It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
24_Guy wrote:
Okay but of course you do recall how the entire Orton/Cutler debate was framed when the trade happened, and when Orton was 6-0, I am sure. 8) It was stats (Cutler) vs. wins (Orton), and the Orton crowd yelled from the rooftops that the QB with wins is always far more valuable than the QB with the stats.
No, they didn't but if you want to think that go ahead. Only an idiot would say that only wins matter in regards to a QB and I'm not going to argue the case put forth by people like that. It matters how the team does but it's not the most important thing. I'd take Philip Rivers over Cutler right now but the Bears are a better team.


Whoa, whoa, now be fair BM. That is precisely what the debate was about when the trade was made. If you personally weren't partaking in that part of the argument, that's fine (if I have time I'll dig up the old threads 8) ), but it's revisionist history to deny that "wins vs. stats" was exactly what NFL Nation was debating. It was all over this board, it was on WSCR, and it was all over the national media.

Guys like Dungy, Jaws, Gruden, Brennaman, Al Michaels, et al, were all claiming that Orton's wins were the most pertinent stat of all. I still remember on MNF when Orton beat San Diego to go 6-0, Gruden proclaimed "forget the other guy with the arm and the stats, GIVE ME THE QUARTERBACK WHO WINS!!!".

The Score had media experts on all the time that were chiding Chicago for foolishly believing in stats more than Orton's winning percentage. There were articles about it on ESPN and other websites all the time. It's only now that Orton has 5 wins in his last 18 games that we don't hear this anymore.



Boilermaker Rick wrote:
24_Guy wrote:
We also have to take into consideration, when looking at the total yards stat where Orton is leading 3650 to 3100, that Orton has a full 100 more pass attempts than Cutler. To make a more fair comparison then, we can look at yards-per-attempt. Orton is at 7.3, Cutler is at 7.9. Orton has used 100 attempts to get just 500 yards ahead of Cutler. So one could actually argue Cutler is winning this category too.
In general though it hurts your yards per attempt when the other team knows that you are passing it all the time. That's why having a balanced team helps a QB.


Well then to be fair, Cutler didn't have much of a running game last year to support him, either. Jaws didn't take that into consideration that when he broke down Cutler's picks and claimed that 26 of the 27 were 100% Cutler's fault. Billick didn't take that into consideration when he said Cutler was turning into Jeff George.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Drew Brees had one of the greatest passing seasons in NFL history when he threw for over 5,000 yards. However, he was only third in yards per attempt and Jake Delhomme was very close to him. I don't think Delhomme would have been able to throw for 5,000 yards if he had been given those extra throws.


That is true, and helps point out how stats can be misleading. At least you agree that wins/losses for a QB can be quite misleading, too. Now if only we could educate the NFL pundits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Did you honestly just cite Gruden as evidence? :lol:

There were and probably still are people who think that win/loss record is the only real thing that matters. It's stupid though and it was then. It's just one component to judge a QB. Orton has taken a hit on that aspect but has certainly improved statistically.
24_Guy wrote:
The Score had media experts on all the time that were chiding Chicago for foolishly believing in stats more than Orton's winning percentage. There were articles about it on ESPN and other websites all the time. It's only now that Orton has 5 wins in his last 18 games that we don't hear this anymore.
I know you know this, but the reason that they no longer cite his win/loss record is that it doesn't really show he is a good QB. People used to say that Peyton Manning couldn't win the Super Bowl. Were you surprised when he did and then people stopped saying it? :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Did you honestly just cite Gruden as evidence? :lol:


Yes, evidence of a buffoon spouting a buffoon's opinion. I didn't say intelligent people were touting Orton's wins. :D

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
24_Guy wrote:
The Score had media experts on all the time that were chiding Chicago for foolishly believing in stats more than Orton's winning percentage. There were articles about it on ESPN and other websites all the time. It's only now that Orton has 5 wins in his last 18 games that we don't hear this anymore.
I know you know this, but the reason that they no longer cite his win/loss record is that it doesn't really show he is a good QB. People used to say that Peyton Manning couldn't win the Super Bowl. Were you surprised when he did and then people stopped saying it? :lol:


No, I'm never surprised when someone retreats from an argument after they lose it. But I am amused that after a year or more of hearing about "the QB who wins" vs. "the QB who only puts up good stats", I am now being constantly reminded of Orton's big stats.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
24_Guy wrote:
No, I'm never surprised when someone retreats from an argument after they lose it. But I am amused that after a year or more of hearing about "the QB who wins" vs. "the QB who only puts up good stats", I am now being constantly reminded of Orton's big stats.
They didn't really lose it though. The evidence changed. The idea was that Orton was a good QB but it was showing up in wins and not in statistics. Now, we see that Orton is actually a good QB so the actual opinion was correct. The argument from the other side was that Orton wasn't that good and his record didn't mean he was. Who would be more correct? Wouldn't it be the ones who said he was good even if the evidence is different now?

I guess you'll have to define what argument was lost. The argument always seemed to be whether Orton was good or not. I know I argued constantly with people who said he wasn't that good, he couldn't throw it past 10 yards, he would be a decent backup, and other things. There were still people that said that Rex Grossman was as good or better than him at that point. Is it your stance that those people lost the argument? :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Here are Cutler's stats vs. Orton's stats since 2008. Cutler beats Orton in every category except for interceptions and fumbles. Based on these stats, I would choose Cutler over Orton. Cutler is more mobile, has a stronger arm and has more upside than Orton does and that is through the "eye test".

(Sorry -- If the file upload sucks, please refer to Yahoo Sports Player Stats for each QB.)

This file upload does suck. Post FAIL. :cry:

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The evidence changed.

:lol: As an Online Debate Master, I know you're better than this! :wink: Are you playing with me!? 8) It's a no-no to cherry-pick evidence to fit a pre-conceived conclusion.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I guess you'll have to define what argument was lost. The argument always seemed to be whether Orton was good or not. I know I argued constantly with people who said he wasn't that good, he couldn't throw it past 10 yards, he would be a decent backup, and other things.


The argument that I'm saying that was lost, is that one that said wins are the most telling stat for a QB. You didn't make that argument, so we're good there. As far as whether or not Orton is good, I still maintain he is not. The one thing he has proven is that he can throw it more than 10 yards. Other than that, has he really done much more than pile up yards between the 20's on a losing team, and continue his penchant for not throwing picks?

The only head coach or GM that seemed to be beating down the doors to get Orton on his team is Josh McDaniels. Which isn't saying much. And, even he felt the need to spend a #1 pick on a QB, and also traded to get Brady Quinn. So...

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
There were still people that said that Rex Grossman was as good or better than him at that point. Is it your stance that those people lost the argument? :lol:



Cutler:

CLOSE CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
4th Q: +/- 7 pts. 35 56 423 62.5 7.55 38 5 2 3.0 100.5
Last 2 min. of half 28 44 414 63.6 9.41 89 6 2 1.0 115.0


Orton:

CLOSE CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
4th Q: +/- 7 pts. 33 67 366 49.3 5.46 31 1 2 5.0 58.4
Last 2 min. of half 46 83 540 55.4 6.51 44 5 2 4.0 85.4



Grossman's last full season, 2006:
CLOSE CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
4th Q: +/- 7 pts. 18 28 207 64.3 7.39 57 2 2 4.0 80.5
Last 2 min. of half 24 40 317 60.0 7.93 29 4 2 1.0 97.6


Too bad Grossman has a habit of inventing new and interesting ways to turn the ball over, and at horrible times (which is really bad, don't get me wrong), otherwise yes, I think Grossman is better than Orton. Who knows, maybe Grossman will get a shot in Washington next year. Would be interesting.

Basically, I still think Cutler is light-years beyond Orton. I guess the circle of people who disagree with me would include the likes of Thom Brennaman, probably Pep Hamilton, maybe a couple of Denver beat guys. I'm fine with that. :cheese: :cheese:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
24_Guy wrote:
I think Grossman is better than Orton.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Thanks for the laugh.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:38 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Take a look at Erik Kramer's last full season. Maybe he is a better option than Orton now.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
Okay, okay, you guys and Josh McDaniels have a happy new year. 8)

Hopefully Kyle is gracious enough to wish the same for Tim Tebow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
rogers park bryan wrote:
No.

Too early.

If the Bears dont sign Peppers they could be 4-11. Then the trade would suck right?

This has nothing to do with the discussion. Why even bring it up?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:24 pm
Posts: 2321
I wonder if there is still anyone out there besides Boilermaker and the Chicago media that wishes we still had Orton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
I wonder if there is still anyone out there besides Boilermaker and the Chicago media that wishes we still had Orton.
Talk to me next week.

If Cutler plays well next week and the Bears beat the Packers the trade was officially a success. I don't think beating the worst playoff team in NFL history shows it though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
I wonder if there is still anyone out there besides Boilermaker and the Chicago media that wishes we still had Orton.
Talk to me next week.

If Cutler plays well next week and the Bears beat the Packers the trade was officially a success. I don't think beating the worst playoff team in NFL history shows it though.


Last stand? I thought you would have said win a SB.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
I wonder if there is still anyone out there besides Boilermaker and the Chicago media that wishes we still had Orton.
Talk to me next week.

If Cutler plays well next week and the Bears beat the Packers the trade was officially a success. I don't think beating the worst playoff team in NFL history shows it though.


Cutler had a much better year than Orton.

After Orton was statistically better last year, you were pretty sold on Orton being better.


Who is better today?

If you had your pick going into this game this week who would you take?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
HOVA wrote:
Last stand? I thought you would have said win a SB.
It's not a last stand at all. I've been impressed with Cutler all year. I have made very few negative posts about him even after bad games. They paid a heavy price to win games like this on Sunday. If he does, I'll have no problem saying he proved me wrong.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Cutler had a much better year than Orton.
It was close until Orton got benched so they could give Tim Tebow a tryout.
rogers park bryan wrote:
After Orton was statistically better last year, you were pretty sold on Orton being better.
I don't think I have ever, in my entire time here, said that Kyle Orton was a better QB than Cutler. I have said he's playing better but I've considered them relatively equal since the trade happened.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is better today?
I don't know. Things went bad for Orton at the end of the season but I don't think it was his fault.
rogers park bryan wrote:
If you had your pick going into this game this week who would you take?
I'd take Orton + 2 picks still just like I would have at the end of the season. My opinion changes if Cutler leads us to the Super Bowl over a team that is better than the Bears.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
rogers park bryan wrote:
If you had your pick (Orton or Cutler) going into this game this week who would you take?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If you had your pick (Orton or Cutler) going into this game this week who would you take?
Cutler played really well on Sunday so of course I would pick Cutler to play next week.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If you had your pick (Orton or Cutler) going into this game this week who would you take?
Cutler played really well on Sunday so of course I would pick Cutler to play next week.

YES
YES

I WIN


jk

BEARS!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
FYI, an article on espn.com:

http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post/_/ ... for-denver

“It’s not difficult to argue who won this trade,” Williamson said. “It wasn’t the Broncos.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
If you had your pick (Orton or Cutler) going into this game this week who would you take?


Terry Boers wrote:
I, I, I, ah, uh I... Look (sigh), it's, uh, I, this thing, uh Cutler, look, in my world, uh, I, I, that is to say in this world and all other worlds, (sigh), I mean I was in favor of this trade, and uh, my guy liked it and told me they would trade Olsen too, uh that didn't but , uh(sigh) they tried and disliking the trade when it happened, uh that made you football retaaaahded, but uh, I, I, now, I can change my mind, that's all I'm saying, and uh, my guy also changed his. Look, kids, this was a bad deal and Cutler winning three Super Bowls ain't gonna change that. That's all I'm saying. That's all I'm saying.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group