It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I agree Nas that the talent is lacking at this point but I would rather they start bringing in talent to play a defense doesn't get torched on a regular basis. The Bears are now 4 years removed from an offense or defense that finished in the top 15 in either yards or points. Turnovers are great but they are still giving up points and aren't scoring that many. I just see no direction from this group from Angelo on down and now we have another year or two to deal with it. I hope they get better. I really do but I don't see it happening.


Angelo wasn't going to go anywhere. That means he would be responsible for bringing in talent for a new coach. The fact that the GM has full control over who stays and who goes makes no sense to me. Coaches know which guys suck and which ones don't. He exposes himself the more he keeps bums around.


I fully want/wanted Angelo gone too.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Talent is the problem. Lovie has made adjustments to his system but injuries to key guys and talent have been the biggest problem. It's been 3 years and the Bears still haven't solved the safety and corner issues.


If it's that hard to find guys to play your system, maybe it's not a very good system.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Chris Harris did work and Lovie put him in over Mike Green. High draft picks by Angelo made him expendable.


Adam Archuleta made him expendable. Who's to blame for that?

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Just so I'm clear I had no problem with the Bears firing Lovie but to think things would change next season bringing in another guy is flat out wrong IMO. It may have been worse because that coach would likely bring a different philosophy.


It probably would have been worse next year. My fear is that will be the same next year and now worse the year after that. A wasted year but Virginia saved $15 million so I guess that's OK.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Lovie came in went 11-5 in his second year with a below average rookie qb.
The next year he went 13-3

He is not without fault, but he is miles ahead of Jauron or Wanny

Because he had a dominating defense. Since then, the defense hasn't just merely declined, its fallen off the face of the earth.

Ok, he made the playoffs in back to back years. They lost to the Panthers because he refused to abandon his scheme and double-cover Steve Smith. They lost to the Colts because he refused to abandon his scheme and stop the Colts from dinking and dunking underneath. He also called a timeout with 2 seconds left against Seattle which put his team in a position to lose rather than a position to win-- something that with clock mismangement, wasting timeouts, and poor challenges he does several times a season. He allowed Ron Turner to run a fullback draw on countless 3rd and 4th and shorts, turning the ball over on downs.

He is under .500 since the Super Bowl, has made countless bad coaching moves and bad personel desicions. A lot of it is on the players and a lot of it is on Angelo too, but Lovie has put this team in a postion to lose moreso than a position to win. Thats pitiful, and he deserved to get his ass fired. But because of that early "success" he sticks around because of his salary.

The worst part about him coming back is that its probably going to be another year of Jay Cutler's wasted with a shit team and bad coaching.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
KDdidit wrote:
I don't care if it was a good financial decision. I don't watch the Bears so I can cheer for their financial decisions. I hate to sound meatballish but you're going too far into the other direction if you're basing the merit of keeping Lovie by finances. If you think he's an adequate coach, fine.


I think it's both. You're wasting money and NOT upgrading your coach, IMO. Maybe you catch lightning in a bottle. But chances are you dont. The talent isn't there yet. Hiring a new coach would set this team back more than keeping Lovie another year or two. And it would be alot more expensive.

The talent isn't there, but injuries also have been more problematic than with other franchises I would guess. It's not the system, it's the players. I believe the Colts run the most similar defense to the Bears. It's a solid defense. Granted, they have Freeny and Mathis. But they've also plugged in rookie CB's this year that have done better than the Bears CB's. Minnesota's defense isn't all that different than the Bears either. The talent hasn't been there to produce the results that some magically expect just by changing the Head Coach.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
They lost to the Colts because Riveria was too stubborn and the Bears got torched on the ground for 200 yards. They lost to the Colts because Danielle Manning should not have been on the field and that would be sack turned into a touchdown because of another mistake by him. They lost to the Colts because the fumble by Benson and Gilmore took away any momentum they had left. They lost to the Colts because bad Rex showed up after he threw a touchdown.


They lost to the Colts because the Colts were a better team that year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:10 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
They lost to the Colts because Riveria was too stubborn and the Bears got torched on the ground for 200 yards.

And has the head coach, Lovie SHOULD HAVE stepped in and said, "Ron we need to X to stop this ground game"

But, he didn't. Failure on his part. Just like he allowed Ron Turner to continue to run bad plays.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
They lost to the Colts because Riveria was too stubborn and the Bears got torched on the ground for 200 yards.

And has the head coach, Lovie SHOULD HAVE stepped in and said, "Ron we need to X to stop this ground game"

But, he didn't. Failure on his part. Just like he allowed Ron Turner to continue to run bad plays.


It's usually a sign of good coaches to trust their coordinators. That's why they have them. If the HC has to continually correct them, they need to be replaced. It's not the HC's job to babysit professional coordinators.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Year 1: Craig Krenzel
Year 2: Starting qb and backup go down, 11-5 Wins division
Year 3: Centerpiece of defense gone in week 12, Goes to Super Bowl
Year 4: QB Roulette, Angelo's #4 pick declared a bust 7-9
Year 5: With Kyle Orton and a terrible line put together by Angelo- 9-7
Year 6: Star MLB out for season in week 1, New Franchise qb throws 26 ints 7-9

I know all coaches have to deal with injuries etc. but do most coaches lose their starting QB or their best defensive players in 5 of 6 years?

I think Lovie has done well despite the obstacles.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I'd aruge (for the reasons that I pointed out above) the Bears have had success over the past 5 years in spite of Lovie Smith and not beacuse of him.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
What do they define insanity as? Doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results? They should have fired Lovie, Jerry, and Ted and spent money on quality replacements while getting all the money back by going into next year with a bunch of nobodies at the salary floor. Bring back the scab Spare Bears. That's a good financial decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'd aruge (for the reasons that I pointed out above) the Bears have had success over the past 5 years in spite of Lovie Smith and not beacuse of him.


So then you think Angelo has done a good job of getting Lovie talented players, and Lovie has caused them to underachieve?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
FavreFan wrote:
It's not the system, it's the players.


Who is the best defensive player on that team for the past decade? Brian Urlacher. How does he utilize that talent? He drops him back into coverage all the f'n time.

You take a guy that was getting 6,7,8 sacks a year and over a hundred tackles, a couple picks and you turn him into a glorified safety. The guy went 2 whole seasons without a sack. This freak of speed and size can't find the QB all of a sudden. But, hey, that's what that position needs to do in the system.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas give me one solid example over the past 2 seasons where Lovie has put his team in a position to win rather than lose. 1 decision that Lovie himself has made.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
You guys are still ignoring the fact that nearly everyone believes that Lovie is simply a lame duck coach.

If Lovie is really that good of a coach why is it nearly universal that he'll be fired without a miracle season next season?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's not the system, it's the players.


Who is the best defensive player on that team for the past decade? Brian Urlacher. How does he utilize that talent? He drops him back into coverage all the f'n time.

You take a guy that was getting 6,7,8 sacks a year and over a hundred tackles, a couple picks and you turn him into a glorified safety. The guy went 2 whole seasons without a sack. This freak of speed and size can't find the QB all of a sudden. But, hey, that's what that position needs to do in the system.


I dont think Urlacher was misused. He was a uniquely talented player, and was a HUGE reason the system succeeded when they got even adequate pressure from the front four(their job btw.) Urlacher's stats might not have been great, but his impact on the game was, and you saw that this year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You guys are still ignoring the fact that nearly everyone believes that Lovie is simply a lame duck coach.

If Lovie is really that good of a coach why is it nearly universal that he'll be fired without a miracle season next season?


Because in general most coaches cant go four years without making the playoffs. I doubt he'll be fired even next season if they make the playoffs. Lame duck coach refers to a coach with 1 year left, not 2.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Wasn't Urlacher defensive player of the year in this system?


It was not nearly his best year.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Copout. Give me one playcall or desicion that has helped the Bears win a game. Because with timeouts and bad challenges, I can name 2 or 3 off the top of my head where he has put them in a position to lose on Sunday.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
FavreFan wrote:
I dont think Urlacher was misused. He was a uniquely talented player, and was a HUGE reason the system succeeded when they got even adequate pressure from the front four(their job btw.) Urlacher's stats might not have been great, but his impact on the game was, and you saw that this year.


Just because he can play Lovie's system doesn't mean that is the best use of his talent. He's played the last 2 years and the defense was not good. He's past his prime now. I guess this is just my opinion but I felt he's been underutilized for what havoc he could create.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Copout. Give me one playcall or desicion that has helped the Bears win a game. Because with timeouts and bad challenges, I can name 2 or 3 off the top of my head where he has put them in a position to lose on Sunday.


He coached a pretty good game against Green Bay in Week 1. Vasher single covering Jennings at the end was a mistake, but they held Rodgers in check and overcame a horrendous game by Cutler to have the lead with a few minutes left.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Lovie came in went 11-5 in his second year with a below average rookie qb.
The next year he went 13-3

He is not without fault, but he is miles ahead of Jauron or Wanny

Because he had a dominating defense. Since then, the defense hasn't just merely declined, its fallen off the face of the earth.

Ok, he made the playoffs in back to back years. They lost to the Panthers because he refused to abandon his scheme and double-cover Steve Smith.

Smith scored on the second play from scrimmage because Tillman fell down.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
[They lost to the Colts because he refused to abandon his scheme and stop the Colts from dinking and dunking underneath.

They lost to the greatest QB of all time. They were done 1 td in the fourth quarter.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
[He also called a timeout with 2 seconds left against Seattle which put his team in a position to lose rather than a position to win-- something that with clock mismangement, wasting timeouts, and poor challenges he does several times a season.

Cant and Wont argue that. That is bad.



Frank Coztansa wrote:
[He is under .500 since the Super Bowl,

Why judge only AFTER the Super bowl


Frank Coztansa wrote:
has made countless bad coaching moves and bad personel desicions.

I was unaware that Lovie was the GM. I dont care if he liked Archeletta. Its Angelo's call.




Frank Coztansa wrote:
A lot of it is on the players and a lot of it is on Angelo too
,
No need to qualify that true statement

Frank Coztansa wrote:
but Lovie has put this team in a postion to lose moreso than a position to win.

Not true. His Winning Pct is 537. You cant just dismiss the success.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Thats pitiful, and he deserved to get his ass fired. But because of that early "success" he sticks around because of his salary.

Why is lovie's success in quotes? What advantage does lovie have over other NFL coaches?
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The worst part about him coming back is that its probably going to be another year of Jay Cutler's wasted with a shit team and bad coaching.

Yeah. Cutler's 26 int are on Lovie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
He coached a pretty good game against Green Bay in Week 1. Vasher single covering Jennings at the end was a mistake, but they held Rodgers in check and overcame a horrendous game by Cutler to have the lead with a few minutes left.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh yeah, a coaching clinic there. Throwing the red flag to see if there were 12 guys on the field was a marvel of coaching.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Because in general most coaches cant go four years without making the playoffs. I doubt he'll be fired even next season if they make the playoffs. Lame duck coach refers to a coach with 1 year left, not 2.
Most coaches don't survive three years without making the playoffs unless it's the first three years they are there.

A miracle run to the playoffs could save his job but it's likely he'll be just like Jim Zorn by week 8 next year. The only reason he wouldn't be fired is because of a lockout.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I dont think Urlacher was misused. He was a uniquely talented player, and was a HUGE reason the system succeeded when they got even adequate pressure from the front four(their job btw.) Urlacher's stats might not have been great, but his impact on the game was, and you saw that this year.


Just because he can play Lovie's system doesn't mean that is the best use of his talent. He's played the last 2 years and the defense was not good. He's past his prime now. I guess this is just my opinion but I felt he's been underutilized for what havoc he could create.


I guess you could have moved him to OLB. MLB's rarely blitz alot. I still dont think that was the best use of his talent. Although it is certainly up for debate. I think he was one of the most dominant players in his prime, and if he was underutilized that's even more amazing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Because in general most coaches cant go four years without making the playoffs. I doubt he'll be fired even next season if they make the playoffs. Lame duck coach refers to a coach with 1 year left, not 2.
Most coaches don't survive three years without making the playoffs unless it's the first three years they are there.

A miracle run to the playoffs could save his job but it's likely he'll be just like Jim Zorn by week 8 next year. The only reason he wouldn't be fired is because of a lockout.


Actually, I think the first three years are the most likely time to fire a coach for not making the playoffs. After early success, you tend to give the coach more of a benefit of the doubt.

There's no way he'll be Zorn by week 8 next year. The Bears wont be nearly as bad as Washington was this year. If they are, it will be BY FAR Lovie's worst season as HC

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
He coached a pretty good game against Green Bay in Week 1. Vasher single covering Jennings at the end was a mistake, but they held Rodgers in check and overcame a horrendous game by Cutler to have the lead with a few minutes left.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh yeah, a coaching clinic there. Throwing the red flag to see if there were 12 guys on the field was a marvel of coaching.


Like a Nas and RPB pointed out, you can only go by results. And the fact is they were on the road against what ended up being an 11-5 team, and barely lost. Sooner or later you have to pin it on the coach or the players. It's usually only both in cases of 3-4 win teams. Lovie's never lost less than 7 games.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Isn't Lovie already "Jim Zorn"? His defensive play-calling duties have been taken away, he has zero interest/input on the offense, and he's widely regarded as being a "lame duck coach" next year.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's not the system, it's the players.


Who is the best defensive player on that team for the past decade? Brian Urlacher. How does he utilize that talent? He drops him back into coverage all the f'n time.

You take a guy that was getting 6,7,8 sacks a year and over a hundred tackles, a couple picks and you turn him into a glorified safety. The guy went 2 whole seasons without a sack. This freak of speed and size can't find the QB all of a sudden. But, hey, that's what that position needs to do in the system.

Urlacher avgd 5 sacks a year before Lovie.
He has never been a good blitzer


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blackhawksfan, conns7901, NME, The Doctor Of Style, The Man and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group