It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
rogers park bryan wrote:
But...Draft picks have a certain value. That value is not changed by the person potentially making the pick.


If the scouting department is shit and give poor reccomondations to the person with the ultimate decision on the pick, I believe that the value is diminished.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I would say that I think that is what Cutler did his last year in Denver.
That is what Orton did his rookie year, and that team made the playoffs, even with him playing practice squad quality. It kind of kills your whole argument though since his worst season was playoff worthy while his best season to date did not.

OK, so using 'make the playoffs' kills the argument, but using performances as a rookie is ok?

I think its fairly safe to say that 95% of the QBs in the NFL would have made the playoffs with that defense. Keep in mind that the one game the Bears loosened the leash on Orton (against Cincy), he performed terribly.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
sjboyd0137 wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
But...Draft picks have a certain value. That value is not changed by the person potentially making the pick.


If the scouting department is shit and give poor reccomondations to the person with the ultimate decision on the pick, I believe that the value is diminished.

If your teams GM cant be trusted with draft picks, youre already fucked so dont worry about who the QB is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
OK, so using 'make the playoffs' kills the argument, but using performances as a rookie is ok?
It just goes to show that "making the playoffs" is a very poor methodology for judging him. His play significantly improved but it didn't show in playoff appearances.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I think its fairly safe to say that 95% of the QBs in the NFL would have made the playoffs with that defense. Keep in mind that the one game the Bears loosened the leash on Orton (against Cincy), he performed terribly.
Once again, that 95% figure you cite shows why judging a QB on "making the playoffs" is a very poor metric. Thanks for the help Frank.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
sjboyd0137 wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
DS,
All those INT's last year are not ALL due to the OL.

Half of them were due to the recievers running the wrong routes.


How is it that the Bears WR's have all regressed & they all look worse than last year?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Scorehead wrote:

How is it that the Bears WR's have all regressed & they all look worse than last year?

I'm not sure, but they sucked then too.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Scorehead wrote:
How is it that the Bears WR's have all regressed & they all look worse than last year?
I do have to laugh because one of the things they said when the trade was made was "He'll make all the WR's better!". Now, the WR are to blame.

Note: That laugh that I just had is not a personal insult to JORR.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
whats interesting is that this team is turning into the 85 bears in a lot of ways. the defense is strong and they hate their offense. the offense is functional but not great, with a cocky love/hate quarterback (best one since j.m.). even the coaches hate eachother (lovie thinks tice and martz could do a better job with the offense). we could be watching the 84 bears... get some big guys in the middle who give cutler at least 3 seconds and WATCH OUT.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
Interesting parallels, Ike. I like it.

B-Rick - OK, having your fun? :lol: I haven't chimed-in on a Cutler-Orton debate since last season. I'll start with a few concessions (concessions, not those other things Jay gets after being smashed around by angry defensemen).

First, Orton has succeeded beyond what I thought he would when the trade was made. I cannot deny that. Now, he does have a system and a strong OL that works in his favor. But, I thought he would strike-out as a full-time starter despite that, and he hasn't.

Second, I thought Cutler's presence on the Bears would upgrade the performance of the players around him, and that hasn't seemed to happen. Hard to say for sure, since I suppose they could potentially suck even more if he wasn't here, but, from a practical standpoint, I concede this point too.

Those points notwithstanding, if I were to wake up tomorrow morning in an alternate universe, and found out I was head coach in the Superbowl later in the day, and I could pick either Cutler or Orton as my QB, I am picking Cutler without hesitation. No question. Period. If he's still post-concussed... maybe even then. :eye:

Orton's numbers are quite gaudy through four weeks. But here's the thing. Orton's loudest proponents - of which I believe you are one! :P - always said to throw the stats out the window, it's only wins that count. Jon Gruden proclaimed "give me the guy that wins!" All the national pundits chanted "all he does is win". Well, he's on a 4-10 run, and now all we hear about is his robust number of passing yards. Uh uh uh, no can do.

Not to mention, despite Orton's numbers, Cutler still had a higher QB rating until the NY debacle (I assume he no longer does, but I didn't look it up). And I think it's only fair to judge the season on the whole, rather than get too excited over 4 weeks. Grossman looked like a first-ballot HOF'er in 2006 through eight weeks, Orton last year with the 6-0... well you get the idea.

I have to give Orton props for doing better than I gave him credit for. But let's not get out of hand. :o


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:24 pm
Posts: 2321
The single most overrated player in Chicago sports history Kyle Orton. The dick sucking that continues is ridiculous.

He does well in September and OCtober I'll give you that but once Halloween hits forget it.

I will listen to people who question the draft picks but nobody who knows a crap about the game would rather have Orton as QB.

Actually I wonder if people who wish Orton was here actually hate him. He'd be dead right now behind that line. The only reason Cutler isn't is because he has mobility.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
The single most overrated player in Chicago sports history Kyle Orton. The dick sucking that continues is ridiculous.

:lol: :lol:

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:24 pm
Posts: 2321
24_Guy wrote:
Interesting parallels, Ike. I like it.

B-Rick - OK, having your fun? :lol: I haven't chimed-in on a Cutler-Orton debate since last season. I'll start with a few concessions (concessions, not those other things Jay gets after being smashed around by angry defensemen).

First, Orton has succeeded beyond what I thought he would when the trade was made. I cannot deny that. Now, he does have a system and a strong OL that works in his favor. But, I thought he would strike-out as a full-time starter despite that, and he hasn't.

Second, I thought Cutler's presence on the Bears would upgrade the performance of the players around him, and that hasn't seemed to happen. Hard to say for sure, since I suppose they could potentially suck even more if he wasn't here, but, from a practical standpoint, I concede this point too.

Those points notwithstanding, if I were to wake up tomorrow morning in an alternate universe, and found out I was head coach in the Superbowl later in the day, and I could pick either Cutler or Orton as my QB, I am picking Cutler without hesitation. No question. Period. If he's still post-concussed... maybe even then. :eye:

Orton's numbers are quite gaudy through four weeks. But here's the thing. Orton's loudest proponents - of which I believe you are one! :P - always said to throw the stats out the window, it's only wins that count. Jon Gruden proclaimed "give me the guy that wins!" All the national pundits chanted "all he does is win". Well, he's on a 4-10 run, and now all we hear about is his robust number of passing yards. Uh uh uh, no can do.

Not to mention, despite Orton's numbers, Cutler still had a higher QB rating until the NY debacle (I assume he no longer does, but I didn't look it up). And I think it's only fair to judge the season on the whole, rather than get too excited over 4 weeks. Grossman looked like a first-ballot HOF'er in 2006 through eight weeks, Orton last year with the 6-0... well you get the idea.

I have to give Orton props for doing better than I gave him credit for. But let's not get out of hand. :o



Orton will win games if he doesn't have to be the reason you win. If he has any adversity he and his team crumble as the Bears did in 08 and the Broncos did last year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:24 pm
Posts: 2321
Question for Rick. Did the Boilermakers get 10 minutes to get off the filed to stop from getting an offsides called against them when Orton was QB there like they did last night against Northwestern? Okay not 10 minutes but that was a terrible call.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
The single most overrated player in Chicago sports history Kyle Orton.


I would say that Matt Forte is more over-rated than Orton. Orton is putting up great numbers...Forte is putting up horrible numbers. Forte sucks & is yet another wasted Jerry Angelo draft pick. I wanted the Bears to draft Mendenhall in the first round in 2008...instead they drafted Chris Williams even though every other team in the NFL know that he had back problems except Angelo.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:43 am
Posts: 671
Scorehead wrote:
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
The single most overrated player in Chicago sports history Kyle Orton.


I would say that Matt Forte is more over-rated than Orton. Orton is putting up great numbers...Forte is putting up horrible numbers. Forte sucks & is yet another wasted Jerry Angelo draft pick. I wanted the Bears to draft Mendenhall in the first round in 2008...instead they drafted Chris Williams even though every other team in the NFL know that he had back problems except Angelo.


Even so when was the last time a great running back made or broke a team. I'm pretty damn sure Barry Sanders never won a Super Bowl and is probably the best running back to ever play the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Necroscope wrote:

Even so when was the last time a great running back made or broke a team. I'm pretty damn sure Barry Sanders never won a Super Bowl and is probably the best running back to ever play the game.

Was this a joke?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
double post.
SOSORRY

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:43 am
Posts: 671
Darkside wrote:
Necroscope wrote:

Even so when was the last time a great running back made or broke a team. I'm pretty damn sure Barry Sanders never won a Super Bowl and is probably the best running back to ever play the game.

Was this a joke?


Not at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
24_Guy wrote:
Orton's numbers are quite gaudy through four weeks. But here's the thing. Orton's loudest proponents - of which I believe you are one! :P - always said to throw the stats out the window, it's only wins that count. Jon Gruden proclaimed "give me the guy that wins!" All the national pundits chanted "all he does is win". Well, he's on a 4-10 run, and now all we hear about is his robust number of passing yards. Uh uh uh, no can do.
Well, I don't think that's completely accurate. No one with any clue would say that the record of a QB is all that matters. I mean, Todd Collins is 1-0 this year. It is a fair point that the Broncos haven't been winning much lately. So let's go ahead and say all those who said "All he does is win" were proven wrong and those who said that he was just a "system qb" or that he didn't have the skills to be a solid NFL QB were wrong.

24_Guy wrote:
Not to mention, despite Orton's numbers, Cutler still had a higher QB rating until the NY debacle (I assume he no longer does, but I didn't look it up). And I think it's only fair to judge the season on the whole, rather than get too excited over 4 weeks. Grossman looked like a first-ballot HOF'er in 2006 through eight weeks, Orton last year with the 6-0... well you get the idea.
You could always compare the combined numbers of this year and last year.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
I will listen to people who question the draft picks but nobody who knows a crap about the game would rather have Orton as QB.
How stubborn do you have to be to realize that Orton may be developing into a top notch QB. My guess is you haven't seen him play much this year. He is doing things that even I didn't expect. Watch this perfect strike for 48 yards(more than 50 in the air). http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d81ad9916/Lloyd-48-yard-TD People always used his rookie year, where he deserved to be benched, and where he was clearly incapable of playing against him. For example, he probably had about 10 snaps in his whole college career not out of the shotgun, but Ron Turner and Olin Kruetz decided that no matter what he was going to be under center. It took him time to adjust but he did have the talent. If you still prefer Jay Cutler that's fine. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm not even ready to say that Orton is a better QB. However, in something that would have been underheard of to say even two years ago, the gap is not that big between the two.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Actually I wonder if people who wish Orton was here actually hate him. He'd be dead right now behind that line. The only reason Cutler isn't is because he has mobility.
Denver doesn't have a great line either. Cutler may be more athletic but as we saw in the Giants game he wasn't able to actually use it effectively and it may have been a negative because he tried to make plays instead of throw it away.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Orton will win games if he doesn't have to be the reason you win. If he has any adversity he and his team crumble as the Bears did in 08 and the Broncos did last year.
This is just a bad football thought. If Cutler was putting up numbers like Orton people would be saying "THE BRONCOS WUOLD BE 0-5 WITHOUT HIM!".

It's pretty clear that you haven't watched a single Broncos game this year. The team has played a really tough schedule so far and the offense is the passing game is all that has been good for them. After the Jets game, the schedule gets easier. Let's see how he does "after Halloween". :lol:
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Question for Rick. Did the Boilermakers get 10 minutes to get off the filed to stop from getting an offsides called against them when Orton was QB there like they did last night against Northwestern? Okay not 10 minutes but that was a terrible call.
I have no idea what you are talking about.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Question for Rick. Did the Boilermakers get 10 minutes to get off the filed to stop from getting an offsides called against them when Orton was QB there like they did last night against Northwestern? Okay not 10 minutes but that was a terrible call.
I have no idea what you are talking about.

Neither does she

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Question for Rick. Did the Boilermakers get 10 minutes to get off the filed to stop from getting an offsides called against them when Orton was QB there like they did last night against Northwestern? Okay not 10 minutes but that was a terrible call.
So I looked into it a little more, and I now know what you are talking about.

Ironically, this rule seems to have been created in least in part because of how Joe Tiller used to try and exploit substitutions for his advantage. I'm sure he wasn't the only one.

Basically, Purdue would bring in a two tight end set and run the ball right down the middle. Immediately, they would bring in 5 WR and do a mass substitution and snap the ball as quick as they could. The opposing defense would be unable to make an adjustment and you'd have 5 WR against a defense that had personnel for a power running game.

So now, when the offense makes a substitution or even shows like they are going to make a substitution it is the job of the officials to make sure that the defense has enough time to react.

It was not a terrible call. It was the right call because otherwise the game would be filled with penalties like that or the defense would really be at such a disadvantage.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Clearly a lot of us were wrong about Orton,

I've heard one argument that Orton is simply playing come-from-behind football every week to put up his numbers is crazy. The guy had 130 yards and a TD passing against the #1 ranked overall Defense in the NFL at halftime this past week. That is not playing from behind.

Since the start of 2009, Orton has thrown for 5,900 yards, 25 TD's, and 13 INT's with a passer rating hovering around 90.

That means that over that stretch, dating back to the start of last season, he's throwing for 280 yards a game with a 2:1 TD to INT ratio, and an excellent passer rating, all while completing nearly 2/3 of his attempts for more yards per completion that just about any QB in the NFL.

So far this season, just his second in that Offense, he's having a Pro Bowl season, on pace for over 5,000 passing yards with a nearly 3:1 TD to INT ratio and a passer rating just shy of 100.

He is ranked among the top 10 QB's in Completion Percentage, Yards, Yards per Completion, TD's, least number of INT's, plays over 20 yards (#2), plays over 40 yards (#1), and passer rating.

Also, the argument that he's just throwing a lot doesn't hold water, since his number of attempts per game are on par with other top QB's like Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, and Tony Romo.

Essentially no matter what he does, some will never change their mind.

The guy is blowing it up in that Offense. Maybe it's the system, blah, blah, blah.

The bottom line is that if nearly a season and a half of production at a high level is insufficient to change minds, combined with a Pro Bowl pace this year, then you are simply refusing to admit your error. Plain and simple.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
superbowl. 4th quarter. ball on 24yd line. who do you want, jay or kyle? thats all. peace

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
IkeSouth wrote:
superbowl. 4th quarter. ball on 24yd line. who do you want, jay or kyle? thats all. peace


Grossman.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:57 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
IkeSouth wrote:
superbowl. 4th quarter. ball on 24yd line. who do you want, jay or kyle? thats all. peace


Neither.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Panther pislA wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
superbowl. 4th quarter. ball on 24yd line. who do you want, jay or kyle? thats all. peace

24 yd line? Cutler.

Inside Red Zone? Anyone else.

Its not in the Red Zone either way, but I think he's saying 76 yds away.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:15 am
Posts: 118
pizza_Place: Uno's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
North can take his jelly beans and his predictions and shove em straight up his ass.

Kyle is a solid quarterback in a system that maximizes his abilities as a system quarterback. Jay is an elite talent who has not been able to harness his full potential and he is on a team with a very dysfunctional offense full of either bad players or players who do not fit the every changing scheme.


What a stupid statement. Cutler an "elite" QB then you say he hasn't harness his full potential. So which is it? Just saying he's an elite QB made me laugh. Yeah he's right there with Peyton, Brees and Tom. Like folks have said he never did shit in Denver. And I was one who hated the trade. Maybe Cutler should be in a "system" like Kyle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
deepdish wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
North can take his jelly beans and his predictions and shove em straight up his ass.

Kyle is a solid quarterback in a system that maximizes his abilities as a system quarterback. Jay is an elite talent who has not been able to harness his full potential and he is on a team with a very dysfunctional offense full of either bad players or players who do not fit the every changing scheme.


What a stupid statement. Cutler an "elite" QB then you say he hasn't harness his full potential. So which is it? Just saying he's an elite QB made me laugh. Yeah he's right there with Peyton, Brees and Tom. Like folks have said he never did shit in Denver. And I was one who hated the trade. Maybe Cutler should be in a "system" like Kyle.


Image

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group