I think he's good, in that even with the crap talent on this team right now, they'll still finish within two games of .500
Although if they don't then I'll lean more towards average than bad. I think Lovie makes good coaching decisions about when to and not to punt (most coaches punt too much), and he displays good clock management, and the players seem to buy his leadership style. I think generally that's a recipe for success.
All in all, I think that coaches could be rated like this (taking into account everything that goes into coaching, from leadership style to football knowledge and intangibles).
Great = +2 wins every year, regardless of whether you're in the regular- or post-season (Belichick right now) Good = +1 wins (Lovie, I think (Pittsburgh this year?)... And guys like Andy Ried, Jack Del Rio) Average = +-0 (Most other coaches) Bad = more than 1 loss added per year (Jauron, Wade Philips).
That said, scouting players and talent is still the most important thing, but I think coaches can get you a win or two if you're lucky, and they're good enough.
|