It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:47 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Agreed. If they even think about giving Orton an extension all the front office should be shot.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Nas wrote:
Orton is fine and he has another year left on his deal.


Did you even watch him tonight? How can you have watched that and say he is fine?

He cannot throw a deep ball to save his life. He makes horrible reads and throws way too many INTs lately. He is not fine. He is awful.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Good NFL QBs do not grow on trees contrary to popular opinion. Orton is fine as far as the list of QBs you could plan on getting next year. They should and need to explore the position in the draft... let the guy ride the pine for a year while you teach him the NFL system and then turn it over to him once you let Orton go next year.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
He was steady and consistent pre-injury. But since he has been back he has been awful. He makes bad reads. He throws INTs. He has happy feet in the pocket. How many times has Hester had his guy beat deep and Orton has under thrown him?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:24 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Orton probably needed at least 2 or 3 weeks off for that injury. I don't think he is anywhere near 100%. He still throws a bad deep ball, but his WRs are shit (Booker, are you fucking kidding me with that drop today?), and his OLine was not very good this evening.

That said, a bad ankle has nothing to do with DBs reading him like a book because he is staring down receivers worse than Grossman did.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Oh I am sure he will be here next year and the starter. But if they even think about giving him more $$ and an extension, they are clueless.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Oh I am sure he will be here next year and the starter. But if they even think about giving him more $$ and an extension, they are clueless.


I agree an extension would be a bad idea.


They're going to need an extension; his contract is up after the year.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Irish Boy wrote:
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Oh I am sure he will be here next year and the starter. But if they even think about giving him more $$ and an extension, they are clueless.


I agree an extension would be a bad idea.


They're going to need an extension; his contract is up after the year.


If he has a good year next year, then you give him a new contract, but you DO NOT do it this offseason like some have suggested.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
I keep hearing conflicting info on the contract. Does anyone have a link or anything? I was under the impression it's up after the year is over.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Irish Boy wrote:
I keep hearing conflicting info on the contract. Does anyone have a link or anything? I was under the impression it's up after the year is over.


http://www.rotoworld.com/content/player ... FL&id=3214

2/25/2008: Signed a two-year, $5.02 million contract. The deal included a $1.4 million signing bonus. Another $1.5 million is available through incentives. 2008: $1.3 million, 2009: $620,000, 2010: Free Agent. Cap charges: $2.1 million (2008), $1.42 million (2009).

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Thanks guys. I stand corrected.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:50 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:00 am
Posts: 1730
Location: Pappyland
He's a number 2, with good WR's he'd be more frustrating because he can't throw a deep ball. Not saying you let him go but he's a good back-up and they need to draft a QB in rounds one the first 3 rounds next year or two. The Bears need another good RB, some Wideouts, a pass rushing DE and help in the secondary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
the season he has had this year is the worst thing that could happen, he was just good enough to make some willing to go with him another year, but not bad enough to give up on him. he isnt bad, but his arm strength seems to be a major weakness, he cant get it out there far enough. if he could get another 10 yards on his throws, he could be pretty good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
He is usually more accurate than he was today.
His career numbers pretty much show him to have below average accuracy...pretty bad considering the conservative game plan. :roll:

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Rex Grossman of 2005.

Similar numbers, similar problems, he even hits linemen with passes just to highlight the similarity.

Two weeks in a row of throwing an INT to a LB on the same crossing route speaks a lot towards his football intelligence.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
Rex Grossman of 2005.

Similar numbers, similar problems, he even hits linemen with passes just to highlight the similarity.

Two weeks in a row of throwing an INT to a LB on the same crossing route speaks a lot towards his football intelligence.

That's a little unfair. This defense is no where near as good as that year. Moose and Berrian are better than anyone currently on the Bears roster. Devin Hester is nothing like he was at kick returner this year.

Kyle Orton has been bad in 3 out of the last 4 games. However, Rex Grossman's problem was he was not just bad, but he was so bad that teams thought they were more likely to score on defense than offense.

Rex Grossman's bad passer ratings: 0.0, 1.3, 10.2, 23.6, 36.8
Kyle Orton's worst passer rating this year: 39.1

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The Rex Grossman of 2005 sat on the bench for 14 weeks with a broken ankle.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7181
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
Magic 1 wrote:
This team has so many problems, most notably, the quarterback position.

Orton is awful.

WE HAVE to get an upgrade at QB this offseason.


Who, specifically, is available that you suggest they bring in to be this upgrade?

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Rex Grossman of 2005 sat on the bench for 14 weeks with a broken ankle.


Oops! 2006.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Rex Grossman of 2005.

Similar numbers, similar problems, he even hits linemen with passes just to highlight the similarity.

Two weeks in a row of throwing an INT to a LB on the same crossing route speaks a lot towards his football intelligence.

That's a little unfair. This defense is no where near as good as that year. Moose and Berrian are better than anyone currently on the Bears roster. Devin Hester is nothing like he was at kick returner this year.

Kyle Orton has been bad in 3 out of the last 4 games. However, Rex Grossman's problem was he was not just bad, but he was so bad that teams thought they were more likely to score on defense than offense.

Rex Grossman's bad passer ratings: 0.0, 1.3, 10.2, 23.6, 36.8
Kyle Orton's worst passer rating this year: 39.1


No doubt. I think the most glaring difference is the offensive line, as this one is simply brutal. I hear people giving them accolades, simply because their orginal expectations were so low. However, the Bears have just played against three of the lower ranked defenses in the NFL and did not run the ball well for 4 straight quarters.

The recievers are bad though. Think last year how bad many thought the WR corps was...this is significantly worse. I'm shocked that there is a worse group in the NFL, but by the numbers, it looks like there are 3 -4.

I want Orton starting next year. I think he maxes out on talent to the point of being comparable to Jake Delhomme. That is good enough for me.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
good dolphin wrote:
I want Orton starting next year. I think he maxes out on talent to the point of being comparable to Jake Delhomme. That is good enough for me.


I would be happy with somone comparable to Delhomme. I am just not sold on Orton being able to be that guy. I hope they draft a QB in the 3rd or 4th round and maybe we will get lucky on finding a better option down the road.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:57 am
Posts: 2104
Location: NW side
pizza_Place: Benny's on 26th in Berwyn
good dolphin wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Rex Grossman of 2005.

Similar numbers, similar problems, he even hits linemen with passes just to highlight the similarity.

Two weeks in a row of throwing an INT to a LB on the same crossing route speaks a lot towards his football intelligence.

That's a little unfair. This defense is no where near as good as that year. Moose and Berrian are better than anyone currently on the Bears roster. Devin Hester is nothing like he was at kick returner this year.

Kyle Orton has been bad in 3 out of the last 4 games. However, Rex Grossman's problem was he was not just bad, but he was so bad that teams thought they were more likely to score on defense than offense.

Rex Grossman's bad passer ratings: 0.0, 1.3, 10.2, 23.6, 36.8
Kyle Orton's worst passer rating this year: 39.1


No doubt. I think the most glaring difference is the offensive line, as this one is simply brutal. I hear people giving them accolades, simply because their orginal expectations were so low. However, the Bears have just played against three of the lower ranked defenses in the NFL and did not run the ball well for 4 straight quarters.

The recievers are bad though. Think last year how bad many thought the WR corps was...this is significantly worse. I'm shocked that there is a worse group in the NFL, but by the numbers, it looks like there are 3 -4.

I want Orton starting next year. I think he maxes out on talent to the point of being comparable to Jake Delhomme. That is good enough for me.


Thank you, I was gonna bring up the O-line, too. Of all the needs that the Beloved have, we most definitely need help there. How nice would it be if Orton (or whoever we have @ QB) had all day to throw like seemingly ALL of our opponents do. If we have somebody who can function behind center, I think that we should address our more pressing issues first.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
How does a team that needs a QB, has no valid #1 or #2 receiver, needs upgrades at 1 tackle and 2 guard positions, and eventually soon a new center win 9 games? That's not even getting into the defensive needs... What went right that allowed them to win potentially 10 games????

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Darkside wrote:
How does a team that needs a QB, has no valid #1 or #2 receiver, needs upgrades at 1 tackle and 2 guard positions, and eventually soon a new center win 9 games? That's not even getting into the defensive needs... What went right that allowed them to win potentially 10 games????


Coaching?

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Irish Boy wrote:
Darkside wrote:
How does a team that needs a QB, has no valid #1 or #2 receiver, needs upgrades at 1 tackle and 2 guard positions, and eventually soon a new center win 9 games? That's not even getting into the defensive needs... What went right that allowed them to win potentially 10 games????


Coaching?

Really? Cause reading these threads both coordinators are morons and Lovie is a boob. Seriously coaching has been called a weakness all year too.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
It's because most people watch one football game a week, and that game is the Bears game, so they become intimately familiar with their drawbacks and weaknesses. They then assume that no other 9-6 or winning teams have similar drawbacks.

Football teams don't win 9 games on accident. No team in the AFC or NFC west has yet and they get to play each other (imagine playing the Rams, Seahawks and 49ers twice this season.) Something must be good here.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:57 am
Posts: 2104
Location: NW side
pizza_Place: Benny's on 26th in Berwyn
Being better than the bad teams does not necessarily provoke me to say that the Bears are great- hey, I just want to see an improvement, because eventually those shitty teams are going to improve, and then we're back to the middle of the pack...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
[quote="hackwilson's ribbies
Thank you, I was gonna bring up the O-line, too. Of all the needs that the Beloved have, we most definitely need help there. How nice would it be if Orton (or whoever we have @ QB) had all day to throw like seemingly ALL of our opponents do. If we have somebody who can function behind center, I think that we should address our more pressing issues first.[/quote]

Remember they will have Williams healthy next year. You would hope that would result in an immediate upgrade. If they can get a starting OG out of this draft, the line should be markedly better next year.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:33 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Tait is way too tall to be a guard. D-tackles will bull rush him at the waiste and drive him into the QB or RB.

It's ok to be tall as a tackle cuz you're protecting the edge rushers. Hurts you if you're a guard.

Tackles never become guards in the NFL. It just never happens.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Leonard Davis would disagree.

Robbert Gallery too.

In general you're right, it's a tough transition, and I don't think he has the speed to pull.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: UltraMAGA and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group