It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 6:00 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Getting eliminated in the first round of the NCAA Tournament or winning the NIT?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
The former.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Getting eliminated in the first round of the NCAA Tournament or winning the NIT?

The college football bowl system.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape or form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Last edited by RFDC on Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape of form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.



ditto

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape of form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.

Mad that your team didn't even get invited?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape of form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.

Mad that your team didn't even get invited?

Not at all.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38697
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape of form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.

Mad that your team didn't even get invited?

I think BRick got Ivan a 5 seed in the NIT. He weilds enormous influence

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
The answer is always the NCAA, even for a team like Colorado or American who got blown out.

That is why it is somewhat sad that things like the Rose Bowl seem destined to become the NIT of college football, though with a 4 team playoff it may be able to hang on with some level of relevance.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape or form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.



Are you too young to remember how excited Indiana and its fans were to win the NIT in 1979? A good performance in the NIT often sets the stage for a big season the following year.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
I meant the NCAA is always better. My post must have been confusing.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Like our chances against Clemson, JORR?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape or form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.



Are you too young to remember how excited Indiana and its fans were to win the NIT in 1979? A good performance in the NIT often sets the stage for a big season the following year.

Maybe eventually you will convince yourself this is a good year for Illinois.

I am glad to see you have lower expectations for a middle of the pack Big 10 team. Will help you survive the Groce years. 8)

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Is this even a debate?
NCAA

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The answer is always the NCAA, even for a team like Colorado or American who got blown out.

That is why it is somewhat sad that things like the Rose Bowl seem destined to become the NIT of college football, though with a 4 team playoff it may be able to hang on with some level of relevance.

The current bowl system is pretty much equal to the Maui Invitational. Becoming the NIT will be a step up.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Like our chances against Clemson, JORR?


I like the Illini to at least make it to face Southern Methodist.

And I disagree with BRick that getting blown out in a first round NCAA game is better than winning the NIT. It's only better to make the NCAA until you get killed. Once you lose like you're supposed to, it's obvious that putting together a run in tournament format helps your team going forward, especially if you have a bunch of young guys returning.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
Douchebag wrote:
The current bowl system is pretty much equal to the Maui Invitational. Becoming the NIT will be a step up.
No.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
Is this even a debate?
NCAA



Maybe Selection Sunday is the biggest day in sports.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
The current bowl system is pretty much equal to the Maui Invitational. Becoming the NIT will be a step up.
No.

Like usual, BRick is right.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
spanky wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
The current bowl system is pretty much equal to the Maui Invitational. Becoming the NIT will be a step up.
No.

Like usual, BRick is right.

You're right.

Someone would rather go to the Poinsetta bowl and play a meaningless game vs having a shot at winning the national championship.

My bad.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Douchebag wrote:
spanky wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
The current bowl system is pretty much equal to the Maui Invitational. Becoming the NIT will be a step up.
No.

Like usual, BRick is right.

You're right.

Someone would rather go to the Poinsetta bowl and play a meaningless game vs having a shot at winning the national championship.

My bad.

What does that have to do with the Maui Invite or the NIT?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape or form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.

Being a #2 ranked team in the NIT means you just missed the field of 64. per Groce. :lol:

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
bigfan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape or form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.

Being a #2 ranked team in the NIT means you just missed the field of 64. per Groce. :lol:


Well, if you were really trying to get the best 64 teams right now in the Tournament, I think Illinois has to be in. I told you last week that Ohio State and Iowa were going out first round. Maybe Illinois would have too, but I doubt they would have lost to Dayton or Tennessee right now. You never know though, obviously they had their hands full with BU the other night.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
Douchebag wrote:
Someone would rather go to the Poinsetta bowl and play a meaningless game vs having a shot at winning the national championship.
You don't think people enjoy going to the Rose Bowl?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
All depends on the school and the situation.

In no way shape or form is Illinois being in the NIT a good thing.

Being a #2 ranked team in the NIT means you just missed the field of 64. per Groce. :lol:


Well, if you were really trying to get the best 64 teams right now in the Tournament, I think Illinois has to be in.

They need to get rid of the automatic bids then. It makes the regular season not matter as much as you say it does. A 13-19 team has no business in the NCAA Tournament.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
They can keep the auto bids, but they need to give the automatic bids to the reg season champs.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
spanky wrote:
They can keep the auto bids, but they need to give the automatic bids to the reg season champs.

I guess that's fine too. Teams don't really seem to give a shit about their conference tournaments anyway.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
FavreFan wrote:
spanky wrote:
They can keep the auto bids, but they need to give the automatic bids to the reg season champs.

I guess that's fine too. Teams don't really seem to give a shit about their conference tournaments anyway.

It benefits most conferences to have the best team "tank" in the conference tourney.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:20 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
They can keep the auto bids, but they need to give the automatic bids to the reg season champs.


It doesn't really matter for the big conferences. The regular season champ is going to make it anyway. Besides that, I think it's up to the individual conferences to decide how they want to assign their automatic bid, isn't it? If one of these small conferences has a freak team win its tournament and that keeps out their really good regular season champ with only a couple losses, they have no one to blame but themselves.

For the record, I don't think Illinois deserved to be in the Tournament. The regular season has to count. I'm merely pointing out that they are a better team right now, today, than a bunch of teams that did get in, including several from their own conference.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is better?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
spanky wrote:
They can keep the auto bids, but they need to give the automatic bids to the reg season champs.


It doesn't really matter for the big conferences. The regular season champ is going to make it anyway. Besides that, I think it's up to the individual conferences to decide how they want to assign their automatic bid, isn't it? If one of these small conferences has a freak team win its tournament and that keeps out their really good regular season champ with only a couple losses, they have no one to blame but themselves.

For the record, I don't think Illinois deserved to be in the Tournament. The regular season has to count. I'm merely pointing out that they are a better team right now, today, than a bunch of teams that did get in, including several from their own conference.

Yes, it is up to the conferences on they give out their Automatic bid.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group