It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:56 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:36 pm
Posts: 793
i would have been a bull on draft day in '97....krause was moving up to get me but bulls would have to part with pipp...mj killed deal....


http://twitter.com/TheReal_TMAC/status/19109144694


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
illini81887 wrote:
i would have been a bull on draft day in '97....krause was moving up to get me but bulls would have to part with pipp...mj killed deal....


http://twitter.com/TheReal_TMAC/status/19109144694


:lol: I don't know why this cracks me up as much as it does but it does.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
If that deal happens:

1. M-Jeff probably doesn't return for 1997-1998 season.
2. Bulls don't win 6th title.
3. Bulls endure an extra year of Tim Floyd era.

What was Krause's obsession with blowing up one of the best dynasty's ever?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Last edited by Douchebag on Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Was that message a precursor to something that may happen?

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Douchebag wrote:
If that deal happens:

1. M-Jeff probably doesn't return for 1997-1998 season.
2. Bulls don't win 6th title.
3. Bulls endure an extra year of Tim Floyd era.

What was Krause's obsession with blowing up one of the best dynasty's ever?


Even if MJeff came back no way they win that last title without Pippen and instead a rookie T-Mac....god I hope this guy goes to the Clips. How much cap room do the Bulls have left at this point anyways.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Best move MJ has made. He would have the same amount of rings as Magic if they trade happens. Of course the Bulls would not have been bad for a long period of time with T-Mac.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
the problem is the worst with the nba because they are all close friends. theyre just sharing titles now it seems like. the jordan era was like the bears 85 era where if you knocked a opponent to the ground, you sure as hell dont help him up

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
And in the Civil War they used to line up elbow to elbow and just shoot at people while walking directly forward.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
I still cannot fathom that Krause actually might of considered making this deal. Trading Pip then would have guaranteed not winning the 2nd three peat. I already fault him for breaking this team up, and think they probably could have won a title the following year during the lockout shortened season if Fat Ass Jerry wasn't such a pud.

Could you imagine that team if Jordan, Pippen, and Phil were all gone, but Rodman was still around for that year with Tim Floyd as the coach? There would have been some hilarious shit going down...

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
I think his stint in NY last year showed he doesn't have much game left.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:08 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12452
mel junior wrote:
I think his stint in NY last year showed he doesn't have much game left.


You certainly can't count on him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Douchebag wrote:
they probably could have won a title the following year during the lockout shortened season

No. Even if M-Jeff hadn't sliced his finger off in January '99, Da Boo would not have beaten Duncan and Robinson. Hell, they were already on their last legs when they beat the Jazz in '98.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
they probably could have won a title the following year during the lockout shortened season

No. Even if M-Jeff hadn't sliced his finger off in January '99, Da Boo would not have beaten Duncan and Robinson. Hell, they were already on their last legs when they beat the Jazz in '98.

I don't know man. They only would of played half a season, and there was some real bad basketball going on that year. Guys came back from the lockout incredibly out of shape. I think they could have coasted to the finals, and anything could have happened at that point.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
DB MJ would have missed the entire season. The championship run was over

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12452
immessedup17 wrote:
BD wrote:
mel junior wrote:
I think his stint in NY last year showed he doesn't have much game left.


You certainly can't count on him.


You don't need to count on T-Mac. You can't count on Matt Barnes either. But is the ceiling higher on MCGrady than it is for Barnes? Yes. And they come at around the same price.


The Bulls don't need to count on T-Mac, but would he accept a lesser role the way a guy like Matt Barnes would? Would McGrady be happy possibly coming off the bench, and playing 15-20 minutes a game? Granted, he may have no choice given his options, but is that a potential headache the team would rather avoid?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:19 am
Posts: 1443
pizza_Place: Jack Brickhouse Toppings
BD wrote:
The Bulls don't need to count on T-Mac, but would he accept a lesser role the way a guy like Matt Barnes would? Would McGrady be happy possibly coming off the bench, and playing 15-20 minutes a game? Granted, he may have no choice given his options, but is that a potential headache the team would rather avoid?


I dont see him as anything else but a 6th man, but he would at least be considered to start over Brewer.

_________________
McDude wrote:
My wife said 2 things about Bernstein today:

"He sounds like a man that was never challenged to be a man."
"He gives a lot of opinions without probably having many life experiences."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:19 am
Posts: 1443
pizza_Place: Jack Brickhouse Toppings
JBills wrote:
I dont see him as anything else but a 6th man, but he would at least be considered to start over Brewer.


Cant believe Im saying that as this guy was a top 5 player for like 5 years.

_________________
McDude wrote:
My wife said 2 things about Bernstein today:

"He sounds like a man that was never challenged to be a man."
"He gives a lot of opinions without probably having many life experiences."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
immessedup17 wrote:
BD wrote:
The Bulls don't need to count on T-Mac, but would he accept a lesser role the way a guy like Matt Barnes would? Would McGrady be happy possibly coming off the bench, and playing 15-20 minutes a game? Granted, he may have no choice given his options, but is that a potential headache the team would rather avoid?


But 3 out of the 4 teams he is interested in going to would be using him in a reserve role, about 15 minutes a game barring injuries and performance. I think he understands, and would accept, the role...he would have the best chance to win he has ever had in his career. Also, his ties to Chicago are strong...I think it would work. And if it doesn't? It cost you next to nothing...and you only missed out on Matt Barnes.

Matt fucking Barnes.


Barnes actually plays defense and doesn't need to have the ball in his hands as much as T-Mac does. Once a prolific scorer enters the downside of his career he can turn into a spot shooter like Ray Allen or Reggie Miller which McGrady never was or he can keep his game the same and keep trying to do things he is no longer capable of like Iverson. Add into the fact that McGrady is a dog with no heart and I don't care how little the investment is it is just not worth it for the Bulls. Oh and Matt Barnes has been out of the first round of the fucking playoffs.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
immessedup17 wrote:
BD wrote:
The Bulls don't need to count on T-Mac, but would he accept a lesser role the way a guy like Matt Barnes would? Would McGrady be happy possibly coming off the bench, and playing 15-20 minutes a game? Granted, he may have no choice given his options, but is that a potential headache the team would rather avoid?


But 3 out of the 4 teams he is interested in going to would be using him in a reserve role, about 15 minutes a game barring injuries and performance. I think he understands, and would accept, the role...he would have the best chance to win he has ever had in his career. Also, his ties to Chicago are strong...I think it would work. And if it doesn't? It cost you next to nothing...and you only missed out on Matt Barnes.

Matt fucking Barnes.

Im sorry to say this but,

Matt Barnes > T-Mac

If the Bulls wanted bad defense, chucking, and overall lazy play, they could have just re-signed Flip Murray. At least he can stay healthy.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Douchebag wrote:
I still cannot fathom that Krause actually might of considered making this deal. Trading Pip then would have guaranteed not winning the 2nd three peat. I already fault him for breaking this team up, and think they probably could have won a title the following year during the lockout shortened season if Fat Ass Jerry wasn't such a pud.

Could you imagine that team if Jordan, Pippen, and Phil were all gone, but Rodman was still around for that year with Tim Floyd as the coach? There would have been some hilarious shit going down...

I guess Krause was looking at life after MJ.

He tried to trade a 32 year old player for a 19 year old that would become a multiple time all star.

Im not saying he should have done it, but its not THAT crazy IMO


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
This is the same guy who traded a 1st year 20/10 PF for a 19 High School kid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
mel junior wrote:
This is the same guy who traded a 1st year 20/10 PF for a 19 High School kid.

and Olden Polynice for Pippen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:19 am
Posts: 1443
pizza_Place: Jack Brickhouse Toppings
And Will Perdue for Rodman.

_________________
McDude wrote:
My wife said 2 things about Bernstein today:

"He sounds like a man that was never challenged to be a man."
"He gives a lot of opinions without probably having many life experiences."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
JBills wrote:
And Will Perdue for Rodman.

You can't really chalk that one up in the "Jerry Krause is a genius" category. Rodman was a guy that ran himself out of town in San Antonio and the Spurs would have taken a bag of balls to get rid of him. The Bulls were probably the only place that could contain his antics because of having Michael and Phil.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:19 am
Posts: 1443
pizza_Place: Jack Brickhouse Toppings
Still Will Perdue for Rodman. The theory Chicago is the only place that could contain him is debatable at best. Seeing as how he was drunk the entire finals series against Utah in '98.

_________________
McDude wrote:
My wife said 2 things about Bernstein today:

"He sounds like a man that was never challenged to be a man."
"He gives a lot of opinions without probably having many life experiences."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group