It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Frank Coztansa wrote:
HOVA wrote:
They overpaid big time.

Just once I would like to see the reaction of signing of one of the biggest free agents available (in any sport) to be "Wow did they underpay for him!"


Whenever Manning and LeBron sign contracts this year I'll say it. :wink:

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Drop In wrote:
HOVA, I'm with you that holes are obvious, and still exist. However, this D is based on pressure. If Peppers draws the double teams I believe he will.........

But, that is a whole bunch of guaranteed money!


If Tommie Harris is 80% of what he was in 06' Peppers will really pay off. At that point they could put you or I a safety.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
HOVA wrote:
Drop In wrote:
HOVA, I'm with you that holes are obvious, and still exist. However, this D is based on pressure. If Peppers draws the double teams I believe he will.........

But, that is a whole bunch of guaranteed money!


If Tommie Harris is 80% of what he was in 06' Peppers will really pay off. At that point they could put you or I a safety.


This scheme is built on speed and covering holes. If you'll pardon the expression. If you saw me in HD today, I would not be a prime candidate for Bears Safety. :lol:

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
HOVA wrote:
Drop In wrote:
HOVA, I'm with you that holes are obvious, and still exist. However, this D is based on pressure. If Peppers draws the double teams I believe he will.........

But, that is a whole bunch of guaranteed money!


If Tommie Harris is 80% of what he was in 06' Peppers will really pay off.


YOU know the saying. "If if was a fifth..." ;) :)

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
1st page of this thread? Kowality. 2nd page had too much relevant info about the subject.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
1st page of this thread? Kowality. 2nd page had too much relevant info about the subject.


When in Rome

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Frank Coztansa wrote:
HOVA wrote:
They overpaid big time.

Just once I would like to see the reaction of signing of one of the biggest free agents available (in any sport) to be "Wow did they underpay for him!"


$13 Million per year is a shit load of money for a guy who averages just 10 sacks per season, doesn't play the run very well, & just signed his last NFL contract.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Scorehead wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
HOVA wrote:
They overpaid big time.

Just once I would like to see the reaction of signing of one of the biggest free agents available (in any sport) to be "Wow did they underpay for him!"


$13 Million per year is a shit load of money for a guy who averages just 10 sacks per season, doesn't play the run very well, & just signed his last NFL contract.


Yes. Now stop making sense you jerks. I'm trying to be Christmas (Bears) drunk. This common sense is ruining it for me.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
HOVA wrote:
They could have signed Rolle for 3 years for the same money they are paying Peppers next year. Kampman will have more sacks than Peppers next year and Rolle will have more picks than any Bears player.


They could have had both of them and probably been able to fire and buy out lovie. While this could work out, it could also be soriano bad.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37836
Location: ...
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Not my money. I would have gone after about 6-8 mid-level guys & Chester Taylor. In the NFL,I think "Deep Depth" is more important then any one great player who is NOT a superstar QB or RB. I'm excited they signed him,but I have to wonder who makes bigger plays next year: Rolle or Peppers. The thing is,Peppers is a guy who disrupts an offense just like THarris WAS. Now 2 guys like that on a line (with a healthy Harris),it might get very interesting next season.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
They could have signed Rolle for 3 years for the same money they are paying Peppers next year. Kampman will have more sacks than Peppers next year and Rolle will have more picks than any Bears player.


Kampman wont have more sacks than Peppers next year. This is easily the best move the Bears could have done to improve their team instantly. Peppers will have a pretty significant impact.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
They paid a guy that has 5 more sacks than Ogunleye over the past 3 years $91.5M. That doesn't make cents at all. They still have a huge hole at safety.


He had 7 more sacks, and that includes the 2.5 sack year of 2007, quite an anomaly on his career stat page. The past two seasons Peppers has 25 sacks and 10 forced fumbles and Ogunleye has 11.5 sacks and 1 forced fumble. Those two cant seriously be mentioned in the same breath. Your top DE just went from a D+ to an A.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
So 2 more sacks a year over 3 years is worth $90M? No wonder Peppers had that smile on his face. Kampman has 2 fewer sacks in the past 3 years even though he missed 7 games last year and had to play in a 3-4 defense. Over the past 4 years they have the same amount of sacks even though Kampman played in 6 fewer games. All of this while Peppers was playing for a contract. I don't know why you think it's crazy to say Kampman will have more sacks. He's done it 2 out of the past 4 seasons.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92055
Location: To the left of my post
HOVA wrote:
So 2 more sacks a year over 3 years is worth $90M? No wonder Peppers had that smile on his face. Kampman has 2 fewer sacks in the past 3 years even though he missed 7 games last year and had to play in a 3-4 defense. Over the past 4 years they have the same amount of sacks even though Kampman played in 6 fewer games. All of this while Peppers was playing for a contract. I don't know why you think it's crazy to say Kampman will have more sacks. He's done it 2 out of the past 4 seasons.
Did Aaron Kampman go to your college or something?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
HOVA wrote:
So 2 more sacks a year over 3 years is worth $90M? No wonder Peppers had that smile on his face. Kampman has 2 fewer sacks in the past 3 years even though he missed 7 games last year and had to play in a 3-4 defense. Over the past 4 years they have the same amount of sacks even though Kampman played in 6 fewer games. All of this while Peppers was playing for a contract. I don't know why you think it's crazy to say Kampman will have more sacks. He's done it 2 out of the past 4 seasons.
Did Aaron Kampman go to your college or something?


:lol:

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
So 2 more sacks a year over 3 years is worth $90M? No wonder Peppers had that smile on his face. Kampman has 2 fewer sacks in the past 3 years even though he missed 7 games last year and had to play in a 3-4 defense. Over the past 4 years they have the same amount of sacks even though Kampman played in 6 fewer games. All of this while Peppers was playing for a contract. I don't know why you think it's crazy to say Kampman will have more sacks. He's done it 2 out of the past 4 seasons.


Like I said, the 2007 season shouldnt be a big factor. Look at that season compared to the rest of his years. I think it's safe to say he wont get 2.5 sacks for a whole season again soon. Kampman isnt nearly as good, and more importantly, isn't even fully recovered.

His 2007 season throws the results way too much when you look at past 3 years. Over the past two years he has 25 sacks and 10 forced fumbles. That's the type of production you can expect.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:48 am
Posts: 672
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Image

_________________
HOVA wrote:
I never liked that Fixed Glee guy even though he has never done anything to me. If I saw him I would punch him in the face.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
So 2 more sacks a year over 3 years is worth $90M? No wonder Peppers had that smile on his face. Kampman has 2 fewer sacks in the past 3 years even though he missed 7 games last year and had to play in a 3-4 defense. Over the past 4 years they have the same amount of sacks even though Kampman played in 6 fewer games. All of this while Peppers was playing for a contract. I don't know why you think it's crazy to say Kampman will have more sacks. He's done it 2 out of the past 4 seasons.


Like I said, the 2007 season shouldnt be a big factor. Look at that season compared to the rest of his years. I think it's safe to say he wont get 2.5 sacks for a whole season again soon. Kampman isnt nearly as good, and more importantly, isn't even fully recovered.

His 2007 season throws the results way too much when you look at past 3 years. Over the past two years he has 25 sacks and 10 forced fumbles. That's the type of production you can expect.


You're right Kampman isn't as talented as Peppers. That being said based on their identical production in the sack department over the past 4 seasons (even though Kampman played 6 fewer games) they aren't that far apart. If Peppers is a 10 then Kampman is no worse than an 8. My guess is the Bears could have had Kampman and Rolle for a lot less ($30M less) than they are paying Peppers. We'll see what happens next season. I would love to be as wrong as I was about Rose and Beasley but I doubt that will be the case.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
They could have signed Rolle for 3 years for the same money they are paying Peppers next year. Kampman will have more sacks than Peppers next year and Rolle will have more picks than any Bears player.


Kampman wont have more sacks than Peppers next year. This is easily the best move the Bears could have done to improve their team instantly. Peppers will have a pretty significant impact.


How many more wins will the Bears have because of Peppers? Big time free agent signings don't usually improve a team that much. The Bears still need 2 OL, 1 WR, 1 S, & maybe 1 DB or CB.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6848
HOVA wrote:
RFDC wrote:
HOVA wrote:
They could have signed Rolle for 3 years for the same money they are paying Peppers next year. Kampman will have more sacks than Peppers next year and Rolle will have more picks than any Bears player.


I thought you liked the move? You really confuse me sometimes.


I do think it makes them better but I've been on record for a while saying I wouldn't target Peppers. I wanted Kampman and Rolle. Rolle was my #1 target. I thought Taylor would be a good fit but I really didn't care if they got him. They paid a guy that has 5 more sacks than Ogunleye over the past 3 years $91.5M. That doesn't make cents at all. They still have a huge hole at safety.


Sean Joneshttp://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=5584 is still on the market. I'll go in record saying he will have a better 2010 season then Rolle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Scorehead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
They could have signed Rolle for 3 years for the same money they are paying Peppers next year. Kampman will have more sacks than Peppers next year and Rolle will have more picks than any Bears player.


Kampman wont have more sacks than Peppers next year. This is easily the best move the Bears could have done to improve their team instantly. Peppers will have a pretty significant impact.


How many more wins will the Bears have because of Peppers? Big time free agent signings don't usually improve a team that much. The Bears still need 2 OL, 1 WR, 1 S, & maybe 1 DB or CB.


I think he could add 2-3 wins to the team. An elite pass rushing DE is the most important defensive position. They just got one who's as good as anyone in the league at it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
So 2 more sacks a year over 3 years is worth $90M? No wonder Peppers had that smile on his face. Kampman has 2 fewer sacks in the past 3 years even though he missed 7 games last year and had to play in a 3-4 defense. Over the past 4 years they have the same amount of sacks even though Kampman played in 6 fewer games. All of this while Peppers was playing for a contract. I don't know why you think it's crazy to say Kampman will have more sacks. He's done it 2 out of the past 4 seasons.


Like I said, the 2007 season shouldnt be a big factor. Look at that season compared to the rest of his years. I think it's safe to say he wont get 2.5 sacks for a whole season again soon. Kampman isnt nearly as good, and more importantly, isn't even fully recovered.

His 2007 season throws the results way too much when you look at past 3 years. Over the past two years he has 25 sacks and 10 forced fumbles. That's the type of production you can expect.


You're right Kampman isn't as talented as Peppers. That being said based on their identical production in the sack department over the past 4 seasons (even though Kampman played 6 fewer games) they aren't that far apart. If Peppers is a 10 then Kampman is no worse than an 8. My guess is the Bears could have had Kampman and Rolle for a lot less ($30M less) than they are paying Peppers. We'll see what happens next season. I would love to be as wrong as I was about Rose and Beasley but I doubt that will be the case.


Like I said, 1.) That 2007 season is so vastly different than every other season on his resume. He's the 10-12 sack a year guy, not 2.5. 2.) Sacks arent the only thing you can judge on. He only had 1 sack against the Vikings but it was clear he was easily the best player on the field that night for either team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7181
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
How much more is Peppers double-teamed compared to Kampman?

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I understand that but you also have to do the same for Kampman. He had to play LB in a 3-4 last year. Also 2007 wasn't the only year he had more sacks than Peppers over the last 4 seasons. Like I said if Peppers is a 10 then Kampman is no worse than an 8. I'll take an 8 if that means I can fill the hole at safety with one of the better safeties in league and still save money.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Lovie and Jerry are not concerned with money at this point (except for their paychecks).

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Killer V wrote:
Lovie and Jerry are not concerned with money at this point (except for their paychecks).


But it's not their money. It's the McCaskeys money. I still cant believe the McCaskeys trusted Teddy, Jerry & Lovie to spend $60+ million guaranteed, yet they wouldn't invest in upgrading the managament or coaches.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7181
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
What is funny to me about this whole thing is for the last several decades people constantly complained about how cheap the McCaskeys are. Now I laugh when I see/hear people complaining that they spent too much money on this deal.

Time will tell if it was a mistake or not but good for them for trying. Perhaps they, like me, want to win now, not a few years from now. Virginia is in her 80's and her kids are not spring chickens. Unlike some of you yutes, they do not have the luxury of waiting.

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Scorehead wrote:
Killer V wrote:
Lovie and Jerry are not concerned with money at this point (except for their paychecks).


But it's not their money. It's the McCaskeys money. I still cant believe the McCaskeys trusted Teddy, Jerry & Lovie to spend $60+ million guaranteed, yet they wouldn't invest in upgrading the managament or coaches.


That's why they spent it. If they hadn't, they'd hear the complaints about being cheap, but moreso, that they didn't give Angelo and Lovie the players they needed to succeed in their final year. With no draft picks and no free agents, Jerry and Lovie could have gotten another free pass.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Sign Peppers
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
A Pats fan gave me the news on Saturday. I was drunk and saddened. Then I found this. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -one-year/
I'm good. I'm on board. Let's go!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: man of few opinions and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group