It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43569
No.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Douchebag wrote:
No.


This

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:53 pm
Posts: 522
Location: NY
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
i was more than happy to get rid of him the first time around. id like to keep it that way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
dont like the crawford. too seafoody

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
immessedup17 wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5504907

Do you look into it?

So he can take all the shots that Rose could possibly take? Might as well kept Gordon.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 3922
Location: Right here
pizza_Place: nowhere
spmack wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5504907

Do you look into it?

So he can take all the shots that Rose could possibly take? Might as well kept Gordon.


I agree. Gordon also has the more consistent shot. Crawford is just a bad player

_________________
"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 495
Mr. Hernandez wrote:
spmack wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5504907

Do you look into it?

So he can take all the shots that Rose could possibly take? Might as well kept Gordon.


I agree. Gordon also has the more consistent shot. Crawford is just a bad player


Not a big fan of the nba are you?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Forgive him. Mr. Hernandez is a football guy.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43569
I would rather have Joey Crawford on my bench.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 3922
Location: Right here
pizza_Place: nowhere
Oh yea I forgot 7 for 32 = good these days

_________________
"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Last year he averaged 18 PPG on 45% shooting (38% from 3PT) and shot 85% from the line

This in about 30 MPG

Didn't turn it over a lot or foul a whole lot

Please explain to me how that makes him a bad player?

He's instant offense. That's his niche. I'm not claiming he's a great defender or makes Jason Kidd-esque no-look passes. He's a scorer. And he does that well and can still do it well.

That's my defense of him as a player....staying in the context of the thread I don't think he would be a good fit on this team at all. I'm also not sure that he's worth 10 million+ , which it seems like is his asking price (at least) for an extension.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
He's a taller and slightly less clutch version of Ben Gordon. I just see him being a black hole that Rose will defer to too often for my liking.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
HOVA wrote:
He's a taller and slightly less clutch version of Ben Gordon. I just see him being a black hole that Rose will defer to too often for my liking.



I agree. I don't think he would be a good fit on the Bulls. On the Hawks, I think he is a good fit. He gives them a solid scorer when Johnson is on the bench.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:50 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Bagels wrote:
HOVA wrote:
He's a taller and slightly less clutch version of Ben Gordon. I just see him being a black hole that Rose will defer to too often for my liking.



I agree. I don't think he would be a good fit on the Bulls. On the Hawks, I think he is a good fit. He gives them a solid scorer when Johnson is on the bench.


Couldn't he give the Bulls a solid scorer when Rose is on the bench?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:19 am
Posts: 1443
pizza_Place: Jack Brickhouse Toppings
He's not coming to the Bulls.

That being said, last year was as close to his full potential as he's gotten since joining the league.

_________________
McDude wrote:
My wife said 2 things about Bernstein today:

"He sounds like a man that was never challenged to be a man."
"He gives a lot of opinions without probably having many life experiences."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
RFDC wrote:
Bagels wrote:
HOVA wrote:
He's a taller and slightly less clutch version of Ben Gordon. I just see him being a black hole that Rose will defer to too often for my liking.



I agree. I don't think he would be a good fit on the Bulls. On the Hawks, I think he is a good fit. He gives them a solid scorer when Johnson is on the bench.


Couldn't he give the Bulls a solid scorer when Rose is on the bench?


I know he wasn't a "team" guy,but who gives a shit? He can SCORE which might be an issue this year.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43569
jimmypasta wrote:
[He can SCORE which might be an issue this year.

That's been an issue for the last 12 years of this franchise. However this season seems to have the best outlook since the Jordan-era when it comes to scoring.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
RFDC wrote:
Bagels wrote:
HOVA wrote:
He's a taller and slightly less clutch version of Ben Gordon. I just see him being a black hole that Rose will defer to too often for my liking.



I agree. I don't think he would be a good fit on the Bulls. On the Hawks, I think he is a good fit. He gives them a solid scorer when Johnson is on the bench.


Couldn't he give the Bulls a solid scorer when Rose is on the bench?


Of course he could. It's more a matter of what would it take to get him via trade and would his salary (and extension he obviously wants) be worth it. I don't think it would.

The Hawks are in a slightly different situation; they really have no one who can handle the ball aside from Bibby. So on the second unit and when Bibby is on the bench he is a good option. The Bulls have Watson and even Brewer can handle the ball OK. Yeah he would be an upgrade over either as far as scoring is concerned but again, you have to consider value. I'm just guessing here but if you're going to spend 10 million plus on a 6th man, I think you could do better.

edit: plus, Bibby due to age and poor defense doesn't play as much anymore so it's almost like a platoon...you notice even though Crawford was ATL's "6th man" he was playing 30 mpg...that's a lot for a 6th man. Meanwhile Rose plays the majority of the game so there isn't as much of a need for that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
[ Of course he could. It's more a matter of what would it take to get him via trade and would his salary (and extension he obviously wants) be worth it. I don't think it would.

The Hawks are in a slightly different situation; they really have no one who can handle the ball aside from Bibby. So on the second unit and when Bibby is on the bench he is a good option. The Bulls have Watson and even Brewer can handle the ball OK. Yeah he would be an upgrade over either as far as scoring is concerned but again, you have to consider value. I'm just guessing here but if you're going to spend 10 million plus on a 6th man, I think you could do better.

edit: plus, Bibby due to age and poor defense doesn't play as much anymore so it's almost like a platoon...you notice even though Crawford was ATL's "6th man" he was playing 30 mpg...that's a lot for a 6th man. Meanwhile Rose plays the majority of the game so there isn't as much of a need for that.[/quote]


OH MY GOD ...... I have to read Bagels fucking NBA pearls til May :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Crawford is a loser. He was a loser when we drafted him, he's a loser now. The Bulls do not need an ego to chuck up bricks.

Edit: Just looked it up, last year was the first time the Crawford was on a team with more than 33 wins. What a difference maker! The season after we got rid of him last time we went 47-35.

00-01 Bulls 15-67
01-02 Bulls 21-61
02-03 Bulls 30-52
03-04 Bulls 23-59
04-05 Knicks 33-49
05-06 Knicks 23-59
06-07 Knicks 33-49
07-08 Knicks 23-59
08-09 Warriors 29-53
09-10 Hawks 53-29


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Crawford is a loser. He was a loser when we drafted him, he's a loser now. The Bulls do not need an ego to chuck up bricks.

Edit: Just looked it up, last year was the first time the Crawford was on a team with more than 33 wins. What a difference maker! The season after we got rid of him last time we went 47-35.

00-01 Bulls 15-67
01-02 Bulls 21-61
02-03 Bulls 30-52
03-04 Bulls 23-59
04-05 Knicks 33-49
05-06 Knicks 23-59
06-07 Knicks 33-49
07-08 Knicks 23-59
08-09 Warriors 29-53
09-10 Hawks 53-29

:lol: I can tell by this post that you don't watch the NBA and really don't know much about basketball. That's funny.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
I think Crawford and his game have matured alot since his time here in Chicago. He's not the chucker with no conscience that he was here - and he's really improved his shot.

If the Bulls hadn't made the move on CJ Watson as the combo guard, backing up both Brewer and Rose, then Crawford would be a great fit. As it is, I'm not sure Ronnie Brewer is much more than a second guard off the bench. I like how he defends, but ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
OH MY GOD ...... I have to read Bagels fucking NBA pearls til May :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


yeah, be grateful. next to going back and finishing up high school, it's the smartest thing you can do for yourself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Crawford is a loser. He was a loser when we drafted him, he's a loser now. The Bulls do not need an ego to chuck up bricks.

Edit: Just looked it up, last year was the first time the Crawford was on a team with more than 33 wins. What a difference maker! The season after we got rid of him last time we went 47-35.

00-01 Bulls 15-67
01-02 Bulls 21-61
02-03 Bulls 30-52
03-04 Bulls 23-59
04-05 Knicks 33-49
05-06 Knicks 23-59
06-07 Knicks 33-49
07-08 Knicks 23-59
08-09 Warriors 29-53
09-10 Hawks 53-29

:lol: I can tell by this post that you don't watch the NBA and really don't know much about basketball. That's funny.



What is that supposed to mean? Anyone who would actually want Crawford on their actual team (not fantasy team) is a lunatic. You don't build teams with selfish players and stat guys. You build losers. As shown by the great records of teams that Crawford played for.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Crawford is a loser. He was a loser when we drafted him, he's a loser now. The Bulls do not need an ego to chuck up bricks.

Edit: Just looked it up, last year was the first time the Crawford was on a team with more than 33 wins. What a difference maker! The season after we got rid of him last time we went 47-35.

00-01 Bulls 15-67
01-02 Bulls 21-61
02-03 Bulls 30-52
03-04 Bulls 23-59
04-05 Knicks 33-49
05-06 Knicks 23-59
06-07 Knicks 33-49
07-08 Knicks 23-59
08-09 Warriors 29-53
09-10 Hawks 53-29

:lol: I can tell by this post that you don't watch the NBA and really don't know much about basketball. That's funny.



What is that supposed to mean? Anyone who would actually want Crawford on their actual team (not fantasy team) is a lunatic. You don't build teams with selfish players and stat guys. You build losers. As shown by the great records of teams that Crawford played for.


are you really Walt Williams Neck? Because you're about the only person here that's as dumb as he is


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 495
HOVA wrote:
He's a taller and slightly less clutch version of Ben Gordon. I just see him being a black hole that Rose will defer to too often for my liking.


Remember clutch doesnt exist :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group