Answer this question steve. And just answer "yes" or "no" :

Do the Sox have more than 4.5 games left to play this season?

_________________

Not gonna play along. It's not that simple. If you want to TRY to make a point, you will have to do so without my cooperation in the matter.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

I also wouldn't bet that if you flipped a coin three times that it would come up heads all three times without the right odds. That doesn't mean that it's virtually impossible to happen.

Hopefully the fourth grade math textbook that you are using to help you with your posts has a section on money and on probability.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

What it means, is that the liklihood of the Sox sweeping the Twins is a desperate longshot and not something a right thinking individual should be counting on. If you take away this "assumption" that the Sox will sweep the Twins, suddenly finding the wins for the Sox and losses for the Twins needed to combine for a Sox divisional championship (or tie) becomes really tough. With the Twins going for another sweep tonight against the Royals than then facing the Indians next (who we all know now are a Godawful team ), and having the easier schedule in their remaining games....come on, give it up!

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

That's a bit rich, considering you were too much of a baby to admit that Alfonso Soriano is a better player than Juan Pierre.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery

You really are an unintelligent person

_________________
Fire Phil Emery

Is that a serious response or are you trying to get attention? I don't even know where to start.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Well, you are just plain stupid. Anyone that reads a chart of players productivity in relationship to their salary ( as you did) and came away thinking that Peavy and A.J were the best values on the White Sox and Danks and Floyd were overpaid is a true DUMBASS!

If you think anything I posted in this thread is incorrect, PLEASE try to explain why you think so. then I'll tell you (and back my position up with stats/facts) and make you look like the nitwit you really are.....again.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

I don't know, at least Pierre hits singles

Pierre isn't afraid of the wall either.

_________________

I read a chart that formatted improperly on the site and then offered a defense of Danks and Floyd. I even said when I saw it that I couldn't tell whether I was reading it correctly because of the format. When the chart was explained, I said that it made sense.

You're stupidity takes many forms. First, you have an annoying habit of speaking in cliches, which suggests an agonizingly simple mind, as many people of low intelligence such as yourself are often limited to shopworn phrases in their mode of expression. You are a sycophantic stooge, willing to submit to the basest indignities just to hear your name--no, your moniker--mentioned on sports radio stations. You boast about hilariously mundane achievements, you seldom make any sort of original point, and when you do, it is strikingly wrong. In this thread alone, you repeatedly conflate probability with certainty.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery

Yes, I deserve that.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery

sorry man...the irony was too great to let it slip by

I would have called me on that too.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery

Wait... so if the Twins continue at their same pace (winning 59% of their games) and the Sox continue at their same pace (winning about 56% of their games)... and the Sox are currently 4.5 games behind the Twins... you're telling me the Sox won't have more wins than the Twins after 162 games? That's what you're saying? Really? Seriously? Did you have to use a calculator to figure this out?

There was nothing wrong with the formatting of the chart, you were just too stupid to figure it out. Nobody else had any difficulty undersanding it. I ask you to address the thread and argue against anything I have posted, but you can't . Doing so would only make you look even dumber than you already seem. You instead resort to vague references to cliches (what chiches do you mean) and submitting to the basest of indignities....please I submit myself to no indignities. But the referrence is intentionally vague, as there are no specific indignities to identify. There is a very strong correlation between probability and outcome. I believe in that correlation and choose to believe in that which is highly probable versus that which is highly unlikely. Typical of a shitty lawyer to try to talk around the question though.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

You are a lot funnier unintentionally than you are intentionally.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

_________________
Fire Phil Emery

You're never funny.... entertaining or interesting for that matter.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

Can you explain why what you said is so funny? Do you even realize why I'm laughing?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Thats right, Rick! Thats why Mac doesn't put you on the air!!!

SNAP!

_________________

There is a very strong correlation between the amount of times you call a show and the number of times you end up getting on a show.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Well, Mac has a little Steve in him. This morning I heard him say, "Most people like favorites".

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

When you actually post in a thread, something that has to do with the subject being discussed I may respond to your post/question. But your habit of adding nothing and making only personal remarks/references instead is annoying and counter-productive to the discussion. You and Irish Asshole come to the thread and add nothing to the discussion of the Sox chances at the wildcard. You don't respond to the actual theories/opinions offered. Instead it's just mindless bullshit. So fuck off.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

_________________

So the answer is "no".

It was nice to see you calling a different ethnicity/race names though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Did you catch his post on the origin of The N word (sorry JORR)before it was deleted?

Quite the lesson

I'll take Pierre over Soriano.

_________________

What did I miss?

_________________