It is currently Tue May 13, 2025 7:37 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3478 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 ... 116  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25259
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
And the Patriots


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2024 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Yes, full stats matter. Not cherry picked stats.


Let's see what constitutes "cherry picked" around here. More TDs and Nearly as Many Yards from scrimmage as the league MVP. Hmmn. Surely "no big deal" apparently.


Wake me when L.Jackson wins or even makes it to the Super Bowl. I want my QB to be compared to P.Mahomes not L. Jackson

You think people in Green Bay and Houston or saying, "Boy, J.Love or C.J. Strout sure are close to becoming the next L.Jackson " :lol:


Keep in mind that this dude thinks it's fucked for any QB to be compared to Lamar Jackson :lol: : :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15226
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Houston is case #1 for building O Line first. Their WR and TE are fantastic. But that line is terrible which is the major reason that he's been bad.

I love Lamar as much as anyone else but the last running QB to win a SB was Wilson. It's just not a good path to success. And Jackson has a ton of weapons. Certainly better than the Bears but their DEF is pretty subpar.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 05, 2024 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26518
pizza_Place: Pizanos
City of Fools wrote:
Houston is case #1 for building O Line first. Their WR and TE are fantastic. But that line is terrible which is the major reason that he's been bad.

I love Lamar as much as anyone else but the last running QB to win a SB was Wilson. It's just not a good path to success. And Jackson has a ton of weapons. Certainly better than the Bears but their DEF is pretty subpar.

You kind of need it all, and even then, the only thing that’ll typically paper over not having a HoF QB is an all-time defense.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 05, 2024 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34077
pizza_Place: What??
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Houston is case #1 for building O Line first. Their WR and TE are fantastic. But that line is terrible which is the major reason that he's been bad.

I love Lamar as much as anyone else but the last running QB to win a SB was Wilson. It's just not a good path to success. And Jackson has a ton of weapons. Certainly better than the Bears but their DEF is pretty subpar.

You kind of need it all, and even then, the only thing that’ll typically paper over not having a HoF QB is an all-time defense.

Nope. This has been settled and you are a dumbass.

Don't make me page the nurse.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 05, 2024 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
City of Fools wrote:
Houston is case #1 for building O Line first. Their WR and TE are fantastic. But that line is terrible which is the major reason that he's been bad.

I love Lamar as much as anyone else but the last running QB to win a SB was Wilson. It's just not a good path to success. And Jackson has a ton of weapons. Certainly better than the Bears but their DEF is pretty subpar.


I'd still take being a perennial contender as opposed to fighting it over which player in the top 10 that I'm going to draft each and every year. Or which coach that I'd rather have coaching the team. Apparently the Juiced of the world would not

This dude thinks it's football genius to proudly proclaim that he'd happily pass on the league's 2 time MVP.. in whose universe but this one is that sort of thing considered "smart"? Just Asking A Question

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2024 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15189
pizza_Place: Grazianos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.


That is correct. It should have been an easy decision. With the draft picks he would have gotten, he could have brought in a bounty of offensive linemen and defensive linemen as well while keeping Fields for another year and see if he could grow with the team. If not, then bring in someone else. Maybe trade for a qb in '25? But he didn't and with the retention of Flush, they were hopeless.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
The Hawk wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.


That is correct. It should have been an easy decision. With the draft picks he would have gotten, he could have brought in a bounty of offensive linemen and defensive linemen as well while keeping Fields for another year and see if he could grow with the team. If not, then bring in someone else. Maybe trade for a qb in '25? But he didn't and with the retention of Flush, they were hopeless.


Yep Hawk. We have always been agreement about this. It was easily the best choice and decision to make.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
To crunch the numbers even further when Caleb passed the ball slightly more than Fields he threw for 8 fewer TDs. Despite having vastly superior weapons to work with on offense.


How many turnovers did Fields have compared to Caleb? Just asking a question.


How MANY points were generated in the first half of games by Justin as opposed to Caleb? Hint:: This might get ugly.

The Bears have had at least 3 games this season where they had zero points at halftime. Ouch!

At least 3 other games where they only have generated 3 points by halftime


We can play this game all day long.

How many turnovers did Justin have in the second half of games as opposed to Caleb? Hint: This will get ugly.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.


No, his decision to keep Eberflus and hire S.Waldren instead of Kingsbury to mentor his #1 pick will be the primary reason he'll be fired.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2817
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.


No, his decision to keep Eberflus and hire S.Waldren instead of Kingsbury to mentor his #1 pick will be the primary reason he'll be fired.

Wow maybe Kingsbury could’ve gotten what, 10 yards out of him in a half against SF?

Plenty of players have had bad coaches, nobody has ever been as bad as Caleb Williams is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.


No, his decision to keep Eberflus and hire S.Waldren instead of Kingsbury to mentor his #1 pick will be the primary reason he'll be fired.



Nah that's what the Caleb apologists will keep clinging too. YOUR GENERATIONAL TALENT cannot even outplay the guys whom you believed him to be better than in his own draft class. He's 4th best in a class of 4 and probably will be 5th once the local kid gets going.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Yes, full stats matter. Not cherry picked stats.


Let's see what constitutes "cherry picked" around here. More TDs and Nearly as Many Yards from scrimmage as the league MVP. Hmmn. Surely "no big deal" apparently.


Wake me when L.Jackson wins or even makes it to the Super Bowl. I want my QB to be compared to P.Mahomes not L. Jackson

You think people in Green Bay and Houston or saying, "Boy, J.Love or C.J. Strout sure are close to becoming the next L.Jackson " :lol:


Keep in mind that this dude thinks it's fucked for any QB to be compared to Lamar Jackson :lol: : :lol:


You want L.Jackson or P.Mahomes? Jackson or Allen? Jackson or Burrow?

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Keep in mind that earlier our resident guru gave such insight as this:
Juiced wrote:
No one serious about winning signs Sam Darnold.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94634
Location: To the left of my post
The Hawk wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.


That is correct. It should have been an easy decision. With the draft picks he would have gotten, he could have brought in a bounty of offensive linemen and defensive linemen as well while keeping Fields for another year and see if he could grow with the team. If not, then bring in someone else. Maybe trade for a qb in '25? But he didn't and with the retention of Flush, they were hopeless.

Launching Fields was the right choice regardless of what was done. The Bears would be screwed this year with Fields. For one thing, Williams is playing better than Fields ever did in Chicago. So, maybe Fields has a career year and the Bears are fighting for a wild card spot though it seems questionable that Fields is such a difference maker. However, they'd now have these two options:
1) Let Fields walk after the season, or if they picked up his option, pay him $25 million next year and then work on a long term extension.
2) Sign him to a long term extension that given the fact he is a starter, the team is a playoff contender, ends up in the Daniel Jones territory at a minimum so it's like $45 million a year. It's the Cutler situation all over.

It has yet to be seen if Williams was the right choice but it's undeniable that moving on from Fields was the right choice. The Steelers turned down his option. The Steelers benched him. The Steelers are going to let him walk unless he accepts a very cheap contract to return. Yet, the Bears should have built around him?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39123
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More than anything else, Poles's decision to keep the #1 pick will turnout to be the primary reason that he'll be fired.


That is correct. It should have been an easy decision. With the draft picks he would have gotten, he could have brought in a bounty of offensive linemen and defensive linemen as well while keeping Fields for another year and see if he could grow with the team. If not, then bring in someone else. Maybe trade for a qb in '25? But he didn't and with the retention of Flush, they were hopeless.

Launching Fields was the right choice regardless of what was done. The Bears would be screwed this year with Fields. For one thing, Williams is playing better than Fields ever did in Chicago. So, maybe Fields has a career year and the Bears are fighting for a wild card spot though it seems questionable that Fields is such a difference maker. However, they'd now have these two options:
1) Let Fields walk after the season, or if they picked up his option, pay him $25 million next year and then work on a long term extension.
2) Sign him to a long term extension that given the fact he is a starter, the team is a playoff contender, ends up in the Daniel Jones territory at a minimum so it's like $45 million a year. It's the Cutler situation all over.

It has yet to be seen if Williams was the right choice but it's undeniable that moving on from Fields was the right choice. The Steelers turned down his option. The Steelers benched him. The Steelers are going to let him walk unless he accepts a very cheap contract to return. Yet, the Bears should have built around him?

YES!!

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Keep in mind that earlier our resident guru gave such insight as this:
Juiced wrote:
No one serious about winning signs Sam Darnold.


Raise your hand if you thought Sam Darnold was going to have a career year. Get your cherry picking ass outta here.

This only proves that coaching matters.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Keep in mind that earlier our resident guru gave such insight as this:
Juiced wrote:
No one serious about winning signs Sam Darnold.


Raise your hand if you thought Sam Darnold was going to have a career year. Get your cherry picking ass outta here.

This only proves that coaching matters.


"Excuses" "Excuses"

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Keep in mind that earlier our resident guru gave such insight as this:
Juiced wrote:
No one serious about winning signs Sam Darnold.


Raise your hand if you thought Sam Darnold was going to have a career year. Get your cherry picking ass outta here.

This only proves that coaching matters.


"Excuses" "Excuses"


Quote:
You want L.Jackson or P.Mahomes? Jackson or Allen? Jackson or Burrow?


You going to answer the question or keep deflecting?

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Keep in mind that earlier our resident guru gave such insight as this:
Juiced wrote:
No one serious about winning signs Sam Darnold.


Raise your hand if you thought Sam Darnold was going to have a career year. Get your cherry picking ass outta here.

This only proves that coaching matters.


"Excuses" "Excuses"


Quote:
You want L.Jackson or P.Mahomes? Jackson or Allen? Jackson or Burrow?


You going to answer the question or keep deflecting?


This is a dumb question because it presupposes that you cannot win with Lamar Jackson as your QB. Even though the Ravens repeatedly win with Lamar Jackson as their QB

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
The Bears offense with "Generational Talent" Caleb is actually worse than the Bears offense during the year in which they happened to tank. Ouch!

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/y ... 2022-11-21

They are near the bottom in nearly every statistical category on offense this year.

1st Quarter points 31st
Avg yards per game: Dead Last
Avg Yards Per pass play Dead Last
Avg Yard Per Completion: Dead Last

2022 Tanking Bears offense (With J. Fields as QB) actually avg more points per game than this "high powered" attack on paper led offense of Generational Talent Caleb Williams.

2024 Bears offense led by Generational Talent Caleb Williams 19.5 ppg

2022 Tanking Bears Offense Led By J. Fields 19.2 ppg but J.Fields missed 2 games and in those 2 games the Bears scored much less than their season avg on offense


WE ARE FUCKING SCREWED!

.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94634
Location: To the left of my post
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.


It's a.wrap for ya McCarver. You're done. And "dispense" with all of the "theorizing" about what is or is not "sustainable". Fact is that the Bears offense was better during a damn tanking year (which you claimed that it wasn't) than it is during a year that "Generational Talent" Caleb is surrounded by numerous "weapons".

And when REAL BEAR FANS accurately point this out to guys like you, you repeatedly refer to them as "Fields Cultists" as opposed to the REAL, TRUE BEAR FANS which they happened to be.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:37 pm
Posts: 238
pizza_Place: Safe slice
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.


It's a.wrap for ya McCarver. You're done. And "dispense" with all of the "theorizing" about what is or is not "sustainable". Fact is that the Bears offense was better during a damn tanking year (which you claimed that it wasn't) than it is during a year that "Generational Talent" Caleb is surrounded by numerous "weapons".

And when REAL BEAR FANS accurately point this out to guys like you, you repeatedly refer to them as "Fields Cultists" as opposed to the REAL, TRUE BEAR FANS which they happened to be.


Brick keep's being wrong like you sre. Field's was Derrick Henry in 2022. Congratulation's. That's why he suck's. Hey LGBTQ Time Guy, you never answered the question why if Field's is so good they/he has only played in 4 game's. Why?

Bitch

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
The rather "effeminate" Caleb Williams would have to be "My Guy"


Last edited by He They Xe Xem on Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
He They Xe Xem wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.


It's a.wrap for ya McCarver. You're done. And "dispense" with all of the "theorizing" about what is or is not "sustainable". Fact is that the Bears offense was better during a damn tanking year (which you claimed that it wasn't) than it is during a year that "Generational Talent" Caleb is surrounded by numerous "weapons".

And when REAL BEAR FANS accurately point this out to guys like you, you repeatedly refer to them as "Fields Cultists" as opposed to the REAL, TRUE BEAR FANS which they happened to be.


Brick keep's being wrong like you sre. Field's was Derrick Henry in 2022. Congratulation's. That's why he suck's. Hay LGBTQ Time Guy, you never answered the question why if Field's is so good they/he has only played in 4 game's. Why?

Bitch


This Is The Return, Of The Dumb Mult

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94634
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.


It's a.wrap for ya McCarver. You're done. And "dispense" with all of the "theorizing" about what is or is not "sustainable". Fact is that the Bears offense was better during a damn tanking year (which you claimed that it wasn't) than it is during a year that "Generational Talent" Caleb is surrounded by numerous "weapons".

And when REAL BEAR FANS accurately point this out to guys like you, you repeatedly refer to them as "Fields Cultists" as opposed to the REAL, TRUE BEAR FANS which they happened to be.

I'm more than happy to analyze Fields entire time as a Bear and Williams entire time as a Bear. Williams is far ahead of him right now.

I'm just glad you've given up on the idea that only the last 6 games Fields played as a Bear are relevant. I celebrate his whole catalog of losses.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.


It's a.wrap for ya McCarver. You're done. And "dispense" with all of the "theorizing" about what is or is not "sustainable". Fact is that the Bears offense was better during a damn tanking year (which you claimed that it wasn't) than it is during a year that "Generational Talent" Caleb is surrounded by numerous "weapons".

And when REAL BEAR FANS accurately point this out to guys like you, you repeatedly refer to them as "Fields Cultists" as opposed to the REAL, TRUE BEAR FANS which they happened to be.

I'm more than happy to analyze Fields entire time as a Bear and Williams entire time as a Bear. Williams is far ahead of him right now.

I'm just glad you've given up on the idea that only the last 6 games Fields played as a Bear are relevant. I celebrate his whole catalog of losses.


"Far Ahead" :lol: Caleb Williams was already a year behind Justin Fields when he entered the League. That's why what they "accomplished" at the same age is extremely relevant.

Justin Fields did more with less than Bumslaying Caleb. You're done McCarver! More importantly so are the damn Bears.

Generational Talent Caleb has led the Bears organization to transition from a team "contending" for a playoff spot to one endlessly discussing what the "rebuild" should look like in a matter of damn months.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94634
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.


It's a.wrap for ya McCarver. You're done. And "dispense" with all of the "theorizing" about what is or is not "sustainable". Fact is that the Bears offense was better during a damn tanking year (which you claimed that it wasn't) than it is during a year that "Generational Talent" Caleb is surrounded by numerous "weapons".

And when REAL BEAR FANS accurately point this out to guys like you, you repeatedly refer to them as "Fields Cultists" as opposed to the REAL, TRUE BEAR FANS which they happened to be.

I'm more than happy to analyze Fields entire time as a Bear and Williams entire time as a Bear. Williams is far ahead of him right now.

I'm just glad you've given up on the idea that only the last 6 games Fields played as a Bear are relevant. I celebrate his whole catalog of losses.


"Far Ahead" :lol: Caleb Williams was already a year behind Justin Fields when he entered the League. That's why what they "accomplished" at the same age is extremely relevant.

Justin Fields did more with less than Bumslaying Caleb. You're done McCarver! More importantly so are the damn Bears.

Generational Talent Caleb has led the Bears organization to transition from a team "contending" for a playoff spot to one endlessly discussing what the "rebuild" should look like in a matter of damn months.

Same age you say?

Caleb Williams at age 23(Yes, I understand how stupid this is but it's your stupid point):
243 ypg, 7 touchdowns, 0 interceptions, 104.1 passer rating
Justin Fields in his first three games at 23(During year 2):
99 ypg, 2 touchdowns, 4 interceptions, 50.0 passer rating

Plus, Fields was about 200 days older when he nearly put up 100 yards a game!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13128
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
2022 Fields was a good player. Not a good quarterback. He was 7th in the league in rushing on far less carries than everyone else. A lot of fumbles though.

But, it wasn't sustainable to have Fields be arguably the best running back in the league. Lamar Jackson went through a similar career trajectory but he was a much better passer and continues to be.

Fields would still be here if he could repeat 2022 but he wasn't ever going to do that again.


It's a.wrap for ya McCarver. You're done. And "dispense" with all of the "theorizing" about what is or is not "sustainable". Fact is that the Bears offense was better during a damn tanking year (which you claimed that it wasn't) than it is during a year that "Generational Talent" Caleb is surrounded by numerous "weapons".

And when REAL BEAR FANS accurately point this out to guys like you, you repeatedly refer to them as "Fields Cultists" as opposed to the REAL, TRUE BEAR FANS which they happened to be.

I'm more than happy to analyze Fields entire time as a Bear and Williams entire time as a Bear. Williams is far ahead of him right now.

I'm just glad you've given up on the idea that only the last 6 games Fields played as a Bear are relevant. I celebrate his whole catalog of losses.


"Far Ahead" :lol: Caleb Williams was already a year behind Justin Fields when he entered the League. That's why what they "accomplished" at the same age is extremely relevant.

Justin Fields did more with less than Bumslaying Caleb. You're done McCarver! More importantly so are the damn Bears.

Generational Talent Caleb has led the Bears organization to transition from a team "contending" for a playoff spot to one endlessly discussing what the "rebuild" should look like in a matter of damn months.

Same age you say?

Caleb Williams at age 23(Yes, I understand how stupid this is but it's your stupid point):
243 ypg, 7 touchdowns, 0 interceptions, 104.1 passer rating
Justin Fields in his first three games at 23(During year 2):
99 ypg, 2 touchdowns, 4 interceptions, 50.0 passer rating

Plus, Fields was about 200 days older when he nearly put up 100 yards a game!


It's dumb to count age difference in number of days apart.

And Can you name a year in which Justin Fields was throwing to 2 1200 Yard receivers as well a top 10 pick as his choice for receiver? I'll hangup and listen for my answer.

The Bears offense was better the year that they were tanking than it is now. Unbelievable!

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3478 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 ... 116  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sneakers O'Toole and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group