Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Chus wrote:
Terrible. Just terrible.
I caught a few minutes this afternoon. They were attempting to discuss today's NCAA games. Neither of them can understand why Kentucky is favored. What is not to get? Lines are set to get equal action on both sides. If one side gets heavier action, the number moves. Certainly somebody who "invests" like Shep does, should understand this. Herb chimes in by saying that he thinks Michigan should be favored. He attempts to make a case for Michigan by talking about how good Michigan State's players are, and how they will be a handful for Kentucky.
Dopes.
Beyond that, the bettors, as a collective, aren't stupid. That money is a whole lot smarter than a small group of dummies that get together to select and seed these teams.
Kentucky opened as a 1.5 point favorite, and closed as a 2.5 point favorite. Obviously, the money was on Kentucky. How does Shep not understand this?
Many of the update guys on the Score, and elsewhere, will refer to a game as an upset just because a lower seed/lower ranked team won the game. Last year, either Ostrowski or Conor McDoink referred to VCU beating Butler as an upset, despite that fact that VCU was an 8.5 point favorite. In my world, when the favorite wins, it's not an upset. Point spreads are determined by crunching numbers. Poll rankings and tournament seedings are completely subjective, as evidenced by many errors this tournament.
Earlier this season, Michigan was tied for 1st in the Big 10, and ranked 15th in the AP poll. It was revealed that John Feinstein not only omitted Michigan from his ballot, but he ranked Stephen F. Austin 25th. I suppose the CBS sports radio minutes have prevented him from watching basketball.