It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 4:31 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Here is what my guy says:


BIG TEN SHAKEUP: 16 teams, 4 divisions.

The Big Ten divisions: (1) Cuse, Pitt, Rut., Penn St.(2) Mich., Wisc., Mich. St., Minny. (3) Ohio St., Purdont., IU, ILL. (4) Mizzou, Iowa, Neb., Kittens.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
My guy had this months ago.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Interesting. When would this supposedly be taking place?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 13406
Location: The Crownville Lab
pizza_Place: Langel's
Why not call it the Super 16 then?


Still don't know why it was called "future mail" either. :?

_________________
-"God is great. Beer is good. And People are crazy!"
bigfan wrote:
I am in the urination, puking, drunk, yelling zone.

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
I once jerked in a chicken truck, so I have that going for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Just a rumor for now... I don't have any other details.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
I don't doubt the teams, but I doubt there will be 4 divisions. One of the major reasons for this would be to have a football title game. It's going to be hard to do that with 4 divisions unless it's a four team tournament which would likely require new rules by the NCAA.

I'd personally really like that division because Purdue actually does pretty well against Ohio State as compared to most other good football schools.

My guess would be that 1 and 2 would be combined and 3 and 4 would be combined with the champs in the title game. One other "protected" rivalry so Ohio State and Michigan always play at least one game and then one other floating game.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
My guess would be that 1 and 2 would be combined and 3 and 4 would be combined with the champs in the title game. One other "protected" rivalry so Ohio State and Michigan always play at least one game and then one other floating game.


Yeah that makes a lot of sense. I like it, let's get it started.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

I'd personally really like that division because Purdue actually does pretty well against Ohio State as compared to most other good football schools.


:lol: Not so much... but much better than NU, I admit. The lifetime dOSU record against Purdue is 37-12-2. You guys win 24% of the time. That compares against 28% for the rest of the Big 10 and about 26% for all opponents. I'd assume that would be even better when you compared against "good" football programs.


Last edited by My_name_1s_MUD on Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Ut oh, now you have done it Mud.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
I just don't see it happening. But we'll see.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Irish Boy wrote:
I just don't see it happening. But we'll see.


Don't just leave it with that. Explain why you don't see it? What do you see happening?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
RFDC wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
I just don't see it happening. But we'll see.


Don't just leave it with that. Explain why you don't see it? What do you see happening?

Maybe just a failure of imagination. But there's too many moving parts, too many campus presidents, conferences, etc. involved.

I think the Big East is preparing to defenestrate Notre Dame to save their football conference. If that happens, ND might be SOL and have to join. If not that, I could see picking off a single team, most likely Pitt, Rutgers, or Mizzou. But I just can't see the dissolution of two major conferences. But I have no inside info and could very well be wrong.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
My_name_1s_MUD wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

I'd personally really like that division because Purdue actually does pretty well against Ohio State as compared to most other good football schools.


:lol: Not so much... but much better than NU, I admit. The lifetime dOSU record against Purdue is 37-12-2. You guys win 24% of the time. That compares against 28% for the rest of the Big 10 and about 26% for all opponents. I'd assume that would be even better when you compared against "good" football programs.
You must have misunderstood me. I believe Purdue is 3-5 against Ohio State since I've been a fan with roughly half of those losses being by a touchdown or less.

Purdue was as bad as Indiana is now for about 3 decades so that 24% isn't really indicative of where they are now.

I'd be surprised if any Big Ten team had a winning record against Ohio State in the same time frame. Therefore, even the best Big Ten team is probably at best 4-4 against them. I'm sure Michigan has a losing record over that time. Penn State is probably just about even.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Bucky Chris wrote:
Here is what my guy says:


BIG TEN SHAKEUP: 16 teams, 4 divisions.

The Big Ten divisions: (1) Cuse, Pitt, Rut., Penn St.(2) Mich., Wisc., Mich. St., Minny. (3) Ohio St., Purdont., IU, ILL. (4) Mizzou, Iowa, Neb., Kittens.

I'd switch Minny to #4, NU to 3, and Ohio State to 2.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Iowa's two biggest Big Ten Rivals are Wisconsin and Minnesota - I can't see them being broken up. I would love to play Nebraska every year though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
No offense Vince - but if expanding the Big Ten to the extent that is being rumored comes at the expense of ruining Iowa's "biggest conference rivalries", well......you know......yeah.......

Sorry. The rest of the 50 million football fans in the midwest......We'll take it.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
spanky wrote:
No offense Vince - but if expanding the Big Ten to the extent that is being rumored comes at the expense of ruining Iowa's "biggest conference rivalries", well......you know......yeah.......

Sorry. The rest of the 50 million football fans in the midwest......We'll take it.

What about Michigan OSU? Would they guarantee that game since they are not in the same division? What about Illinois/NU?

I actually don't believe this alignment would happen. I think it's more likely to get 1 or 3 teams than 5.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
I hate this idea. The conference would have absolutely no identity. The football would not even be all that great.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
I hate this idea. The conference would have absolutely no identity. The football would not even be all that great.
That's a good point. Adding Nebraska/Missouri and Rutgers/Syracuse/Pittsburgh does really seem to make the conference lose some identity. That's a huge geographic region.

Personally, I'd rather see them expand to 14 teams and drop Nebraska and Missouri.

I wonder if this "rumor" is simply an attempt to scare Notre Dame into joining since taking those three teams would cripple the Big East to the point where they may not recover. Losing Pittsburgh and Syracuse and replacing them with Memphis and Central Florida is a big downgrade.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You must have misunderstood me. I believe Purdue is 3-5 against Ohio State since I've been a fan with roughly half of those losses being by a touchdown or less.


Illinois is 3-5 against OSU in their last 8 meetings with an overtime loss, 3 point loss, and a 7 point loss.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
I'd think you'd want to find a way to get Illinois and Mizzou together.

I like spmack's lineup best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
mel junior wrote:
I like spmack's lineup best.
So would Purdue, Illinois, Northwestern and Indiana. :lol:

They might as well call that group "Big Ten:Slightly better than the MAC division".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
mel junior wrote:
I like spmack's lineup best.
So would Purdue, Illinois, Northwestern and Indiana. :lol:

They might as well call that group "Big Ten:Slightly better than the MAC division".


That group would be called The Big 1 and Little 3.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
mel junior wrote:
I like spmack's lineup best.
So would Purdue, Illinois, Northwestern and Indiana. :lol:

They might as well call that group "Big Ten:Slightly better than the MAC division".


They would rule Women's Lacrosse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37832
Location: ...
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's a good point. Adding Nebraska/Missouri and Rutgers/Syracuse/Pittsburgh does really seem to make the conference lose some identity. That's a huge geographic region.



their identity is a number, not a region.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:35 pm
Posts: 4896
Location: Division 1 Cook County Jail
pizza_Place: NEW YORK STYLE PEPPERONI FROM LOMBARDI'S IN MANHATTAN.
Irish Boy wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
I just don't see it happening. But we'll see.


Don't just leave it with that. Explain why you don't see it? What do you see happening?

Maybe just a failure of imagination. But there's too many moving parts, too many campus presidents, conferences, etc. involved.

I think the Big East is preparing to defenestrate Notre Dame to save their football conference. If that happens, ND might be SOL and have to join. If not that, I could see picking off a single team, most likely Pitt, Rutgers, or Mizzou. But I just can't see the dissolution of two major conferences. But I have no inside info and could very well be wrong.


Rumblings out of Big Least that they want the Irish all in....Football, too, or the Irish out.
Big 10 vs. Big Least should be a no brainer for Irish, but who knows how they think down there after two bottles of wine and a trip to the Grotto.

_________________
There goes one over the fence..Tru Link Fence..Beauty, Privacy Security....Call Tru Link.
Murph's Union 76 Truck Stop....A great Thanksgiving Tradition!!!!

WOO LIFE!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Aggravated Sox Fan Bob wrote:
Rumblings out of Big Least that they want the Irish all in....Football, too, or the Irish out.
Big 10 vs. Big Least should be a no brainer for Irish, but who knows how they think down there after two bottles of wine and a trip to the Grotto.

I heard from Terry's peeps that they are joining the Pac 10 to keep the USC rivalry.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Interesting info from Illini sports writer Mark Tupper -

Mark Tupper wrote:
BIG MONEY FOR BTN – It doesn’t seem long ago that the world was full of doubters and complainers regarding the launch of the Big Ten Network.

Access during the network’s first year was difficult due to rough negotiations with Comcast and Time-Warner, but after an agreement was reached in 2008, the network has taken off big-time and now is the envy of all of college sports.

According to an article in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, the Big Ten now leads all conferences in television revenue, turning $22 million over to each member institution in 2008-09.

Southeastern Conference schools, by comparison, pulled in the second-most at $17 million each. But the dropoff was significant after that. Big 12 schools were third at $6.5 million each.
That’s why when the Big Ten considers expanding to 12, 14 or 16 teams, schools like Missouri have to take a very serious look at the financial implications.

Over a five-year period, Missouri’s TV revenue from the Big 12 Conference would be $32.5 million. If Missouri was in the Big Ten during the same period, the school’s TV revenue would be $110 million.

How many schools presidents and athletic directors can afford to sniff away $77.5 million?

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
BTN is an unequivocal success. I've seen it written that if ND accepted a B10 offer, that they would be actually financially better off than their current NBC contract. I'm sure the ND will leverage this in their next negotiation. However, now NBC Universal is a subsidiary of Comcast and I'm not sure Comcast will be as free with the checkbook as GE. Keep in mind that Comcast is a lower-rated (credit quality) compay than GE, which has substantially more resources than Comcast.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The New Big Ten?
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
I wonder how big things go even with only a minor addition to the conference.

Right now, every cable/satellite provider available to me has BTN and I'm pretty far from Big Ten country(for now). This isn't even true for the NFL Network. It's not available here on my cable system. I think there is a pretty substantial portion of the market here that wants it and makes demand and the BTN will be able to raise rates as it takes advantage of the FIOS vs. cable vs. satellite wars. The BTN is one of those things that people will switch providers for.

What's interesting is that currently a lot of this money is being used to upgrade facilities. Purdue will use it to upgrade the basketball facilities and then upgrade the football stadium. Once that is done, the coaches salaries start to come in to play.

If you look at the SEC, the coaches salaries attracting big names is one of the major reasons why they are so dominant. The Big Ten may not only be able to compete with that but they may also be able to outspend them and over the next decade or so the upgraded facilities and upgraded coaching may close the gap.

The other conferences, outside of the Pac-10 won't be able to compete with either of them on money. It should be interesting.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group