It is currently Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:22 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38038
Location: ...
Curious Hair wrote:
Who's driving into midtown Manhattan 222 times a year? There has to be a better way.


single dads.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2244
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Curious Hair wrote:
Who's driving into midtown Manhattan 222 times a year? There has to be a better way.

Cops, firefighters, city workers of all stripes really. Odd hours doesn’t always line up with public transportation even in NYC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2600
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
My knowledge of Manhattan is about 20 years old, but one of the biggest differences I observed between Manhattan and Chicago is Manhattan's dearth of parking garages. That whole area was set up to make public transportation be the most efficient option.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82995
downtown isn't really congested. I frequently drive from south to north in the loop at rush hour and I think it moves well for a big city

but, they have to call it something other than "another tax"

remember, the tollways were supposed to have reverted to free ways after something like 20 years. that was 52 years ago

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23544
pizza_Place: Giordano's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
…it makes sense for Manhattan. You just can't have that many cars on the streets at that density.

Why?

I gotta believe this is somehow tied to that obsession people have with making every American metropolis resemble "walkable" European shitholes. They've gotten the immigrants committing rampant crime down, now they just need to come and take your ca—oops, I mean make it prohibitively expensive to drive your car on public roads.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
Warren Newson wrote:
My knowledge of Manhattan is about 20 years old, but one of the biggest differences I observed between Manhattan and Chicago is Manhattan's dearth of parking garages. That whole area was set up to make public transportation be the most efficient option.

A lot of them were also more well hidden because they used car elevators and you hoped it came back with minimal damage. It was still cheaper to park there than take the train in from where we lived though especially since we were doing it during non-business hours. Most of the money in transportation in New York came from encouraging and price gouging people taking the bridges.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25469
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Once upon a time, these types of things were well understood as incredibly regressive money grabs by governments that can’t manage budgets.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Once upon a time, these types of things were well understood as incredibly regressive money grabs by governments that can’t manage budgets.

It's kind of a unique situation, but basically these types of fares/tolls that are mostly profit subsidize the rest of the system and gives NYC by far the best public transportation system in the country.

https://www.columbia.edu/~kyl2120/mtaproject/

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25469
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I don’t think this qualifies as either a fare or a toll.

Both of those are intended to maintain & improve the thing you’re paying for. This explicitly has nothing to do with maintaining roads south of 60th.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2244
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Once upon a time, these types of things were well understood as incredibly regressive money grabs by governments that can’t manage budgets.

Americans are so stupid they will literally give you money just to soothe their own egos and prove that they can. :lol: “it’s like a fast pass” OK Mr. Moneybags, why aren’t you just flying around in a helicopter then?

This mentality is unique to our country.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2244
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t think this qualifies as either a fare or a toll.

Both of those are intended to maintain & improve the thing you’re paying for. This explicitly has nothing to do with maintaining roads south of 60th.

It is literally just so they can borrow billions of dollars and not make cuts to their obscenely bloated and wasteful municipal bureaucracy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t think this qualifies as either a fare or a toll.

Both of those are intended to maintain & improve the thing you’re paying for. This explicitly has nothing to do with maintaining roads south of 60th.
How is it not a fare or a toll?

The bridge fares in NYC are used to subsidize all the other things they do and lose money on. They are under no obligation to only spend the money on fares on the direct infrastructure of the place they collect the fare for.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
Brick wrote:
They are under no obligation to only spend the money on fares on the direct infrastructure of the place they collect the fare for.


sounds like good accountability


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25469
pizza_Place: Pizanos
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t think this qualifies as either a fare or a toll.

Both of those are intended to maintain & improve the thing you’re paying for. This explicitly has nothing to do with maintaining roads south of 60th.

It is literally just so they can borrow billions of dollars and not make cuts to their obscenely bloated and wasteful municipal bureaucracy.

I’ll say this for Chicago…when it comes time to find creative ways to confiscate people’s money, they do their best to look at activities over represented by tourists. That’s more a matter of political expediency than decency but it’s a more considerate approach no matter the motive.

This is just…I mean - who pays this?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Brick wrote:
They are under no obligation to only spend the money on fares on the direct infrastructure of the place they collect the fare for.


sounds like good accountability

It's a double edged sword. On one hand, it's the only good public transportation in the whole country. On the other hand, they are billions in debt, managed incredibly poorly outside of the actual "get you where you want to go on time" part, and it probably eventually has to go bankrupt completely.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25469
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t think this qualifies as either a fare or a toll.

Both of those are intended to maintain & improve the thing you’re paying for. This explicitly has nothing to do with maintaining roads south of 60th.
How is it not a fare or a toll?

The bridge fares in NYC are used to subsidize all the other things they do and lose money on. They are under no obligation to only spend the money on fares on the direct infrastructure of the place they collect the fare for.

The bridge fares don’t contribute to maintenance of the bridges? That seems like an oversight.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43865
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Once upon a time, these types of things were well understood as incredibly regressive money grabs by governments that can’t manage budgets.

Americans are so stupid they will literally give you money just to soothe their own egos and prove that they can. :lol: “it’s like a fast pass” OK Mr. Moneybags, why aren’t you just flying around in a helicopter then?

This mentality is unique to our country.

Congestion pricing is not uncommon in Europe

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The bridge fares don’t contribute to maintenance of the bridges? That seems like an oversight.
They fully cover the maintenance to the bridges and the massive surplus from tolls is redirected to other non-car related parts that don't make money or lose money.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2244
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Douchebag wrote:
Congestion pricing is not uncommon in Europe

This behavior where people who are not rich try to act rich by literally giving money away for nothing is an American trait.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43865
USA wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Congestion pricing is not uncommon in Europe

This behavior where people who are not rich try to act rich by literally giving money away for nothing is an American trait.

Can you send me $100?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2244
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t think this qualifies as either a fare or a toll.

Both of those are intended to maintain & improve the thing you’re paying for. This explicitly has nothing to do with maintaining roads south of 60th.

It is literally just so they can borrow billions of dollars and not make cuts to their obscenely bloated and wasteful municipal bureaucracy.

I’ll say this for Chicago…when it comes time to find creative ways to confiscate people’s money, they do their best to look at activities over represented by tourists. That’s more a matter of political expediency than decency but it’s a more considerate approach no matter the motive.

This is just…I mean - who pays this?

A bunch of public municipal employees who will soon either work some sort of refund into their compensation package. So it’ll just be money cycling with a bunch of useless programs in between.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2244
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Douchebag wrote:
USA wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Congestion pricing is not uncommon in Europe

This behavior where people who are not rich try to act rich by literally giving money away for nothing is an American trait.

Can you send me $100?

Add a couple zeroes and maybe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25469
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The bridge fares don’t contribute to maintenance of the bridges? That seems like an oversight.
They fully cover the maintenance to the bridges and the massive surplus from tolls is redirected to other non-car related parts that don't make money or lose money.

Ok, so they do cover upkeep. Seems like we’ve differentiated why those are fares and this is not.

These are just straight up fees that explicitly have nothing to do with road maintenance. You’re not being charged for “use” - as is typical in transportation world - you’re being charged because fuck you, that’s why.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The bridge fares don’t contribute to maintenance of the bridges? That seems like an oversight.
They fully cover the maintenance to the bridges and the massive surplus from tolls is redirected to other non-car related parts that don't make money or lose money.

Ok, so they do cover upkeep. Seems like we’ve differentiated why those are fares and this is not.

These are just straight up fees that explicitly have nothing to do with road maintenance. You’re not being charged for “use” - as is typical in transportation world - you’re being charged because fuck you, that’s why.
It seems like you are using an incorrect definition of fare/toll and it isn't worth arguing further.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25469
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The bridge fares don’t contribute to maintenance of the bridges? That seems like an oversight.
They fully cover the maintenance to the bridges and the massive surplus from tolls is redirected to other non-car related parts that don't make money or lose money.

Ok, so they do cover upkeep. Seems like we’ve differentiated why those are fares and this is not.

These are just straight up fees that explicitly have nothing to do with road maintenance. You’re not being charged for “use” - as is typical in transportation world - you’re being charged because fuck you, that’s why.
It seems like you are using an incorrect definition of fare/toll and it isn't worth arguing further.

So you’re saying that you don’t understand why fares & tolls are charged and want to just accept any and all government fees as inherently good?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
So you’re saying that you don’t understand why fares & tolls are charged and want to just accept any and all government fees as inherently good?
A fare or toll is under no obligation to be used to fund the specific thing that is subject to the fare.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25469
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
So you’re saying that you don’t understand why fares & tolls are charged and want to just accept any and all government fees as inherently good?
A fare or toll is under no obligation to be used to fund the specific thing that is subject to the fare.

I’m sure there are exceptions somewhere in the world but I don’t think you’re even directionally correct in practice.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56730
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Warren Newson wrote:
My knowledge of Manhattan is about 20 years old, but one of the biggest differences I observed between Manhattan and Chicago is Manhattan's dearth of parking garages.

That and the lack of alleys. Only in the last two or three years did they figure out how to put garbage in a bin instead of just throwing it on the sidewalk. But yeah, most of Manhattan just isn't meant for heavy car traffic. Doesn't work!

good dolphin wrote:
downtown isn't really congested. I frequently drive from south to north in the loop at rush hour and I think it moves well for a big city

I think Loop traffic is worse than it was pre-pandemic but the Kennedy has always been the real problem.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2600
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Brick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Brick wrote:
They are under no obligation to only spend the money on fares on the direct infrastructure of the place they collect the fare for.


sounds like good accountability

It's a double edged sword. On one hand, it's the only good public transportation in the whole country. On the other hand, they are billions in debt, managed incredibly poorly outside of the actual "get you where you want to go on time" part, and it probably eventually has to go bankrupt completely.


I'll grant you that NYC probably has the best public transportation system in the country, but I think D.C.'s subway system is better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Congestion Pricing
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2600
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Curious Hair wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
My knowledge of Manhattan is about 20 years old, but one of the biggest differences I observed between Manhattan and Chicago is Manhattan's dearth of parking garages.

That and the lack of alleys. Only in the last two or three years did they figure out how to put garbage in a bin instead of just throwing it on the sidewalk. But yeah, most of Manhattan just isn't meant for heavy car traffic. Doesn't work!

good dolphin wrote:
downtown isn't really congested. I frequently drive from south to north in the loop at rush hour and I think it moves well for a big city

I think Loop traffic is worse than it was pre-pandemic but the Kennedy has always been the real problem.


You've made this statement twice about Loop traffic being worse now than before the pandemic and I completely disagree with you. As someone who has worked in the Loop for 17 years, I am still amazed at the lack of traffic you'll see at midday during the week.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group