It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2687 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 90  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:47 pm
Posts: 1058
Location: Las Vegas
pizza_Place: The Bowling alley, where else?
Darkside wrote:
I don't like banning and outing. It's poor precident.
But... it has happened. Mao (outed) and Goldendomer (banned).
Do what you will, BF.


What were the historical circumstances for the unprecedented ousting of these two mults? What is the ousting criteria under Big Fan's domain?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
Big Ern wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I don't like banning and outing. It's poor precident.
But... it has happened. Mao (outed) and Goldendomer (banned).
Do what you will, BF.


What were the historical circumstances for the unprecedented ousting of these two mults? What is the ousting criteria under Big Fan's domain?

GoldenDomer racked up about 1,000 posts in 5 days, and also sent pretty much everyone here dozens of PM's. I wasn't around for Mao, but I agree that GoldenDomer is bannable.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
What I mean by a regular is someone who posts here just about every day for 5-10 posts a day.....that's what I mean...For Example, Zizou was Mao; I don't really consider him a regular because while he is known, he doesn't post enough for me to consider him a regular. Or maybe he posts everyday in the soccer section and I don't notice. :wink:

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Big Ern wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I don't like banning and outing. It's poor precident.
But... it has happened. Mao (outed) and Goldendomer (banned).
Do what you will, BF.


What were the historical circumstances for the unprecedented ousting of these two mults? What is the ousting criteria under Big Fan's domain?


Outing: general annoyance, specifically large amounts of spamming that rendered the board unreadable.

Banning: the same, including way more spamming, but also multiple PMs to many members of the board.

Neither of these cases are directly on point, since Juggs doesn't post in every section non-stop, but then again, there's never been a character specifically dedicated to following around board members and harassing them. I think the case for outing here is even stronger. But in both cases, the rationale is the same: by not outing or banning the person, you are making the board less readable as a whole and discouraging useful participants from taking part.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:44 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Irish Boy wrote:
Neither of these cases are directly on point, since Juggs doesn't post in every section non-stop, but then again, there's never been a character specifically dedicated to following around board members and harassing them. I think the case for outing here is even stronger. But in both cases, the rationale is the same: by not outing or banning the person, you are making the board less readable as a whole and discouraging useful participants from taking part.


....as one who was harrassed by specific characters, I beg to differ. April-June of 06 comes to mind.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
doug - evergreen park wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Neither of these cases are directly on point, since Juggs doesn't post in every section non-stop, but then again, there's never been a character specifically dedicated to following around board members and harassing them. I think the case for outing here is even stronger. But in both cases, the rationale is the same: by not outing or banning the person, you are making the board less readable as a whole and discouraging useful participants from taking part.


....as one who was harrassed by specific characters, I beg to differ. April-June of 06 comes to mind.


Is that when someone was "guest posting" as "Doug's ex wife"?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
doug - evergreen park wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Neither of these cases are directly on point, since Juggs doesn't post in every section non-stop, but then again, there's never been a character specifically dedicated to following around board members and harassing them. I think the case for outing here is even stronger. But in both cases, the rationale is the same: by not outing or banning the person, you are making the board less readable as a whole and discouraging useful participants from taking part.


....as one who was harrassed by specific characters, I beg to differ. April-June of 06 comes to mind.


I didn't realize that ever happened. A little bit before my time... even before my lurking time.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65779
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Wow that is fuckin low, is that for real?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:47 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Doug's ex-wife, Doug's balls, Doug's Mom, etc...

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:44 pm
Posts: 2
pizza_Place: Shermans
Evil J.A.C.K. wrote:
My Dear Internet Friends,
Who are we to ban anyone? Are there not people on your block that you do not like? Or people on your floor that you do not agree with, or people in your head that are always making all kinds of noise? Yet we do not move to ban them do we? Sure we might have to take Thorazine and Haloperidol to shut them up. To me I suppose that is a chemical varity of foe list. But we do not blow our own brain out do we? Heaven no! We like being alive! It makes us happy, and gay!
Listen gentlemen, there is not a doubt that this Juggs is indeed a regular poster gone Rogue. She has crossed the unwritten multcode.
However, she has not gone after "family members" as one baloney breath huffed out between mouth breaths. She is actually a board member, and of more fair game than say the spouse of spanky, who does not post here.
In short, Juggs is a sick fuck, and I do not care who is the puppetmaster.
Your Pal,
Evil.



My Dear Jack,

As equally bad 70s characters and while being noted for being incredibly intelligent, I had truly hoped to read some prose here that would have made sense. After all a troll such as Juggs threatens our very existence on this board. To continue to allow this person to run amok without some censorship or at the very least a good beatdown, would be counterproductive to all of prosperity on said board. We are ridiculed and defamed et al, except for a few mults who have been deemed worthy of trampsing among the elitists of the board. The rest of us are relegated to occasional appearances in threads that call for us to be created. And even then we are treated as if someone just farted and waved to go away while people hold their noses in our presence.

I will continue to show you the respect that your kingship deserves here, but I ask you to please reconsider your position. Our lives depend on it and RPB's entertainment on a daily basis as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
DegenerateDave wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
v) No, BF should NOT ban a mult ---- A MULT! ---- for chrissakes.


I rarely disagree with you DT but on this one I have to. ESPECIALLY A MULT. A mult gives cowards license to post negative shit that they would never have the sack to post as their real persona because their board experiene would cease to exist; especially here - with Steve being the rare exception. Say what you will about him but he has weathered a shitstorm of scrutiny and posted all under his own name. At least he has the balls to say it under his own moniker.

But using a mult to disparage a board member, especially one as sweet as RNM is cowardice on a level that only banning will solve.


I'm not arguing the merits of Juggs, obviously.

However, the bolded portion of your point doesn't hold water. At no point, unless a given poster purposefully and actively wishes to make it otherwise, is ANY account holder's "real persona" on display.

Also, and perhaps more importantly, there is no more or less accountability whether I post as Don Tiny, Fred Bilitnikoff, Krusher Kruschev, or Juggs (and again, no, I am not Juggs nor do I have any mults). I'll repeat and rephrase that .... there is no actual accountability assigned to anyone posting at CSFMB.

How is it more accountable for me to post as "Don Tiny" than it would be to post as (for example only) "Juggs"? Anyone can 'cowardly' hide behind any moniker they wish on the internet.

And so what if "Juggs" is banished? Nothing really prevents the same person making a new persona and starting it all over again. So BF gets to go on banning trips all over the board, while the person - assuming they have a brain - logs in with false IPs almost ad infinitum, making it actually much more difficult to reign the prick in.

There may be a case to be made for banning "Juggs", but I haven't seen it yet.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Last edited by Don Tiny on Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
That's bad Dave.....try again

also, at the beginning of it all I was almost certain GoldenDomer was Keeping Score


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 1055
This board is full of people who like to dish it out but can't take it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Don Tiny wrote:
DegenerateDave wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
v) No, BF should NOT ban a mult ---- A MULT! ---- for chrissakes.


I rarely disagree with you DT but on this one I have to. ESPECIALLY A MULT. A mult gives cowards license to post negative shit that they would never have the sack to post as their real persona because their board experiene would cease to exist; especially here - with Steve being the rare exception. Say what you will about him but he has weathered a shitstorm of scrutiny and posted all under his own name. At least he has the balls to say it under his own moniker.

But using a mult to disparage a board member, especially one as sweet as RNM is cowardice on a level that only banning will solve.


I'm not arguing the merits of Juggs, obviously.

However, the bolded portion of your point doesn't hold water. At no point, unless a given poster purposefully and actively wish to make it otherwise, is ANY account holder's "real persona" on display.

Also, and perhaps more importantly, there is no more or less accountability whether I post as Don Tiny, Fred Bilitnikoff, Krusher Kruschev, or Juggs (and again, no, I am not Juggs nor do I have any mults). I'll repeat and rephrase that .... there is no actual accountability assigned to anyone posting at CSFMB.

How is it more accountable for me to post as "Don Tiny" than it would be to post as (for example only) "Juggs"? Anyone can 'cowardly' hide behind any moniker they wish on the internet.

And so what if "Juggs" is banished? Nothing really prevents the same person making a new persona and starting it all over again. So the BF gets to go on banning trips all over the board, while the person - assuming they have a brain - logs in with false IPs almost ad infinitum, making it actually much more difficult to rain the prick in.

There may be a case to be made for banning "Juggs", but I haven't seen it yet.


Maybe I didn't make my point very well - maybe my point wasn't very strong in the first place. But to rephrase it, I will attempt to clarify.

While yes you post as Don Tiny, you have a presence on the board as Don Tiny and you are known as Don Tiny, if one day you just suddenly decided to go apeshit on someone and calling them names and making references to their wives and children, etc., I would venture to say that your board experience would change for the worse. You would be given a pretty rough ride, much in the way that Steve in fact was.

My point was why would a "regular" subject themselves to that kind of scrutiny when they could log in as a nefarious mult and post whatever they want without fear or reprisal?

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
frank has frequently said bad shit about steve's wife.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
The first argument is that there's a deterrence factor. Most of the people here consider themselves as part of the CSFMB community. As such, there's certain rules of decency that attach to belonging to a community. I wouldn't create a mult that goes around insulting people, but I'd be more likely to do that than do it under my own moniker, which people on the board know me by. Most everyone has met everyone else in real life by this point, and even if they haven't and have no plans to do so, almost everyone participating here has an interest in continuing participating beyond mere harassment. A single outing or banning reinforces that deterrence.

The second argument is that there's a crude justice to outing. The Juggs character has been a complete asshole, and is hiding behind what is a very useful, and on the whole good, policy of not outing or banning mults (eliminating names =/= banning). If that person thought it was appropriate to mock someone else on the board, than it is appropriate that they be shamed into having to acknowledge that it was their behavior. If you want to talk sports or politics or whatever, and you've been revealed to be a complete and utter asshole, you're probably going to have to go somewhere else.

Finally, like you said, the punishment isn't that severe. It's not like you're having personal information revealed on the board, which I would argue is always per se beyond the pale. You're just being shamed into acknowledging your bad behavior, or being hindered from continuing it. That's not the end of free speech on the board. I don't even think it has much of a chilling effect.

Farvefan: I agree, and I think Frank has stepped over the line with that repeatedly.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
FavreFan wrote:
frank has frequently said bad shit about steve's wife.


And I was against that too - family members should be off limits.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Irish Boy wrote:
The first argument is that there's a deterrence factor. Most of the people here consider themselves as part of the CSFMB community. As such, there's certain rules of decency that attach to belonging to a community. I wouldn't create a mult that goes around insulting people, but I'd be more likely to do that than do it under my own moniker, which people on the board know me by. Most everyone has met everyone else in real life by this point, and even if they haven't and have no plans to do so, almost everyone participating here has an interest in continuing participating beyond mere harassment. A single outing or banning reinforces that deterrence.

The second argument is that there's a crude justice to outing. The Juggs character has been a complete asshole, and is hiding behind what is a very useful, and on the whole good, policy of not outing or banning mults (eliminating names =/= banning). If that person thought it was appropriate to mock someone else on the board, than it is appropriate that they be shamed into having to acknowledge that it was their behavior. If you want to talk sports or politics or whatever, and you've been revealed to be a complete and utter asshole, you're probably going to have to go somewhere else.

Finally, like you said, the punishment isn't that severe. It's not like you're having personal information revealed on the board, which I would argue is always per se beyond the pale. You're just being shamed into acknowledging your bad behavior, or being hindered from continuing it. That's not the end of free speech on the board. I don't even think it has much of a chilling effect.

Farvefan: I agree, and I think Frank has stepped over the line with that repeatedly.


What Irish Boy said Don Tiny - lol.

I gave you the beat up Ford Pinto version and Irish Boy turned it into a Rolls Royce. Well said.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
DegenerateDave wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
frank has frequently said bad shit about steve's wife.


And I was against that too - family members should be off limits.

but noone is asking for him to be banned. I would be in favor of outing juggs though

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
FavreFan wrote:
DegenerateDave wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
frank has frequently said bad shit about steve's wife.


And I was against that too - family members should be off limits.

but noone is asking for him to be banned. I would be in favor of outing juggs though


I think Frank has stopped. Or at least I hope he has. I don't care about the gray areas of why everyone felt that was ok in that case - it still wasn't IMO.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
And Steve has always been classy regarding my personal endeavors. Family is off limits, but the band, friends, or ex-GFs are not apparently?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Frank Coztansa wrote:
And Steve has always been classy regarding my personal endeavors. Family is off limits, but the band, friends, or ex-GFs are not apparently?


Everyone knows ES is a douche.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
And Steve has always been classy regarding my personal endeavors. Family is off limits, but the band, friends, or ex-GFs are not apparently?


All of that shit should be off limits. It should be limited to members and that's it. I have to grudgingly admit that as a member the females like Spaulding, RNM, RW and others would be exposed in this case, but I don't see any other way.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Last edited by DegenerateDave on Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65779
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Did anyone actually talk to or PM with Bigfan? Chances are pretty good he'll never see this thread. He's usually spacy.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Darkside wrote:
Did anyone actually talk to or PM with Bigfan? Chances are pretty good he'll never see this thread. He's usually spacy.


No I didn't talk to him or PM him.

I assumed he read all threads or at least scanned through them.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
DegenerateDave wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
And Steve has always been classy regarding my personal endeavors. Family is off limits, but the band, friends, or ex-GFs are not apparently?


All of that shit should be off limits. It should be limited to members and that's it. I have to grudgingly admit that as a member the females like Spaulding, RNM, RW and others would be exposed in this case, but I don't see any other way.


you're going down a slippery slope my friend.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Bagels wrote:
DegenerateDave wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
And Steve has always been classy regarding my personal endeavors. Family is off limits, but the band, friends, or ex-GFs are not apparently?


All of that shit should be off limits. It should be limited to members and that's it. I have to grudgingly admit that as a member the females like Spaulding, RNM, RW and others would be exposed in this case, but I don't see any other way.


you're going down a slippery slope my friend.....


I feel it too. And this is probably the reason why BF doesn't hand out the ban or the outing very often. Where do you draw the line is a very very tough question to answer.

Maybe it's best that BF just look at it on a case by case basis and use his judgment - I don't know.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Bagels wrote:
DegenerateDave wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
And Steve has always been classy regarding my personal endeavors. Family is off limits, but the band, friends, or ex-GFs are not apparently?


All of that shit should be off limits. It should be limited to members and that's it. I have to grudgingly admit that as a member the females like Spaulding, RNM, RW and others would be exposed in this case, but I don't see any other way.


you're going down a slippery slope my friend.....


+1....Juggs sucks no doubt but cmon now. Should we run every post past Degen to make sure it is safe and acceptable? If I wanted a sterile conversation I would turn on ESPN 1000.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Phil McCracken wrote:
If I wanted a sterile conversation I would turn on ESPN 1000.

John Kruk has a radio show?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57247
Phil McCracken wrote:
+1....Juggs sucks no doubt but cmon now. Should we run every post past Degen to make sure it is safe and acceptable? If I wanted a sterile conversation I would turn on ESPN 1000.


I agree, and another reason why I say just ignore it and forget it. There is all kinds of crap that gets said on here every day, a lot of which would get removed from a lot of boards, but one of the things that makes this place great is the fact that it is not moderated.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2687 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 90  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group