It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:01 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Every team has a basic quick audible on special teams, the Bears being no exception. The call is entirely out of the coaches hands. The responsibility for counting the players on the field is the upman- in this case, Garrett Wolfe. If you watch the replay, you see that Wolfe gives a signal- he extends his arm out- as Mannelly is watching before the snap. I don't think that was intentional; the signal has to be something subtle, or else everyone on the other side would know. Mannelly saw the motion, interpreted it as the quick audible, and snapped.

Why is it the upman's responsibility? Everyone else is otherwise occupied. The gunners are focused on getting downfield and don't have the appropriate angle to count the men on the field. The blockers are preparing to do their jobs against their men. The long-snapper wouldn't be able to count the men on the field even if he wanted to, and he has more pressing concerns. The punter in theory could, but if you left it to the punter the upman would have no way of knowing it was an audible.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
So it WASNT Mannely's fault

His streak of no mistakes in his entire career is intact.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
rogers park bryan wrote:
So it WASNT Mannely's fault

His streak of no mistakes in his entire career is intact.


Well, it depends what you mean. Garrett Wolfe probably inadvertently gave the signal, but he also probably assumed that it was just understood you don't run the audible in that situation. They both goofed, to some degree.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
While it was clearly an audible, shouldn't it be coached to only be used in certain circumstances?

It was fourth and long.
The guy was running off the field which brings in what happened last night.

I know it should be a no-risk move but in reality there are things that could have gone wrong. One did.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
IB, did you see Mannelly point back at Wolfe through his legs?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Irish Boy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
So it WASNT Mannely's fault

His streak of no mistakes in his entire career is intact.


Well, it depends what you mean. Garrett Wolfe probably inadvertently gave the signal, but he also probably assumed that it was just understood you don't run the audible in that situation. They both goofed, to some degree.

Ok but what if Wolfe really gave the signal and Mannelly ignored it? I may be reaching here being the only member of the Mannelly ALS but if he sees the signal doesnt he pretty much HAVE to just run the audible?

Is it possible he thought..."Wolfe just gave the signal...so theyre must be a slam dunk better snap it quick"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
While it was clearly an audible, shouldn't it be coached to only be used in certain circumstances?

It was fourth and long.
The guy was running off the field which brings in what happened last night.

I know it should be a no-risk move but in reality there are things that could have gone wrong. One did.


I'm sure it is. But the coaches don't run up to the team and say "don't do the audible" before every punt that meets that description. Mannelly should have understood that; that's why, even if Wolfe gave the signal, I think it's ultimately on him.

Chris in St. Charles wrote:
IB, did you see Mannelly point back at Wolfe through his legs?


I'd have to watch a normal punt more closely to see if that's something Mannelly does before most punts, just to make sure everyone is set. But yes, I saw that.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
The real kicker about this stupid audible is that even if a penalty was called for too many men, it wouldn't have resulted in a 1st down anyway. There was absolutely no reason to call that at that point in the game.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
rogers park bryan wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
So it WASNT Mannely's fault

His streak of no mistakes in his entire career is intact.


Well, it depends what you mean. Garrett Wolfe probably inadvertently gave the signal, but he also probably assumed that it was just understood you don't run the audible in that situation. They both goofed, to some degree.

Ok but what if Wolfe really gave the signal and Mannelly ignored it? I may be reaching here being the only member of the Mannelly ALS but if he sees the signal doesnt he pretty much HAVE to just run the audible?

Is it possible he thought..."Wolfe just gave the signal...so theyre must be a slam dunk better snap it quick"?


Yes. It's a tough position. You need to be extra careful if your Wolfe not to do anything that can be misconstrued as the signal, and if your Mannelly, you need to let your override take over. If you snap to Mannelly, the worst that happens is the upman is slightly out of position on the block, which isn't the end of the world, and if he really as giving the signal, you'll get the penalty anyway.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
spanky wrote:
The real kicker about this stupid audible is that even if a penalty was called for too many men, it wouldn't have resulted in a 1st down anyway. There was absolutely no reason to call that at that point in the game.


The point isn't to get the penalty; the point is to get a risk-free chance at the first down. Surprisingly, Collinsworth missed this last night (he's normally quite sharp). I wouldn't say there was no reason, but yes, obviously a bad decision process.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 2:22 pm
Posts: 2123
The real kicker is that there weren't 12 men on the field. Unless there's no chance the guy won't be off the field in time, you can't make that play.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
casual fan wrote:
The real kicker is that there weren't 12 men on the field. Unless there's no chance the guy won't be off the field in time, you can't make that play.


I felt like the announcers got too caught up in the last guy running off the field. I think that was complete coincidence, and I have a feeling that anything we hear to the contrary is going to be CYA.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:56 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
how is 4th and 11, going to 4th and 6 a risk free chance at a first down? the Bears would have punted anyway.
it was Pat Mann's fault, not Wolfe.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
doug - evergreen park wrote:
how is 4th and 11, going to 4th and 6 a risk free chance at a first down? the Bears would have punted anyway.
it was Pat Mann's fault, not Wolfe.

If Wolfe ran 12 yards it would have been a first down.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
doug - evergreen park wrote:
how is 4th and 11, going to 4th and 6 a risk free chance at a first down? the Bears would have punted anyway.
it was Pat Mann's fault, not Wolfe.


Because if you don't get the first down on the fake you can still punt. Assuming there's a penalty, which there obviously wasn't.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:58 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
ah...gotcha.

btw: Pat Mann admitted it was his fault after the game last night. Just heard the tape.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43581
doug - evergreen park wrote:
how is 4th and 11, going to 4th and 6 a risk free chance at a first down? the Bears would have punted anyway.
it was Pat Mann's fault, not Wolfe.

He's saying you get a free shot. If you make the first down, you decline the penalty and bring the offense back on the field. If you don't make the first down, you accept the penalty and punt away.

I understand the philosophy of doing it, but I disagree that it was a good idea.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:00 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
i didn't read-in to your (posters) "ifs" of the play.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
My question is, if Pat was the one who saw the 12th man, why the fuck didn't he see the 12th man run off the field?


I think the play is a very good one if you know for a fact the 12th man is on the field. But that's a HUGE if.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
doug - evergreen park wrote:
ah...gotcha.

btw: Pat Mann admitted it was his fault after the game last night. Just heard the tape.

Shouldering the blame...like all the great ones do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Douchebag wrote:
doug - evergreen park wrote:
how is 4th and 11, going to 4th and 6 a risk free chance at a first down? the Bears would have punted anyway.
it was Pat Mann's fault, not Wolfe.

He's saying you get a free shot. If you make the first down, you decline the penalty and bring the offense back on the field. If you don't make the first down, you accept the penalty and punt away.

I understand the philosophy of doing it, but I disagree that it was a good idea.


Oh, I never said it was a good idea, at least there. In that situation I'm taking no risks whatsoever. But the coaches don't run up to players before every critical play and go "don't do the audible!"

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: On "the play"
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
There was one player who was really trying to get off the field, but there was a second player who broke to that same side of the field, then a few ticks later, ran back into position. Maybe Mannley saw that second guy break to the sideline and thought he was an extra guy. Then, with all of the looking and pointing backwards through his legs, he never saw that second player run back into position.

(the old second-player theory...)

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Darkside, RFDC, ShortTimeLurker, Sneakers O'Toole and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group