ChgoSportsFreak wrote:
Chris in St. Charles wrote:
You know what the problem is I think? That the show isn't buzzworthy. Nobody talks about it. When you look at this board in particular and you consider us as a whole, we are some of the most avid listeners... but no one ever talks about the Afternoon Saloon. Unless it's to rip on Harry. Just like no one talks about Mully & Hanley, because it's just a 'safe' partnership. They just aren't polarizing shows... there is never a moment where you want to call up your buddy and say "did you just hear that?" For the same reason, there aren't ever many posts on here about it.
In comparison, look at the Danny Mac section and the B&B section. Feels like they get multiple threads per day. Of course Danny Mac being a card carrying member of CSFMB has a lot to do with it, but I still think either way... there is just more to talk about regarding those two shows.
In summary... I don't know that it's they are bad, as much as they just aren't anything special.
I agree totally...great post. The only thing I don't understand is if we are the avid listners, who listen daily - and you take in comparison the Danny Mac and B&B section's activity of multiple threads per day, the rating book simply don't agree.
Great point. I honestly believe it has to do with ESPN in general. I'm 24, and I can tell you that out of my entire group of friends, I'm not sure any is an avid listener of the Score. I wasn't a fan as near as a year ago. I simply didn't like the programming on 670 (I also don't believe I gave it a real chance... and now that I have, I barely move the dial). And I think a lot of that has to do with the fact that during high school, and even college... PTI, Around the Horn, Sportscenter are the absolute center of the sports universe. Therefore, if you tune in to sports radio, it's going to be ESPN.
This is a complete assumption (and could be incorrect), but it seems that 670 has an older (I use the term relatively) crowd, while ESPN's is younger. Again, no stats to compare that's just how I see it with the people I know and the people I discuss sports with. Teens and college aged kids aren't going to tune in to Mully and Hanley... they will tune in to a show like Mike and Mike. The younger crowd won't tune in to a show like Boers and Bernstein... they will flock to a Waddle and Silvy type show. I think there is a big carryover with ESPN as it's hard to get the brainwashing out of your head. Luckily I have done it, and I'm not a slave to Sportscenter anymore. But I am guessing a lot of poeple just see ESPN as the leader and will tune in no matter what is on.