It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
If they lose out on Boozer and Korver, then Paxson and Gar need to go.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
All it says is they couldn't pull off a trade for Bosh. Since Bosh will make $498k more this season by signing with the Heat it was the next best move. Now we will find out if LeBron will team up with them. I believe all of this was done for their documentary.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:07 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Without knowing where LBJ wants to go yet, I really can't judge the job GARPAX has done in recruiting him. With that being said, however, I am not confident that the Bulls have enough to offer at this time to lure LBJ away from Cleveland.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Why is Korver involved in this? Who cares if they don't get him? I would prefer Ray Ray infinitely more, and even Reddick due to contract size over Korver.


And landing Lee instead of Boozer isn't as bad as it sounds. I don't think the Bulls are in the ship just getting 2 guys like this, so it makes sense to go for the younger David Lee.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
immessedup17 wrote:
I find it extremely hard to believe that no one wanted to come here. We have the best young core in place...we had the cap room...and now we're lucky just to get one free agent (David Lee or Carlos Boozer) out of all that were available to us?


Wade wanted to stay in Miami all along. He was just using the Bulls as leverage. Thanks to the Larry Bird rule and no state income tax Wade wasn't going anywhere. Wade is a proven commodity, but I wonder with these max deals how good he would be in 5 or 6 years. The knee surgery should be a red flag.

Bosh is kind of a dufus. He wants to play with Wade on a bad Miami team? Good luck to him too. He doesn't deserve max money. Of the top 3 I think he was the one the Bulls could most use. Still if he thinks the money and Wade are worth it than good riddance to him too. He's a good player, but not a great player. He's almost 7 feet tall and he doesn't want to play the post.

As for LeBron, it would be a smart move for him to come to Chicago. But I don't think he wants to live in Jordan's shadow. LeBron is an immature millionaire. He can't even show up to the free agent meetings with a suit. There's no way he's leaving Cleveland. The fact that he announces his decision on ESPN is ridiculous. No player is bigger than the team and LeBron is just jerking everyone's chains.

As for the Bulls, they may have done better if they could have moved Deng. It's obvious that they can't get anyone to come play here for whatever reason. It could be management or it could be that other teams have better offers. The Bulls best move is to pick up a shooting 2 guard and a post player. Taj Gibson is serviceable, but I think he could be better off the bench. The Bulls unloaded most of the roster, so they do have openings. They'll probably finish 5th or 6th in the East. They're okay as long as they don't let Rose get away.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Only guy the Bulls got rid of that I know they wanted was Hinrich and he was overpaid. Everyone else they wanted is still here. I want them to get David Lee. I know Boozer would be the sexier choice but I think Lee will be great with the Bulls. Rebounding wins games.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Please tell me we won't give Boozer a max deal?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
RFDC wrote:
Please tell me we won't give Boozer a max deal?


That would be stupid. No more than a $13M starting salary. I really wouldn't want to do that. I would be more interested in giving the younger and more dependable Lee a starting salary of around $11M.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
HOVA wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Please tell me we won't give Boozer a max deal?


That would be stupid. No more than a $13M starting salary. I really wouldn't want to do that. I would be more interested in giving the younger and more dependable Lee a starting salary of around $11M.


Agreed about Lee, but I think at this point it's almost certain that Boozer gets a max. Someone will give it to him, whether its the Clips, Bulls or Nets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:36 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Bucky Chris wrote:
HOVA wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Please tell me we won't give Boozer a max deal?


That would be stupid. No more than a $13M starting salary. I really wouldn't want to do that. I would be more interested in giving the younger and more dependable Lee a starting salary of around $11M.


Agreed about Lee, but I think at this point it's almost certain that Boozer gets a max. Someone will give it to him, whether its the Clips, Bulls or Nets.


Plus the Clips have a great basketball mind coaching for them now, so we've really got to pay to get Boozer.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: No Carlos Boozer????
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
bigfan wrote:
If they lose out on Boozer and Korver, then Paxson and Gar need to go.


lol, who gives a shit about Boozer and Korver? Paxson needed to go a long fucking time ago! He's far and away the worst GM in league history and I've been saying that for YEARS. Now people are finally starting to listen to me. For years I was laughed at when I said Deng had the worst contract in the NBA...and sure enough I was proven right this off season.

Paxson's entire legacy has ONE positive feature, the drafting of Noah. EVERY SINGLE thing he did besides that was a complete bust (and no, I am not giving him even one ounce of credit for drafting Rose #1, even a retard like Pax couldn't fuck that up).

They should rehire Crumbs, he was 100x better than Pax as a GM.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group