It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:40 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
FavreFan wrote:
It's not the system, it's the players.


Who is the best defensive player on that team for the past decade? Brian Urlacher. How does he utilize that talent? He drops him back into coverage all the f'n time.

You take a guy that was getting 6,7,8 sacks a year and over a hundred tackles, a couple picks and you turn him into a glorified safety. The guy went 2 whole seasons without a sack. This freak of speed and size can't find the QB all of a sudden. But, hey, that's what that position needs to do in the system.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas give me one solid example over the past 2 seasons where Lovie has put his team in a position to win rather than lose. 1 decision that Lovie himself has made.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
You guys are still ignoring the fact that nearly everyone believes that Lovie is simply a lame duck coach.

If Lovie is really that good of a coach why is it nearly universal that he'll be fired without a miracle season next season?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's not the system, it's the players.


Who is the best defensive player on that team for the past decade? Brian Urlacher. How does he utilize that talent? He drops him back into coverage all the f'n time.

You take a guy that was getting 6,7,8 sacks a year and over a hundred tackles, a couple picks and you turn him into a glorified safety. The guy went 2 whole seasons without a sack. This freak of speed and size can't find the QB all of a sudden. But, hey, that's what that position needs to do in the system.


I dont think Urlacher was misused. He was a uniquely talented player, and was a HUGE reason the system succeeded when they got even adequate pressure from the front four(their job btw.) Urlacher's stats might not have been great, but his impact on the game was, and you saw that this year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You guys are still ignoring the fact that nearly everyone believes that Lovie is simply a lame duck coach.

If Lovie is really that good of a coach why is it nearly universal that he'll be fired without a miracle season next season?


Because in general most coaches cant go four years without making the playoffs. I doubt he'll be fired even next season if they make the playoffs. Lame duck coach refers to a coach with 1 year left, not 2.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Wasn't Urlacher defensive player of the year in this system?


It was not nearly his best year.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Copout. Give me one playcall or desicion that has helped the Bears win a game. Because with timeouts and bad challenges, I can name 2 or 3 off the top of my head where he has put them in a position to lose on Sunday.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
FavreFan wrote:
I dont think Urlacher was misused. He was a uniquely talented player, and was a HUGE reason the system succeeded when they got even adequate pressure from the front four(their job btw.) Urlacher's stats might not have been great, but his impact on the game was, and you saw that this year.


Just because he can play Lovie's system doesn't mean that is the best use of his talent. He's played the last 2 years and the defense was not good. He's past his prime now. I guess this is just my opinion but I felt he's been underutilized for what havoc he could create.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Copout. Give me one playcall or desicion that has helped the Bears win a game. Because with timeouts and bad challenges, I can name 2 or 3 off the top of my head where he has put them in a position to lose on Sunday.


He coached a pretty good game against Green Bay in Week 1. Vasher single covering Jennings at the end was a mistake, but they held Rodgers in check and overcame a horrendous game by Cutler to have the lead with a few minutes left.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Lovie came in went 11-5 in his second year with a below average rookie qb.
The next year he went 13-3

He is not without fault, but he is miles ahead of Jauron or Wanny

Because he had a dominating defense. Since then, the defense hasn't just merely declined, its fallen off the face of the earth.

Ok, he made the playoffs in back to back years. They lost to the Panthers because he refused to abandon his scheme and double-cover Steve Smith.

Smith scored on the second play from scrimmage because Tillman fell down.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
[They lost to the Colts because he refused to abandon his scheme and stop the Colts from dinking and dunking underneath.

They lost to the greatest QB of all time. They were done 1 td in the fourth quarter.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
[He also called a timeout with 2 seconds left against Seattle which put his team in a position to lose rather than a position to win-- something that with clock mismangement, wasting timeouts, and poor challenges he does several times a season.

Cant and Wont argue that. That is bad.



Frank Coztansa wrote:
[He is under .500 since the Super Bowl,

Why judge only AFTER the Super bowl


Frank Coztansa wrote:
has made countless bad coaching moves and bad personel desicions.

I was unaware that Lovie was the GM. I dont care if he liked Archeletta. Its Angelo's call.




Frank Coztansa wrote:
A lot of it is on the players and a lot of it is on Angelo too
,
No need to qualify that true statement

Frank Coztansa wrote:
but Lovie has put this team in a postion to lose moreso than a position to win.

Not true. His Winning Pct is 537. You cant just dismiss the success.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Thats pitiful, and he deserved to get his ass fired. But because of that early "success" he sticks around because of his salary.

Why is lovie's success in quotes? What advantage does lovie have over other NFL coaches?
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The worst part about him coming back is that its probably going to be another year of Jay Cutler's wasted with a shit team and bad coaching.

Yeah. Cutler's 26 int are on Lovie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
He coached a pretty good game against Green Bay in Week 1. Vasher single covering Jennings at the end was a mistake, but they held Rodgers in check and overcame a horrendous game by Cutler to have the lead with a few minutes left.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh yeah, a coaching clinic there. Throwing the red flag to see if there were 12 guys on the field was a marvel of coaching.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Because in general most coaches cant go four years without making the playoffs. I doubt he'll be fired even next season if they make the playoffs. Lame duck coach refers to a coach with 1 year left, not 2.
Most coaches don't survive three years without making the playoffs unless it's the first three years they are there.

A miracle run to the playoffs could save his job but it's likely he'll be just like Jim Zorn by week 8 next year. The only reason he wouldn't be fired is because of a lockout.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I dont think Urlacher was misused. He was a uniquely talented player, and was a HUGE reason the system succeeded when they got even adequate pressure from the front four(their job btw.) Urlacher's stats might not have been great, but his impact on the game was, and you saw that this year.


Just because he can play Lovie's system doesn't mean that is the best use of his talent. He's played the last 2 years and the defense was not good. He's past his prime now. I guess this is just my opinion but I felt he's been underutilized for what havoc he could create.


I guess you could have moved him to OLB. MLB's rarely blitz alot. I still dont think that was the best use of his talent. Although it is certainly up for debate. I think he was one of the most dominant players in his prime, and if he was underutilized that's even more amazing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Because in general most coaches cant go four years without making the playoffs. I doubt he'll be fired even next season if they make the playoffs. Lame duck coach refers to a coach with 1 year left, not 2.
Most coaches don't survive three years without making the playoffs unless it's the first three years they are there.

A miracle run to the playoffs could save his job but it's likely he'll be just like Jim Zorn by week 8 next year. The only reason he wouldn't be fired is because of a lockout.


Actually, I think the first three years are the most likely time to fire a coach for not making the playoffs. After early success, you tend to give the coach more of a benefit of the doubt.

There's no way he'll be Zorn by week 8 next year. The Bears wont be nearly as bad as Washington was this year. If they are, it will be BY FAR Lovie's worst season as HC

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
He coached a pretty good game against Green Bay in Week 1. Vasher single covering Jennings at the end was a mistake, but they held Rodgers in check and overcame a horrendous game by Cutler to have the lead with a few minutes left.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh yeah, a coaching clinic there. Throwing the red flag to see if there were 12 guys on the field was a marvel of coaching.


Like a Nas and RPB pointed out, you can only go by results. And the fact is they were on the road against what ended up being an 11-5 team, and barely lost. Sooner or later you have to pin it on the coach or the players. It's usually only both in cases of 3-4 win teams. Lovie's never lost less than 7 games.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Isn't Lovie already "Jim Zorn"? His defensive play-calling duties have been taken away, he has zero interest/input on the offense, and he's widely regarded as being a "lame duck coach" next year.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's not the system, it's the players.


Who is the best defensive player on that team for the past decade? Brian Urlacher. How does he utilize that talent? He drops him back into coverage all the f'n time.

You take a guy that was getting 6,7,8 sacks a year and over a hundred tackles, a couple picks and you turn him into a glorified safety. The guy went 2 whole seasons without a sack. This freak of speed and size can't find the QB all of a sudden. But, hey, that's what that position needs to do in the system.

Urlacher avgd 5 sacks a year before Lovie.
He has never been a good blitzer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
FavreFan wrote:
I guess you could have moved him to OLB. MLB's rarely blitz alot. I still dont think that was the best use of his talent. Although it is certainly up for debate. I think he was one of the most dominant players in his prime, and if he was underutilized that's even more amazing.


Sacks are not the best stat. I wish I had tackle for loss stats as I think I would be right. His best years for tackles and sacks and I suspect TFL were pre-Lovie.

But, back to Lovie bashing.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
FavreFan wrote:
There's no way he'll be Zorn by week 8 next year. The Bears wont be nearly as bad as Washington was this year. If they are, it will be BY FAR Lovie's worst season as HC

If the Bears lose 2-3 more games next year than they did this year, you'd be surprised?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I guess you could have moved him to OLB. MLB's rarely blitz alot. I still dont think that was the best use of his talent. Although it is certainly up for debate. I think he was one of the most dominant players in his prime, and if he was underutilized that's even more amazing.


Sacks are not the best stat. I wish I had tackle for loss stats as I think I would be right. His best years for tackles and sacks and I suspect TFL were pre-Lovie.

But, back to Lovie bashing.


I'm certain you are right on this. But I'm not sure that was his best use. Having a MLB that can dominate the middle of the field is invaluable. I dont even think there is one in the league right now. I think Lovie correctly utilized that rare talent, although it didn't often show up in the box score.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
spanky wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
There's no way he'll be Zorn by week 8 next year. The Bears wont be nearly as bad as Washington was this year. If they are, it will be BY FAR Lovie's worst season as HC

If the Bears lose 2-3 more games next year than they did this year, you'd be surprised?


That'd make them 4-12 or 5-11. Yes, that would surprise me alot.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Actually, I think the first three years are the most likely time to fire a coach for not making the playoffs. After early success, you tend to give the coach more of a benefit of the doubt.
There aren't many examples of coaches missing the playoffs three years in a row keeping the job for the fourth.
FavreFan wrote:
There's no way he'll be Zorn by week 8 next year. The Bears wont be nearly as bad as Washington was this year. If they are, it will be BY FAR Lovie's worst season as HC
He's starting the season on the hot seat. If they start 3-5 people will be saying he is as good as fired. If that continues to 4-8 or 5-7 his firing will be all but guaranteed and he'll finish the season like Zorn did knowing that it's over.

They'll probably win more games than the Redskins but Lovie Smith will end the season with everyone knowing he is gone and speculation and secret meetings with new coaching options.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Nas wrote:
Wasn't Urlacher defensive player of the year in this system?


It was not nearly his best year.


He had the 2nd most sacks of his career that year and had 5.5 sacks through 9 games the year before in the same system. In Urlacher's first 64 games he had 21 sacks. In his next 64 games he had 16 sacks. Not that big a difference. He's had 2 of his top 3 sack seasons in Lovie's system and he had 5 more picks in his first 64 games in Lovie's system.


I didn't say it was a bad year. :wink:

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
That'd make them 4-12 or 5-11. Yes, that would surprise me alot.

The thing is that even 8-8 gets Lovie fired next year. As soon as it's obvious that the Bears won't be winning 10+ games he'll be as good as gone and simply playing out the season.

Even 9 wins may not be enough depending on how the wild card shakes out.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Actually, I think the first three years are the most likely time to fire a coach for not making the playoffs. After early success, you tend to give the coach more of a benefit of the doubt.
There aren't many examples of coaches missing the playoffs three years in a row keeping the job for the fourth.
FavreFan wrote:
There's no way he'll be Zorn by week 8 next year. The Bears wont be nearly as bad as Washington was this year. If they are, it will be BY FAR Lovie's worst season as HC
He's starting the season on the hot seat. If they start 3-5 people will be saying he is as good as fired. If that continues to 4-8 or 5-7 his firing will be all but guaranteed and he'll finish the season like Zorn did knowing that it's over.

They'll probably win more games than the Redskins but Lovie Smith will end the season with everyone knowing he is gone and speculation and secret meetings with new coaching options.


One thing good teams have in common is coaching longevity. Billick wasnt a great coach but he had good success for almost a decade.

I doubt they will start 4-8. If they are 5-6, that wont make Jim Zorn. I've never seen a coach as good as fired mid-season as Zorn was.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
spanky wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
There's no way he'll be Zorn by week 8 next year. The Bears wont be nearly as bad as Washington was this year. If they are, it will be BY FAR Lovie's worst season as HC

If the Bears lose 2-3 more games next year than they did this year, you'd be surprised?

Considering the Seattle game and Pittsburgh game, I would not be surprised.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That'd make them 4-12 or 5-11. Yes, that would surprise me alot.

The thing is that even 8-8 gets Lovie fired next year. As soon as it's obvious that the Bears won't be winning 10+ games he'll be as good as gone and simply playing out the season.

Even 9 wins may not be enough depending on how the wild card shakes out.


You're probably right. I was simply answering spanky's question. Nothing in Lovie's 6 year history suggests a 4-12 season is coming up. I expect them to compete for the WC/Division next season. 8-8 would be pretty accurate. With a few breaks, and better play by Cutler, 10-6 is realistic. This team has improved a great deal since discovering Devin A and moving Chris Williams to LT

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
I think the Bears will win 10 games next season.

Are you on marriage #2 and/or were you ever a cop? :P

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
OK, I'll admit all rational, irrational, and statistical arguments aside, I just don't like this defense. I don't like watching it. It makes me mad. I think the linemen are undersized. I think they lack real pass rushers from LB because they don't fit the system. I think they don't tackle well.

I admit when they had All-Pro caliber players up the middle, it was a highly effective defense. Maybe the D is just so delicate that losing any one of those would decimate it.

Although, I think if you have any defense with three All-Pro caliber players up the middle, it's going to look pretty good. And if you lose one in other systems it would look quite so terrible but that's just me.

I'm a meatball and I want change.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
OK, I'll admit all rational, irrational, and statistical arguments aside, I just don't like this defense.

I'm a meatball and I want change.

4 pages later the truth emerges :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: a retard, Darkside, Hawg Ass, NME, RFDC, The Doctor Of Style, This Ends in Antioch and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group