It is currently Sat Feb 22, 2025 5:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3466 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 ... 116  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
JJ McCarthy is 2 years younger than Caleb yet he was taken in the same draft. Yet it's out of bounds to suggest that Caleb is a "little old to be a rookie". Good Grief!
Number of QBs taken in the first round younger than 22. I may have missed a first round pick based on not throwing a single pass in the NFL but I did include JJ in that.
2024: 1 out of 6
2023: 2 out of 3
2022: 0 out of 1
2021: 2 out of 5
2020: 1 out of 4
2019: 0 out of 3
2018: 3 out of 5
2017: 2 out of 3
2016: 1 out of 4
2015: 2 out of 2

So, 14 out of 36 were less than 22 years old. So no, 22 is not a little old to be a rookie QB.

See what I mean by "cannot comprehend" if when instructed.
You are evaluating a gut that is turning 23 his rookie year against guys that "might" turn 22 their rookie year. And somehow you think this is a "valid" point. How?

Huh? The age is as of September 1st of the draft year. Anyone who would turn 22 during their rookie year would be counted as 21 in the above numbers.


Brick it's tough to discuss anything with you because you're an internet troll as opposed to a fan of anything in particular. Thus you will always think like a troll rather than a fan or person who knows anything.
It's not a troll to prove factually that your point is incorrect.

Your basic premise is to troll about everything. You just stated the guy who is 21 before the season started should be evaluated the same as a person that turns 23 after the season started which is stupid. And is nothing more than a stupid hypothetical which pertains to absolutely nothing in particular. And please do not elaborate that stupid point again because it'd irrelevant to my point.

Hopefully you can "comprehend" this question.

Why would it be unfair to evaluate and measure Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud currently?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
FavreFan wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
every thread in the Bears section is made unreadable by ltg arguing about the steelers backup QB

You know what's also "unreadable"? Posters that don't post.

:lol: Fair point


You're still my guy! :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93620
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Your basic premise is to troll about everything. You just stated the guy who is 21 before the season started should be evaluated the same as a person that turns 23 after the season started which is stupid.
You seem confused. The ages I posted were all the age of the person on September 1st of the year they were drafted. So no, there was no comparison between a guy who is 21 who turns 23. It's all comparing all of them at the same age.


The Doctor Of Style wrote:
And is nothing more than a stupid hypothetical which pertains to absolutely nothing in particular. And please do not elaborate that stupid point again because it'd irrelevant to my point.

Hopefully you can "comprehend" this question.
I don't think anyone could comprehend whatever that was.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Why would be unfair to evaluate Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud?
I'd compare them both as rookies but as CJ Stroud is proving, rookie stats only mean so much.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Why would be unfair to evaluate Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud?
I'd compare them both as rookies but as CJ Stroud is proving, rookie stats only mean so much.


The fact that you would only look at what both did as Rookies is part of the problem here. And also illustrative of the point which i happened to effectively be making here. Why should they ONLY be comped as rookie players when they are essentially the very same age? They are only like a month apart.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93620
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Why would be unfair to evaluate Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud?
I'd compare them both as rookies but as CJ Stroud is proving, rookie stats only mean so much.


The fact that you would only look at what both did as Rookies is part of the problem here. And also illustrative of the point which i happened to effectively be making here. Why should they ONLY be comped as rookie players when they are essentially the very same age? They are only like a month apart.

CJ Stroud is playing worse this year than he did last year so if you want to compare them at the same age that is fine too. :lol: They've got the same passer rating this year.

Stop with this game where the criteria changes every 5 seconds looking for whatever criteria fits you the best now. You have recently wanted to compare only the last 6 games of Fields in Chicago with what Williams has done now.

Still though, Williams isn't old for a rookie.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Why would be unfair to evaluate Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud?
I'd compare them both as rookies but as CJ Stroud is proving, rookie stats only mean so much.


The fact that you would only look at what both did as Rookies is part of the problem here. And also illustrative of the point which i happened to effectively be making here. Why should they ONLY be comped as rookie players when they are essentially the very same age? They are only like a month apart.

CJ Stroud is playing worse this year than he did last year so if you want to compare them at the same age that is fine too. :lol: They've got the same passer rating this year.

OK let's compare them then. CJ Stroud is much more accomplished as an NFL player than Caleb Williams. And much further along in his development though they are very same age essentially. It's actually yet one other thing which should give cause for pause where Caleb is concerned with respect to his being a "Generational Talent"

"Relative Age" matters in sports and always has. You might believe it does but again you're nothing more than an internet troll whose "beliefs" blow with the wins depending on whom you're arguing with on any given day.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23548
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Your basic premise is to troll about everything. You just stated the guy who is 21 before the season started should be evaluated the same as a person that turns 23 after the season started which is stupid. And is nothing more than a stupid hypothetical which pertains to absolutely nothing in particular. And please do not elaborate that stupid point again because it'd irrelevant to my point.

Hopefully you can "comprehend" this question.

Why would it be unfair to evaluate and measure Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud currently?

This seals it, you're just plain dumb. Brick isn't comparing anyone, he's proving to you that a 22-year old rookie QB is not relatively "old" for a drafted prospect at that position because most QB prospects taken in the first round over the last decade are 22 years old or older.

How is it this hard for you to understand?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Your basic premise is to troll about everything. You just stated the guy who is 21 before the season started should be evaluated the same as a person that turns 23 after the season started which is stupid. And is nothing more than a stupid hypothetical which pertains to absolutely nothing in particular. And please do not elaborate that stupid point again because it'd irrelevant to my point.

Hopefully you can "comprehend" this question.

Why would it be unfair to evaluate and measure Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud currently?

This seals it, you're just plain dumb. Brick isn't comparing anyone, he's proving to you that a 22-year old rookie QB is not relatively "old" for a drafted prospect at that position because most QB prospects taken in the first round over the last decade are 22 years old or older.

How is it this hard for you to understand?


Hey Caddyshack. AKA Juicy. AKA Useful +diot. AKA Rightwing Stooge. AKA Test Dummy Durango. AKA Resident Buffoon. AKA Stalkinghorse Jones. AKA Lapdog Notes. If there was ever a time for someone as stupid as you to "sit this one due to lack of knowledge " now would be that time dumbass.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23548
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Your basic premise is to troll about everything. You just stated the guy who is 21 before the season started should be evaluated the same as a person that turns 23 after the season started which is stupid. And is nothing more than a stupid hypothetical which pertains to absolutely nothing in particular. And please do not elaborate that stupid point again because it'd irrelevant to my point.

Hopefully you can "comprehend" this question.

Why would it be unfair to evaluate and measure Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud currently?

This seals it, you're just plain dumb. Brick isn't comparing anyone, he's proving to you that a 22-year old rookie QB is not relatively "old" for a drafted prospect at that position because most QB prospects taken in the first round over the last decade are 22 years old or older.

How is it this hard for you to understand?


Hey Caddyshack. AKA Juicy. AKA Useful +diot. AKA Rightwing Stooge. AKA Test Dummy Durango. AKA Resident Buffoon. AKA Stalkinghorse Jones. AKA Lapdog Notes. If there was ever a time for someone as stupid as you to "sit this one due to lack of knowledge " now would be that time dumbass.

Most QBs drafted in the first round over the last decade were 22 or older, therefore a QB who is 22 during his rookie season is not "old for a rookie". It's that simple. You've never dealt well with being proven wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Your basic premise is to troll about everything. You just stated the guy who is 21 before the season started should be evaluated the same as a person that turns 23 after the season started which is stupid. And is nothing more than a stupid hypothetical which pertains to absolutely nothing in particular. And please do not elaborate that stupid point again because it'd irrelevant to my point.

Hopefully you can "comprehend" this question.

Why would it be unfair to evaluate and measure Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud currently?

This seals it, you're just plain dumb. Brick isn't comparing anyone, he's proving to you that a 22-year old rookie QB is not relatively "old" for a drafted prospect at that position because most QB prospects taken in the first round over the last decade are 22 years old or older.

How is it this hard for you to understand?


Hey Caddyshack. AKA Juicy. AKA Useful +diot. AKA Rightwing Stooge. AKA Test Dummy Durango. AKA Resident Buffoon. AKA Stalkinghorse Jones. AKA Lapdog Notes. If there was ever a time for someone as stupid as you to "sit this one due to lack of knowledge " now would be that time dumbass.

Most QBs drafted in the first round over the last decade were 22 or older, therefore a QB who is 22 during his rookie season is not "old for a rookie". It's that simple. You've never dealt well with being proven wrong.


Nice try Caddyshack. It won't work. Stick to perusing around "The greens" in Golf Carts dumbass.

I know you work from the premise that you must back you guy" no matter what. But this shouldn't be one of those times stupid!

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93620
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
OK let's compare them then. CJ Stroud is much more accomplished as an NFL player than Caleb Williams. And much further along in his development though they are very same age essentially. It's actually yet one other thing which should give cause for pause where Caleb is concerned with respect to his being a "Generational Talent"
Stroud and Williams are playing roughly the same this year at the same age though.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
"Relative Age" matters in sports and always has. You might believe it does but again you're nothing more than an internet troll whose "beliefs" blow with the wins depending on whom you're arguing with on any given day.
Age and experience both matter. There are things that you only learn in pro sports by playing at that level. Throws that work in college don't work in the NFL. Rookie years are tough for everyone because of that.

Still though, Williams isn't old for a rookie. Do you finally understand the numbers I posted?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
Still though, Williams isn't old for a rookie. Do you finally understand the numbers I posted?


This is how dumb both you are resident stooge happen to be with respect to this. You both are arguing that it is dumb to compare players that are exactly the same age.

And as far as the "old for a Rookie 1st Rounder goes, that will be debunked "fairly quickly" as well.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13464
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
OK let's compare them then. CJ Stroud is much more accomplished as an NFL player than Caleb Williams. And much further along in his development though they are very same age essentially. It's actually yet one other thing which should give cause for pause where Caleb is concerned with respect to his being a "Generational Talent"
Stroud and Williams are playing roughly the same this year at the same age though.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
"Relative Age" matters in sports and always has. You might believe it does but again you're nothing more than an internet troll whose "beliefs" blow with the wins depending on whom you're arguing with on any given day.
Age and experience both matter. There are things that you only learn in pro sports by playing at that level. Throws that work in college don't work in the NFL. Rookie years are tough for everyone because of that.

Still though, Williams isn't old for a rookie. Do you finally understand the numbers I posted?

Let me tell you a story about a team which is both very young and successful. :wink:

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93620
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This is how dumb both you are resident stooge happen to be with respect to this. You both are arguing that it is dumb to compare players that are exactly the same age.
It's not dumb to compare players at the same age. Experience matters too. If Michael Penix doesn't play until he is 26 it won't be completely fair to compare him to Caleb Williams with 2 or 3 seasons of NFL football played.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
And as far as the "old for a Rookie 1st Rounder goes, that will be debunked "fairly quickly" as well.
I mean, it's just a fact. There isn't anything to debunk. The numbers are clear that 22 is not old for a first round QB.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This is how dumb both you are resident stooge happen to be with respect to this. You both are arguing that it is dumb to compare players that are exactly the same age.
It's not dumb to compare players at the same age. Experience matters too. If Michael Penix doesn't play until he is 26 it won't be completely fair to compare him to Caleb Williams with 2 or 3 seasons of NFL football played.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
And as far as the "old for a Rookie 1st Rounder goes, that will be debunked "fairly quickly" as well.
I mean, it's just a fact. There isn't anything to debunk. The numbers are clear that 22 is not old for a first round QB.


Caleb turned 23 in the calendar year of his rookie season. Thus his comp is with other 23 year olds that are rookies. Not 22 year olds.

And the majority of 1st rd draft picks these days (since 2020) have not been 23 years old and older.

And there is a very good reason for it.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23548
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Your basic premise is to troll about everything. You just stated the guy who is 21 before the season started should be evaluated the same as a person that turns 23 after the season started which is stupid. And is nothing more than a stupid hypothetical which pertains to absolutely nothing in particular. And please do not elaborate that stupid point again because it'd irrelevant to my point.

Hopefully you can "comprehend" this question.

Why would it be unfair to evaluate and measure Caleb Williams "progress as a player to that of CJ Stroud currently?

This seals it, you're just plain dumb. Brick isn't comparing anyone, he's proving to you that a 22-year old rookie QB is not relatively "old" for a drafted prospect at that position because most QB prospects taken in the first round over the last decade are 22 years old or older.

How is it this hard for you to understand?


Hey Caddyshack. AKA Juicy. AKA Useful +diot. AKA Rightwing Stooge. AKA Test Dummy Durango. AKA Resident Buffoon. AKA Stalkinghorse Jones. AKA Lapdog Notes. If there was ever a time for someone as stupid as you to "sit this one due to lack of knowledge " now would be that time dumbass.

Most QBs drafted in the first round over the last decade were 22 or older, therefore a QB who is 22 during his rookie season is not "old for a rookie". It's that simple. You've never dealt well with being proven wrong.


Nice try Caddyshack. It won't work. Stick to perusing around "The greens" in Golf Carts dumbass.

I know you work from the premise that you must back you guy" no matter what. But this shouldn't be one of those times stupid!

Can you refute the fact that most first-round QBs in the last decade were 22 or older?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Can you refute the fact that most first-round QBs in the last decade were 22 or older?


Statement "23 is old for a rookie"

Rebuttal from YOUR resident jackass "23 is not old for a Rookie"

Followed up by this question from YOUR resident jackass
"Hey when are you going to tell us the number of QBs 22 years or older the past 10 years"?

:lol: :lol:

Stupid motherfucker doesn't even realized that his question doesn't even pertain to his original point. Nor Bricks. Or mine. Dumbass

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
OK let's compare them then. CJ Stroud is much more accomplished as an NFL player than Caleb Williams. And much further along in his development though they are very same age essentially. It's actually yet one other thing which should give cause for pause where Caleb is concerned with respect to his being a "Generational Talent"
Stroud and Williams are playing roughly the same this year at the same age though.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
"Relative Age" matters in sports and always has. You might believe it does but again you're nothing more than an internet troll whose "beliefs" blow with the wins depending on whom you're arguing with on any given day.
Age and experience both matter. There are things that you only learn in pro sports by playing at that level. Throws that work in college don't work in the NFL. Rookie years are tough for everyone because of that.

Still though, Williams isn't old for a rookie. Do you finally understand the numbers I posted?

Let me tell you a story about a team which is both very young and successful. :wink:

Funny how he now seems to understand the idea of age adjusted production.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93620
Location: To the left of my post
I always did. It's just a dumb thing to care about for teams when most of the league is within a year of you.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23548
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Can you refute the fact that most first-round QBs in the last decade were 22 or older?


Statement "23 is old for a rookie"

Rebuttal from YOUR resident jackass "23 is not old for a Rookie"

Followed up by this question from YOUR resident jackass
"Hey when are you going to tell us the number of QBs 22 years or older the past 10 years"?

:lol: :lol:

Stupid motherfucker doesn't even realized that his question doesn't even pertain to his original point. Nor Bricks. Or mine. Dumbass

Caleb Williams was 22 when the Bears drafted him, he was 22 when the season began, and was 22 for most of the season. He is not "old for a rookie" if most first round QBs drafted in the last decade were at least 22 years old like he was.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Can you refute the fact that most first-round QBs in the last decade were 22 or older?


Statement "23 is old for a rookie"

Rebuttal from YOUR resident jackass "23 is not old for a Rookie"

Followed up by this question from YOUR resident jackass
"Hey when are you going to tell us the number of QBs 22 years or older the past 10 years"?

:lol: :lol:

Stupid motherfucker doesn't even realized that his question doesn't even pertain to his original point. Nor Bricks. Or mine. Dumbass

Caleb Williams was 22 when the Bears drafted him, he was 22 when the season began, and was 22 for most of the season. He is not "old for a rookie" if most first round QBs drafted in the last decade were at least 22 years old like he was.


Hey Caddyshack. That's not how Sports work dumbass.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
I always did. It's just a dumb thing to care about for teams when most of the league is within a year of you.


Just to recap. You think that it is "dumb" to compare Stroud and Caleb Williams as players. Even though they are the same age. Ok :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93620
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
I always did. It's just a dumb thing to care about for teams when most of the league is within a year of you.


Just to recap. You think that it is "dumb" to compare Stroud and Caleb Williams as players. Even though they are the same age. Ok :lol: :lol:

No. I am happy to compare them at this age. Turns out they are playing equally well.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
I always did. It's just a dumb thing to care about for teams when most of the league is within a year of you.


Just to recap. You think that it is "dumb" to compare Stroud and Caleb Williams as players. Even though they are the same age. Ok :lol: :lol:

No. I am happy to compare them at this age. Turns out they are playing equally well.

As Caleb's and his 7 game losing streak as a starting QB can firmly attest :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
You guys realize Doc is just trolling you, don't you?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Darkside wrote:
You guys realize Brick is just trolling you, don't you?

FTFY.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23548
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Darkside wrote:
You guys realize Doc is just trolling you, don't you?

He's not, tho.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11990
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Justin Fields 9-5 over his last 14 games
Caleb Williams 4-10 over his last 14 games. I rest my case

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57667
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Justin Fields 9-5 over his last 14 games
Caleb Williams 4-10 over his last 14 games. I rest my case

:lol: don't forget to add that Fields has been benched and is carrying a clip board in his last few games

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82995
RFDC wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Justin Fields 9-5 over his last 14 games
Caleb Williams 4-10 over his last 14 games. I rest my case

:lol: don't forget to add that Fields has been benched and is carrying a clip board in his last few games


last few? He's way under 50% of the offensive snaps for the year and they said they'd welcome him back next year as a backup

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3466 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 ... 116  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group