redskingreg wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I can't pretend what Dan's secret motivation is for this over the top stuff? Perhaps, simply a healthy love of innocent kids and thats why he helps with camp and cancer etc? That said, getting so pissed and over the top with university related people reacting negatively to what most agree is a sever punishment is odd and unnecessary after today on Chicago radio in my opinion.
Same shit happened when Knight got fired and would likely happen if Coach K went down.
Has anyone asked Dan on the show or any other avenue specifically to explain exactly why his passion on this is so high?
Pretty sure he answered that in his mailbag last week.
Here you go:
“Why are you still talking about Penn State?” – Godfather
Because it is one of the biggest and most important sports stories ever, and is still developing with every passing day. It matters to people not only because of the actual people and institutions involved, but because of the larger themes on which it touches: reverence of coaches, the cultural power of football in America, and the place of sports in our lives. It is rare that we can begin to grasp the size and historical significance of something while still handling details at a relatively early stage, as is happening at this moment.
But this question is also representative of a bizarre interactive phenomenon in our business, in which many find the need to object to the very subject matter of a given segment, show, news story or column. “Why are you talking about the White Sox?,” “Talk more hockey!!” and “Stop talking about the NBA!” are typical examples. Simply, this makes no sense.
Here’s how it works: we talk about whatever we want, and you either listen or not. I write about whatever I want, and you either click on it or not. I will tweet whatever I want, and you can follow or not. It serves no purpose whatsoever to express displeasure with a topic of discussion, and accomplishes absolutely nothing.