immessedup17 wrote:
Call of Duty 1 was a fantastic game...and Call of Duty 4 was a huge leap in online multiplayer FPS gaming. Those games should be held in high regard. But as a series...that is when the Call of Duty brand becomes a joke. Nothing but retreads...and content packs "marketed" as new $60 sequels. Treyarch could never match IW, and Sledgehammer made a mockery of the series. MW3 won the initial battle against BF3 upon release, but as I look at current stats...BF3 (PC) has 18,000 players currently online, MW3 has 7,000. People are starting to realize CoD is becoming a joke...and I hope Black Ops 2 is the nail in the coffin. I'd rather remember CoD and CoD4 instead of these money grab butcherings.
edit: I don't think "gamers" love it. All the guys I know who play CoD are the casual gamers. Maybe play an hour or two or week...and if it is Black Ops - that is usually just the zombie stuff. But they aren't the "true" FPS gamers...and forgive me for making that sound "above" casual gamers. But I mean...CoD is too unbalanced and too "perk-based" to be a true skill / twitch FPS. I don't like that.
Counter-Strike is the most pure of FPS games...and I can't wait to see how this generation of gamers enjoys it. It doesn't have embedded "hampster wheel" gameplay though...and a lot of current gamers need that as a reason to play. Call of Duty games and MMO's have made the hampster wheel standard.
Shut yer friggin' pie-hole, junior. The grown-ups are talking about the good ol' days.
NOW .... for those hankering for a game of Adventure (and don't have an emulator installed ... and why not, might I ask?), here ya go, mister ....
http://www.2600online.com/Adventure.html