It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:27 pm
Posts: 2251
pizza_Place: Gino's East - Pepperoni & Garlic Deep Dish
I like Knox, but for some reason his skill set reminds me a little of Bobby Wade.

_________________
Second City Saint


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Northside_Dan wrote:
Here's my realistic dream for our WR next year:

#1: Anquan Bolden
#2: DA
#3: Earl Bennett
#4/5: Knox/Igelisas..can flip around depending on play call etc.

I actually like Hub's idea of using Hester for KR/PR/3rd Down/Gimmick kind of back. He has a unique talent that should be used, but not featured like it is now

That's a uniquely shitty idea. You're getting high-level production in special teams right now anyway. And he's already returning punts when he's healthy. Why would he be better being used less? And how in the world are you going to use someone that slight in the backfield even a handful of times per game? Not to mention that you'd have to once again retrain him at a different position despite the fact that you were getting more production out of him than any other WR on the roster in his second year at the position.

Hub is genuinely retarded.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Irish Boy wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Here's my realistic dream for our WR next year:

#1: Anquan Bolden
#2: DA
#3: Earl Bennett
#4/5: Knox/Igelisas..can flip around depending on play call etc.

I actually like Hub's idea of using Hester for KR/PR/3rd Down/Gimmick kind of back. He has a unique talent that should be used, but not featured like it is now

That's a uniquely shitty idea. You're getting high-level production in special teams right now anyway. And he's already returning punts when he's healthy. Why would he be better being used less? And how in the world are you going to use someone that slight in the backfield even a handful of times per game? Not to mention that you'd have to once again retrain him at a different position despite the fact that you were getting more production out of him than any other WR on the roster in his second year at the position.

Hub is genuinely retarded.


If the Bears make a coaching change, Hesters WR career is over.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Irish Boy wrote:

Hub is genuinely retarded.



How would you like to see Hester used then? I think he's more of a hindrance than asset to the WR corps especially if the Bears do get a big name The only problem is his contract is built with the WR incentives in there

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Northside_Dan wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:

Hub is genuinely retarded.



How would you like to see Hester used then? I think he's more of a hindrance than asset to the WR corps especially if the Bears do get a big name The only problem is his contract is built with the WR incentives in there

He was on pace to have 75-80 receptions before his injury. How is that a hindrance? He's everything Johnny Knox is, but better. Much better.
Quote:
If the Bears make a coaching change, Hesters WR career is over.

no

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I think the opposite. Knox has the edge over Hester.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Spaulding wrote:
I think the opposite. Knox has the edge over Hester.

He certainly has the edge in giving up on routes and getting jammed on the line. I'm not sure where else he's better though.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:17 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Hester is stronger than Knox and can break tackles a littler better. Speed is about the same. I agree with Irish Boy. He's not as horrible at WR as everybody says. He had a decent season. Like Irish Boy said, he was on pace for 80 catches and he might have gotten 1,000 to 1,100 yards. That's not great but it's certainly not horrible. He doesn't suck. He actually has good hands. People don't give him credit for his hands.

He only had 3 TDs. That was a little disapointing. Ya know what's weird? He got open deep more times for Orton than he did this year. Orton missed him about 4 or 5 times. Maybe he was open this year a few more times and Cutler didn't hit him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:34 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Hester did more digs, curls and slants this season. He was more of a possesion receiver this year. He was the "go route" guy last year. That's why his TDs were down. Knox was the "go route" guy this year. That's all they trusted him with. Plus he's not strong enough to go into the middle. He'd get killed or he'd be scared to catch some passes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
This was Knox first year in the league. He will get stronger and be a more polished player next season. I also believe like spaulding that Knox is a better player and has a better future as a receiver.
In my opinion, Knox will barely see the field next year. Hester, Bennett, and just about any free agent WR will all play over him.

Knox had an above average first two games. Since then, he's really only had one productive game.

His biggest problem is that he can't really get stronger because he will get slower and that takes away pretty much any advantage he has. He's just a fast guy. I don't really see him as a great fundamental WR or a superior jumper who can get the ball.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Irish Boy wrote:
He certainly has the edge in giving up on routes and getting jammed on the line. I'm not sure where else he's better though.


I think he has better hands and instincts. He thinks and has better vision. Is Knox less penalized also? Neither run routes or get off the line well. I think Hester is as good as he will ever be, that's my main problem with him. Maybe Knox can learn.


Last edited by Spaulding on Wed Dec 30, 2009 6:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Thats really not a problem, though. If this really IS as good as he ever will be, thats not bad considering he has never been a WR before. He's actually progressed pretty nicely and the WR development, however miniscule, is the one thing the Bears can hang thier hat on this season.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
I don't understand this "he's just a guy" line of thinking.

I don't give a shit if "he's just a guy", if he's the "guy" who performs the best shouldn't he be on the field as much as possible? This isn't a great receiving corps as it is so when a guy shows something, leave him out there. Same with Bell at RB. So he's a third stringer....if Forte isn't doing shit stick the other guy in to see what happens.

Wouldn't this be the time to throw in Iglesias or any other young player? Why is this so fucking hard for this coaching staff to grasp?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
The Bears have de-valued Hester. He was worth a hell of a lot more 3 years ago than he is now. 3 years ago Hester was a star...now he's just a guy.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Scorehead wrote:
The Bears have de-valued Hester. He was worth a hell of a lot more 3 years ago than he is now. 3 years ago Hester was a star...now he's just a guy.


Agreed. Fuck up of monumental proportions. The "he's just a guy" tag fits him perfectly.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NME, The Doctor Of Style and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group