It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:21 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:02 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:12 pm
Posts: 498
Location: Joliet Correctional center cell3452
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
August was likely the high water mark for WSCR's 10 am to 3 pm ratings for 2K9--after Perfect Buehrle, the Peavy and Rios trades, interest picked up in White Sox baseball. That's going away, one way or the other. And then the Bulls season starts in a month or so and instead of leaving their radios tuned to WSCR to catch the White Sox games and commentary, sports fans will be up at WMVP to keep up with Jan(n)ero Pargo and his Chicago Bulls.


Very doubtful as I was a Bulls season ticket holder 13 years ago and they called me on Tuesday asking if I'd like to come back and purchase season tickets . Derick Rose needs a supporting cast and untill then I'll wait.

_________________
"lET ME , Worry about Luca Brasi"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
THE WIND SOCK wrote:

Very doubtful as I was a Bulls season ticket holder 13 years ago and they called me on Tuesday asking if I'd like to come back and purchase season tickets . Derick Rose needs a supporting cast and untill then I'll wait.


Did you miss the "Jan(n)ero Pargo" part? This...this is a GREAT roster**:

NO. NAME POS AGE HT WT COLLEGE 2009 - 2010 SALARY
9 Luol Deng SF 24 6-9 220 Duke $10,365,000
22 Taj Gibson F 24 6-9 225 USC $1,039,800
12 Kirk Hinrich G 28 6-3 190 Kansas $9,500,000
11 Lindsey Hunter SG 38 6-2 195 Jackson State $825,497
31 Jerome James C 33 7-1 285 Florida A&M $6,600,000
16 James Johnson F 22 6-9 245 Wake Forest $1,594,080
52 Brad Miller C 33 7-0 261 Purdue $12,250,000
13 Joakim Noah C 24 6-11 232 Florida $2,455,680
2 Jannero Pargo PG 29 6-1 185 Arkansas $1,990,000
1 Derrick Rose PG 20 6-3 190 Memphis $5,184,480
15 John Salmons SF 29 6-6 207 Miami (FL) $6,429,150
24 Tyrus Thomas PF 23 6-9 215 LSU $4,743,598




**For a European team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Are midday Sox games good or bad for ratings? I'm not implying anything one way or another, I genuinely don't know.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Irish Boy wrote:
Are midday Sox games good or bad for ratings? I'm not implying anything one way or another, I genuinely don't know.



Do they count on-line listeners? If so, the amount of listeners who can't listen on line coupled with the casual listener who turns his radio on for the game probably offset eachother.

I know that since I'm at work, I have to find an alternative when an afternoon game comes on the Score....unless I want to listen to the two douchebags who do their version of a radio show on Sporting News.

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Irish Boy wrote:
Are midday Sox games good or bad for ratings? I'm not implying anything one way or another, I genuinely don't know.

I know for a while, they were bad for sales.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:06 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Keep pulling at straws, Hussra!

Since Mac's show hit the air, there have been 7 afternoon Sox games (8 if you count Labor Day). I guess those 7 day really swing the ratings up! :roll:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:13 pm
Posts: 2584
It's amazing what a week up at cottage will do for the show's ratings. ;)

_________________
Disclaimer: Most of my posts are not suitable for work or home viewing.

The name's Rockmore. Beef Rockmore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Are midday Sox games good or bad for ratings? I'm not implying anything one way or another, I genuinely don't know.


Sox games add to the cume, or the overall amount of listeners that turn on WSCR.

Do they count on-line listeners? If so, the amount of listeners who can't listen on line coupled with the casual listener who turns his radio on for the game probably offset eachother.


On line listeners are not counted in the Arbitron ratings.


I know that since I'm at work, I have to find an alternative when an afternoon game comes on the Score....unless I want to listen to the two douchebags who do their version of a radio show on Sporting News.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 5039
The most laughable part of these ratings is the focus on men age 25-54. Most men age 55 and older have more money and disposable income than they have ever had in their lives. And they sure as hell are every bit as passionate about sports as younger guys. Many businesses understand they are much more desirable as a demographic than kids in their 20s and 30s who have far less disposable income. But the old, outdated notions about people in their 20s and 30s consuming more, and building long-term listening habits still drives this kind of idiotic radio decision making. If these radio shows also worried about the 55-65 male demo, they would be much more appealing to many advertisers. Many businesses that target men do understand the value to advertisers of men over age 54. But not the genius minds that run sports radio.

So guys over age 54 don't matter don't matter to Mac and the other radio people who cite the importance of this 25-54 demo? Since we are irrelevant to them, are we supposed to take our ears and our money to spend on other programs and advertisers who do care about us? It will be interesting to see how much Mac continues to focus on the under 54 demo in a few years when he reaches that age. Telling part of your audience that they are irrelevant is certainly an interesting business practice...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
So you're not into vasectomies, male enhancement products, and strip clubs?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Coast2Coast wrote:
The most laughable part of these ratings is the focus on men age 25-54. Most men age 55 and older have more money and disposable income than they have ever had in their lives. And they sure as hell are every bit as passionate about sports as younger guys. Many businesses understand they are much more desirable as a demographic than kids in their 20s and 30s who have far less disposable income. But the old, outdated notions about people in their 20s and 30s consuming more, and building long-term listening habits still drives this kind of idiotic radio decision making. If these radio shows also worried about the 55-65 male demo, they would be much more appealing to many advertisers. Many businesses that target men do understand the value to advertisers of men over age 54. But not the genius minds that run sports radio.

So guys over age 54 don't matter don't matter to Mac and the other radio people who cite the importance of this 25-54 demo? Since we are irrelevant to them, are we supposed to take our ears and our money to spend on other programs and advertisers who do care about us? It will be interesting to see how much Mac continues to focus on the under 54 demo in a few years when he reaches that age. Telling part of your audience that they are irrelevant is certainly an interesting business practice...


I've never understood the logic of that either. I could understand a high-end cutoff where most people end up on fixed incomes/pensions/social security and don't have much disposable income, but 55 seems much too low. 70 perhaps?

But from a "best show/most popular show possible" perspective, a 16 year old teenage girls ears should be just as valuable as a 32 year old male or a 79 year old male. Maybe you don't target each equally, but none is inherently "better" than another.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1358
pizza_Place: Marinos-EGV
Irish Boy wrote:

But from a "best show/most popular show possible" perspective, a 16 year old teenage girls ears should be just as valuable as a 32 year old male or a 79 year old male. Maybe you don't target each equally, but none is inherently "better" than another.


Agreed, but at the end of the day it's still a business. You can't sell to advertisers that the Danny Mac Show is the best show on radio, but rated 15th in his day part. (I dont know what you are rated Mac, I am just making up a number) My response and any rational persons would be, well thats great, but how does that get my product out to more people. Thats why ratings rule the world in radio and tv. You would much rather have a show flush with 25-54 or 65 (for coast) than the 12-18 demo, who most likely will not be buying a new car at Schaumburg Acura.

_________________
Bob Loblaw wrote:
Also is a good alternative if the cock on cock contact in men's mma makes anyone uncomfortable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
EG Greg wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:

But from a "best show/most popular show possible" perspective, a 16 year old teenage girls ears should be just as valuable as a 32 year old male or a 79 year old male. Maybe you don't target each equally, but none is inherently "better" than another.


Agreed, but at the end of the day it's still a business. You can't sell to advertisers that the Danny Mac Show is the best show on radio, but rated 15th in his day part. (I dont know what you are rated Mac, I am just making up a number) My response and any rational persons would be, well thats great, but how does that get my product out to more people. Thats why ratings rule the world in radio and tv. You would much rather have a show flush with 25-54 or 65 (for coast) than the 12-18 demo, who most likely will not be buying a new car at Schaumburg Acura.


Sure, I agree with all that. I guess all I mean is that (not apropos of the Mac show) if I had the highest rated show with 25-54 men, but my competition was higher rated overall, I wouldn't brag amongst laypeople that really, I'm more popular overall- although I would push it to advertisers, of course.

Coast's point was more narrow, but I agree there as well, that the 54 cutoff is arbitrary and kind of stupid.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Keep pulling at straws, Hussra!

Since Mac's show hit the air, there have been 7 afternoon Sox games (8 if you count Labor Day). I guess those 7 day really swing the ratings up! :roll:


Actually, I'd imagine night games swing more listeners either to WSCR (for white sox games) and then back to WMVP (for Bulls games). People listening to the game in their car or at work (if they work nights) etc are far more likely to listen to whatever station they were listening to the night/day before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Are midday Sox games good or bad for ratings? I'm not implying anything one way or another, I genuinely don't know.



Do they count on-line listeners? If so, the amount of listeners who can't listen on line coupled with the casual listener who turns his radio on for the game probably offset eachother.



You do realize the average daily visitor tally for 670thescore.com is around 6,000.

6,000 hits to the web site ain't squat in the ratings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
The general point here is that there are people listening to WSCR during baseball season who likely PTFB sometime in October and then don't return to WSCR until April. Same goes for WMVP and their Bulls broadcasts after April/May/June (whenever Jannero Pargo's Bulls get eliminated).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Hosts don't win ratings books. Radio stations win ratings books.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Hosts don't win ratings books. Radio stations win ratings books.


Remember when Bernstein did that show with a head cold? :lol:

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
Exclamation Moint wrote:
If anything, I think the Score's target demo has changed to more like 35-70. I know the ratings aren't figured that way, and therefore the ad dollars don't follow that model.

I don't think that many under 35 listen to sports radio. It's an older and contracting niche, unless there's some data to show otherwise. Probably a dying format. Just my half-baked theory. Mid-career professional males and retirees seem like the audience. Does a 20-yr-old in '09 get into the Score like they might have 20 years ago? I strongly doubt it. There's so much more to do than back then. Where will the new listeners come from?



Jurko's working on a 15 minute show focused on video games to complement his hour NASCAR show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:31 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 5039
Spaulding wrote:
So you're not into vasectomies, male enhancement products, and strip clubs?


No, Spaulding. I want my sports radio to carry ads for adult diapers. And top shelf single malt scotch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Coast2Coast wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
So you're not into vasectomies, male enhancement products, and strip clubs?


No, Spaulding. I want my sports radio to carry ads for adult diapers. And top shelf single malt scotch.


hey,now you got my attention! :wink:

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 5039
Jimmy, what is your brand preference: "Depends" or "Oops I crapped my pants"?


http://www.hulu.com/watch/10308/saturda ... d-my-pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Exclamation Moint wrote:
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
Jurko's working on a 15 minute show focused on video games to complement his hour NASCAR show.

I'd love to listen to a show on the radio about video games. Theater of the mind.

The Me and Z show used to use a lot of video game drops IIRC

http://niggastolemybike.ytmnd.com/

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: August Ratings
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Exclamation Moint wrote:
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
Jurko's working on a 15 minute show focused on video games to complement his hour NASCAR show.

I'd love to listen to a show on the radio about video games. Theater of the mind.


So would I...it would be awesome...it would...wait, I think you're being sarcastic...

Sad face


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group