It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 6:28 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:23 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Douchebag wrote:
If this report is true, I would consider the Bulls to be dead in the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes.

Quote:
Several league sources on Monday told ESPN.com that they believe the Nets have emerged as the front-runner to secure Anthony. Not only is Anthony willing to sign a contract extension with the Nets, sources say the club is willing to make an intriguing offer of Derrick Favors (the No. 3 pick in this year's draft), the expiring contracts of Troy Murphy and Kris Humphries, and at least one future first-round pick to Denver to land Anthony.

A source close to the Nets told ESPN.com that he wasn't ready to concede that the Nets were the front-runners for Anthony's services, nor was the source willing to confirm what the Nets would offer. However, the source did acknowledge that New Jersey was in serious consideration based on the Nuggets' reluctance to trade Anthony to a Western Conference team and the Nets' combination of expiring contracts, draft picks and a young player with serious upside.


There's another report out this morning that says the Bulls are out of the talks because they won't move Noah.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Douchebag wrote:
If this report is true, I would consider the Bulls to be dead in the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes.

Quote:
Several league sources on Monday told ESPN.com that they believe the Nets have emerged as the front-runner to secure Anthony. Not only is Anthony willing to sign a contract extension with the Nets, sources say the club is willing to make an intriguing offer of Derrick Favors (the No. 3 pick in this year's draft), the expiring contracts of Troy Murphy and Kris Humphries, and at least one future first-round pick to Denver to land Anthony.

A source close to the Nets told ESPN.com that he wasn't ready to concede that the Nets were the front-runners for Anthony's services, nor was the source willing to confirm what the Nets would offer. However, the source did acknowledge that New Jersey was in serious consideration based on the Nuggets' reluctance to trade Anthony to a Western Conference team and the Nets' combination of expiring contracts, draft picks and a young player with serious upside.


hmm...murphy probably makes a lot, right? that would be a lot of money to clear for sure, but then again what are the Nets going to do w/ all that cap space? it certainly didn't help them this summer. Offering Favors is pretty good, but in my opinion I think they'd be better served with actual talent that the Bulls can offer as opposed to expiring deals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:44 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Bagels wrote:

hmm...murphy probably makes a lot, right? that would be a lot of money to clear for sure, but then again what are the Nets going to do w/ all that cap space? it certainly didn't help them this summer. Offering Favors is pretty good, but in my opinion I think they'd be better served with actual talent that the Bulls can offer as opposed to expiring deals.


I believe Murphy makes at least $12 million a season, probably more. I think the Nets are going to have somewhere around $30 million in expiring deals after this season. I haven't seen a list of free agents for the next off-season, or who else will have the room to made a bid for Anthony though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Quote:
Isiah Thomas' formal business affiliation with the New York Knicks was denied by NBA commissioner David Stern, but that doesn't keep the Hall of Fame guard from having an opinion regarding the likely trade destination for Denver Nuggets star Carmelo Anthony.

"I think it will come down to Chicago and New York, whoever can put together the better package," Thomas told the Tribune on Monday. "I would say that a month ago he wasn't as open to Chicago as he is now. I think he has given New York enough time to put something together. But I think it will come down to those two cities."


If Isiah Thomas says that he is going to the Bulls or Knicks that means he is headed to New Jersey

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
The Bulls continue to blow my mind:


Jason Goff: Bulls have reportedly pulled out of the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes. Joakim Noah apparently is the sticking point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
Completely ridiculous!

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Bucky Chris wrote:
The Bulls continue to blow my mind:


Jason Goff: Bulls have reportedly pulled out of the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes. Joakim Noah apparently is the sticking point.

Bringing in Carmelo would certainly give the Bulls some cachet, but I don't necessarily think they would be improved. Who is going to rebound the basketball when you have to trade away major pieces of your front court?

For the Bulls to make a deal they would probably have to trade Noah, Gibson, Deng. The only inside guy they would be left with is Boozer. There are downsides to making the deal, and there are downsides to not making the deal. I think the downside of trading away most of your inside prescense is worse, IMO.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Douchebag wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
The Bulls continue to blow my mind:


Jason Goff: Bulls have reportedly pulled out of the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes. Joakim Noah apparently is the sticking point.

Bringing in Carmelo would certainly give the Bulls some cachet, but I don't necessarily think they would be improved. Who is going to rebound the basketball when you have to trade away major pieces of your front court?

For the Bulls to make a deal they would probably have to trade Noah, Gibson, Deng. The only inside guy they would be left with is Boozer. There are downsides to making the deal, and there are downsides to not making the deal. I think the downside of trading away most of your inside prescense is worse, IMO.


This wouldnt be a problem if they still had the White Panther

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Phil McCracken wrote:
This wouldnt be a problem if they still had the White Panther

Exactly

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
The Bulls continue to blow my mind:


Jason Goff: Bulls have reportedly pulled out of the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes. Joakim Noah apparently is the sticking point.

Bringing in Carmelo would certainly give the Bulls some cachet, but I don't necessarily think they would be improved. Who is going to rebound the basketball when you have to trade away major pieces of your front court?

For the Bulls to make a deal they would probably have to trade Noah, Gibson, Deng. The only inside guy they would be left with is Boozer. There are downsides to making the deal, and there are downsides to not making the deal. I think the downside of trading away most of your inside prescense is worse, IMO.


You make this move because it makes the organization better for the next 5-7 years, IMO. It could be a drop off this year (which is even debatable), but in the long run it makes you better. Just my take.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Bucky Chris wrote:
You make this move because it makes the organization better for the next 5-7 years, IMO. It could be a drop off this year (which is even debatable), but in the long run it makes you better. Just my take.

Would you make the deal if there wasn't a guarantee that Melo would sign an extension?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
You make this move because it makes the organization better for the next 5-7 years, IMO. It could be a drop off this year (which is even debatable), but in the long run it makes you better. Just my take.

Would you make the deal if there wasn't a guarantee that Melo would sign an extension?


Very good question. Probably not. I'm assuming you can get that done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Would you make the deal if there wasn't a guarantee that Melo would sign an extension?


Very good question. Probably not. I'm assuming you can get that done.


well that much is obvious. you wouldn't move major pieces for a year of Melo. you need a guarantee he's going to sign an extension, period

i know it will leave them thin up front, but I still would make the deal. you can always find a reggie evans/ronny turiaf type guy who can grab rebounds. you can't always find a premier scorer who can get to the line a TON.

the picks the Bulls would be giving up aren't going to be that great. they're likely going to be in the top 4/5 in the East. JJ, who cares. Gibson is like a Mark Blount type. so it's basically Melo for Noah? yeah i like Noah too and yeah it would leave them thin but you have to give up something to get something. i'd do it in a heartbeat. further more, what about the top teams in the East? Miami is going to be thin up front, Boston is aging and Perkins is comoing off an injury. no one is stopping Howard, sure. Just saying yeah it might come into play if they were facing the Lakers front line in the Finals, but i'd worry aobut that when the time comes. I'm not too concerned about being thin up front in the short term


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 2270
Location: Wheaton, IL
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
You all forget that 2010/11 begins the Omer Asik era

_________________
Host of the weekly "We Fish ASA" podcast
Weekly columnist for the Northwest Herald
Bi-monthly columnist for Illinois Outdoor News magazine
Former host of The Outdoors Experience on WIND and The Great Outdoors on CLTV
http://www.wefishasa.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Bucky Chris wrote:
The Bulls continue to blow my mind:


Jason Goff: Bulls have reportedly pulled out of the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes. Joakim Noah apparently is the sticking point.



Jason Goff doesn't have any secret inside information unless you consider all those ESPN/Yahoo Reporters that tweet out conflicting information.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:24 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BD wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
The Bulls continue to blow my mind:


Jason Goff: Bulls have reportedly pulled out of the Carmelo Anthony sweepstakes. Joakim Noah apparently is the sticking point.



Jason Goff doesn't have any secret inside information unless you consider all those ESPN/Yahoo Reporters that tweet out conflicting information.


You mean Goff's info about Wade coming to Chicago wasn't any good?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
pax wanted noah since he hit college, and noah has far exceeded what he thought he would be at this point. i really doubt that foot is that bad, they just knew they werent going anywhere anyway last year so why press it.

they wanted noah for a reason too...

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92084
Location: To the left of my post
Interesting...
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5602165
Anthony doesn't want to go to New Jersey it seems. The Knicks can't offer Denver anything.

The Bulls may be playing this just right and all that talk of the Nets may have been an attempt to scare Paxson into including Noah.

If they get Carmelo without getting rid of Noah Paxson may have saved his legacy in Chicago. I think you do it either way but I think the Bulls may be playing from strength right now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Interesting...
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5602165
Anthony doesn't want to go to New Jersey it seems. The Knicks can't offer Denver anything.

The Bulls may be playing this just right and all that talk of the Nets may have been an attempt to scare Paxson into including Noah.

If they get Carmelo without getting rid of Noah Paxson may have saved his legacy in Chicago. I think you do it either way but I think the Bulls may be playing from strength right now.

Good point.

Denver could be put in a situation where they know they have to deal Melo. The Bulls offer of Deng, Gibson, and a first-rounder might be able to get it done. I would also have no problem including the first-rounder that the Bulls received from the Bobcats in the Tyrus Thomas deal. It's an unprotected pick in 2014 or 2015. You could always give the Nuggets next year's first rounder (which will probably be a late round pick, plus the 2014/2015 Charlotte pick, which could very well be a lottery pick). The Bulls could be able to not trade Noah once Denver realizes there are not any better options on the table.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
Thanks for the link Brick. If Pax is able to get Melo without giving up Noah there is no doubt in my mind he saves his legacy and probably brings more titles to Chicago. A potential lineup of Rose, Brewer/Korver, Melo, Boozer, and Noah is pretty stout.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
I need to stop reading this thread. I'm just going to be disappointed just like with LeBron.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:57 am
Posts: 2104
Location: NW side
pizza_Place: Benny's on 26th in Berwyn
Douchebag wrote:
Denver could be put in a situation where they know they have to deal Melo.


That's been my angle through all of this speculation - why would Denver let him walk when all indications point to the fact that he's already looking at other teams?

Douchebag wrote:
I would also have no problem including the first-rounder that the Bulls received from the Bobcats in the Tyrus Thomas deal. It's an unprotected pick in 2014 or 2015. You could always give the Nuggets next year's first rounder (which will probably be a late round pick, plus the 2014/2015 Charlotte pick, which could very well be a lottery pick). The Bulls could be able to not trade Noah once Denver realizes there are not any better options on the table.


Agreed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Interesting...
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5602165
Anthony doesn't want to go to New Jersey it seems. The Knicks can't offer Denver anything.

The Bulls may be playing this just right and all that talk of the Nets may have been an attempt to scare Paxson into including Noah.

If they get Carmelo without getting rid of Noah Paxson may have saved his legacy in Chicago. I think you do it either way but I think the Bulls may be playing from strength right now.


Very very very possible. But at this point, I just have no reason to give Paxson the benefit of the doubt. Hope you're right though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:57 am
Posts: 2104
Location: NW side
pizza_Place: Benny's on 26th in Berwyn
Northside_Dan wrote:
I need to stop reading this thread. I'm just going to be disappointed just like with LeBron.


:| I'm trying to tell myself that this won't happen for this reason as well, but it's hard to not consider this move a real possibility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Once training camp opens in about a week, we will probably know for certain if Melo will get traded. Right now all of this is just speculation, and there haven't been many comments from Denver's front office, or Carmelo himself. Once everyone gets together, a move will probably be made very quickly, if it's going to happen.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Does all of this speculation involve the assurance of being able to lock down an extension?

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Does all of this speculation involve the assurance of being able to lock down an extension?


You don't make the trade unless he signs an extension.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Does all of this speculation involve the assurance of being able to lock down an extension?

That's probably what Denver is desperately trying to do right now.

RFDC wrote:
You don't make the trade unless he signs an extension.

Exactly.

If this isn't a sign and trade, he probably takes his talents to Madison Square Garden next season. The good thing about this whole siutation is that with the possible lockout, and the expiration of the CBA, Melo really needs to sign an extension now, rather than waiting. He could be leaving multi-millions of dollars on the table if he doesn't.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Last edited by Douchebag on Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
If we would just move Deng/Gibson + picks, would you do it without the extension already in place? I'd strongly consider it if we were keeping Noah.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 3922
Location: Right here
pizza_Place: nowhere
RFDC wrote:
Thanks for the link Brick. If Pax is able to get Melo without giving up Noah there is no doubt in my mind he saves his legacy and probably brings more titles to Chicago. A potential lineup of Rose, Brewer/Korver, Melo, Boozer, and Noah is pretty stout.


Lookin at it now that's a pretty formidable lineup. It'd be great if Pax couble pull it off but I doubt it'll happen. Hope I'm wrong

_________________
"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group