Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Torry Holt

Page 2 of 2

[ 36 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

spmack

Post subject: Re: Torry Holt

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:41 pm

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero

Urlacher's missing neck wrote:

spmack wrote:

Frank Coztansa wrote:

34 year old Torry Holt is the #1?
Cutler is doomed.

A 34 Year Old Terrell Owens had 81 Catches for 1355 Yards and 15 TD's in 2007.....

A 34 Year Old Jerry Rice had 108 catches for 1254 Yards and 11 TD's in 1996.......

A 34 Year Old Tim Brown had 76 catches for 1128 and 11 TD's in 2000....

A 33 year old Torry Holt had 51 catches for 722 and 0 TD's

A 32 year old Torry Holt had 64 catches for 796 and 3 td's

He didn't have Jay Cutler throwing to him either.....

_________________

Seacrest wrote:

I rarely troll.

Top

W_Z

Post subject: Re: Torry Holt

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:25 pm

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37845
Location: ...

joe horn was a #1 for brees at age 34 and he was still damn good. holt would be a great addition to this offense.

Top

HOVA

Post subject: Re: Torry Holt

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:44 pm

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me

Frank Coztansa wrote:

HOVA wrote:

They aren't giving up on him at all. They are using him the way they should have in the beginning. Putting him in the slot is best for him and the Bears. Also I don't believe they are looking for a castoff. They are looking for a #1 guy to play on the opposite side of Devin A.

You're probably right, but if thats really the case, why even entertain the thought of Torry Holt? The Bears have enough medicore receivers and Holt is only a #1 if we go back at least 4 or 5 years. They need to worry about the Oline and the secondary first and foremost.

I agree.

_________________

spanky wrote:

Elmhurst Steve wrote:

In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.

Top

lipidquadcab

Post subject: Re: Torry Holt

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:54 pm

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen

Frank Coztansa wrote:

Holt is only a #1 if we go back at least 4 or 5 years.

Holt had almost 1200 yards in 2007...

Top

good dolphin

Post subject: Re: Torry Holt

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:51 pm

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260

Why not just go after TO. He showed he could still go deep.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Top

HOVA

Post subject: Re: Torry Holt

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:59 pm

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me

I would agree because he is a big target and he can stretch the field but I'm not sure if he would be open to learning this offense and he usually wears out his welcome after 2 years. Does he have 2 years left as a #1/2? Jay needs a guy he could build with. That's why I think the Bears need to make Marshall an offer no one can beat.

_________________

spanky wrote:

Elmhurst Steve wrote:

In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.

Top

Page 2 of 2

[ 36 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2

Torry Holt

Who is online