Kane is in that rare breed of men who can fuck a woman and leave no physical traces that he did. Talk about a needle dick!!!

Easier question for you. Do you think he had not just forcible but ANY interxourse with her ?

Most likely not.

Kane is in that rare breed of men who can fuck a woman and leave no physical traces that he did. Talk about a needle dick!!!

I don't understand this question.

The negative rape kit was a major reason why Kane wasn't charged. It just isn't definitive proof one way or another that a rape occurred. If it had been positive, the same would have been true.

yep, his comments really show that this was a trumped up charge.

from the Trib

"In a strongly worded statement Thursday morning, Buffalo-area prosecutors shredded the accuser's allegation, saying there was no proof that she had been raped. They also suggested that Kane never behaved as if he had committed a crime — though he never spoke with authorities and has maintained an unusually low profile since the investigation began.


Without providing details, Erie County District Attorney Frank Sedita III said there were "significant material inconsistencies" between the woman's claims and those of other witnesses. He also said the physical evidence and forensic evidence "tend to contradict" her allegation that a rape took place in Kane's bed — where she apparently said it occurred.

Investigators said there was no proof she had been penetrated, an element that is required under New York law to bring a rape charge.



Though Kane "exercised" his right not to speak with investigators, Sedita said, the player never made any incriminating statements to witnesses and has not "engaged in any conduct consistent with the consciousness of guilt."

"The totality of the credible evidence — the proof — does not sufficiently substantiate the complainant's allegation that she was raped by Patrick Kane and this so-called 'case' is rife with reasonable doubt," Sedita said in the statement."