It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Seems odd to me. I thought after the Cincy game they would be 8 or 9 point favorites but 13.5? I know the Bears are bet heavy in Vegas by Chicago people. They are also a national favorite team and non Chicago people bet on them. But coming off back to back losses with the last one being a blow out, this is the line?

I guess I'm saying I'll take the points, but there is no way in hell the Bears lose the game.


Last edited by Beardown on Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:31 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Beardown wrote:
Seems odd to me. I thought after the Cincy game they would be 8 or 9 point favorites but 13.5? I know the Bears are bet heavy in Vegas by Chicago people. They are also a national favorite team.

I guess I'm saying I'll take the points, but there is no way in hell the Bears lose the game.

No way in hell? I bet they could find a way.
Shit, getting 13.5 you take that action. 13 NFL points is a LOT man.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:33 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I know. I said I'll take the points.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:36 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
If the line doesn't move then you buy that hook to make it 14.

It's gonna be 52 on Sunday with no wind so field goals won't be a problem. But it's the lake front so you never know at Soldier Field.


Last edited by Beardown on Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
If a line seems too good to be true it probably is.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Right now, I realize it's a lot of points, but the point spread is to generate $$$$ on both sides. The reason why it's that much is there's not just a lot of $$$$ on the Bears, but the Browns simply can't score. One sight of Eric Mangini on the Cleveland sideline Sunday and I immediately think of Kevin James on "The King of Queens" yelling for "CARRIE!" :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If a line seems too good to be true it probably is.

+1 I believe the term is "Sucker Bet"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
That is going to have to shift down as the week progresses. Obviously somebody somewhere thinks the Bears are worth a +10 at home (assuming they get the full +3 to begin with), but 13.5 just seems like something's fishy.

Plus, the field in ideal conditions is shitty; all this rain leading up to, and possibly, Sunday, isn't going to help at all. Too sloggy, too slippy, too turfy. All points, regardless of who scores them, will be at a premium.

Meaning that, if I actually had dispensary cash, I can't envision anything stopping me from dropping a sizable portion on the side of the Browns.

As an aside, I'd be curious to know the +/-.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:47 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Over/under is 40.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
have you seen the browns play? The packers aren't much better than the bears. The bears are a lock to cover this week

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Beardown wrote:
Over/under is 40.


Wow.

If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but the 13.5 pts & the under seem like outstanding plays on a Tuesday afternoon.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:00 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Beardown wrote:
Seems odd to me. I thought after the Cincy game they would be 8 or 9 point favorites but 13.5? I know the Bears are bet heavy in Vegas by Chicago people. They are also a national favorite team and non Chicago people bet on them. But coming off back to back losses with the last one being a blow out, this is the line?

I guess I'm saying I'll take the points, but there is no way in hell the Bears lose the game.


Cleveland is one of the worst teams in the league, they beat a team of similar caliber (Detroit) by 24 points. I don't think this line is that outrageous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Keep in mind Derek Anderson hasn't been much better since replacing Brady Quinn about 3 weeks ago as the Browns' starting quarterback. This is the same Derek who threw 2 completions in a WIN (!) over the Bills by a baseball-like final of 6-3. :oops: It's not just the fact the Browns are losing, but the way they're doing so that makes me want to lay the lumber and take the Bears to win big Sunday.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:07 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
SHARK wrote:
Keep in mind Derek Anderson hasn't been much better since replacing Brady Quinn about 3 weeks ago as the Browns' starting quarterback. This is the same Derek who threw 2 completions in a WIN (!) over the Bills by a baseball-like final of 6-3. :oops: It's not just the fact the Browns are losing, but the way they're doing so that makes me want to lay the lumber and take the Bears to win big Sunday.


I believe he only completed 1 pass to his WR's this past Sunday in 13 attempts, so this will be another barameter to see what a team with a horrid passing game can do against the Bears.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
BD wrote:
SHARK wrote:
Keep in mind Derek Anderson hasn't been much better since replacing Brady Quinn about 3 weeks ago as the Browns' starting quarterback. This is the same Derek who threw 2 completions in a WIN (!) over the Bills by a baseball-like final of 6-3. :oops: It's not just the fact the Browns are losing, but the way they're doing so that makes me want to lay the lumber and take the Bears to win big Sunday.


I believe he only completed 1 pass to his WR's this past Sunday in 13 attempts, so this will be another barameter to see what a team with a horrid passing game can do against the Bears.

BD, this is also the same Derek Anderson who also had a good season a few years ago and many "experts" thought Derek would be the next big thing at QB...So much for that!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:09 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I'm very much aware that the Browns are shit. I still think it's too many points with the Bears offensive line and red zone struggles.

I'm with Don Tiny. I like the Browns and the under.

Once again, no way the Bears lose. Somebody can look it up but 13 point favorites and higher have to be 95% or better that they win the game outright. Very rare for an NFL dog, this big, to win a game outright. Irish boy, you got those numbers?

So for you non gamblers, Vegas is saying that it's just about impossible for the Bears to lose. Bears will be 4-3.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Anybody rooting for the Browns Sunday?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Scorehead wrote:
Anybody rooting for the Browns Sunday?

Depends on how it affects the Broncos playoff chances.

Note: That was a joke.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
I hope the Bears win, but I sure would like to see Lovies press conference after a loss to the Browns.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Scorehead wrote:
I hope the Bears win, but I sure would like to see Lovies press conference after a loss to the Browns.

Scorehead, perish the thought...Besides, just imagine how irate The SCORE's postgame duo of Doug Buffone & Ed O'Bradovich will be if the Bears lose Sunday. I know Doug & OB were furious after the Bears got their clocks cleaned Sunday in Cincinnati, and before going to the national Westwood One broadcast of the yawner between the Eagles/Redskins, LoHo sounded pretty pissed off as well and wanted to hold Lovie accountable for this mess. "Trust me?" I think not...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Note to people who think that this is tremendously easy money: bet the game. Go ahead. Do it. The books are daring you. If you're that confident, you should be emptying out your bank account right now. You can almost double your money in three hours. That's better than any other investment strategy I can think of.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:07 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Irish Boy wrote:
Note to people who think that this is tremendously easy money: bet the game. Go ahead. Do it. The books are daring you. If you're that confident, you should be emptying out your bank account right now. You can almost double your money in three hours. That's better than any other investment strategy I can think of.


Right. No such thing as "knowing the easy bets" or else Vegas would be out of business.

You got the percentage of 13+ point favorites winning outright? It has to be 95% or better. I'm just talking NFL.


Last edited by Beardown on Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Irish Boy wrote:
Note to people who think that this is tremendously easy money: bet the game. Go ahead. Do it. The books are daring you. If you're that confident, you should be emptying out your bank account right now. You can almost double your money in three hours. That's better than any other investment strategy I can think of.


Yea. This is a huge trap game. I see Joshua Cribbs either returning a Kick to the house, or breaking a long run out of the Wildcat formation. If Eric Mangini was smart he would stop the Derek Anderson experience before he ruins Brady Quinn. Quinn should be the Browns starter.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Scorehead wrote:
I hope the Bears win, but I sure would like to see Lovies press conference after a loss to the Browns.


Jesus Christ ... only the sun rising in the east is more predictable than your posts, and the spread's pretty close on that matchup.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
FavreFan wrote:
have you seen the browns play? The packers aren't much better than the bears. The bears are a lock to cover this week


Image

Even a fan of Farve can have a moment of clarity.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Don Tiny wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
I hope the Bears win, but I sure would like to see Lovies press conference after a loss to the Browns.


Jesus Christ ... only the sun rising in the east is more predictable than your posts, and the spread's pretty close on that matchup.


Same goes for your posts as well.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Between 1997 and 2007 there were 124 games with a spread of 13 points or greater. The favorite went 110-14 in those games.

Interestingly, amongst the 14 teams that lost those games outright, here were the coaches:

Andy Reid (2)
Bill Cowher (2)
Marvin Lewis
Mike Martz (3)
Lovie Smith
Bill Parcells
Mike Shanahan
Dave Wannstadt
Bill Bellicheck
Jim Fassel

Not a lot of correlation there between "quality" and "choking", although the sample size is skewed towards coaches that had good enough teams to actually be favored by that much. The Lovie loss was the 2006 Dolphins game.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Thanks. 110-14 is 88%. I thought it would be higher but that's still good. If the Bears lose this game Lovie should be fired.

I'll bet 13 point favorites are 100% coming off a loss. Certainly 100% coming off back to back losses. No let down effect when you've lost 2 in a row.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
That doesn't include the playoffs. Between 1990 and 2007 teams were 14-2 when they had a spread of 13 points or greater. Bonus Irish Boy points to whomever can name those games. There was a game in the 2008 playoffs as well- the Super Bowl, where the Giants were a 14 point underdog.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:33 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Broncos in the Super Bowl vs the Packers.

Falcons vs Vikings in 1998 NFC championship game.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hawg Ass and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group