 12:42 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Obama: Joe Biden is like a brother to me. I love him so much that I backed another candidate in 2016, 2020, and now in 2024.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 5:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79526
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Joe might be the worst POTUS we have had.

George W. Bush was the worst president we ever had, but in support of your argument, Joe Biden was with him every step of the way on invading Iraq.



Trump was the only respite in a brutal run of Bush II- Obama and now Biden.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82196
Nas wrote:
Obama: Joe Biden is like a brother to me. I love him so much that I backed another candidate in 2016, 2020, and now in 2024.


with friends like him, who needs enemies

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82196
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79526
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Who is in charge right now? Is Biden alive? Did he have a stroke? Where is he?

We've come along way from the media flying into an uproar over Al Haig saying he was in control to the point where nobody knows who is running things and most people don't care.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92027
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.

They are giving Harris a week to improve her poll numbers but they built in a system where she could be easily replaced too based on how they are doing the new nomination process.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79526
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.



First Zuckerberg. Now dolphin. Everyone is voting for Trump, yet somehow Kamala Harris will get 90 million votes.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13245
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
reversing the usa's energy momentum is:

- revoking leases to drill for oil and gas on federal lands and in federal waters

- revoking leases for mining

- halt permits to export LNG

- halting pipelines that would have imported 830k bbl/day (keystone, alone) of canadian oil to the usa

the consequences are two-fold, the hit on usa consumers and the political headaches of relying on other nations for energy.

Except that we don't rely on other nations for energy. In terms of oil, the U.S. produced more in 2023 than any previous year (including Trump's reign) and also more than any other country in history (including Saudi Arabia). This is one of Trump's oft repeated falsehoods (one of many) which is widely accepted as fact by his flock.
Image
Momentum indeed.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.

They are giving Harris a week to improve her poll numbers but they built in a system where she could be easily replaced too based on how they are doing the new nomination process.


She raised $30M in like 2 hours. Obama and Friends may not love her, but the elite media and donors can't get enough. The latter is creating an environment where it would be fatal to skip her.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82196
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.



First Zuckerberg. Now dolphin. Everyone is voting for Trump, yet somehow Kamala Harris will get 90 million votes.


I will not be voting for Trump and never have.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:51 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31599
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.

They are giving Harris a week to improve her poll numbers but they built in a system where she could be easily replaced too based on how they are doing the new nomination process.

They ramped it up so quickly that it feels like Joe got fired while he was sleeping and Kamala had a commercial out by the time Joe got dressed.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82196
Nas wrote:
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.

They are giving Harris a week to improve her poll numbers but they built in a system where she could be easily replaced too based on how they are doing the new nomination process.


She raised $30M in like 2 hours. Obama and Friends may not love her, but the elite media and donors can't get enough. The latter is creating an environment where it would be fatal to skip her.


It's already there. In 24 hours it has become unthinkable to have anyone else.

I don't know if this was the most un American occurrence or most American occurrence

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92027
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
She raised $30M in like 2 hours. Obama and Friends may not love her, but the elite media and donors can't get enough. The latter is creating an environment where it would be fatal to skip her.
It depends on where her poll numbers are by next Monday. If she is polling equal or worse than Biden they'll say "She can't beat Trump" and find a way to move on. That's why they set the rules to let another candidate win the nomination when they do the delegate poll and it really wouldn't even be that hard.

They had to give her the first chance but just like people suddenly decided that Joe Biden couldn't beat Trump they'll decide that Kamala Harris can't beat Trump if her numbers show that she is likely to lose.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82196
Brick wrote:
Nas wrote:
She raised $30M in like 2 hours. Obama and Friends may not love her, but the elite media and donors can't get enough. The latter is creating an environment where it would be fatal to skip her.
It depends on where her poll numbers are by next Monday. If she is polling equal or worse than Biden they'll say "She can't beat Trump" and find a way to move on. That's why they set the rules to let another candidate win the nomination when they do the delegate poll and it really wouldn't even be that hard.

They had to give her the first chance but just like people suddenly decided that Joe Biden couldn't beat Trump they'll decide that Kamala Harris can't beat Trump if her numbers show that she is likely to lose.


After what you have seen in the last day, it is naive to think voters matter.

The money is behind her. She is the candidate. Fin.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82196
The guy who did the Biden impression with Shane Gillis' Trump is probably cursing himself on his choice.

Maya Rudolph just made herself some money.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 9:06 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
W_Z wrote:
"this week" still had donna brazile talking about biden still being president. the whole roundtable was talking about how biden could still maintain running.


It's disgusting that at 10 am Sunday the Democrat establishment all thought it needed to be an open process with multiple candidates but by 10 pm EVERYONE now said that was impossible and Harris should be the only candidate.

This should be offensive to voters.

by this morning, everyone is praising Harris for locking down all the "important" constituencies: specifically delegates and money. No mention of the voters.

There is no such thing as a liberal any more. There are people who hold leftist political positions but there are no liberals.

They are giving Harris a week to improve her poll numbers but they built in a system where she could be easily replaced too based on how they are doing the new nomination process.


:lol: :lol:

Who is this Mythical Democrat that is going to have great polling numbers?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13245
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
good dolphin wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nas wrote:
She raised $30M in like 2 hours. Obama and Friends may not love her, but the elite media and donors can't get enough. The latter is creating an environment where it would be fatal to skip her.
It depends on where her poll numbers are by next Monday. If she is polling equal or worse than Biden they'll say "She can't beat Trump" and find a way to move on. That's why they set the rules to let another candidate win the nomination when they do the delegate poll and it really wouldn't even be that hard.

They had to give her the first chance but just like people suddenly decided that Joe Biden couldn't beat Trump they'll decide that Kamala Harris can't beat Trump if her numbers show that she is likely to lose.


After what you have seen in the last day, it is naive to think voters matter.

The money is behind her. She is the candidate. Fin.

Money is certainly key since she is apparently the only one who can legally access the cash already in the Biden/Harris coffers. Also, if they choose someone like Whitmer they risk alienating black women. If it were one of the other Governor's mentioned they would also risk losing women in general - which is their strongest constituency following the Roe decision.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Uncle Joe
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92027
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
After what you have seen in the last day, it is naive to think voters matter.

The money is behind her. She is the candidate. Fin.
She's the favorite but let's say next Monday she is polling lower than Biden.

One candidate simply has to get 300 of about 4,000 delegates to sign a petition to put him/her/they/them onto the ballot. The next step would be to choose whoever between the two is "most likely to beat Trump" which is how they got Biden out. I don't think anyone really thinks Harris has a better chance to beat Trump than any of the other options.

It will likely be Harris but she has a week to show she is up for the task.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group