It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:35 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 241
pizza_Place: Palermo's in Chicago
I believe this is what Bucher was referring to about Bulls' fans being happy. Can they get LeBron?

5 years at 80 million, I think.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
:alien: :alien: :alien:

Bosh may be a slightly better player, but Boozer was the second best post player available in my opinion.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
Interesting as, at those numbers, it preserves a max slot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:57 am
Posts: 2104
Location: NW side
pizza_Place: Benny's on 26th in Berwyn
http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nba/n ... id=5361792


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:10 pm
Posts: 6774
It's a piece, but only matters if we get Lebron. No Lebron = 2nd round exit at best

_________________
Fuck Edwards and Zobrist


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:09 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
PDcavsinsider Twitter confirms: Reports that Bulls have signed Boozer to 5yr, $80 million deal no doubt improves their chances w/LeBron. Even if they had to overpay.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 241
pizza_Place: Palermo's in Chicago
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
:alien: :alien: :alien:

Bosh may be a slightly better player, but Boozer was the second best post player available in my opinion.


+1. Rose and Boozer will complement each other very well, especially off the pick and roll.

Is Bosh going to play center in Miami? I'm sure he'll do it, but I thought he'd rather play PF.

Noah: C
Rose: PG
Boozer: PF
Deng: SF
Who the hell is at Shooting Guard at this moment?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
If and when the Bulls do not sign LeBron they will be stuck with an overpaid 29 year old powerforward who will probably once again miss significant time with an injury. They should have targeted David Lee and saved some money. Now lets get JJ Reddick for the soft players from Duke trifecta.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
schmitty1121 wrote:
It's a piece, but only matters if we get Lebron. No Lebron = 2nd round exit at best
Keep in mind they still have a complete max contract left to offer.

Rose, Noah, Boozer, Deng + 2 more good free agents and the Bulls are competitive with any team in the East besides the unlikely combination of Lebron/Bosh/Wade.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:53 pm
Posts: 522
Location: NY
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
boozer and deng will both be starters on the All "most money per game" team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
WittyMoniker2 wrote:
Who the hell is at Shooting Guard at this moment?



Duhh... Derrick Byars
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/4319

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
I like Boozer over Amare, probably the best the Bulls could have done if they couldn't land Bosh. Good move for them and still have a max contract left.

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
I also like the fact Boozer is coming from the Jazz. He has played in lot of playoff games and has been tutored under Sloan in the art of the pick and roll. That is really going to help Rose IMO. If he can just stay healthy, the Bull is going to be a dangerous team with or without LBJ.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 241
pizza_Place: Palermo's in Chicago
Apologist wrote:
WittyMoniker2 wrote:
Who the hell is at Shooting Guard at this moment?



Duhh... Derrick Byars
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/4319


Lol. Well played. Any relation to Keith?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:45 am
Posts: 8
pizza_Place: California Pizza Kitchen
Whatever happens - the Bulls are better. They may still be in basketball hell if they can't land LeBron - but they're better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
WittyMoniker2 wrote:
Apologist wrote:
WittyMoniker2 wrote:
Who the hell is at Shooting Guard at this moment?



Duhh... Derrick Byars
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/4319


Lol. Well played. Any relation to Keith?



No... but the fact I had to search around for a suitable answer says something :lol:

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 8
pizza_Place: Sweet Lou's
Good move considering the options available with Bosh off the market, need a shooter now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
NoCleverMoniker wrote:
Good move considering the options available with Bosh off the market, need a shooter now.



something i was thinking about...listening to B&B on the way home and Bernsie pondering if they can add a shooter between now and tomorrow's Lebron show to pretty much say- "we have everything if you want to win come here" and still maintain the max slot. Goff was suggesting some kind of handshake deal for the MLE.....isn't that how the Timberwolves got into trouble with Joe Smith?

also, the other thing on my mind is that Boozer took slightly less than the max, no? wouldn't *some* other team like the Nets, Clippers, etc. - spurned by all the other free agents- offer him a max deal? So why would Boozer take less than the max to play for the Bulls unless there was some chance remaining to get James


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Bagels wrote:
So why would Boozer take less than the max to play for the Bulls unless there was some chance remaining to get James

Put the pipe down...

or pass it on over to me.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
So why would Boozer take less than the max to play for the Bulls unless there was some chance remaining to get James

Put the pipe down...

or pass it on over to me.


i'm not saying agreements are in place or anything :lol:
just peculiar, that's all.....
in an environment where the major free agents are gone and there is still a boatload of cash out there it's odd that the biggest name left would take less than a max deal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
$70 million for Dung $80 mil for Loozer can anyone tell me that's not the worst spent 150 million spent? I know Farve Fan and and Bagels love the move. Bye Paxson :twisted: PS what keeps Rose around when his contract is up????

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
$70 million for Dung $80 mil for Loozer can anyone tell me that's not the worst spent 150 million spent? I know Farve Fan and and Bagels love the move. Bye Paxson :twisted: PS what keeps Rose around when his contract is up????


What will keep Rose around is the same thing keeping Wade, LeBron, Pierce, Dirk, etc. around. Money. The majority of free agents are staying with their teams because of -wait for it- MONEY

As for the 150...you need to look at the NBA landscape. If you're expecting them to salaries equal to what the players are worth, you're obviously an NBA moron. Which we know already but this just makes it more clear. Maybe Boozer is worth 10, 11 million but he's getting 15. That's the going rate right now. I guess you would have preferred for them to not sign Boozer and just sit on a pile of cash. Maybe you'd prefer Jerry Reinsdorf to have one extra lobster with his dinner tonight. You're a grade A moron.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 8
pizza_Place: Sweet Lou's
Bagels wrote:
NoCleverMoniker wrote:
Good move considering the options available with Bosh off the market, need a shooter now.



something i was thinking about...listening to B&B on the way home and Bernsie pondering if they can add a shooter between now and tomorrow's Lebron show to pretty much say- "we have everything if you want to win come here" and still maintain the max slot. Goff was suggesting some kind of handshake deal for the MLE.....isn't that how the Timberwolves got into trouble with Joe Smith?

also, the other thing on my mind is that Boozer took slightly less than the max, no? wouldn't *some* other team like the Nets, Clippers, etc. - spurned by all the other free agents- offer him a max deal? So why would Boozer take less than the max to play for the Bulls unless there was some chance remaining to get James


Not sure about the Joe Smith thing, but like B&B said, if you could have some kind of conditional deal and say "if LeBron comes here we can offer you the MLE, or if he doesn't we can offer you this (insert amount here)". Not sure what the rules are but it just seems like what might be a regular negotiation as long as the shooter in question is OK with it.

Could be Boozer took less because the Bulls have more talent than some of those other teams and maybe he wants to win? I know thats rare in the NBA today but It could be. Maybe he sees what the "big 3" were supposed to see: Drose and Noah.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Phil McCracken wrote:
If and when the Bulls do not sign LeBron they will be stuck with an overpaid 29 year old powerforward who will probably once again miss significant time with an injury. They should have targeted David Lee and saved some money. Now lets get JJ Reddick for the soft players from Duke trifecta.


I said the same thing. They could have save about $25M too.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Free Ajent wrote:
I like Boozer over Amare, probably the best the Bulls could have done if they couldn't land Bosh. Good move for them and still have a max contract left.


I do too considering he got $100M but I still maintain Lee was the best option. Not sexy but the best option.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
$70 million for Dung $80 mil for Loozer can anyone tell me that's not the worst spent 150 million spent? I know Farve Fan and and Bagels love the move. Bye Paxson :twisted: PS what keeps Rose around when his contract is up????


They spent about $30M too much. In the case of Deng they bid against themselves.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer to Chicago
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Bagels wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
$70 million for Dung $80 mil for Loozer can anyone tell me that's not the worst spent 150 million spent? I know Farve Fan and and Bagels love the move. Bye Paxson :twisted: PS what keeps Rose around when his contract is up????


What will keep Rose around is the same thing keeping Wade, LeBron, Pierce, Dirk, etc. around. Money. The majority of free agents are staying with their teams because of -wait for it- MONEY

As for the 150...you need to look at the NBA landscape. If you're expecting them to salaries equal to what the players are worth, you're obviously an NBA moron. Which we know already but this just makes it more clear. Maybe Boozer is worth 10, 11 million but he's getting 15. That's the going rate right now. I guess you would have preferred for them to not sign Boozer and just sit on a pile of cash. Maybe you'd prefer Jerry Reinsdorf to have one extra lobster with his dinner tonight. You're a grade A moron.


Boozer couldn't win with James how in the fuck will he win here?They spent the money because they failed big time...throw some money at JJ Redick...ps you're a dickweed

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group