It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 4:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
This is a good trade by the Cubs and I'm finding it very difficult to believe Hendry pulled it off. Talk about giving up quantity over quality. It would be even better if he signs Garza to an extension.

I wonder if Hendry is now shopping the Big Dumbass.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
immessedup17 wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
This is a good trade by the Cubs and I'm finding it very difficult to believe Hendry pulled it off. Talk about giving up quantity over quality. It would be even better if he signs Garza to an extension.

I wonder if Hendry is now shopping the Big Dumbass.


Decent trade. No one wanted to trade Archer for a second tier pitcher.


No one knows whether Archer is going to be the real deal, Garza is a proven commodity. Hard as it is for me to believe it, I actually agree with Keyser for once regarding the Cubs.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
immessedup17 wrote:
Decent trade. No one wanted to trade Archer for a second tier pitcher.

2nd tier in AL East = #1 starter in NL Central


Solid move by Hendry, I can't believe Tampa didn't/couldn't get more for him.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
He's between a 1 and a 2


No way he's a 3


And Randy Wells is not gonna be a perrenial 13-15 game winner.

He'll probably be out of baseball in a few years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
immessedup17 wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
He's between a 1 and a 2


No way he's a 3


And Randy Wells is not gonna be a perrenial 13-15 game winner.

He'll probably be out of baseball in a few years.


I'm hopeful that Garza will have a low three's ERA.

I strongly disagree with you on Randy Wells.

Randy Wells didnt pitch in the majors til he was 26

Not too many of those guys work out. I hope he does.

It just seemed from your two comments that you think Garza and Wells are similliar and I think thats pretty crazy.

I mean a 13-15 win guy is a #2 at least

And you say Garza may be a #3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Throw Garza in along with Z,Dempster,Wells Cashner,Coleman,Gorzelanny and maybe Marshall.
That's a pretty decent selection of SP.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Wells will be much better if he isn't out getting jenksed every night.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
immessedup17 wrote:
On a good team, even the 3's and 4's can easily win 12-15 games if they have a three or four ERA.

The 3 and 4 on the Cubs won't win double digit games.


Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Wells will be much better if he isn't out getting jenksed every night.

Drinking, or visiting the buffets?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
immessedup17 wrote:

I strongly disagree with you on Randy Wells.




Can I be in on your Randy Wells bandwagon too? I think he's a lock 3/4 starter for this team. He threw some AMAZING games last year which speaks to the talent he has. Once he learns the ropes, all the hitters etc he will be right there at 13ish wins on a decent team.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
too much young talent given up

Hendry, instead of rebuilding, once again went back to his bombastic splashy ways

all it takes is for garza to be injured and this is a horrible deal

15-10 is the guy's best year... not bad, considering he faced the Yankees and Red Sox a combined 10-12 times a year

so not a bad trade overall, considering one was a catcher and 1 was a SS (which we already have homegrown talent at those positions already)

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
On a good team, even the 3's and 4's can easily win 12-15 games if they have a three or four ERA.

The 3 and 4 on the Cubs won't win double digit games.

If you have an ERA between 3 and 4 you're winning 10 games on this team. I mean, a full season of starts or what not being the deal.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
whistler wrote:

all it takes is for garza to be injured and this is a horrible deal

)


Garza's started more than 30 games the previous 3 years and has shown no signs of consistent injury. You could also make this statement about any trade in the history of the entire world. We could have traded Sam Fuld for Albert Pujuols and if Pujols gets hurt on his first AB and never plays again it would be a bad trade. Damn, you're dumb.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19334
whistler wrote:
too much young talent given up



Looks like the Rays GM bullied Henry this time.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
ERA of 3.91 reads to me as 3.15 in the NL.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
jimmypasta wrote:
ERA of 3.91 reads to me as 3.15 in the NL.


He does a 3.3-3.45 i'll be very happy

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
This should be one hell of a battle for 3rd place with the Cardinals now.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
whistler wrote:
too much young talent given up

Hendry, instead of rebuilding, once again went back to his bombastic splashy ways

all it takes is for garza to be injured and this is a horrible deal

15-10 is the guy's best year... not bad, considering he faced the Yankees and Red Sox a combined 10-12 times a year

so not a bad trade overall, considering one was a catcher and 1 was a SS (which we already have homegrown talent at those positions already)

You are a reh tahd

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
Phil McCracken wrote:
whistler wrote:
too much young talent given up

Hendry, instead of rebuilding, once again went back to his bombastic splashy ways

all it takes is for garza to be injured and this is a horrible deal

15-10 is the guy's best year... not bad, considering he faced the Yankees and Red Sox a combined 10-12 times a year

so not a bad trade overall, considering one was a catcher and 1 was a SS (which we already have homegrown talent at those positions already)

You are a reh tahd


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
Northside_Dan wrote:
whistler wrote:

all it takes is for garza to be injured and this is a horrible deal

)


Garza's started more than 30 games the previous 3 years and has shown no signs of consistent injury. You could also make this statement about any trade in the history of the entire world. We could have traded Sam Fuld for Albert Pujuols and if Pujols gets hurt on his first AB and never plays again it would be a bad trade. Damn, you're dumb.



i knew somebody would come back with this

what i meant was, the Peavy style deals...the one-top-guy for 5-farm-guys type deal

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
RFDC wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
This is a good trade by the Cubs and I'm finding it very difficult to believe Hendry pulled it off. Talk about giving up quantity over quality. It would be even better if he signs Garza to an extension.

I wonder if Hendry is now shopping the Big Dumbass.


Decent trade. No one wanted to trade Archer for a second tier pitcher.


No one knows whether Archer is going to be the real deal, Garza is a proven commodity. Hard as it is for me to believe it, I actually agree with Keyser for once regarding the Cubs.

I...agree too.

Now I'm afraid.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
This should be one hell of a battle for 3rd place with the Cardinals now.


Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
This rumor needs to go away already. Its well past its shelf life.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
whistler wrote:

what i meant was, the Peavy style deals...the one-top-guy for 5-farm-guys type deal


Oh, well I don't think we gave up that much. Garza is definitely a pitcher of value, so we had to give some up. Thus Archer. Lee is a guy who is a potential very good defensive shortstop, but lots of questions about how his bat will be in the majors. Maybe he'll be something, but no scout considered him a can't miss type prospect. Also, there are a lot of people who believe Junior Lake has a higher ceiling than Lee. Also the SS position is already quite full with Starlin. Chances are one of the three (castro, lee, lake) eventually would need to be moved to 2nd anyways

Plus we didn't have to give up McNutt,Brett Jackson, Carpenter. I also agree with Keyser the more I look at this, the more I like it.

Edit: I know I'm over projecting a bit with Lake, but probably was some of Hendry's thinking

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
I like the trade but giving up Archer concerns me. But whatever this will make them more competitve and better to watch next year. There is really no team in the Central that scares me as I think the Cardinals are due for a down year and some distractions with the Pujols situation. Additionally I am going on record right now that Garza will have a better year than Grienke

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
we also got 2 minor-leaguers, probably targeted to be spare parts/reinforcements for injuries

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Fernando Perez is the OF. He was on Tampa's top 30 list last year, but nothing more than a 4th/5th OF for this team. He turns 28 this year.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I don't care about Guyer or Fuld at all. I would have liked to have seen what Lee could do at a higher level but the Cubs aren't going to have an opening at SS anytime soon so I'm not bent on him being included. Chirinos has been the flavor of the month recently but I had never heard of him prior to this year and he is kinda old to be a prospect. I don't like Archer being in there though.

We will have to wait a few years to see how this plays out.

What pisses me off is that this seems to confirm that there is not long term plan with this organization and that winning is not in the top two priorities.

Priority #1- Sell tickets
Priority #2- Save our own jobs
Priority #3- Try to win so the first priorities will take care of themselves...if not see priority #4
Priority #4- Retire a number and erect a statue to help with priority #1
Priority #5- If Priority 4 isn't enough bring in an Iron Chef to enhance the concessions menu to satisfy Priority #1
Priority #6- Hope Dusty blows out all his arms to help with priority #3
Priority #7- Host Public League Football playoffs to help offset any deficiencies in Priority #1
Priority #8- Schedule Belushi and Ditka and 20 other meatball favorites for the 7th inning song to help Priority #1
Priority #9- Win the BP Cup
Priority #10- Develop marketing scheme with commercials depicting Quade as Stinger from Top Gun and Mr. Strickland that feature Wood and Dempster as Navy Pilots and Soto as a time traveling slacker....to help with Priority #1
Priority #11- Assemble a team

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Phil McCracken wrote:
I like the trade but giving up Archer concerns me. But whatever this will make them more competitve and better to watch next year. There is really no team in the Central that scares me as I think the Cardinals are due for a down year and some distractions with the Pujols situation. Additionally I am going on record right now that Garza will have a better year than Grienke

I think Garza will have a good year but I wouldn't got that far. Unless you have some inside injury info.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
City of Fools wrote:
I...agree too.

Now I'm afraid.


Damn it, now I gotta reconsider the whole thing. :|

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43549
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Priority #1- Sell tickets
Priority #2- Save our own jobs
Priority #3- Try to win so the first priorities will take care of themselves...if not see priority #4
Priority #4- Retire a number and erect a statue to help with priority #1
Priority #5- If Priority 4 isn't enough bring in an Iron Chef to enhance the concessions menu to satisfy Priority #1
Priority #6- Hope Dusty blows out all his arms to help with priority #3
Priority #7- Host Public League Football playoffs to help offset any deficiencies in Priority #1
Priority #8- Schedule Belushi and Ditka and 20 other meatball favorites for the 7th inning song to help Priority #1
Priority #9- Win the BP Cup
Priority #10- Develop marketing scheme with commercials depicting Quade as Stinger from Top Gun and Mr. Strickland that feature Wood and Dempster as Navy Pilots and Soto as a time traveling slacker....to help with Priority #1
Priority #11- Assemble a team

I was thinking the other day. What other number do the Cubs have that they can even retire? Billy Willams was retired, right? Who else is left? Dawson? Grace? Sosa will have to wait for about another 50 years I think.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Garza to Cubs?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Douchebag wrote:
I was thinking the other day. What other number do the Cubs have that they can even retire? Billy Willams was retired, right? Who else is left? Dawson? Grace? Sosa will have to wait for about another 50 years I think.

Honestly, it would not surprise me to see #34 retired.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group