It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 3:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: More Erin Andrews talk
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:02 am 
Call me crazy but I thought it was some great radio hearing Mac and Pants going after each other a bit there.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
You're not crazy. This was very good radio.

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
I'm with you, they are legitimately going at it. This is great stuff.



"Eat Me."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Wildcard_630 wrote:
Call me crazy but I thought it was some great radio hearing Mac and Pants going after each other a bit there.


I thought it was awful & certainly will not help Dans reputation. He basically said that it is ok for reporters to "get on their knees" to get the story if they want to. Meat to Mac to task for his lack of morals & ethics.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
who was on what side of the issue?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
The discussion was pretty much along the lines of how far you would go to get a story.

Mac has no problem with a reporter doing whatever it takes to get a scoop. Be it sleeping with, sharing drugs, etc.

Meatpants thinks Mac is nuts for this stance (I agree).

I think Mac is blurring the lines between using your sexuality or being friendly with an athlete with completely whoring yourself out. He's not saying he would do it, he's saying he's not bothered by others doing it. Still an odd stance...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Krazy Ivan wrote:
The discussion was pretty much along the lines of how far you would go to get a story.

Mac has no problem with a reporter doing whatever it takes to get a scoop. Be it sleeping with, sharing drugs, etc.

Meatpants thinks Mac is nuts for this stance (I agree).

I think Mac is blurring the lines between using your sexuality or being friendly with an athlete with completely whoring yourself out. He's not saying he would do it, he's saying he's not bothered by others doing it. Still an odd stance...


He's just trying to justify having slept with Jon Garland.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Meats biggest concern is the journalistic integrity... and Mac is admitting reporters should do what it takes to get the story. Meat pointed out that if a reporter is sleeping with a ballplayer, wouldn't that reporter be more likely to report on them in a positive light?


I guess this means Bruce Levine must be having sex with Jim Hendry.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: More Erin Andrews talk
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Then Meat exposed a CBS TV Female morning show peson who broke up the marriage of a Male CBS TV guy...and said that he might get fired for saying this, but oh well...
He mentione both names but I dont remember them.
As for Mac, he is really losing me with this discussion this morning.

I predict...Danny Mac will win WYC crappin' this week.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Another aspect of this argument is Mac admitting it's a waste of time to clench your fists over how other people do their job. "It's a waste of time to try to change things you can't control."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Krazy Ivan wrote:
The discussion was pretty much along the lines of how far you would go to get a story.

Mac has no problem with a reporter doing whatever it takes to get a scoop. Be it sleeping with, sharing drugs, etc.

Meatpants thinks Mac is nuts for this stance (I agree).

I think Mac is blurring the lines between using your sexuality or being friendly with an athlete with completely whoring yourself out. He's not saying he would do it, he's saying he's not bothered by others doing it. Still an odd stance...

Odd? Maybe


But to some media people the story is all that matters. Lot of people advance their career by any means neccessary. Is it right? Probably not. Is it moral? Definitely Not. Is it an effective way to advance in your profession? maybe.

As far as "sharing drugs"...If im a reporter and I know an athlete will feel more at ease and possibly a better story...Id get him high.

Im sure reporters have a lot of methods of getting "in" with a subject.

I gotta agree with Mac's Machiavellian stance on this...Do what you gotta do.
I wont stop you. Everyone has their personal limits. Some will do anything. Its just the way it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
So let me get this straight:

Mac = Good Story over Journalistic Integrity?

Wow...

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Chris in St. Charles wrote:
Meats biggest concern is the journalistic integrity...

Yet he apparently (dont listen...but have seen several comments) advances his career by not taking his boss to task on the air as much as he should.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:24 am 
rogers park bryan wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
But to some media people the story is all that matters. Lot of people advance their career by any means neccessary. Is it right? Probably not. Is it moral? Definitely Not. Is it an effective way to advance in your profession? maybe.



I agree that it seems that the story at the end of the day is what matters to most people. It is hard to trust the integrity of the story though when it is achieved by immoral means though.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Mac is going to take a beating on this.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Wildcard_630 wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
But to some media people the story is all that matters. Lot of people advance their career by any means neccessary. Is it right? Probably not. Is it moral? Definitely Not. Is it an effective way to advance in your profession? maybe.



I agree that it seems that the story at the end of the day is what matters to most people. It is hard to trust the integrity of the story though when it is achieved by immoral means though.

misquote...i wrote that. Ivan's posts are funny and clever. Mine are not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Scorehead wrote:
Mac is going to take a beating on this.

If by "a beating" you mean get talked about on other SCORE shows...get this site going and get pub for the show...you're correct


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
My only thought about this is, who is Mac sleeping with/drugging to write his thought provoking Sun-Times pieces?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Douchebag wrote:
My only thought about this is, who is Mac sleeping with/drugging to write his thought provoking Sun-Times pieces?



John Paxson

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:31 am 
rogers park bryan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Mac is going to take a beating on this.

If by "a beating" you mean get talked about on other SCORE shows...get this site going and get pub for the show...you're correct



Agreed. I bet even a few people who are listening to W & S who are reading this board have flipped down the dial to listen.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
Maybe Mac is taking a page from LoHo's book and is turning heel. He's spewing immoral thoughts, attacking board members...what do you guys think? It worked so well for Larry...

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:47 pm
Posts: 223
My personal opinion on the Erin tapes is that it was WRONG for someone to do that.That being said Erin uses her sexuality ALL the time to her advantage and obviousely its been working.She got the job BECAUSE of her looks,period.She is very friendly with a lot of the people she covers and is "flirt" and plays to the camera at all times.
Again not right what was done to her and the people should pay for it.............


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Douchebag wrote:
Maybe Mac is taking a page from LoHo's book and is turning heel. He's spewing immoral thoughts, attacking board members...what do you guys think? It worked so well for Larry...

attacking board members? Details?

and yes it's all contrived.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:37 am 
Douchebag wrote:
Maybe Mac is taking a page from LoHo's book and is turning heel. He's spewing immoral thoughts, attacking board members...what do you guys think? It worked so well for Larry...


I hope you don't mean Elmhurst Steve, that wasn't even close to being an attack. I might have missed something though as my boss has been by my desk a lot during that convo.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
rogers park bryan wrote:
attacking board members? Details?

Well he went after people criticizing his show.

And of course there are the anti Bryan Adams remarks, those were uncalled for.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:41 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
the show is great today.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
doug - evergreen park wrote:
the show is great today.


It can't possibly be better than yesterdays Judy and Cathy-esque conversation about the color of Stewart Cink's shirt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38327
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Douchebag wrote:
So let me get this straight:

Mac = Good Story over Journalistic Integrity?

Wow...



I like Mac personally, but I am surprised that folks here are shocked by his position.

Please explain that to me.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
TheSerb wrote:
My personal opinion on the Erin tapes is that it was WRONG for someone to do that.That being said Erin uses her sexuality ALL the time to her advantage and obviousely its been working.She got the job BECAUSE of her looks,period.She is very friendly with a lot of the people she covers and is "flirt" and plays to the camera at all times.
Again not right what was done to her and the people should pay for it.............


Sure Erin looks great...but she also really does have a great personality & does a good job.
Obviously good looks are important in TV, but dont let Erins good looks make you think that she isnt good at what she does. As far as sideline reporters go, she's the best, regardless of looks.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Seacrest wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
So let me get this straight:

Mac = Good Story over Journalistic Integrity?

Wow...



I like Mac personally, but I am surprised that folks here are shocked by his position.

Please explain that to me.



Not shocked. Just disagree with him. I've listened to Mac long enough to know what his take will be on most stories. I'm just not big on the "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" position that he's taking. I find it strange when people mistake not being able to change a situation with condoning a situation. It sounds like Mac is saying there is nothing you can do about somebody sleeping with someone else for a story, so it must be ok...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group