It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:06 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
I don't think the opposition is going in with a balanced gameplan. Now, it's pass on the Bears. The running stats will be lower as they seem to be pass on at will. False assumption on this stat I bet.


This is accurate. Also, Tommy Harris deserves a lot of credit for this. He was getting a lot of push inside all day yesterday.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Scorehead,

Let me go at this from a different angle.

Tell me exactly what you saw from the linebackers yesterday, outside of Briggs play and Roach's sack, that you thought indicated that the linebackers had a good game?

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
Roach's sack


:lol: :lol: :lol: I am immature

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Irish Boy wrote:
Quote:
Roach's sack


:lol: :lol: :lol: I am immature
.


yeah as soon as I typed it, I thought it sounded bad. Fuck it, I'm going to leave it up just as is.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Darkside wrote:
Scorehead touches on a good point.
But something is definately missing in this defense. Their 1st half d has been shitty in all four games (I think, I'm a little hazy).
Naw, scorehead has a good point but the truth is that something is wrong with the D. It's not necesserally that Urlacher is missing, but that sure ain't helping.


They are missing a good 3-technique defensive tackle, a good safeties, and cbs. Tillman has been doing okay but not near what he was.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
the Steelers don't exactly light it up either.


Yeah that 38 they put up last night was pedestrian.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
They have a real running back now.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Odd timing for this thread after a rookie QB almost throws for 300 yards on them and Seneca Wallace puts up nearly 250.

Let me put it in perspective, you hope Nick Roach makes the plays you expect Urlacher to make

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
good dolphin wrote:
Odd timing for this thread after a rookie QB almost throws for 300 yards on them and Seneca Wallace puts up nearly 250.

Let me put it in perspective, you hope Nick Roach makes the plays you expect Urlacher to make


And that's why GD's name is at the top of any list that includes this sites best posters.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Stats say the LB crew is credited with 57 tackles out of 199 total tackles for the year. I think that's pretty good. I like this LB crew because Roach and Williams look like they can run & tackle. Hopefully,that Hawaiian guy is ready to go with the bye coming up. Bears still might need some depth there.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
jimmypasta wrote:
Stats say the LB crew is credited with 57 tackles out of 199 total tackles for the year. I think that's pretty good. I like this LB crew because Roach and Williams look like they can run & tackle. Hopefully,that Hawaiian guy is ready to go with the bye coming up. Bears still might need some depth there.


That stat is totally dependent on where those tackles took place at too JP. Personally I would love to see a larger percentage of the tackles coming from the D line, but I of course know that's not a reality.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
jimmypasta wrote:
Stats say the LB crew is credited with 57 tackles out of 199 total tackles for the year. I think that's pretty good. I like this LB crew because Roach and Williams look like they can run & tackle. Hopefully,that Hawaiian guy is ready to go with the bye coming up. Bears still might need some depth there.


Williams has done nothing in his 1.5 weeks of starting and Tinoisamoa is tinoiSAMOAN.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
The reason so many people distrust football statistics is that there are a lot of useless ones. Tackles is one of those useless statistics.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Irish Boy wrote:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a fallacy.

Besides, the defense isn't playing that well. They allowed 24 legitimate points to the Lions at home. The Ray Lewis comparison is once again apt, in that if Lewis were injured for the season tomorrow, the Ravens defense would play pretty much the same with occasional, specific slip-ups (i.e., remember the screen pass that went for a TD against Seattle? Yeah, Urlacher prevents that). But it matters because the difference between elite and average is small but important, and because you only have so many elite working pieces, and losing them has a super-cumulative effect (losing Briggs and Urlacher is more than twice as bad as losing Briggs or Urlacher).


Briggs is an elite player...Urlacher is not. Losing Briggs would negativly impact the Defense much more than losing Urlacher.
Again, I have always been a fan of #54 & I am happy that the Bears are 3-1 without him after many fans were predicting gloom & doom. Remember all the Meatball posts here..."The Bears are finished" blah blah blah. Good for Bears. Lets hope they can keep it up!

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
DegenerateDave wrote:


John - you seem like a decent enough guy here, so I am going to try to say this without being insulting but yes I watched the game. But the difference between what you and I as observing fans notice from our tv screen is worlds different from what the bears positional coaches may have noticed from the pressbox. As I stated before, until I hear how Roach graded out from yesterday's game or unless Boilermaker Rick or Irish Boy tell me that Roach had a great game, I will defer to the experts.


I did not say that Roach had a great game. I said that he had a good game. He made some plays & he seemed to be in position on most plays. I think the Bears D is better of with Roach at Middle Linebacker that Hunter H.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
We'd be saying the same stuff if Briggs was out for the year and Urlacher not. "Man, things aren't as bad as I thought they would be", even though a lot of small differences creep in all the time (and sometimes the differences aren't so small, as with the ability to tackle Julius Jones on screen passes). My point is that when you have an overabundance of LB talent, relatively speaking, each additional piece provides less marginal benefit, so when you lose one piece but have another, it's not as noticeable. But the defense is significantly weaker now that it was in game one, and I dare say that poor LB play is going to cost the Bears a game they shouldn't lose, either to a team with good TE play, or a team that can stretch the defense to the outside on the ground. Unfortunately, Atlanta in two weeks might be that team.

Roach did not have a good game.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Irish Boy wrote:
We'd be saying the same stuff if Briggs was out for the year and Urlacher not. "Man, things aren't as bad as I thought they would be", even though a lot of small differences creep in all the time (and sometimes the differences aren't so small, as with the ability to tackle Julius Jones on screen passes). My point is that when you have an overabundance of LB talent, relatively speaking, each additional piece provides less marginal benefit, so when you lose one piece but have another, it's not as noticeable. But the defense is significantly weaker now that it was in game one, and I dare say that poor LB play is going to cost the Bears a game they shouldn't lose, either to a team with good TE play, or a team that can stretch the defense to the outside on the ground. Unfortunately, Atlanta in two weeks might be that team.

Roach did not have a good game.



THIS

I still haven't seen or heard the grades for the linebackers from yesterday, but this is good enough for me.

I'm not saying that Roach isn't capable of holding down the job - but it's a huge leap to go from Urlacher to Roach and say that the Bears do not miss Urlacher in the middle because of Roach.

The comments about Urlacher not be HOF worthy; I'm not even going to touch.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:47 pm
Posts: 1058
Location: Las Vegas
pizza_Place: The Bowling alley, where else?
Urlacher only had one year over 100 solo tackes and that was in 02 where he had Traylor and Washington allowing him to run free. I would not put him in the upper echelon of the top linebackers. That group of linebackers can shed the blockers and still make the play. He was above average and I'd rather have him than not have him but he wasn't as good as the National media blew him up to be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Irish Boy wrote:
The reason so many people distrust football statistics is that there are a lot of useless ones. Tackles is one of those useless statistics.


Who are you? this guy?

"Sacks don't matter"
Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Tackles are an incredibly flawed statistic for three reasons. First, the NFL is lazy about collecting it. Second, it is entirely context-dependent, so you have no idea of whether you are measuring something important or not (it would be like if we knew how many passes a QB completed without knowing how many he threw, or how many yards those passes went for). Third, it is scheme-dependent; the Bears scheme does not allow for the MLB to make as many tackles as the WLB. That has been true since Lovie took over, and remains true even with the smei-abandonment of the Tampa 2.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Irish Boy wrote:
Tackles are an incredibly flawed statistic for three reasons. First, the NFL is lazy about collecting it. Second, it is entirely context-dependent, so you have no idea of whether you are measuring something important or not (it would be like if we knew how many passes a QB completed without knowing how many he threw, or how many yards those passes went for). Third, it is scheme-dependent; the Bears scheme does not allow for the MLB to make as many tackles as the WLB. That has been true since Lovie took over, and remains true even with the smei-abandonment of the Tampa 2.


Thank you again IB for providing sanity to this thread.

Now will you please address the people that feel that Urlacher's career and contributions to the Bears are not HOF worthy?

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:47 pm
Posts: 1058
Location: Las Vegas
pizza_Place: The Bowling alley, where else?
DD, get off your knees. You are embarassing yourself.

Irish, every stat can be interpreted any way you like. But it is still a stat. Scheme or no scheme takles matter. And every middle linebacker needs to be on the ball every possible play. They are the field general who is supposed to be able to read the defense and be able read where the play is supposed to be. Ray Lewis was phoenomenal at this.


Last edited by Big Ern on Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Big Ern wrote:
DD, get off your knees. You are embarassing yourself.


Why? Because I defer to those who clearly have a better stated knowledge of the Bears defensive schemes instead of blindly saying "The Bears are playing pretty good without that Urlacher guy". :roll:

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I heard the same argument when the Bears let Bobby Engram go to free agency.
He caught 90-something balls because it was the scheme/system. Yeah,the scheme
is still waiting for the next guy to be as consistent.

I do agree the system helps,but you still need the players!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Last edited by jimmypasta on Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
It is amazing to me how people undervalue Urlacher.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Who?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
RFDC wrote:
It is amazing to me how people undervalue Urlacher.


Unfortunately, it doesn't surprise me RFDC. I would really be a pariah if I told everyone that I thought Urlacher was more valuable to this Bears defense than Singletary was at any time during his career.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
DegenerateDave wrote:
RFDC wrote:
It is amazing to me how people undervalue Urlacher.


Unfortunately, it doesn't surprise me RFDC. I would really be a pariah if I told everyone that I thought Urlacher was more valuable to this Bears defense than Singletary was at any time during his career.


Mike was the better tackler but Urlacher does everything else better.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
jimmypasta wrote:
DegenerateDave wrote:
RFDC wrote:
It is amazing to me how people undervalue Urlacher.


Unfortunately, it doesn't surprise me RFDC. I would really be a pariah if I told everyone that I thought Urlacher was more valuable to this Bears defense than Singletary was at any time during his career.


Mike was the better tackler but Urlacher does everything else better.


Yet Singletary is a HOF'r and Urlacher's career doesn't begin to approach it according to some people.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
DegenerateDave wrote:

Yet Singletary is a HOF'r and Urlacher's career doesn't begin to approach it according to some people.



Stop it with that logic DD. No need for it around here

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: billypootons, W_Z and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group